Reading difficulties don't disappear when students reach middle or high school, but the resources available to help them often lag behind. Many literacy intervention programs are designed for early elementary learners, leaving older students to practice reading with books that feel childish or disconnected from their interests. That mismatch can make reluctant readers even less willing to engage, creating another barrier to improving literacy skills.

Storyshares' LIFT offers structured, evidence-based instruction that supports decoding, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension, with materials that respect students' age and encourage them to keep reading.

The Literacy Intervention For Teens (LIFT) program was developed for students in grades 6-12 who are reading below grade level. LIFT combines structured literacy instruction with age-appropriate decodable books and highly interesting texts written for adolescent readers.

The program seeks to build foundational reading skills using content designed to feel relevant and engaging.

The result is a comprehensive literacy intervention package that includes curriculum materials, classroom resources, and teacher support, making it suitable for intervention specialists, special educators, tutors, and classroom teachers alike.

Here's what educators need to know about LIFT, how it works, and whether it could be the right fit for supporting struggling secondary readers.

What is LIFT?

Storyshares Literacy Intervention for Teens (LIFT) is a structured literacy program designed specifically for middle and high school students in grades 6-12 who continue to struggle with reading.

LIFT combines evidence-based literacy instruction with books and activities that are perfectly appropriate for teenagers.

This focuses on high-interest, age-appropriate content that allows students to develop foundational reading skills without feeling like they're reading "baby books" aimed at younger years learners – as often that's all that is available.

LIFT uses structured literacy principles and the Science of Reading. The curriculum was developed alongside literacy experts, including HILL for Literacy, and is intended for Tier 2 intervention, making it suitable for small-group instruction, special education, English language learners, tutoring, and classroom support.

This doesn't concentrate solely on phonics, but instead the program also develops fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and writing through a connected sequence of lessons.

Designed to help teachers manage the wide range of reading abilities often found in secondary classrooms, LIFT provides a complete intervention package rather than simply a collection of books.

How does LIFT work?

The program is built around a structured sequence of decoding and fluency instruction that gradually develops students' reading confidence.

Students work through decodable chapter books written specifically for adolescent readers, alongside high-low (high-interest, lower reading level) books that allow them to engage with more mature themes while practicing core literacy skills.

Throughout the curriculum, learners revisit decoding strategies, build vocabulary, and improve reading fluency before applying those skills to increasingly challenging texts.

Teachers receive scripted and adaptable lesson plans, helping both literacy specialists and general classroom teachers deliver consistent instruction. The package also includes professional development, implementation support, and classroom resources that minimize preparation time.

Hands-on learning is another major component. Dry erase boards, sound-keyword cards, vocabulary cards, decoding workbooks, and fluency activities encourage students to actively practice multisyllabic word recognition rather than simply reading passively.

What are the best LIFT features?

One of the biggest strengths of LIFT is that it recognizes adolescent literacy requires different resources than early years reading.

Instead of relying on childish illustrations and simplistic stories, students get engaging chapter books featuring characters and situations more relevant to teenagers. This can help reduce the embarrassment some older struggling readers experience during intervention sessions.

The curriculum is also unusually comprehensive. Schools receive educator manuals, multiple book sets, student workbooks, vocabulary and decoding resources, classroom materials, and implementation training. This is all part of one coordinated package rather than assembling separate intervention resources themselves.

Another useful feature is its flexibility. LIFT is designed for special educators, literacy interventionists, tutors, multilingual learner support, and even general classroom teachers without specialist literacy training, making it easier to implement across different school settings.

How much does LIFT cost?

Storyshares lists the complete LIFT Intervention Program for Grades 6-12 at $2,399.

The package includes multiple classroom sets of decodable chapter books and high-low readers, educator manuals, student workbooks, classroom materials such as dry erase boards, and vocabulary cards, plus a 45-minute live implementation session to help schools get started.

Additional consumable student materials and professional development options can also be purchased separately.

Schools interested in district-wide implementation or customized solutions can contact Storyshares directly for quotes and partnership options.

Best LIFT tips and tricks

Use small groups
LIFT is designed primarily as a Tier 2 intervention, allowing targeted instruction for students with similar literacy needs.

Focus on confidence as well as accuracy
Age-appropriate texts can help reluctant readers stay engaged while developing core skills.

Take advantage of the scripted lessons
Even teachers without specialist literacy training can deliver structured intervention consistently using the provided manuals.

Build decoding into every session
Regular practice with multisyllabic words and fluency activities reinforces long-term reading development.

Use the implementation training
The included onboarding session helps staff establish consistent teaching routines and get maximum value from the curriculum resources.

Adobe is really known for professional creative software such as Photoshop and Illustrator, but its latest education-focused app goes in a new direction. Adobe Aqua is a free drawing and creativity app designed for children aged five to 12, to give younger learners a safe place to experiment with art, storytelling, and design.

Aqua focuses on building confidence through play. Students can draw, color, create comics, design fashion, explore simple 3D creations, and even digitize artwork they've produced on paper. The aim is to make creativity feel approachable while helping children develop artistic and visual communication skills.

For teachers, that means an easy way to introduce creative activities across multiple subjects without the need for previous art experience.

The app can support literacy, science, social studies, math, STEM, and social-emotional learning through drawing-based projects that encourage students to think visually as well as verbally. Adobe also provides classroom-ready lesson ideas that connect Aqua activities to curriculum topics.

Aqua is completely free, contains no advertising or in-app purchases, and has been designed with child safety in mind. That makes it an attractive option for classrooms looking to encourage creativity without introducing unnecessary distractions. Here's all you need to know about Aqua from Adobe.

What is Adobe Aqua?

Adobe Aqua is a free creativity app for iPhone, iPad, and Android devices aimed at children between the ages of five and 12. Developed by Adobe Labs, it combines drawing, painting, coloring, simple design tools, and creative games. This single platform is intended to make artistic expression feel fun rather than intimidating.

Students can work with traditional digital drawing tools, complete guided tutorials from children's illustrators, color thousands of templates, create comic strips, design clothing collections, and experiment with simple 3D artwork.

One popular feature allows children to photograph artwork they've created, on paper, and store it alongside their digital creations inside a personal virtual museum. This helps bridge traditional and digital art.

Aqua also includes collaborative activities such as "1-2-3 Pass," in which students take turns adding to the same drawing, encouraging teamwork and creative thinking. Other activities introduce design concepts such as color, composition, and pattern through playful challenges rather than formal lessons.

Adobe positions the app as a creativity platform rather than simply a drawing program. Alongside artistic skills, the company says Aqua is intended to help develop confidence, imagination, problem-solving, and communication through regular creative practice.

While these broader benefits depend on how the app is used, its emphasis on open-ended creation makes it great for a wide variety of classroom activities.

How does Adobe Aqua work?

Students begin by selecting from a range of creative experiences instead of opening a blank canvas. They might start with coloring pages, follow a guided drawing lesson, create a comic scene, build a fashion collection, or explore a collaborative game. Each activity gradually introduces creative techniques without overwhelming younger users.

The interface is intentionally simple, with large icons and clear navigation suited to younger children. Aqua concentrates on features that encourage experimentation and creativity while remaining easy to understand.

Teachers can use Aqua as an individual creativity tool or as part of wider classroom projects. Adobe's education resources suggest activities including illustrating vocabulary, designing historical costumes, creating diagrams for science topics, drawing story characters, and producing visual reflections for social-emotional learning.

Because the emphasis is on drawing ideas, rather than creating polished artwork, students with different artistic abilities can participate comfortably.

Some features make use of Adobe's Firefly AI technology to apply creative effects or help transform artwork into different visual styles. These AI features are presented as optional enhancements rather than replacing the student's own work. This allows learners to explore different artistic possibilities while keeping creativity at the center of the process.

Completed artwork can be saved inside each student's virtual gallery, creating a digital portfolio that can be revisited throughout the school year and shared with families when appropriate. Since Aqua also works offline for many activities, it can be useful in classrooms where internet access is limited.

What are the best Adobe Aqua features?

One of Aqua's biggest strengths is that it feels playful rather than instructional. Students are encouraged to explore ideas freely while still developing useful artistic and creative thinking skills.

The ability to combine physical artwork with digital creations is ideal for elementary classrooms. This allows traditional drawing lessons to continue while gradually introducing digital creativity.

Cross-curricular lesson ideas also make Aqua more useful than a standalone art app. Teachers can integrate drawing into literacy, science, history, or emotional wellbeing activities without needing specialist art knowledge.

Perhaps most importantly, Aqua removes many of the barriers associated with children's apps by remaining free, ad-free, and designed specifically for younger learners, making it easier to introduce safely in school environments.

How much does Adobe Aqua cost?

Adobe Aqua is completely free to download and use on supported iPhone, iPad, and Android devices.

It has no advertisements, no in-app purchases, and no subscription required. Adobe has designed the app specifically for families and schools, with child privacy and safety forming a core part of the platform.

Best Adobe Aqua tips and tricks

Illustrate vocabulary
Ask students to draw new vocabulary words instead of simply writing definitions.

Support science learning
Create labelled life cycles, habitats, or diagrams using drawing tools rather than worksheets.

Retell stories visually
Have students recreate scenes or characters from class reading to demonstrate comprehension.

TeacherServer is a teacher-created and -run AI platform that offers thousands of free tools for educators. More significantly, the whole platform complies with Department of Education guidelines, offers the option of adjusting outputs to various grade levels depending on your students' needs, and all information is private and deleted immediately after you use it.

After experimenting with TeacherServer, I found it to be a wonderful resource for various AI tools, from quiz and lesson plan generators to subject-specific resources, including data analysis, spelling and grammar checkers, and much more.

Because it is teacher-backed and education-aligned, I felt better about using TeacherServer than most AI tools. Even so, I still found some similar frustrations to when I have experimented with AI in the past: namely, that despite what I hear from colleagues, I never seem to get great results from AI when it comes to lesson planning or slide generation.

