Directions Needed
Every school has a mission statement. Chances are that your school district has one too, and that it contains something about life-long learning, the creation of critical thinkers, and the development of high-quality citizens.
I’ve seen Guy Kawasaki speak several times and he never fails to talk about mission statements, why they are not worth much, and how you can develop one quickly and easily with the use of the Dilbert Mission Statement Generator. Here is one, developed with a single click:
We exist to globally network principle-centered data while continuing to proactively simplify high standards in benefits to exceed customer expectations.
So, when I was driving through the town I live in, my eye instantly caught this mission statement on a school's billboard:
Educating Students to Be Self-Directed Learners.
That’s a fine goal, and a worthy mission for any school. But what are the characteristics of self-directed learning? What kind of climate and culture must be present in a school to pull that off? Here is my take on what I think those students should be capable of and what that school should be like, if that mission is indeed actualized. My Twitter network also weighs in, with comments in italics….
Self-directed learners are capable of asking great questions, essential questions.
Self-directed learners have internalized a problem-solving approach, typically some inquiry-based methodology that provides a framework for learning.
Self-directed learners are capable of developing a direction for their learning, and are comfortable and capable of exploring their own path, and can set short and long-term goals for their learning.
Self-directed learners are equally capable of working independently, collaboratively, locally and globally.
From Quentin D’Souza via Twitter: one who perpetually asks questions, explores different opinions, and strives toward answers.
From Tom Turner, via Twitter: self-directed learners are….not afraid to take risks and ask questions to learn.
From pjhiggins, no fear of failure. Self-directed learning is all about being willing to fall down.
From John Howell, via Twitter: a self-directed learner is one who asks questions, seeks answers, and then realizes that it leads to more questions.
Self-directed learners continually engage in metacognitive processes that promote reflective thinking about learning.
Self-directed learners are capable of expressing the outcomes of their learning in multiple media and formats.
Self-directed learners have internalized strategies for self-assessment of their learning and for the representations of their learning. This self-assessment data is used to redirect and refocus their learning.
Self-directed learners are capable of using a variety of tools to drive learning, from paper and pencil to the cell phone and mp3 player they bring to school.
From Arthus, via Twitter: a self-directed learner is a leader of themselves, finding knowledge as its own reward and continually searching for more.
From Dean Shareski, via Twitter: Learning when you want, how you want, with whom you want.
What about the climate and culture of the self-directed learner’s school?
Self-directed learners develop in learning climates where a professional teacher is a catalyst for learning, a connector for learners, and a passionate champion for student learning. No facilitators, no guides-on-the-side, no-sage-on-the-stage or any other 1990 representation of teacher roles are present in these schools.
Self-directed learners develop in a structured and safe school environment, where the responsibility for one’s own learning is gradually increased over time.
Self-directed learners develop in learning climates where their teachers and administrators are self-directed learners.
Self-directed learners develop in learning climates that are permeable and permit students to explore learning connections beyond the four walls of the typical classroom. Self-directed learners form networks of learners.
OK, so how does all of this translate to actual practice? Go no further than Christian Long’s English class in Texas. Take a look at their study of Frankenstein to see what self-directed learning looks like under the tutelage of a master practitioner. From Christian:
Instead of being 'English students' dutifully following my syllabus and daily plan as is so tempting from the teacher's side of the desk, each of my 4 classes will become real-time archeologists, detectives, and futurists in an effort to co-develop a strategic plan for mastering this literary masterpiece. The standards will be blatantly put forward: become an expert. By any means necessary.
And on his role:
I'll offer myself as a 'free' consultant for a specific # of days that they can 'hire' when they feel that they have exhausted their own instincts/research.
Please read the rest of the post, it's well worth it.
From Marie Coleman, via Twitter: a self-directed learner… initiates growth and "stretching" - constantly seeking new skills, knowledge, interactions to improve self amd hopefully impact others.
From Mark Wagner, via Twitter: a self-directed learner can set his or her own objectives, choose learning strategies and resources, self-check for understanding, adjust, and self-assess.
From Glovely, via Twitter, a self-directed learner follows their wonder with purposeful wandering...
Finally, from Chris Lehmann, his description of a self-directed learner:
Someone who wants to be better tomorrow than they were today.
Now that’s a great vision statement.
What's your vision of self-directed learning?







Comments
We're starting to create skills for life-long learning too at my school. In an idea borrowed from Karl Fisch, we using Personal Learning Networks at school to help kids ask essential questions and reflect on their own learning. They'll use RSS feeds, google reader, and wikispaces for teachers. They'll read articles, think, write, discuss, and present. We just started, so I hope it's as successful as I think it will be.
Posted by: Mike Hasley | November 29, 2007 5:27 PM
I find this conversation very intriguing and informative. I didn't actually know that there was such a tool as a mission statement generator. I am glad I didn't. My team and I just completed writing a proposal for a new school and we spent months working into the late night hours brainstorming, challenging each other, wrting, rewriting, planning thinking through different aspects of the proposal. We started out with a clear vision which got clearer and clearer as we worked at it. In our proposal we used terminology like "critical thinkers" and we spent hours talking about what that should look and feel and sound like. I hope no one reads it and thinks that it is robotic or meaningly becaus it holds significant meaning and purpose for us. We have given and continues to give serious thought into what it should look like for our students and. As I read some of you twitters twittering I agree with some of their comments about what it should look like. I think it is all of those and much more.
By the way how are twitters different from bloggers? Is this a twit and not a Blog? If so, why? If so, why the choice of language? I am open to learning. Fill me in.
Posted by: anita | November 29, 2007 7:27 PM
Mike: sounds like you are well on your way to have a different kind of learning take place in your school.
Anita: I agree-mission statements are important to provide a vision, but only if that vision is implemented and lived every day, by everyone, in my opinion.
The posts from Twitter are like small blog entries, microblogging, if you will, at a limit of 140 characters. Twitter allows people to connect quickly and easily and is another type of network for learning.
Thanks to both of you for your comments.
David
Posted by: David Jakes | November 29, 2007 10:49 PM
I am new to the district I am in, so I don't know how the mission statement came about, but I really like it.
"Our mission is to improve learning"
It gets right to the point. The how is the hard part.
Posted by: Hank Thiele | November 30, 2007 2:43 AM
David... your entry really identifies the crux of the problem of what is wrong with public education in America. We, as a nation, have not really agreed on or come to terms with the purpose of our school.
What is the goal or mission statement of our entire public school system?
Posted by: Scott Meech | November 30, 2007 3:59 PM
Hank: Simple is good. Why complicate things with fluff when the purpose should be obvious.
Scott: Good question. Unfortunately, I think the answer is: To pass a test.
Posted by: David Jakes | December 1, 2007 11:36 AM