| TL Advisor Blog
|
|
|
Permanent linkMy daughter is 4 1/2 years old, and she amazes me every day.
Watching her learn, explore, and grow has been a fantastic experience
that is beyond description. In many ways, I have learned more from her
than she from me, and I don't think these learning experiences for me
could have been replicated in any other way. Art activities are
currently a priority for her, and she wants feedback every time she
switches to a different colored marker.
This past weekend she
colored a picture for her grandfather who she has given the illustrious
title of "Paw Paw". After completing her masterpiece, she had to get it
to Paw Paw immediately. See, Paw Paw was coming out to the house later
that afternoon, but she could not wait that long. She decided that we
needed to mail the picture to Paw Paw immediately. She went into my
home office and grabbed
an envelope which we addressed together. She then proceeded to stamp it
and place it into the mail box after raising the red mail flag. This
was a fantastic learning experience as she learned all about mailing
something via snail mail that led to discussions on money for the
stamp, etc.
Ten minutes after mailing the picture she began to talk about how
excited she was that Paw Paw would get this picture before coming out
to our house later that same afternoon. I obviously broke the news to
her that he would not receive it for a few days because of the delay in
the mail system. After being distraught at first, she quickly devised a
new plan, "Why don't we just scan it and email it to him?".  See, I had
scanned a picture of hers sometime back and emailed it to all of our
relatives, so she knew what the process meant, but she had not
immediately transferred that learning to her current "Paw Paw" dilemma.
It took a specific need to get this artwork out immediately to hammer
home her understanding the fundamental difference between snail mail and email.
Of course, I could have told her immediately how to get the image to
Paw Paw, but I don't think the lesson would have hit home as well as it
did. I don't buy the whole "digital native" label that kids are given
these days, and I think this label is harmful in many ways. Too often,
we assume students are going to learn how to use technology well
because they use it so often in their personal worlds. Kids are not
connecting technology with their learning as well as many of us adults
assume.
Obviously my daughter's age is an important factor,
but my experience is that students at all ages are not utilizing
technology well to foster their own learning without guidance from
their teachers. As she develops and ages, will my daughter use
technology well to enhance her learning simply because she has learned
how to scan an image, email, and communicate with family members via
Skype and iChat? Teachers do not have sole control of "knowledge" as
they once did as we all know that any fact or piece of information is
just one click away. Teachers' greatest strength lies in their ability
to "connect" knowledge and enhance student learning. Educators need to
connect technology with their students' learning at every opportunity
when it is fundamental to the learning process to help foster this
connection.
While many schools' mission statements include "lifelong learning"
as an essential component, what are we really doing to foster this ability? We
need to identify sound educational activities that foster connections
with technology, students' basic learning skills and the classroom's
content.
Basically, I believe there are fundamental learning
experiences utilizing technology that can not be replicated as well by
traditional education methodology without technology. and electronic mail.
- Digital Storytelling
- Blog Commenting - See Example at "The Edge of Tomorrow"
- Blog Writing - http://students2oh.org/
- Digital Collaboration
- Logic via Programming Skills
- Media Literacy
- Visualizing Text - Hank Thiele's Presentation (PDF format)
Do you think there are fundamental learning experiences
that can't be replicated well without technology? Do you agree with the
experiences I quickly referenced? Are there certain experiences when
using technology that are important learning lessons that should be
considered fundamental to one's learning? What specific tech skills
should we focus on to truly provide students the skills to becoming a
lifelong learner?
Take at look at Mike Elgan's blog at Computer World
as an example of what some others outside the "Edublogsphere" think
about education and where technology fits into schools. Is Mike
correct? Are there fundamental uses of high quality technologies that
are important to consider for the sake of learning with and from the
best technologies available? Mike says, "The students are already
immersed in these technologies and services." Should education leverage
these technologies better in schools or continue to force poor quality
and safer technologies?
Mike's point should go one step
further in my opinion. If we don't leverage these tools in schools, are
students really going to connect their technology with their learning
well enough? Are we giving our students the best experience possible to
truly become lifelong learners?
Most of the lessons my
daughter has taught and continues to teach me would never have happened
if I hadn't been blessed with becoming a father. I feel as if my
experience of being a parent has made me a better person and a better
teacher. No matter what others told me about parenting, I would never
have learned many of the most valuable lessons without that experience.