Here’s a closer look at TeacherServer.

What is TeacherServer?

TeacherServer is a free library of AI education tools that are designed for teachers. It was created by Zafer Unal, a professor and associate dean of undergraduate studies at the University of South Florida. Unal, who has a dual background in computer science and education, designed TeacherServer to address concerns educators have about using AI. To that end, TeacherServer is focused on data privacy and grade-appropriate learning. It’s also quite fast at generating materials thanks to its utilization of a locally installed AI server.

TeacherServer comes preloaded with more than 1,194 AI tools. These tools are utilized by other teachers, and some are ranked based on popularity. Tools are separated by subject, and users can often input what grade level they are teaching for more grade-specific responses. While TeacherServer’s initial focus was on K-12 resources, it also offers tools for those in higher education.

A truly dizzying number of capabilities are available, from talk-to-PDF features to all manner of subject-specific quiz, lesson plan, and summary generators. While you could do some of these tasks with a standard AI tool, doing so and getting good results would often require some prompt engineering. The AI tools at TeacherServer start already prompted for education overall, and for specific education tasks in particular.

What Are TeacherServer's Best Features?

The education-focused nature of all the AI tools offered on TeacherServer is what stood out to me. Additionally, the focus on privacy, speed, and education standards is really important.

Another fun feature is that simply browsing the catalog of AI tools can give teachers ideas about how other educators are using AI and possibly inspire them in the process.

What Are Some Areas Where TeacherServer Could Improve?

As mentioned at the start of this article, as much as I loved TeacherServer overall, I did have some of the same complaints with TeacherServer as I do with AI overall.

Despite what I hear about how others are using it to save time, I don’t find that that’s the case for me unless I am willing to really compromise on quality. For instance, I’ve never found AI to produce really good slides. True to that trend, when I asked TeacherServer to summarize a link to a resource story, I thought the slides it created were fairly basic and not very helpful.

Additionally, while a grammar and spelling tool was good at catching grammar mistakes, I still did not like the way AI tried to edit my writing. It tried to get rid of any character in my writing, and more unforgivably, it had some incorrect suggestions on comma use and tried to change content within quoted passages.

How Much Does TeacherServer Cost?

TeacherServer is free. To use it you just need to go to TeacherServer.com and create an account. This accessibility is part of its mission and a great feature for educators.

What Are The Best TeacherServer Tips and Tricks?

Search TeacherServer By Subject

TeacherServer has a wide variety of subject-specific tools that teachers of various topics can explore. These range from music and art lessons to math, writing, and more.

Search Most Popular Tools

Exploring the most popular tools on TeacherServer gives you a quick idea of what is working for other educators. This can save you time and give you ideas for prepping in your classroom.

Be Critical

TeacherServer is a really teacher-friendly AI tool, but that doesn’t mean it's perfect. You’re the human being in the classroom and should still be carefully vetting any outputs from any AI tools, including those from TeacherServer.

Teachers have no shortage of AI tools that promise to save time, but most still rely on writing prompts and refining the results. TeacherForge offers a structured approach to help build classroom resources through dedicated lesson generators.

This is designed specifically for English language teachers and creates grammar worksheets, vocabulary exercises, reading comprehension tasks, writing prompts, listening activities, and complete exams. Teachers choose a CEFR level, select the type of activity they want, and let the AI generate ready-to-use materials.

Unlike general AI chatbots, TeacherForge keeps everything focused on ESL and EFL teaching. Resources can be regenerated to produce fresh versions, downloaded as editable Word documents or PDFs, and include answer keys automatically. Listening activities also come with audio and transcripts.

For language teachers looking to reduce planning time without sacrificing quality, TeacherForge offers a streamlined way to produce classroom resources in minutes. This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about how it could work for your class.

What is TeacherForge?

TeacherForge is an AI-powered lesson creation platform built specifically for teachers of English as a second or foreign language. It focuses entirely on producing language-learning resources, giving teachers a set of purpose-built tools instead of a general chatbot interface.

The platform is organized around six resource generators covering grammar, vocabulary, reading, writing, listening, and exams. Each one is tailored to the type of activity being created, so teachers choose options from guided menus rather than relying on carefully worded prompts. That makes it easier to produce consistent resources while reducing the amount of editing needed afterward.

Everything is designed around the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), allowing teachers to generate materials suitable for learners from beginner through to advanced.

Activities can focus on specific grammar points, vocabulary themes, or language skills, while reading exercises can either use AI-generated passages or text supplied by the teacher.

Once a resource has been created, it can be downloaded as an editable Word document or as a PDF for printing or sharing digitally. Listening activities also include generated audio and transcripts, while worksheets automatically include answer keys.

TeacherForge also stores the settings used to create each activity, allowing teachers to return later and generate fresh versions without starting again.

The result is a platform that feels less like chatting with AI and more like using a specialist lesson planning tool that happens to be powered by AI behind the scenes.

How does TeacherForge work?

Using TeacherForge follows a straightforward workflow that should feel familiar to most teachers. After signing in, you select the type of classroom resource to create before choosing the appropriate CEFR level for the learners. From there, each generator presents different options depending on the activity being built.

A grammar worksheet, for example, allows teachers to select the language point they want students to practice before choosing the exercise format. Reading activities can generate an original passage or build questions around text uploaded by the teacher. Vocabulary exercises can be based on custom word lists or predefined themes, while writing activities include prompts, guidance, and model responses. Listening exercises combine generated audio with accompanying classroom tasks.

After reviewing the generated material, teachers can download it as a Word document for further editing or as a PDF ready for printing. Because the documents remain editable, it is easy to adjust wording, replace examples, or tailor activities to a particular class before using any.

One of the platform's more useful features is its ability to regenerate resources. Instead of producing exactly the same worksheet every time, TeacherForge can create fresh versions using the same structure and level of difficulty. That makes it useful for parallel classes, revision activities, or assessment retakes in which teachers want similar exercises without repeating identical questions.

By guiding teachers through structured lesson builders instead of relying on free-form prompting, TeacherForge reduces the amount of trial and error needed to produce classroom-ready materials.

What are the best TeacherForge features?

TeacherForge's big appeal is its specialist focus. Every part of the platform has been designed around English language teaching rather than general classroom use, making the generated resources feel far more targeted than those produced by a standard AI chatbot.

The ability to regenerate worksheets is another standout feature, allowing teachers to produce multiple versions of the same activity for different classes without rebuilding the lesson from scratch.

Editable Word downloads also make it easy to personalize resources before reaching students. Automatic answer keys and listening transcripts remove several additional preparation steps.

Combined with CEFR alignment throughout the platform and these make TeacherForge really useful for teachers who regularly create their own language-learning materials.

How much does TeacherForge cost?

TeacherForge offers a free plan with a limited number of credits, allowing teachers to try each of its lesson generators before subscribing.

Paid plans start at around $5.75 per month when billed annually, with a higher-tier subscription offering unlimited generation and batch creation tools. School licences are also available for departments and institutions.

Best TeacherForge tips and tricks

Build differentiated lessons
Generate the same activity at different CEFR levels to support mixed-ability classes.

Upload your own texts
Turn class readers, articles, or curriculum materials into comprehension exercises instead of relying on AI-generated passages.

Create resit papers
Regenerate saved activities to produce fresh assessments that match the original level of difficulty.

Teaching in reality is very different than many of us envision it beforehand. It’s also harder than is depicted in movies and television.

That said, I find that those new to teaching often need a reminder that they are not alone in facing difficulties inspiring students, preparing classes, responding to inappropriate AI use, and much more. I still struggle with all this, and I’ve been teaching for more than a decade.

What I find actually helps is talking with other educators. I make a point of trying to share my struggles honestly and openly with other educators, especially new ones as they, in particular, typically need reminders of this.

So if you will be stepping into a classroom for the first time soon, here are some things I remind myself of and which may be helpful for you as well.

1. Not Every Idea You Have Will Work

Most teachers, especially when starting out, have constant innovative ideas for improving their lessons and classes. These ideas are impassioned and are really and truly great ideas—the problem is that students don’t always recognize their brilliance.! Or at least I’ve found It’s common for well-thought-out lesson plans to fall flat with students due to a variety of factors that are beyond my control.

This realization is a bummer when it happens, but it will happen, and more than many teachers will admit. Just realizing that I wasn’t the only one experiencing this helped me when I started.

2. There’s Such a Thing As Overpreparation

Teachers tend to be people who pride themselves in preparation. This is generally a good thing, but new teachers have a tendency to lean too much into this and can easily burn a lot of time painstakingly crafting lesson plans and overstuffed slides.

At best, this is just more work than necessary, but it can also actually hurt by eliminating the chance of spontaneity. Underpreparing isn’t good, either, but I learned fast that just because I spent my whole weekend preparing a lecture didn’t mean it would be good. In fact, I find that often spending less time on preparation allows me more time to focus on other teaching-related tasks and ultimately be more present for my students.

In other words, follow the old advice: work smarter, not harder.

3. You Will Encounter More AI Than You Think

Everyone knows about AI and has gotten used to spotting computer-generated slop on social media, but there’s still nothing quite like reading student emails or papers for the first time and realizing that these are AI-generated.

As a teacher, you are going to see this more often than you expect and in many cases, in the absence of clear institutional guidelines, you will have to determine how to handle AI misuse on your own. I’ve written about various approaches, but no approach of which I am aware is perfect, so be prepared to be flexible in your response to AI.

You also have to accept that teaching in the age of AI adds a layer of complication that wasn’t present years ago. Of course, there are many educators who find that using it can help save time in class prep and other areas of teaching, so for some, AI takes but also gives.

4. Good Teachers Question If They Are Good Teachers

Every good teacher I’ve ever met has one thing in common: they worry if they are doing a good job. This is because good teachers care, and the more you care, the more you feel like there’s more you can do. So those worries that you blew it or should be doing more are actually a sign that you’re doing the right thing by continuing to strive to do better for your students.

