The Question has Changed
Last week, I presented a featured address at the Council for Chief State School Officers' summer institute in Portland, Maine. This was a golden opportunity to enlighten state superintendents, commissioner, and deputies of education from each of the fifty states with the realities of school in the 21st century -- if I might be so self-aggrandizing.
Alas, I squandered that opportunity on the wrong question.
For several years, I have sought to make a case for a broader definition of literacy skills, and, consequently, to promote learning environments and experiences that demand these skills -- as learning literacies. It became clear, while in Portland, that the case has been made, the "Why" has been answered. Many of the talks and demonstrations were centered around the economic realities of our times and the inadequacies of today's basic skills. Yet in every conversation that followed, it became increasingly clear that the case is made. Leadership is convinced. Certainly many influential people remain doubtful. Some aren't even asking the question. But the time has come for us to focus our attentions and our creativity to the "What" and the "How."
At the CCSSO institute, one presentation did aim itself squarely at the "What," Mark Tuckers presentation on Tough Choices or Tough Times, a controversial blueprint for 21st century schooling. "How" arose in almost every formal discussion, primarily seeking ways to convince their constituents -- telling a new story.
What and how are not new conversations for us. They are our bread and butter. But how do we elevate that conversation. How do we inspire it with energy and new language? How do we make it our interest to redesign and retool?
What do you think?
PS: I just scanned through







Comments
I agree David. The conversations are moving away from adoption and more toward implementation.
These are exciting times are they not?
I would love to know more about the ways that leadership let you know that they were convinced and the case has been made. How exciting that must have been for you.
Posted by: Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach | August 6, 2007 5:52 PM
I agree that attention is necessarily turning toward implementation and content, and that Sheryl helps to take us to a new level of thinking, actually using some of the terms of learning community in FTF teaching that will help us understand what we're doing in this new terrain. Thank you for the link to "Tough Choices or Tough Times"--a radical proposal, indeed, to alter the entire educational system in order to stay competitive in the world market. But who is reading this? Is it possible that the powers-that-be will take up this challenge, so that the idea of systematic change will not be seen as "only" liberal subversion?
Posted by: Susan | August 7, 2007 1:45 PM
I think it is always easier to argue the theoretical without an action plan. Just ask virtually any politician.
The problem is that the action plan is actually harder to win people over with!
Posted by: Scott Meech | August 8, 2007 9:51 PM
A very good point, Scott. It's why that action plan needs to be wrapped around a very simple and fundamental structure, probably the same structure that we use to sell change.
I've got my three bullets, but they're no better than anyone elses...
Posted by: David Warlick | August 9, 2007 12:11 PM