Please visit our other Web sites:  21st Century Connections  SchoolCIO  K12 Blueprint 
New Bay Media
Teachers Technology Coordinators Administrators
left slice

Home Publications eBooks Resources Events Hot Topics About Us Subscribe

Write for Educators eZine Write for Educators eZine
RSS Feed: Learn more



Second Life

  Please Visit Our Other   Web Sites

21st century connections k-12 blueprint school CIO TL Blog TL Podcasts

« Evaluating Technology Use in the Classroom | Main | The world is spiky »

"I don't have time to learn anything more with technology." comment overheard in many classrooms worldwide

Turn back the clock to 1996, if it were card letter t I plain card disc letter m Copper Lowercase Letter e
to add your grades to the report cards you would most likely have to share all 100+ report cards with your peers, if you were at the high school or junior high level especially.


I can imagine that to be a rollicking good time, negotiating with your peers to have the shoebox full of report cards in order that you could add your grades to the student record. This might mean that in the week between when grades closed and report cards were sent out, you had to wrangle not only the time during your school day to actually get the report cards in your hands, but also you needed to transfer your grades from your grade book to the individual sheets of paper for each student. From that point, I can only imagine that someone else had to take all the grades and input them into a program which would allow the information to be printed in a report card. You can imagine the rest, the report card would be printed, then sent out to the family. T i m e001, time time.

Fast forward to a time where most of us have computers where we keep track of student daily grades and then a program we log into that keeps track of the grades, we add the grades when we have time to work on them without negotiating with others.

How about attendance at your school? Not too long ago many of us were taking attendance with attendance cards, or writing our attendance on a paper, waiting for yet another person to come around the building and collect the information. Then we were introduced to online attendance. While it may not have freed up the classroom teacher that much for more instructional time, it did allow for the data to be electronically stored and immediately used. The office secretary indeed did get many hours back in the day by having this type of electronic data input from all the teachers, rather than the one secretary adding all the data from all the teachers. Time, time, time.

Do you recall how these 2 transformations happened? I assume that 30 percent of us jumped at a chance to use the technology to give us more time to teach. I assume that the other 60 percent of us had to be told we had no choice. Still, there are 10 percent in denial that we need to enter data electronically.

What has all this provided us? This has provided us with an opportunity to make the information or the data, transparent? Parents and students no longer have to wait until progress time or end of the semester or trimester to learn about the status of the student's grades. We have the opportunity to make much more of our school work transparent.

For those of us who answer the TechLearning weekly polls, Between 38% and 72 % of us reported that Technology's Impact on our teaching has mostly been in the area of planning and instructional support. However between 0% and 12.9% of us report the technology has impacted student data and accountability. What I find most odd about this, is that in my school, as part of the NetDay Speak Up survey, the greatest percentage of my teachers reported that 90% regularly use email or IM peers or parents and 100% use an online Student Information System for reporting attendance and grades. However, 70% use online resources for classroom instruction or remix online resources for their specific classroom needs.

Is there a relationship between what technologies we use as educators and what is "mandated" that we use? If all of our staff were mandated to add information to our Student Information System then we show 100% use. Our parent groups and our school committee promoted electronic communication and we show that with 90% regular usage. With permissive use of technology in our lesson presentations we remain at 70%. Interesting that we found the time to learn how to email and add information to the Student Information Systems. Now we must find the T i M e001 to use more technology tools with our students. Schools have changed, schools are changing, it is time, time, time to stop saying that schools are living in the 20th Century. We have evidence that we have moved beyond.

Resources:
Spell with Flickr

Comments

I can understand how it is important to mandate the use of technology for clerical tasks like attendance and grades but to mandate its use is a fruitless effort and frankly misses the point. Time and again the mantra has been that technology does not improve student learning and the research done in the traditional behaviorist model classroom supports it. However, where technology has been shown to have a positive effect on learning has been with a constructivist approach. With a constructivist approach we need just provide the tools and let the students use them to solve content related problems. There is no need to mandate the use of technology, just mandate the availability of it and the availably of support for it. If we are talking about making mandates we should mandate teachers to integrate new pedagogies into their practice, not new technologies. If we do that the technologies will find their way into the curriculum.

Carl, I agree and I disagree with your statement. If the administration mandates a new tool, a best practice a new pedagogy, then that mandate will push the new vision forward.

Just because I have hand held microscopes in a classroom does not guarantee that my students will use them. If not the teacher who should support the teaching of how to use that microscope? Just wondering?

Cheryl,
I agree with you. I've been in education 30+ years and have seen things come and go. The challenge preventing teachers from fully integrating technology stems from administrative support and knowledge of possibilities, financial requirements of keeping systems running and up-to-date and more importantly continually training teachers how to integrate successfully not just how to use a program.

We have done so much training on how to use this or that software but where we need to focus is on how to use technology as a tool to improve instruction and how to go about doing that. The constructivist approach is one way to accomplish this. School level and above administrators need to have the vision to understand the needs so we as educators can meet today's students where they are.

Cheryl,
I agree with you. I've been in education 30+ years and have seen things come and go. The challenge preventing teachers from fully integrating technology stems from administrative support and knowledge of possibilities, financial requirements of keeping systems running and up-to-date and more importantly continually training teachers how to integrate successfully not just how to use a program.

We have done so much training on how to use this or that software but where we need to focus is on how to use technology as a tool to improve instruction and how to go about doing that. The constructivist approach is one way to accomplish this. School level and above administrators need to have the vision to understand the needs so we as educators can meet today's students where they are.

Linda, Thanks for your comments and thanks for making sure the comments were posted! In my current class I am taking on Brain Research and the classroom, we are discussing the constructivist approach and demonstrating what that looks like in classrooms. It is about finding the tools to improve instruction and make the learning more accessible to our learners. Thanks for stopping by.

Linda, Thanks for your comments and thanks for making sure the comments were posted! In my current class I am taking on Brain Research and the classroom, we are discussing the constructivist approach and demonstrating what that looks like in classrooms. It is about finding the tools to improve instruction and make the learning more accessible to our learners. Thanks for stopping by.

Post a comment

About the Captcha Code below: Please copy the letters you see below into the box to the right of the letters so we can make sure that you're a real person entering a comment and not a robot trying to insert spam. Thank you.




Security Software Training
Offers training courses on software security testing and secure software development for software testers, developers, and QA managers.

Postsecondary IT Programs
100% Online Six Sigma Certificate from Villanova. Find Out More Now.

Web Based Microsoft Certification Training
44 course topics study for MCSE, MCDBA, MCSD, MCSA, and MCP. Get $2,600.00 worth of Microsoft Certification training for only $149.95. 100% Guarantee.