On the other hand, I’ve found that teachers who are overly confident often have blind spots. These folks give feedback that is less helpful than they think it is, and their “fixes” for AI misuse and other problems don’t actually work, but they’re too arrogant to see it.

Ultimately, if you feel some doubts creeping into what you’re doing here and there, that’s a good sign. You can start worrying when you feel like you have all the answers!

PlayKids Learning is an educational platform designed for children aged roughly 2 to 12. It combines videos, games, activities, stories, and original shows in a single app, with a focus on safety and age-appropriate content.

The company says this can help children develop academic and life skills while maintaining a healthy relationship with screen time. Something that could make this a parent's favorite educational app pretty fast.

PlayKids Learning lets children move between educational games, videos, creative activities, and interactive content covering areas including literacy, mathematics, arts, music, science, and social-emotional learning.

The platform is available across devices, including smart TV and interactive whiteboard platforms, making it accessible both at home and in school. This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about PlayKids Learning.

What is PlayKids Learning?

PlayKids Learning is an educational entertainment platform developed by Sandbox Group. It offers a large library of children's content that includes educational games, videos, cartoons, podcasts, and interactive learning activities. It is designed to provide a safe, ad-free environment in which children can learn through play and exploration.

The company says the platform is used by millions of families across more than 180 countries and supports multiple languages. Content includes both PlayKids original productions and licensed children's programming featuring familiar characters.

A key focus is helping children build skills beyond traditional academics. PlayKids highlights areas such as creativity, communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and social-emotional learning alongside literacy and numeracy development.

How does PlayKids Learning work?

PlayKids Learning works as a subscription service that gives teachers and families access to a large library of child-friendly educational content through a single app. Once an account is created, parents or teachers can set up profiles for individual children and begin accessing games, videos, stories, podcasts, and interactive activities tailored to different age groups.

The platform is available on smartphones, tablets, web browsers, and many smart TVs, allowing children to switch between devices while keeping their progress and preferences. Content can also be downloaded for offline use, making it useful for travel or situations where internet access is limited.

PlayKids Learning combines entertainment and educational activities in one place. Children can move between watching shows, playing learning games, listening to audio content, and completing creative activities, while parents can use built-in controls to manage screen time and monitor usage.

The service is designed for independent use by younger children, with a simple interface and large visual navigation elements that make it easy to explore without constant adult supervision.

What are the best PlayKids Learning features?

One of PlayKids Learning's appealing aspects s is the variety of content available in a single subscription. Children can watch educational videos, play games, complete activities, listen to podcasts, and engage with interactive learning experiences without needing multiple apps.

The service is also designed with parental oversight in mind. Parents can set screen-time limits, manage profiles, and download content for offline use. Multiple devices can access the same subscription, which can be useful for families with more than one child.

Safety is another major selling point. PlayKids Learning is ad-free and promotes its kidSAFE certification and curated content approach. This can help parents avoid advertising and recommendation algorithms.

The platform also encourages activities beyond passive viewing. Alongside videos and games, children can access drawing activities, creative projects, music content, and hands-on exercises designed to extend learning away from the screen.

How much does PlayKids Learning cost?

PlayKids Learning offers two main subscription options through its website. The monthly plan costs $7.99 per month, while the annual plan costs $79.80 per year, effectively reducing the monthly cost by around half compared to paying monthly. A free trial is also available for new users.

Subscriptions include unlimited access to the platform's content library, support for multiple devices, offline downloads, parental controls, and access across supported mobile, web, and TV platforms.

It's worth noting that pricing can vary slightly depending on whether families subscribe directly through the PlayKids website, Apple App Store, Google Play Store, or a partner platform.

Best PlayKids Learning tips and tricks

Start with age-appropriate profiles
Take time to set up profiles that match each child's age and developmental stage. This helps ensure the recommended content remains relevant and engaging.

Use offline downloads for travel
Download videos and activities before trips or long journeys. This allows children to access content without requiring an internet connection.

Balance screen time with hands-on activities
Look for the platform's creative projects, crafts, music activities, and offline exercises. These can help turn screen-based learning into wider real-world experiences.

Even though it was composed more than 2,700 years ago, The Odyssey never gets old. This summer it will be brought to the big screen by Christopher Nolan in a much-anticipated film starring Matt Damon, Zendaya, Tom Holland, and Anne Hathaway.

Emily Wilson, a professor of Classical Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, says film adaptations of the epic poem always generate interest in the classic work and could provide a good excuse to introduce the epic into the classroom.

Wilson knows of what she speaks.

Nolan consulted her much-heralded 2018 translation for his film version. Wilson’s translation is also the first complete translation by a woman, and in it, she hoped to convey the rhythm of the original.

“Most of the available modern English translations before and after mine, use free verse or prose, rather than metrical, rhythmical verse,” she says.

Wilson recently shared some of the strategies she uses when teaching The Odyssey, and other works by Homer and myths, to her undergraduate students.

Teaching The Odyssey: Take A Detour From The Hero’s Journey

The Odyssey is frequently taught through Joseph Campbell’s framework of the “hero’s journey,” but Wilson thinks that approach can be too limited.

“[It] invites students to see The Odyssey as a kind of template for all other quest narratives, and to focus exclusively on the perspective of the protagonist,” she says. This can overshadow how Odysseus interacts with many other characters, “including those who do not have either a quest or a journey home.”

She adds, “When I teach undergraduates who have read The Odyssey in high school, I often invite them to reflect on both the appeal of this universalizing approach and to consider what it leaves out, including the historical specificity of the poem's concerns, which echo the particular preoccupations of the archaic Greek world, a world of large-scale Greek migration and colonization.”

Don’t Shy Away From The Alien Nature of The Book

“The Odyssey, like other works of ancient literature, is fascinating largely because it is both extremely familiar in its concerns and themes and also extraordinarily alien,” Wilson says. “The deities, for example, may seem like narrative conveniences, and in a sense they are, and yet The Odyssey was also created by and for people who worshipped and sacrificed to Athena, Zeus, and Poseidon.”

She finds that examining the conflict between the familiar themes and alien ones can lead to deep discussions with students. “The first four books are about the small-scale journeys of Telemachus, Odysseus' son, to visit his father's old comrades. The theme of a lost, anxious young person exploring his own identity through visiting alternative homes, is entirely relatable for any young reader.”

But at the same time there are limits to how far that relatability goes. “The terms in which the poem defines adult masculinity may be quite alien and even disturbing,” Wilson says. “Telemachus demonstrates a divinely inspired confidence by telling his mother to be quiet, and later takes a new step to manhood by murdering the thirteen enslaved people claimed by his mother's suitors to reclaim the honor of the household.”

Examine Gender Roles

Many students today take issue with gendered inequality seen in the poem.

“Those feelings can be an excellent opportunity for discussion and reflection,” Wilson says. She adds, it’s also “an opportunity to consider whether these feelings are invited by the poem itself, or the result of a gap in values between The Odyssey and modern values.”

Wilson’s students are often “outraged by the fact that Odysseus spends eight years in sexual relationships with two goddesses, at least partly voluntarily, and yet he seems to suffer no repercussions in his marriage to his eternally faithful wife.”

She adds, “There is an interesting and teachable mismatch between the modern idea of ‘adultery’—a gender-neutral disapproval of extramarital sex—and the ancient idea of moicheia, which refers only to sexual relationships between a man and another man's wife.”

This disconnect is more complex than students might realize. “The affair of Paris and Helen, or that of Aegisthus and Clytemnestra, threatens the integrity of the household and the male lineage, whereas Odysseus's affairs abroad are of no relevance for the household,” she says.

This is all an example of how, in Wilson’s words, “There are many opportunities for discussion of the relationship between modern norms of gender and sexuality and those of the poem.”

Use Visuals and Share Technological Breakthroughs

“When I teach myth, including The Odyssey, I often juxtapose it with ancient art; students who struggle with literary analysis often flourish in response to visual representations,” Wilson says. “There's a lot to say about, for instance, how Athenian vases depict the blinding of Polyphemus, and how this might compare or contrast with the poem's version of the same scene.”

Modern technology is also playing a role in the ongoing story of ancient texts. High-profile AI-assisted translations of damaged text have recently been released, but that’s only the beginning of what technology can do, Wilson says.

“One of the most exciting developments to me is not AI but digital imaging combined with radiocarbon analysis, which has enabled the decipherment of papyri that would otherwise be unrecoverable,” Wilson says. “It's exciting for everyone, including students, to learn that we're still discovering ‘new’ ancient literature.”

Talk About Translation

Wilson is, of course, interested in the differences between various translations of Homer’s work, but stresses that there are many excellent translations beyond hers, and students should be invited to compare and contrast the differences.

“As a way of teaching the value of close reading and the fact that every word matters, there's no better exercise than asking students to look closely at maybe two to three lines of The Odyssey in several different translations," she says. "I love this exercise, and I find it wakes students up to the fact that literature isn't just, and in fact, isn't primarily, about meaning; it's about specific words in a specific order, and every choice matters.”

Wilson's new book Crossing the Wine Dark Sea, which will be released in September, ends with a long essay about what Wilson calls the “minutiae of choices involved in translating just a few lines of The Odyssey and comparing multiple different translations of the same lines.”

This essay is a great introduction for educators looking to explore the role of translations in The Odyssey.

Remember: Teaching The Odyssey Shouldn't Be An Epic Challenge

Wilson says sometimes teachers shy away from teaching The Odyssey because they think it will be daunting.

“In many ways, Homer, especially in a reasonably user-friendly modern translation, is far less daunting than Shakespeare, whom I hope people also teach,” she says.

