TL Advisor Blog rss  


Beyond the Web 2.0 Hype Opening by Ryan Bretag

 Permanent link
I recently had the honor of sitting on a panel at TechForum Midwest in Chicago with Lucy Gray and Clarence Fisher addressing topics surrounding web 2.0 in education. Both of these fine educators I hold with the greatest respect and really enjoyed our exchanges and opportunities to work through issues together with the audience.

In the spirit of transparency and the fact that the session was not streamed, I thought I'd share my responses so here is my opening of the panel discussion.

Opening

This panel is exciting because it represents something greater than merely the next web 2.0 tool; it represents a discussion about various topics that schools are facing when trying to make the philosophy of web 2.0 a systemic reality. For me, this shift in education towards one that is participatory and connective needs to include a strong understanding of the social phenomenon that is the Internet.

This phenomenon is one in which we are seeing the blurring of spaces: physical and digital spaces, social and working spaces, formal and informal spaces, and so forth. In many ways, it is exhausting to think about a participatory society that is shaped by the ability to navigate and interact with hyper speed information flow, create and maintain networks, embrace the notion of sharing, engage in creation, live in a continuous state of partial attention, and actively socialize in various spaces across multiple identities.

However, it is clear that there is a tremendous gap between this social phenomenon and education, which is both disappointing and nerve-wracking. Society has gravitated towards this "different", blended world yet too many in education have not.

Yes, teachers are using some of the tools or even a lot of the tools. While this is great and provides wonderful new contexts for students, I'm not convinced this will fundamentally shift education if we continue to retrofit these tools instead of embracing the philosophy of participatory and connective learning. In other words, it is time we start seeing these tools as the tip of the iceberg not the identifier of classrooms or schools that have become 21st Century, that have become participatory.

That is why...

  1. We need to understand this social phenomenon and extract from it salient points that can help transform education to an exciting, engaging, and inspirational hubs of learning
  2. We need to focus on teaching, learning, and leading for all NOT focus on tools for teachers
  3. We need to shift our organizational mindsets on teaching and learning: rethink the notion of content as outcome; reallocate classroom time for collaboration, inquiry, and production; shift practices to participatory and connective learning; focus on quality of thought and action for a lifetime; create a multi-dimensional learning space; and revisit the values and methodologies all classroom should exhibit
  4. We need to empower students and teachers in these shifts
  5.  We need to understand that many students are "expert" at social networks but  are not "expert" at learning networks - we need to learn how to leverage both and understand both
  6. We need to triangulate our beliefs and practices with theory, research, and practitioner narratives
  7. We need to embrace change, innovation, and risk-taking as constants in education
  8. We need to begin seeing and shaping all students as scholars with qualities of genius
  9. We need to open the doors of our classrooms and schools
  10. We need to accept passion, play, professional learning, and professionalism as non-negotiable

  • Posted by Ryan Bretag at 04/29/2009 06:37:30 PM | 


    Ryan,
    Technology and how it can be applied to children's education is and will continue to change and evolve at warp speed. Schools need to integrate evolving technology (ie. Web 2.0) at a much faster pace and capitalize on the social media skills children have acquired.
    Posted by: David Rhodes - Computertots/Computer Explorers ( Email: | Visit ) at 4/30/2009 1:30 PM


    Great article. I have just completed a webinar for a client on the very topic of Filtering vs Web 2.0 in the school. What people also seem to avoid is that they see these great awarded lesson and then get back to their local school and discovered they are blocked. We also need a super simple way for the Main Street teacher to get into collaborative learning. We need to move from blocking into a web 20 learning system, the LMS is not the answer.
    The average teacher needs a way to get into this. Main Street teacher do not have radical schools with award winning IT budgets.
    I would love to chat on the phone and perhaps run the webinar in front of you for your thoughts. I will be at NECC
    Richard Close
    Posted by: Richard Close ( Email: | Visit ) at 5/1/2009 7:58 AM


    From your tips, Ryan:<br><br>I love 5, agree with 3, and worry about 9.<br><br>Should we really open the doors of our classroom and schools more? Sometimes yes (oink, haaaa-chew!). Just as long as we still carefully consider the safety and protection of our children.<br><br>In my opinion, open is great, but safety must come first. Perhaps even at the cost of limiting options in the creation of multi-dimensional learning spaces.
    Posted by: Darren Draper ( Email: | Visit ) at 5/1/2009 8:42 PM


    Darren:

    I understand your notion of potentially being "too open". However, your context may stem from thinking that is more limited in scope than what I feel but didn't articulate.

    1. Teacher isolation is a major problem and we cannot continue to embrace teachers closing the doors of their one room schoolhouses
    2. School isolation is a major problem and we cannot continue to embrace schools that isolate themselves
    3. Student isolation is a major problem and we cannot continue to embrace learning opportunities that shelter them.

    I believe this can happen and should happen locally as well as globally. Teachers and schools should open their classrooms so there can be peer sharing, connecting, and collaboration. Students should move towards opening their work to wider and wider audiences.

    Open and collaboration seem to be tied to the notion of publishing on the web for the world when I think there are plenty of opportunities to become open that scaffold towards that process. In my school, there are 200+ educators and 2,000+ students. That is quite an audience and I like the openness that could provide. Now you add on my sister school and we've doubled that. Provides a pretty nice audience and scaffolds the process.

    My thoughts might not be clear so please toss back your ideas.

    Thanks for extending the conversation!
    Posted by: Ryan Bretag ( Email: | Visit ) at 5/2/2009 6:47 AM


    I enjoyed reading your blog. I am just beginning to understand web 2.0 and what it means. As I think about my personal experiences with the web and my experiences profesionally, I see some major inconsistancy. I believe that personally I am utilizing web 2.0. I am using to collaborate, to connect and share. However, as a teacher, professioanlly I am still lagging behind in the world of 1.0. As I try to do this, I feel all too often blocked by secerity filters and lack of available resources. My colleagues lack considerable knowledge to use any form of technology and my school system is not providing staff development opportunities. I am struggling to find ways around these restrictions, to provide not just myself, but for my students to ultimately benefit from the resources available using web 2.0. I am concerned overall with the lack of technology integration, especially in the primary classroom. I feel that in my personal situation/setting, I would be better off tackling the integration of technology in the classroom first, before trying to promote the consistent use of web 2.0.
    Sarah Horner
    Posted by: sarah ( Email: ) at 5/7/2009 7:05 PM


    Leave a comment
    Name *
    Email: *
    Homepage
    Comment


    Digital Edition
    mag
    Top Stories