Please visit our other Web sites:  21st Century Connections  SchoolCIO  K12 Blueprint 
New Bay Media
Teachers Technology Coordinators Administrators
left slice

Home Publications eBooks Resources Events Hot Topics About Us Subscribe

Write for Educators eZine Write for Educators eZine
RSS Feed: Learn more



Second Life

  Please Visit Our Other   Web Sites

21st century connections k-12 blueprint school CIO TL Blog TL Podcasts

Also Check Out:
Digital Learning Environment Blogs

« Photographing the curriculum | Main | Directions Needed »

Stretching with Wikis

I love wikis. They're easy to create, anybody can update them, they're just fantastic for collaborative projects. In fact, just about anytime 3 or 4 people are going to be working on a web page together, I almost always begin to hear the word "wiki" being whispered.

That being said, more often than not wikis rarely live up to their potential. While anybody can edit them, generally only the original author does. The ease with which they can do so is still a boon and may justify the use of a wiki anyway, but there are usually other tools that would work just as well.

So let's put the wiki up on the pedestal and look at it from all angles. How can we maximize it's many strengths and above all, stretch our ideas about what's possible in the school setting.

I wonder what would happen if...

Your school's vision and mission statements lived on a wiki?
Typically a committee is formed to create these incredibly important passages. That committee takes the issues to the various stakeholders and gathers ideas. Then they craft out an initial statement or update, let it be argued about for an indeterminate amount of time, and upon completion it is signed off on, printed in the school handbook and possibly engraved into a plaque. In a few years, it is dusted off and the whole thing begins again.

What if instead of being carved into a plaque it was posted on a virtual chalkboard for all to see? With anybody (student, administrator, teacher, parent, grandparent) having the ability to pick up the chalk and eraser, make a few tweaks and then leave it for the next person. Perhaps a little corkboard next to it for people to add notes with their ideas for possible changes. You never know when somebody will note a connotation implied in a statement that nobody had ever considered before. Or when some student might realize that their particular group does not seem to be represented in the statements. Doesn't it make more sense for the Mission and Vision to be modified as needed, rather than some arbitrary schedule?

What if everyone at your school had an equal share of the responsibility to make sure the school was heading in the right direction... Sounds crazy, eh?

The next test you give is written in... pencil!
I see two ways this one could work. The first is to put to put the test for a unit up on a wiki at the beginning of the unit. Students can see it from the beginning so they know what you consider to be the most important points for them to learn. Then, as you actually go through things, they have the freedom to adjust the questions to reflect what THEY feel is most important for them to know. Radical idea, having students take control of their learning. Of course, you are a member of the class too, so you have the right to change anything back if you feel strongly about it.

Or perhaps you don't want to lose the surprise aspect of the exam. What if you handed out a test written in pencil, such that students had the ability to change the questions on the fly. Why would they? Think back to when you were a student. Remember what happened when you came to a question that you completely had no idea? You either left it blank, or made something up. Why not change the question to something that you DID know, so you could demonstrate what you have learned rather than what you haven't? Let's also be sure to recognize that just as students have different learning styles, students take with them different things from a unit or lesson. 20 different students could have 20 different ideas about what was significant about the unit. Why not give them the opportunity to demonstrate this.

One last point about tests in pencil (no pun intended)... When students take ownership of their learning, teachers often find that they have higher standards than the teacher would have had. If you ever give this a try, you might be surprised to find the students replacing your 'softball' questions with much more difficult ones. In fact, they may even use the internet to find questions intended for a much higher grade level. Only one way to find out of course...

Your class took notes on a wiki?
I know I know, only one person can be editing at a time, but what if every night one student put their notes up on a wiki page. Then the rest of the classes assignment was to fill in what they may have missed, correct any mistakes, add in hyperlinks and examples and so on... Minimum points for making a contribution, bonus points for creating new related pages and such. Certainly would make a wonderful resource for students at the end of the unit, when it comes time to study.

And let's face it, it'd also give you a lot of feedback about what you actually taught versus what you THINK you taught. It's always a surprise when that happens, but this could really be a great way to reflect upon your own practice.

These are just a few brief ideas that I've discussed with other people recently, but I'd really like to hear your ideas. Have you seen a wiki that really stretched the boundries? One that couldn't simply be replaced by any ol' html web page. Or have you tried any of these ideas in your own classroom? If so, please share your experiences for making the most of this ingenious tool!


Comments

Our South Campus newspaper class uses a wiki for the development of their issues. Kids(reporters)compose in the wiki pages, the chief editor assigns other editors to a particular article in a wiki page, all members of the newspaper can comment on every article, editors can track revisions of the articles via history, and the classroom teacher/sponsor can view participation of the wiki participants from the data the wiki provides. And all of this is done in one location, the wiki.

Thanks for the ideas. I already have a teacher at my building talked into doing the last 2 for their next unit. I would love to see more blogs such as this where we discuss quality uses of how to incorporate the technology into the classroom. All to often we get sidetracked and talk more about the issues in education. http://futureofeducation.edublogs.org/

Thank you for these ideas, Steve, especially the last one about taking class notes on wiki. It's a practical and useful way to really make the wiki a part of the class rather than some cute add-on.

Love the notetaking idea. I'm currently researching wiki options for my students. I love the collaborative nature of wikis and am determined to find an application in my Math classes. The logistics of creating a wiki that provides the security features appropriate for middle school has been a challenge. On my blog, I've already outlined a few ideas I have for using wikis in the classroom. The trouble I'm having is finding a low-cost (preferably free) wiki host that will allow me to permit only my students to edit the wiki. I agree with Toby Fischer in that I too love seeing real applications of the technology discussed.

I've used (or tried to use) wikis in several classes over the past couple of years. None of these efforts have been very successful. And, the reason why they've faltered is related, I think, to the way you approach wikis in your article.

Wikis are collaborative tools. Our normal pedagogy is not based on collaboration. In other words, wikis will only work within pedagogies that are based, fundamentally, on collaboration.

Your examples of the test and the homework are good and familiar examples of why wikis don't seem to succeed. Both belong to a pedagogy that is centered on individual performance, with some sharing thrown in after the individual work. Sharing is different than collaboration - - as your first example of the "mission wiki" illustrates. Modifying a mission statement implies a different process than collaboration.

The "failure" of wikis in my teaching has actually been pretty productive - - because it has encouraged me to rethink my teaching. And, especially to rethink how to engage the "wisdom of the crowd" authentically in my teaching and in student learning.

The wiki as "heuristic" is a good starting point for thinking about pedagogy. The wiki as "supplement" (in search of a reason) only spells frustration - - IMO.

http://pbwiki.com/

Free, password protected, so you can limit editing to your class.

I use it, as a school librarian, for students to do reviews of the library materials, "booktalking" and thus encourage other students to checkout and use our library: http://penquislibraryreads.pbwiki.com/

Post a comment

About the Captcha Code below: Please copy the letters you see below into the box to the right of the letters so we can make sure that you're a real person entering a comment and not a robot trying to insert spam. Thank you.




Hands-On, Instructor-Led Computer / IT Training
Instructor-led information technology (IT) training in 75 cities. Learn Java, SQL, NET, and more. On-site training available. Request a free proposal.

Instructor-Led Microsoft Certification Preparation
Hands-on courses in 75 cities in the US, Canada, and the UK. Instructor-led training quickly prepares you for your MCSE, MCDBA, MCSA, MCTS, and more.