She adds, “The debate about teaching great books or the canon is sometimes framed as if teaching canonical or ancient texts were antithetical to the project of inviting students to be aware of themselves, their own culture, and their own world, but to me, nothing could be further from the truth. We learn about ourselves by discovering who we aren't, and who we almost are, and how we relate to others. There's no more generative text than The Odyssey for exploring those questions.”

Smore aims to solve the problem of poor school-to-home communication by turning school newsletters into visually engaging, mobile-friendly web pages that are easy to create and share.

Newsletters traditionally were blocks of text and a few images. Smore lets teachers and schools build interactive updates that can include videos, calendars, forms, links, images, documents, and more.

The platform is designed as a communication tool rather than a classroom teaching platform. Teachers can use Smore to keep parents informed about class activities, share resources with students, celebrate achievements, publish project work, or create information hubs for events and school projects.

Because everything is web-based, newsletters can be viewed on phones, tablets, laptops, or desktop computers without requiring parents to download a separate app.

So what exactly is Smore and how can teachers make the most of it?

What is Smore?

Smore is an online newsletter and family engagement platform designed specifically for schools and educators. It allows teachers and admins to create visually rich digital newsletters -- using drag-and-drop tools rather than needing web design experience, as some platforms demand.

Teachers can build newsletters from templates or start from scratch, adding text, images, videos, buttons, calendars, documents, forms, polls, and event information. Completed newsletters can then be shared through email, links, QR codes, social media, or embedded into school websites.

Lots of communication tools focus on one-way messaging. Smore is designed to encourage engagement. Features such as polls, event RSVPs, embedded content, and analytics help schools understand whether information is actually reaching families.

The platform is used by individual teachers, entire schools, and districts that want a more modern method of family communication.

How does Smore work?

Smore works through a browser and requires very little setup. After creating an account, teachers can choose from a range of newsletter templates and customize one using a drag-and-drop editor.

Content is added in blocks, making it easy to insert announcements, photos, videos, links, classroom updates, homework information, event details, and downloadable files. Teachers can rearrange sections as needed without having to touch any code.

Once a newsletter is published, it receives a unique web address. That newsletter can be emailed directly through Smore, shared as a link, embedded into another website, or distributed using a QR code.

One very useful feature for schools with diverse communities is automatic translation support, allowing families to read newsletters in their preferred language on supported plans.

Teachers and administrators can also track readership through built-in analytics, helping them see how many people opened a newsletter and which links attracted the most attention.

What are the best Smore features?

One of Smore's best features is its ease of use. Teachers can create professional-looking newsletters in minutes without needing graphic design skills.

The multimedia support is another highlight. Rather than attaching files to an email, teachers can embed videos, include image galleries, add links to resources, and create a more engaging experience for families.

The event RSVP tools can also be useful for school activities. These help teachers collect responses for trips, performances, parent evenings, and classroom events.

For schools focused on accessibility, Smore includes support for accessibility standards and offers translation options that can help improve communication with multilingual families.

Analytics provide another advantage, allowing educators to see whether important communications are actually being read rather than simply assuming an email reached its destination.

How much does Smore cost?

Smore offers a free version that allows you to create up to three newsletters, send up to 200 emails per month, and access basic designs and limited analytics. For teachers who want to use the platform regularly, paid plans are likely to be the more practical option.

The Basic plan costs $99 per year and includes unlimited newsletters, advanced analytics, customizable designs, PDF exports, file attachments, event RSVPs, polls, and up to 5,000 email sends per month.

The Pro plan costs $179 per year and adds automatic translation into more than 130 languages, Canva integration, custom headers, a table of contents feature, logo branding, and a higher monthly email allowance of 15,000 sends.

For larger schools or educators with extensive communication needs, the Premium plan costs $299 per year and raises the monthly email limit to 30,000 while adding priority support.

Schools and districts can also opt for Smore for Teams, which adds multi-user access, shared folders, collaboration tools, branded templates, enhanced analytics, and administrative controls. Pricing is available on request.

Best Smore tips and tricks

Create a weekly class hub
Use a single newsletter format each week so parents know exactly where to find homework, key dates, and classroom updates.

Showcase student work
Embed photos, videos, and project examples to give families a window into classroom learning.

Use analytics to refine communication
Monitor which sections receive the most engagement and adapt future newsletters accordingly.

The way schools have adopted AI has been unlike any other tech revolution Microsoft’s Matt Jubelirer has witnessed.

“We've always known that technological innovation puts pressure on schools to adapt, but I don't think we've seen anything move at this pace,” says Jubelirer

In his work as General Manager of Education Marketing for Microsoft, Jubelirer is constantly meeting with educators and learning about their needs and how they are using AI these days. As part of that work, he's seeing innovative AI uses in areas ranging from the classroom to administration in schools.

Here are some of the top trends he’s seeing around teaching with AI.

1. Differentiated AI Use

Even though the pedagogy is constantly evolving, educators are getting better at learning when and where to use AI, and with which students.

“We're asking better questions,” Jubelirer says. "It's not about, ‘here's an AI chatbot, go nuts.’” Instead, educators are learning which tools might help specific students and how they can strategically use AI to support individualized learning.

Some specific examples Jubelirer points to include tools such as Reading Progress, which helps students practice reading out loud with the help of AI. Another example is Copilot’s study and learn feature, which is built with learning science in mind and asks students questions to promote learning rather than merely providing answers.

2. AI Literacy That Goes Beyond Prompt Engineering

As AI has evolved, so too have the education programs around it for teachers.

“AI literacy is no longer about, 'Do I know how to prompt? What is prompt engineering?'“ Jubelirer says. “It's about understanding the capabilities, being better at assessing the problems, and figuring out what context is needed to solve them.” And then learning to better understand whether AI should be used in this context at all.

Classroom educators are actively leading and fostering this conversation, which is increasingly important. Students today, Jubelirer says, want access to AI tools, but they also want to ensure these AI tools are used ethically.

3. An Emerging Trust Issue

AI is also causing some tensions between teachers and students that didn’t necessarily exist in the past.

“If you ask teachers what they're concerned about, cheating and plagiarism is at the top of the list, and if you ask students what they're worried about, being accused of those things is at the top of their list,” Jubelirer says, suggesting that this demonstrates that “there’s clearly a trust issue.”

He adds, “That's a real challenge because when trust erodes, learning environments are not as effective as they could be. And I think it's really important that we move to just more transparency.”

To that end, he advises more openness from educators and students about how they are using AI.

“I have seen examples where teachers literally show the students how they prepared for class using AI and then ask them for feedback, and I’ve seen the same in the inverse, where students are encouraged to try and use AI but then share,” he says.

4. Recognition That There Are Times AI Shouldn’t Be Used

As AI use increases among students and teachers, it has become clearer that there are times when AI should not be used. For instance, when it comes to grading, Jubelirer says AI can be really helpful on the preparation side, whether that’s developing a rubric or devising questions, but there’s a limit.

“We shouldn't be using AI to grade people, because we need human judgment,” Jubelirer says. He adds it's important that schools clarify which types of problems AI is suited to help solve, and continue to make sure their AI use emphasizes the human side of things.

5. AI Creating New Opportunities

While Jubelirer acknowledges challenges around AI use and valid concerns students have, he’s also optimistic about the potential of technology for young people who can now come up with an app or other idea and create products and projects at a speed unparalleled in human history.

“I'm really encouraged by how the collection of tools that have emerged empowers individuals to have a higher level of impact faster than we've ever seen before," he says. "If we learn to get that right, and if we build the systems and the culture to support that, there's really an opportunity for this next generation to change the world in ways that I don't think any generation before it has had the capability or access to do.”

zSpace takes a different approach to VR, offering immersive 3D learning experiences without asking students to strap a device to their faces.

Designed specifically for education, zSpace combines hardware and software to create interactive lessons that allow students to explore complex concepts in a more hands-on way.

From dissecting a virtual heart, to examining the inner workings of an engine, or investigating scientific phenomena that would be impossible to recreate safely in a classroom -- the aim is to move learning beyond textbooks and flat screens.

STEM subjects, career and technical education (CTE), and workforce readiness all get a focus. zSpace has found a place in schools looking for ways to make learning more engaging while helping students develop practical skills.

Here's everything you need to know about zSpace and how it can be used for teaching.

What is zSpace?

zSpace is an immersive learning platform that combines dedicated hardware with a library of educational software designed for schools, colleges, and training environments.

The company focuses on what it calls experiential learning. This aims to give students the opportunity to interact directly with digital objects and simulations -- rather than simply reading about processes or watching videos.

zSpace does not rely on traditional VR headsets. Instead, students use specially designed laptops or workstations that display 3D content that can be manipulated using a stylus. This creates the feeling of interacting with physical objects and dodges lots of the practical challenges associated with headset-based VR.

The platform is popular for STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), but it also supports health sciences, manufacturing, skilled trades, and career-focused learning programs. The idea here is to help students better understand difficult concepts through direct interaction and exploration.

How does zSpace work?

zSpace is designed to make digital learning feel more physical. Students can pick up, rotate, enlarge, shrink, and examine virtual objects from every angle.

Rather than viewing a diagram of the human body, for example, they can pull virtual organs apart, explore anatomical systems layer by layer, and investigate structures that would be difficult to visualize using more standard teaching methods.

The same approach applies across other subjects. Engineering students can inspect machine components, science students can investigate molecular structures, and technical education learners can practice procedures in simulated environments before working with real-world equipment.

For teachers, the platform functions as another instructional tool rather than a replacement for existing teaching methods. Lessons can be integrated into classroom activities, used as part of blended learning programs, or offered in small groups.

Because students are actively interacting with the content rather than passively consuming it, the technology is designed to encourage curiosity, exploration, and discussion.

One of the biggest advantages is the ability to provide experiences that would otherwise be too costly, dangerous, impractical, or simply impossible in a normal classroom setting.

What are the best zSpace features?

One of the most standout features is the headset-free approach. zSpace removes the need to wear VR goggles, as many other immersive tech platforms require, making classroom use simpler and potentially more comfortable for learners.