Shouldn't we start looking at some aspects or experiences of learning
with technology in a similar fashion? Are there educational lessons
that require the use of technology because they can't be replicated
without it?... Scott Meech
Posted by Tech Learning Blog Staff at 04/12/2009 02:38:32 PM | Scott, What a good article with important points to ponder. Using the example of your daughter made your point very clear. For educators just grasping the importance of technology I believe it is important that they know that "kids often aren't connecting technology with their learning as well as they assume."
I would add to your list of "fundamental learning experiences utilizing technology that can't be replicated with traditional education" - Organization Skills. Many students once they reach junior high struggle with organizational issues that carry on into high-school and college. With tools such as Outlook, EDMOTO, electronic grades, Jott ... students who would have traditionally struggled in this area can now succeed. Posted by: Judy Okazaki ( Email: | Visit ) at 4/13/2009 9:35 AM
|
Chinese Made Easy for Kids with a proven method that engages children for Learning Chinese speaking and writing including knowing 170 Chinese characters from memory. Part of a 9-level series that is used by schools and by home schoolers. Posted by: EliteDress ( Email: | Visit ) at 4/13/2009 9:38 AM
|
Great article that fairly exposes the reality that what the students come to school with (knowledge, ability tech or otherwise) is where we really need to look first to create life long learners. They already are they just don't know it. Our job should be not to stifle that but enhance it. Posted by: Elisabeth LeBris ( Email: ) at 4/13/2009 11:03 AM
|
I agree with you that the digital native idea is somewhat of a myth...when it comes to learning anyway. Student may learn to use various technologies because they want to connect with friends, but will they extend that to using technology for learning? I don't think that always happens naturally. Teachers are needed to guide the way.
An experience with technology that I don't think would be the same without it is using a motion sensor to track movement. There is that magic moment when students see both a moving object (person, bouncing ball, cart rolling down an incline, etc.) AND the motion graphs being created at the same time. All of the sudden, those graphs are REAL in a way they can't be without seeing it happen at the same time. Posted by: Heather Dowd ( Email: | Visit ) at 4/13/2009 3:47 PM
|
Scott, as a kindergarten teacher and a mother of 2, I agree that children are not necessarily digital natives. Many parents I speak with do not think their child is old enough for the computer or the parents do not know much more than Word or other programs their work requires. As you state, "While many schools' mission statements include "lifelong learning" as an essential component, what are we really doing to foster this ability?" One of the biggest things we can do is make sure our teachers are on board and that they are lifelong learners. For my own children, some of their teachers are embracing technology by having the students take part in simulations, create PowerPoints and track progress electronically, other teachers they have do not use it at all. When there is that much inconsistency between classrooms, I'm not sure that is giving students the best possible experience. Posted by: Dina Matasovsky ( Email: ) at 4/14/2009 12:28 PM
|
Thank you very much for all of your comments on my post.
You make an interesting point Judy regarding "organization". Do we teach our kids naming schemes for their documents? Do we teach them "tagging" skills? Etc.
Elisabeth, your use of the word "enhance" is very important in my opinion.
Heather, experimentation within the sciences is completely different when we give the proper tools to experiment with isn't it.
Dina... You bring up an important point as to how important a students parent's perception is of technology and its relationship with education. Posted by: TLBlogger ( Email: | Visit ) at 4/16/2009 2:51 AM
|
My 5-year old daughter has been having difficulty with her reading, so I signed her up for tutoring with this company called TutorJam (http://www.tutorjam.com/our_company.html). I was amazed at how many things she just somehow understood, but also at the things it took her forever to pick up. For instance, using her mouse to draw up on the screen was no problem at all for Caitlyn, but it took her 3 sessions to realize that there was actually another person talking to her, and that that wasn't just the computer. I'm always surprised by the things she just somehow understands, and the things she has difficulty grasping. Posted by: Mark ( Email: ) at 4/22/2009 3:38 PM
|
Thanks, Scott, for the interesting post. You made me wonder what has prompted me to become a "life-long learner;" originally I would have said, "my teachers" and given you some specific examples. But in retrospect, I have decided that my parents were the prevailing influence: neither of them went to college, but my father installed Encyclopaedia Britannica in our living room where it was available for rainy day reading; my mother invented word games and we played Scrabble at least two-three times a week. The daily newspaper and tv news was fodder for dinner table discussion. Technology or not, parents who take (or have) the time to seize those teaching moments are probably the differentiators.
Cyndee Perkins Director, Curriculum and Program Development COMPUTER EXPLORERS http://www.computerexplorers.com Posted by: Cyndee Perkins ( Email: | Visit ) at 4/24/2009 11:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| 21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
| 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blogroll
Archive
BlogCategories
Recent Posts
|
|