The platform's interactive 3D models are another major strength. Being able to manipulate objects directly can help students grasp concepts that are often difficult to understand through static images alone. This is helpful for subjects such as anatomy, engineering, physics, and technical training.

zSpace also stands out because of its focus on CTE and career readiness. Much of the content is designed to teach academic concepts and to help students with skills and scenarios they may encounter in future professions.

The company also provides curriculum resources, implementation support, and professional development for educators, to help schools integrate the technology into existing teaching practices rather than treating it as standalone.

How much does zSpace cost?

zSpace does not publicly list pricing. Costs vary depending on the hardware selected, the software packages required, and the level of support and training a school needs.

As a result, schools interested in adopting the platform will need to contact zSpace directly for a customized quote.

Best zSpace tips and tricks

Use it for concepts students struggle to visualize
The biggest gains are likely to come when teaching topics that are difficult to understand through diagrams, photographs, or written explanations alone.

Build discussion around the experience
Rather than treating zSpace as a solo activity, use it as a starting point for questions, predictions, and classroom conversations that help students process what they have explored.

Focus on experiences you cannot easily recreate
The technology is at its strongest when it enables students to do something that would otherwise be impossible, unsafe, prohibitively expensive, or unavailable in a typical classroom.

When Kadion Phillips first joined Shrewsbury Public Schools in Massachusetts as Director of Information Technology a few years ago, one of the first tasks on his agenda, like many other district leaders, was tackling how to implement artificial intelligence.

To that end, Phillips and district superintendent Joseph Sawyer established a special committee of approximately 20 staff and faculty members to address the rapid development and implementation of AI.

Ultimately, the Shrewsbury AI committee came up with five pillars to guide the district’s use of AI:

1. Preparing students for an AI future - Focusing on readying students for a future in which AI tools will be infused throughout society, higher education, and the workplace.
2. Effectively utilizing AI learning tools for students - Using AI tools to appropriately support student learning across all classrooms.
3. Implementing AI working tools for staff - Finding the right AI platforms to help faculty and staff to work more efficiently and effectively.
4. Establishing guardrails against inappropriate AI use - Putting effective rules and best practices in place to protect data and discourage inappropriate use of AI.
5. Ensuring AI practices promote academic integrity - Creating an effective framework for acceptable use of AI by students in the context of academic integrity.

Rather than selecting specific tools, the committee has worked to align these pillars with the district's "Portrait of a Graduate" skills, such as critical thinking and innovation.

“We also started creating a guiding document, more of a framework, that we're hoping to get out to staff in terms of, ‘Here's where we are right now, and here's what we're trying to get to,” Phillips says. “We're also developing a one-pager of AI dos and don'ts to release this year.”

For this and his other work in his district, Phillips was recently recognized with a Tech & Learning Innovative Leader Award. He shares his continued efforts around AI and for improving the district’s cybersecurity.

A Work In Progress

The son of a math teacher from Jamaica who eventually went on to be a school principal, Phillips was exposed early to the possibilities of a career in education and technology. He was working in tech support for a startup company near Times Square in New York City with plans on going to grad school for physics when he heard that there was a local teacher shortage.

“I decided the best way to study for grad school is to teach physics,” Phillips says. He became a teaching fellow since he didn’t have a teaching degree, which was the shortest path to certification. “I was basically kind of thrown into the classroom in New York City after doing a summer intensive, and it was definitely rewarding but also challenging.”

While teaching, his tech expertise helped him become the de facto tech guy at his school, helping to resolve any issue, from fixing the copier to helping in the computer lab to running data analysis. Although he eventually became an assistant principal, following in his mother’s footsteps, a colleague suggested another path.

“I met the tech director in Rochester and he was telling me, ‘Hey, this is what you should do, you should be a tech director,” Phillips recalls. “And I'm like, ‘a tech director, what’s that?’ I'd never heard of that role. I know you had one person help send emails, but I never really thought somebody was in the back end coordinating it all.”

Phillips and his wife, also an assistant principal in NYC, were looking for a better work-life balance at this point, so they moved to suburban Massachusetts where she had been raised. After diving into tech leadership positions in a few districts, Phillips eventually ended up in Shrewsbury about two years ago, just in time for AI’s arrival in education.

As mentioned, Phillips has been proactive in implementing AI, although there are always challenges, such as staff who still are resistant to allowing it in their classrooms because they can’t get past the potential for cheating, and navigating the student data privacy aspects. Like for many districts, it continues to be a work in progress.

“We aren't necessarily picking a tool and saying this is what you need to use but it's like thinking about, ‘Hey, what are the opportunities where AI could be useful?’” Phillips says. “We figured out the skills that we want kids to get with AI is going to be similar to what we did with our portrait of a graduate, such as critical thinking, content mastery, innovation, resilience, collaboration, and even the global citizenship piece.”

‘Locking Down Without Locking Out’

In addition to a focus on AI, Phillips has prioritized cybersecurity as a foundational element of the district’s technology plan, which has earned his team a Massachusetts Governor’s Citation for Municipal Cybersecurity.

“We try to lock things down as much as possible,” says Phillips, adding that they have multifactor authentication on all systems now. “We also have tiered access, like limiting who needs to get access to what. So like our main account doesn't have access to our domain controller, for example, so even if our regular account were to get compromised, it wouldn't have any access to our other internal systems.”

Or, as he puts it, “locking down without locking out” users.

Despite his best efforts, however, Phillips knows cybersecurity is sometimes out of his hands.

“It's just one of those things where we're trying to do best practices but the vendors for our most critical systems, we also have to trust that they're also doing the same,” he says, noting some recent high-profile data breaches. “I think that's what keeps us IT workers up at night, you know, showing up in the morning and seeing that your system potentially could be compromised.”

The district utilizes a state-funded grant to provide training and conduct phishing campaigns, which has improved staff awareness and the reporting of suspicious activities.

Even so, cybersecurity needs to be a constant commitment.

“You can create all this security, do all the training, and build this wall around it,” Phillips says. “But then somebody just leaves the door right open.”

Tools They Use

• Google for Education
• Schoology
• Seesaw
• ParentSquare
• Zoom
• Apple MacBooks and iPads
• Epson
• Fresh Service

A recent book review in The New York Times generated controversy after readers noted it echoed certain passages from a previously published review of the same book in The Guardian. After investigating the incident, New York Times editors revealed the writer who wrote their review admitted to using AI and was unaware the chatbot was lifting ideas.

This is a mainstream example of a new type of plagiarism that has become increasingly common in the classroom. I’ve started calling AI plagiarism to distinguish it from both traditional plagiarism and overall AI cheating.

What’s striking is that it emerges both from clearly inappropriate AI use, such as students entering prompts directly into an AI chatbot, as well as from using AI as a brainstorming partner. As such, it has significant implications for how educators think and talk about appropriate AI use and prevent inappropriate use, at least when it comes to writing assignments.

Thinking about these policies recently has changed my approach as a writer and professor. Here’s how I'm overcoming AI plagiarism.

Warning Students About Dangers of AI As A Thought Partner

Since generative AI emerged as a mainstream force in education, the use of AI as a brainstorming tool has been recommended by many educators as an appropriate way for AI to assist the writing process.

Though I was initially open to this idea, I recently became skeptical of its ability to truly help as a writing partner. Students I work with have not improved their writing by asking AI for advice, and if anything, the writing I read, both in and out of class, has gotten much worse in recent years.

Beyond quality concerns, using AI as a “thought partner” places the user at a high risk of committing plagiarism. Also, if everyone is using it for the same assignments, there's potential for a lot of overlap, intentional or not.

I’ve started to tell students that taking advice from AI is like buying art from an unscrupulous art dealer. You can never be certain that the painting you purchased doesn’t belong to someone else.

Focusing On The Plagiarism Part

One positive about AI plagiarism is that it's frequently easier to catch using an old-fashioned plagiarism detector such as SafeAssign and Turnitin, which search the internet for papers submitted by other students and similar content in general.

In the writing courses I teach, when multiple students start using AI to write their papers, similar setups and phrasings start appearing. It’s easier to confront students about this than it is about potential AI use, which is more difficult to prove.

I’m all for giving students more chances and treating these infractions as teachable moments, but I’m taking a harder line than I once did because AI has made this problem more prevalent. The first time I catch students with a line or two of text that’s identical to another student, they might get off with a warning and a conversation with me. The next time, the penalty will be reported for an academic infraction.

Being Less Strict About Small Mistakes

Another way to discourage AI use in general is to let students know that I won’t be taking them to task for little grammatical mistakes as long as what they write sounds like they’re actually writing.

I never thought I’d say this, but I miss the run-on sentences and tortured, passive sentence construction, and all the other common grammar mistakes I used to see constantly. I’d rather flawed human writing than the flat, passionless, and generic owner's manual-type pieces that too many students are submitting these days.

By encouraging students to truly share their writing, without fear, I’m trying to take away one potential incentive for turning to AI.

Remind Students That AI Writing Is Bad Writing

Many people are convinced AI is making their writing better, but plagiarism concerns aside, it isn’t. I can tell when someone on social media starts using AI to write their posts, and I also see when a student turns to the AI dark side mid-semester. It’s not an improvement.

This all bears repeating for students. Writing can be an emotional roller coaster. I’ve been a professional freelance writer for close to two decades and have averaged hundreds of published stories per year. Despite this, in the course of nearly every story I’ve ever written — including this one — there was a point when I stopped and thought I should contact my editor and tell them the story is just not working.

AI catches students, and even professional writers, in this vulnerable state, and suddenly, its self-confident and immensely digestible prose looks really good. Don’t fall for it! When it comes to writing, AI is a con artist that makes you believe it knows better than you. It doesn’t, and that’s the message we should be sharing constantly with students.

ispring Free is a specific version of the larger ispring ecosystem that's designed to help make courses, and lesson creation, a simple process. Crucially, this offers a way to help teachers make digital interactive lessons using their own skills.

The idea here is to work as an add-in with Microsoft PowerPoint so that educators can build slides into lessons easily. This means using a platform that may already be familiar, only now with the option to add questions and more before outputting to an LMS for use.

The powerful free version lets you get going with lesson making right away, but you also have some other paid features including AI-driven tools to enhance the offering even further.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about ispring Free, primarily, with those extra paid tools mentioned later on so you know what else is available too.

What is ispring?

ispring is an elearning creation tool that works directly within Microsoft PowerPoint. This adds extra teaching and publishing features right there within a tool that many educators already know how to use.

Teachers can create lessons using standard slides, then enhance those with quizzes, embedded video, audio, YouTube clips, web objects, and interactive elements. Once finished, the presentation can be exported as HTML5 content or packaged as a SCORM course for use within an LMS.

You can also use PowerPoint animations, transitions, triggers, and layouts as these are preserved during conversion. Consequently, existing classroom presentations can often be repurposed rather than rebuilt from scratch.

The free version includes three quiz types: multiple choice, multiple response, and short answer. These are enough for many classroom assessments and knowledge checks, plus you can pay for the more premium features if needed.

How does ispring work?

ispring Free appears as an additional tab inside PowerPoint. Teachers build lessons as they normally would, then use ispring’s tools to add interactive and assessment elements.

To publish, educators can export lessons as SCORM 1.2 or SCORM 2004 packages for upload into LMS platforms, or simply create HTML5 lessons that can be shared via links or websites.

Courses are responsive, so these automatically adapt for phones, tablets, and desktop devices without extra work. That's very useful for homework, remote learning, or flipped classroom teaching so students can then access content on different devices.

Teachers can track learner progress when using an LMS. Quiz scores, completion rates, and learner participation data can all be monitored through these systems.

This is built to be quick and easy to pick-up and use. So while there are limitations in terms of complexity, for a lesson building tool that works with ease, this does the job well.

What are the best ispring features?

ispring is integrated into PowerPoint, which is one of the main appeals here for ease of uptake and simplicity of creation. No training is going to be needed here in most cases.

SCORM publishing is another major appeal. Lots of other free tools struggle with LMS compatibility, but ispring Free supports SCORM 1.2 and 2004 output, allowing courses to work with platforms such as Moodle and Blackboard.

Courses automatically resize for different screens, which helps students access lessons on phones or tablets -- something that's rare to find in free tools such as this.

Quiz creation is simple but effective, with built-in knowledge checks that can include timers, shuffled answers, and feedback. In addition, there's support for embedding web objects and multimedia directly into lessons, helping otherwise less engaging slide decks feel more interactive and enthralling.

The biggest limitation is depth. The paid ispring Suite adds far more advanced interactions, branching scenarios, drag-and-drop tasks, AI tools, narration features, and richer quiz options.

How much does ispring cost?

ispring Free is just that, without any cost to use. It has no limits on time or slides, and does not include forced branding.

It's worth noting that the free version is very much intended as a gateway into the paid ecosystem. Those who want advanced quiz types, video creation tools, AI features, role-play simulations, or content libraries will need to upgrade to ispring Suite.

Individual accounts for the full suite start in the hundreds but for education institutions there are bespoke prices available on request.

ispring best tips and tricks

Reuse old presentations
Convert existing PowerPoint lessons into interactive online resources rather than rebuilding content from scratch.

Add quick knowledge checks
Use the built-in quizzes after key slides to reinforce understanding and keep learners engaged.

Publish for mobile learning
Export lessons as responsive HTML5 content so students can revise on phones and tablets.

University of Central Florida associate professor Humberto López Castillo was recently looking at a student project when he saw that it cited a paper by Castillo himself. There was, however, a problem with this citation: López Castillo couldn’t remember ever writing this paper or conducting the research it referenced.

“It was a hallucination,” López Castillo says.

The student had clearly used AI, and López Castillo shares the story as an example of how not to use AI in the classroom. Still, he has plenty of counterexamples.

López Castillo, a trained pediatrician and associate professor in the Department of Health Sciences, has also seen students use AI in creative ways to promote public health understanding, and as a research tool. For one project, López Castillo asks students to explain health concepts from class to non-experts, and since he started encouraging students to use AI, he’s seen the projects get better. Students have created health-themed board games and Hamilton-style rap songs. Others have designed AI to aid in health research in ways that wouldn’t be possible without the technology.

This compassionate and student-centered approach to AI use is part of why López Castillo was named Superhuman (formerly Grammarly’s) 2026 Educator of the Year. The student who nominated López Castillo for the award, Vardhan Avaradi, is a bioscience major, who with López Castillo’s mentorship, is using AI to try to comb through massive data sets with the goal of predicting people who are at risk for cardiovascular disease.

López Castillo shares some advice for other educators on how they can use AI in their classes.

Teaching With AI Effectively: Set Expectations

The first step to positive AI use in a classroom is making it clear to students when they can and can’t use the tool, López Castillo says.

“Perhaps my most important advice is to set expectations up front around what is allowed, what is not allowed, what you are expecting to see, and what is a big no-no for your classroom,” he says.

He adds that at the University of Central Florida, “We have several policies on the menu that we could use. We can say, for example, ‘AI is absolutely not allowed in the classroom,’ all the way to ‘AI is absolutely encouraged in this classroom,’ as long as you specify there's a critical thinking component.”

López Castillo leans toward the permissive approach but makes sure that student AI use is human-driven.

Model Proper Use

Part of encouraging proper AI use is modeling the types of uses you want to see.

For example, for a summer course López Castillo is teaching in Barcelona, he is asking students to share regular blog posts. He tells students, “You may generate some content through AI, but you still have to put in your human element.” He models exactly what he means in his introduction post in which he shares photos, talks about his hobbies, and makes it clear the post was written by a human.

“Without even giving them guidelines on what their introduction post should look like, they just take that as their model, and they go with it,” he says. They can use AI to help generate their posts, “but of course they have to tweak it, and they have to provide their own input on who they are.”

Learn From Students

López Castillo is not afraid to admit that when it comes to using AI in the classroom and health science more broadly, he is frequently as much a student as those he’s teaching.

“I learn a lot from students,” he says. “Teaching and learning is a two-way street, so they are teaching me new tricks, I'm teaching them new tricks on how we use AI, and it has been very collaborative.”

His students, for instance, encouraged him to use AI to code, which, with proper oversight, has been really helpful, López Castillo says. They’ve also used the tool in unexpected ways, from the aforementioned projects looking at cardiovascular health to a virtual escape room in which participants had to correctly diagnose a patient with diabetes in order to escape.

Embrace Teachable Moments

López Castillo has long allowed open-book tests because that is what the clinical world is like.

“I don't think real life operates like, 'We're gonna lock you down in a room without resources, and you have to produce everything from your brain,'” he says. “I'd rather make sure that you have a fair balance of the tools that are available to you.”

He feels the same way about AI, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have to work with students to ensure they are using AI correctly. For instance, when that student cited a paper by López Castillo that didn’t exist, he met with the student.

“We sat down, and it was an interesting moment, where I was like, 'Tell me more about this paper by me that you incorporated in your reference list,'” López Castillo says. The student immediately got nervous because he couldn’t provide any details since the paper wasn’t real. When the student admitted to not checking his sources, López Castillo reminded him that even with AI, humans are still in the driver’s seat.

“You are the one who's responsible for that writing,” López Castillo tells his students. “Your name is the only name that's going to be among the published authors, so you are the one who needs to verify those sources.”

He adds that rather than being a drawback, allowing students to make these types of mistakes with AI use in the college setting has value.

“It is a teaching opportunity," López Castillo says. "This is the moment to make those mistakes."

Vibe coding might sound like a hipster on a surfboard with a MacBook, but it’s actually a simple way to describe creating computer code using artificial intelligence.

Instead of writing every line of code yourself, you describe what you want created and the AI generates the code for you. The “vibe” part comes from the idea that you may not actually know exactly how the code is working. You are guiding the AI by feel, asking for changes, testing the result, and moving toward something that works.

While vibe coding can be looked down upon by some in the development community, its popularity is growing fast, as are its capabilities.

When people, including myself, first started vibe coding, they would ask a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Google Gemini, to create the code for a specific app or tool, then copy and paste that code into a code editor and run it manually.

When an error appeared, you would copy that error back into the LLM and it would, hopefully, provide a fix that you would then dutifully copy and paste back. You still needed to be relatively technical, even if you were not a developer, to get all these systems set up and working. It wasn’t elegant, but it could help create simple tools, fix website issues, and build early prototypes.

Things have moved on a lot over the past few years, though. Vibe coding is now much more powerful and can complete more complex tasks and create feature-filled applications. It has also become much more accessible, with bespoke tools now doing much of the heavy lifting and setup work required to get an app or website working.

Lovable, for example, uses a variety of LLMs to create a one-stop vibe coding shop using credits as AI currency. It allows people with very little, or even no, knowledge of how to develop apps to create something quickly just by describing it. Of course, as with everything AI, understanding how to prompt well makes all the difference.

I like using Claude with VS Code when I vibe code, as I know a bit of the programming language Python and want to be able to see what’s happening to the code and do some manual troubleshooting. It’s also relatively cheap.

To be brutally honest, though, AI is far more capable than I am at writing code, and I quickly have to defer to it if and when things don’t go as expected.

The difference between the two approaches is significant. With a tool such as Lovable, the “guts” are hidden and dealt with automatically, whereas with more traditional vibe coding tools you will need to set up your own environments or run programs directly on your computer to get something you can use.

What are the risks of vibe coding?

This leads into one of the biggest risks of vibe coding: you don’t fully hold the reins.

An LLM can misunderstand what you want. It can also make mistakes, confidently create code that does not work, or create fragile systems that look good but are hard to change or maintain. As complexity increases on a project, you might find yourself losing control of it. This can be particularly problematic when the AI ties itself up in knots trying to understand what you want or fix something it does not know how to fix.

This is where choosing the right AI tool can help a lot. In my experience, some AI coding tools can get stuck and claim to have fixed an issue when clearly it has not, or even worse, created a new one somewhere else.

As with all LLMs, you need to be able to decipher the language when it tells you something such as, “Oh sorry, I see what I need to do now, let me fix that,” so you know when it is genuinely correcting the problem and when it is just trying to be helpful but is actually more stuck than Winnie the Pooh in a jar of honey. Best-case scenario this can lead to wasted time or credits being used up without the issue being resolved.

It’s good to be aware of the recent horror stories, such as AI coding tools deleting databases or removing whole features from a product. It’s also worth being careful with the idea that vibe coding means anyone can now create an app. That is true up to a point, particularly for simple prototypes, experiments, and personal tools. But creating a safe, reliable app that other people depend on is a different thing altogether.

You might be able to describe what you want in plain English and get the AI to generate the code, but that does not remove the need to check, test, and understand what has been created. The easier AI makes it to build something, the easier it also becomes to build something fragile without realizing it.

This is why relying solely on a vibe-coded program that is integral to your work can be risky. But there are areas where vibe coding is, frankly, a bit magical.

What are the benefits of vibe coding?

Vibe coding feels like a genuine shift because it lets people who are not developers start making software, in the same way the early web let people publish without owning a printing press.

One of its most powerful benefits is that it allows someone with an idea to create a working proof of concept quickly. That does not mean the end result is ready to be used by hundreds or thousands of people, but it can be enough to show what is possible.

Creating a visual and working prototype can also help guide a development team and stakeholders. Instead of simply describing what you want, you can show an early version of the tool or app and use that to shape the discussion.

Vibe coding can also help you learn by doing. You can ask the AI questions and ask it to explain what it is doing and why. Over time, this can start to give you a better understanding of how the code works.

One of the most powerful uses of vibe coding, in my opinion, is creating small tools or programs that are very specific to your needs. Whether that’s a simple game you want to create for your students, a classroom quiz, a revision tool, or an app that helps keep parents up to speed on school changes, vibe coding can help you get there more quickly and at far less cost than using a development team or, in some cases, paying for a third-party provider.

Vibe coding can also be useful for experienced developers. They might not use it in quite the same way as a beginner, but it can still help them move faster. Sometimes the AI is useful for getting the first rough version of something working, even if the developer then has to go back through it, tidy it up, and make sure it is actually safe and sensible.

The important point is that vibe coding is strongest when it is used for experimentation, learning, and prototyping. It is less suitable when the software needs to be secure, reliable, long-lasting, or used by lots of people without proper review.

How to explain vibe coding to students in class

The best way to explain vibe coding to students is to say that it is giving instructions to an AI and seeing whether the AI can turn those instructions into a working program.

The student is not writing every line of code in the traditional way. They are describing what they want the software to do, then testing whether the AI has understood them correctly. That’s the key difference.

In normal coding lessons, students often start by learning syntax: the rules of the programming language. They learn how to write a variable, a loop, a function, or a condition, and then use those building blocks to make something.

With vibe coding, the starting point is often the idea instead. The student might begin with, “I want a quiz about volcanoes,” or “I want a game that helps me practice spelling.” The AI then creates the first version of the code.

That does not mean the student has finished. In many ways, that is where the learning starts. The student has to work out whether the AI understood the task. Does the program do what they expected? Is the information correct? Does the scoring work? What happens when a user makes a mistake? Can the student explain why the code behaves the way it does?

This is the part students need to understand. Vibe coding can feel instant, but it is not simply pressing a button and getting a finished app. It is a process of describing, testing, questioning, fixing, and improving.

As school is almost out around the country, I think a great deal about transition and change opportunities, knowing a new path forward can present our choice of solutions over persistent problems. I can remember when I started my leadership journey, handling a faculty that was carved out of the “us against them” mentality . . . .

School leaders need to leverage change when faced with this. Considering challenges like this remind me of a hit dystopian show, The Handmaid’s Tale. In it, The Eyes are the secret police of Gilead—ubiquitous, invisible, and terrifying. They don’t just enforce laws; they create a climate in which everyone becomes a volunteer spy, terrified that a coworker, friend, or neighbor is documenting and reporting their every "indiscretion."

When a school culture mirrors this, we are stuck in our own dystopia; it becomes a place where teachers and leaders look over their shoulder instead of at their students.

Here is how that toxic dynamic manifests, and how a principal can act as a buffer to disrupt–or better yet–dismantle it.

The Faculty Lounge as a Surveillance Hub

In a toxic school environment, "The Eyes" are not a formal department but rather a culture of lateral surveillance through which staff members monitor each other’s clock-in times, lesson plan quality, curriculum delivery, or management styles.

This is rarely done to help; instead, it is used to gather "intel." In these places, gossip serves as a weaponized currency used to gain power, influence, or divert attention from personal insecurities. When mistakes occur—whether it is a parent complaint or a botched lesson—the immediate instinct is not to solve the problem, but to find a scapegoat.

The Principal as a Protective Shield

School leaders need to own this problem even if they didn’t create it. They must consistently and respectfully manage these “blamers,” responsibilities, problems, and complaints back to their rightful owners.

Principals must act as a shield that absorbs negativity from those attempting to weaponize others' vulnerabilities so it doesn't crush the staff morale, or worse, hamper their impact on children.

This process begins by actively filtering the "intel." When a staff member attempts to "report" a colleague’s minor infraction, formally or informally, a protective principal shuts it down, redirecting rather than using that perceived, or worse, real power to build a file on a peer.

The principal must redirect by shifting the focus from who made a mistake to what went wrong with the system. For example, if an assembly fails because of a technical error, the leader pivots others from blaming an individual to analyzing how to make the technical checklist more transparent for everyone.

By practicing accountability and absorbing the shock for others' mistakes, the principal removes the incentive for staff to blame one another. If the leader says, "That’s on me," the staff no longer needs a scapegoat, unless that scapegoat becomes twisted into the principal to blame (more on that later).

Building a Sanctuary of Practice

Disrupting this culture requires an intentional focus on psychological safety. School leaders must move the environment away from a system of surveillance and secrecy toward one of support and transparency. Instead of monitoring for mistakes, the leader transforms the organization to monitoring for needs. This shift replaces finger-pointing with process analysis and ensures equity, through which everyone is held to the same clear standard rather than utilizing toxic informants.

When a principal refuses to allow staff to throw each other under the bus, the "Eyes" eventually lose sight of the cause. If snickering, spying, and sabotage no longer result in social or professional capital, the behavior is minimized, or better yet, stops altogether.

By serving as a filter, the principal can build a safe practice space. Teachers begin to take risks and innovate because they know that if they stumble, their leader will catch them rather than let the "Eyes" report them.

If All Else Fails: Dismantling "The Eyes"

Sometimes, despite your best efforts to empower decent people, a toxic culture has taken deep root. If all else fails, you have to look at the climate of surveillance that the police state has built and act to dismantle it. Break up the group!

The vocal, negative minority rarely perform their negativity in a vacuum and thrive on a specific kind of fuel: an audience. These cliques require the middle-of-the-road teachers to watch, nod, or remain silently compliant.

Neutralizing a negative clique is about protecting the classroom for those who are there for their kids. This process starts by identifying the ringleaders—often veterans with high informal influence—and addressing them with surgical precision. By dealing with these bad actors individually and privately, the leader prevents the public access to the theater of their "gotcha" moments, removing their ammunition of derailment, ensuring the oxygen in the room remains focused on student growth rather than adult grievances.

As the leader works to shut the "Eyes," systems thinking becomes a silent form of cultural reorganization. Because negative energy is highly contagious in close quarters, the architect of a "win-win" faculty thoughtfully disperses these magnets away from one another, breaking up the echo chambers in which gossip acts as a weapon.

When the focus shifts from the challenging individuals to the majority who stand together for children over power, the social capital of the negative group begins to deteriorate. By giving the best teachers the loudest voice and the most significant influence, the principal makes it socially "uncool" to join the surveillance culture. If spying and sabotage no longer result in proximity to power, the "Eyes" eventually go blind.

Administrative transfers are equivalent to retirement and other “miracles,” when relocating individuals to different departments, grade levels, or schools permanently disrupts the clique’s daily operational power.

In the end, the goal is to curate a faculty in which every member is invested. By removing these final toxic roadblocks, the leader ensures that the negative individuals move on to environments better suited for them, while the remaining staff finally finds the psychological safety they need to thrive, innovate, and look forward instead of over their shoulders.

Edcafe AI is a rare tool in the world of AI as it, unlike many others out there, is specifically designed to support classes through the entire teaching cycle.

Built for educators, this AI tool works to offer support across the full teaching process, from lesson planning to assessments -- all in one easy-to-access platform.

The idea here is to offer a more time-efficient way to work, without jumping around between tools. From building a lesson from scratch -- differentiating for mixed abilities -- to tracking student progress, this tool should streamline that process for ease.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about Edcafe AI for use in your class.

What is Edcafe AI?

Edcafe AI is a digital AI-powered assistant for teachers to help across planning, teaching, and assessing lessons. By combining multiple tools, this offers a single platform for teachers to create, organize, deliver, and evaluate learning.

This allows teachers to plan curriculum-aligned lessons and then create classroom-ready learning materials. Assigning these to students, and assessing as well as tracking progress, is also built into the platform.

That all should mean teachers only need to open this one tool to get everything done, saving on time and effort -- so they can focus on more valuable teacher-student time.

How does Edcafe AI work?

Edcafe AI combines the power of artificial intelligence with the materials already being used by teachers. Current and sourced materials can be uploaded for use, all being enhanced to work with the AI ecosystem.

What that actually looks like is a teacher uploads a document, slides, or curriculum content. The AI then generates lessons, quizzes, or activities that can be shared using links or QR codes. Students can then work with these materials as teachers track engagement and performance in real time.

Usefully, there are feedback loops that allow teachers to see how students are responding, so as to refine future lessons based on student ability.

Since students don't need accounts, this is all super simple to setup and share so students can begin working with the materials right away.

What are the best Edcafe AI features?

Edcafe AI uses artificial intelligence to make the creation of materials fast and easy from full lesson plans, slides, and quizzes to reading activities.

Chatbots can also be created, with custom inputs, which are then able to assist students as they work through topics. They then can get personalized feedback and help as they work, without it costing teachers on time.

Those quizzes that can be generated are also able to be auto-graded, saving even more teacher time. This can be a quick way to assess student ability with any learning gaps easy to identify and work on improving.

Since Google Drive can be used with this system, it makes for an easy way not only to access and enhance current materials, but to generate and share more across the school.

Everything is end-to-end here, so teachers can work in one platform to get everything done. This is not only helpful for saving on time, but can also be far less mentally straining.

How much does Edcafe AI cost?

Edcafe AI offers a tiered pricing model, including a free option. The plans break down like this:

Free plan: Limited AI generations and core tools.

Pro plan: From around $7.99/month (annual billing) with expanded features.

Premium plan: From around $14.99/month with unlimited usage and school-level tools.

Custom options are also available for schools and districts, including onboarding and integration support.

Edcafe AI best tips and tricks

Start with your own materials
Upload existing lesson content to get more accurate, curriculum-aligned outputs.

Use chatbots for differentiation
Set up different chatbots for varying ability levels or topics to personalize support.

Generate then refine
Treat AI outputs as a starting point and tweak for tone, accuracy, and class context.

Google is attempting to position Gemini as a leader for AI tutoring when it comes to standardized test prep for the SAT and other tests. Earlier this year, they announced a partnership with the Princeton Review to allow practice tests followed by instant feedback from Gemini that can tell a student where they excelled and highlight areas they might need to study more.

The feature builds on Gemini’s learn mode. Previously called “Guided Learning,” this is a tutoring mode built on a collection of AI models called LearnLM that were specifically designed with teaching in mind and built with principles of education science.

Here’s a closer look at Gemini’s tutoring and test prep abilities.

Using Gemini To Prepare for Tests

For SAT prep, Gemini can generate full practice tests for free. All you need to do is enter a prompt such as, “I want to take a practice SAT test,” and Gemini will generate a test on it. This test will utilize resources from the Princeton Review, a test-prep company that draws on real SAT questions to generate practice tests.

In my experience, this feature works just as advertised. It took me only minutes to generate a quick practice test, and I also had the option of having Gemini create sample SAT questions. It quizzed me and offered encouragement when I got questions right and great explanations when I got questions wrong. This is a tool that seems like it would be helpful for students preparing for this test.

This type of access to high-quality practice tests and tutoring is a great way to increase access to better test preparation methods for people from all economic backgrounds as Gemini is available for free. I also suspect Gemini’s AI coaching could be helpful even for those who get one-on-one tutoring.

Google Wants Gemini To Be A Tutoring Leader

This recent foray into test prep is part of Google’s larger effort to make Gemini the go-to AI for tutoring. So far they seem successful in these efforts to me.

Gemini in learn mode has outperformed other similar tools in certain studies. For instance, researchers compared Google Gemini's and ChatGPT's effectiveness for enhancing the academic writing skills of English learners in two Thai universities. The study found “both tools effectively improved linguistic accuracy and essay structure,” however, “Gemini was found to work better than ChatGPT in multimodal feedback and source integration.”

This tracks with my own experience using both tools. While any AI tool has its limitations and subtle inaccuracies can be a big problem for test prep, Gemini in learn mode is the best AI tutor with which I have interacted. And Gemini continues to improve its tutoring features. In addition to the SAT test, Google recently announced Gemini can provide vetted tests for the Joint Entrance Examination, a standardized engineering entrance exam used in India. It also seems likely Google will expand Gemini’s data set to include other standardized tests going forward.

Overall, I’m once again really impressed with Gemini’s tutoring abilities. My graduate school options were somewhat limited because I was so afraid of taking the GRE that any program that required its completion was ruled out. It’s possible had a tool such as Gemini been available when I was younger, I would have felt differently, though I am very happy with the graduate program in which I ended up attending.

As regular Tech & Learning readers know, I have mixed feelings about AI. But I’m impressed by this feature. Using Gemini to prepare for standardized tests feels as if it could have been a game-changer for me personally and may indeed be a game-changer for many students today.

ClassPoint is one of those tools designed to perfectly blend other software that teachers, until now, have been using separately. The idea being that this can save time and effort with one do-it-all solution.

The combination here is of the ever-helpful slides-based tools, such as PowerPoint, with quiz-style apps that allow for more measurable engagement.

This does plenty more though, thanks to AI and the ability to gamify learning, all while offering real-time feedback to educators.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about ClassPoint to see if it could save you time and enhance your instruction.

What is ClassPoint?

ClassPoint is a digital tool that combines slide-based teaching with interactive assessment options to offer a more dynamic class experience.

This integrates directly with Microsoft PowerPoint so teachers can use current tools and slides to make it all more interactive.

The app offers quizzes and polls that allow educators to measure student answers, live. This also helps teachers to turn slides into interactive whiteboards, with slide annotation live as the class works through materials.

To be clear, this works within PowerPoint, so existing class materials can be reused rather than doing everything from scratch.

How does ClassPoint work?

ClassPoint works as a PowerPoint add-on, so you can get this installed and then work on your slide decks directly.

Teachers can work with the interactive elements right there from within the slides. Students are sent a join code that allows them to interact using their own devices. Everyone can be working on the main whiteboard screen, with interactions sent live from their devices.

So while teachers are presenting as normal, students are able to respond with answers to quizzes, annotation drawing, or even uploads from their devices. The results of all this can be shown immediately on screen at the front of class.

Also integrated is an AI quiz generator. This scans the slides you're using and automatically offers questions that will work with that presentation. That can mean a huge saving on preparation time for teachers as well as the ability to get into a quiz on any slide section, even if previously unplanned.

What are the best ClassPoint features?

ClassPoint is all real-time so feedback from students is live, allowing teachers to adapt their teaching -- stopping longer on a topic or moving on -- as the lesson progresses.

That AI quiz generator is a really big value as saves time, offering more spontaneity and the ability to adjust these to suit different ability levels.

Teachers can gamify everything as there is the option to award stars, track progress, and even display leaderboards to help with motivation and participation.

Thanks for the ability to annotate directly, this allows any PowerPoint slide to become an interactive whiteboard canvas. This is for teachers, live, but also for students that want to add text, images, audio, video, drawings and more.

Usefully, for teachers, this can help with tracking of participation, with built-in reporting tools.

How much does ClassPoint cost?

ClassPoint offers a tiered pricing model that includes a free plan. The levels break down into:

Free (Basic): Limited features, small class sizes, and capped quizzes.

Pro: Around $8/month (billed annually), unlocks larger classes, unlimited questions, and more advanced tools.

Premium: Custom pricing for schools, with features such as unlimited AI credits and deeper analytics.

The free tier is functional enough for trying it out, but most of the more powerful features, especially AI and analytics, sit behind the paid plans.

ClassPoint best tips and tricks

Turn slides into instant quizzes
Add interactive questions directly into your PowerPoint to check understanding without switching tools.

Use live responses to guide teaching
Adjust your lesson in real time based on how students answer polls and quizzes.

Gamify participation with points
Reward correct answers and engagement to motivate quieter students to get involved.

Since I was young, one of my favorite things to do was read. So naturally, as I got older, I more or less stopped doing it. Part of the problem was that I was waiting for the perfect time and place to read. I wanted a quiet spot with a comfortable chair and enough time to read a chapter or so.

However now, as a father of two young kids juggling multiple teaching and writing experiences, these types of perfect reading moments don’t really exist for me—I'm sure other educators can relate.

Over the years, I’ve had to abandon this idealized reading mindset and adopt a more I-thrive/read-in-chaos mindset. Technology has helped with this, and the combination of using ebooks and audiobooks has allowed me to average about three to four books per month.

I’m certainly no super reader, but as the summer approaches and we all look to get in extra reading, here are some ways in which technology has helped me keep up with my reading.

1. Reading Ebooks

I truly prefer to read a real paper book over an ebook as there’s just something about the way the paper crinkles as you turn the page that can’t be duplicated in a Kindle or other digital reader.

Even so, I read much more when I read ebooks. Unsurprisingly, this is all about convenience. Real books require two hands to hold and proper lighting to see. They also have a habit of getting lost or left at home when you need them most.

Ebooks are always with you. I’ve tried dedicated ebook readers, such as a Kindle, but the best bet for me is just to use a reading app on my phone. This way it's always with me, and when I’m tempted to go online and start scrolling through social media, I remind myself to read for five minutes instead. Often this five minutes turn into 10 or 15 minutes, and little by little, I work my way through more books.

2. Listening to Audio Books

I love going to live author events and listening to them read from their work, but I will admit that during a live reading, my mind often wanders and I can’t follow the plot details. This used to happen to me with audiobooks as well.

To stay engaged, I eventually started adjusting the playback speed. I start at 1.25 speed and then go up from there based on the speed of the narrator. When I’m really dialed into a story, I’ll often listen at 1.7 speed, which approaches the speed at which I actually read.

I also find that audiobooks lend themselves particularly well to nonfiction, first-person narratives, and/or stories with fewer characters. Sprawling multicharacter epics still tend to confuse me a bit when listening. But overall, when we listen to books, we retain about as much information as when we read them, research shows, and that's what I've found.

3. Reading Audio and Ebooks Together

Some worry that when we listen to audiobooks instead of reading, it encourages us to stop reading altogether. This isn’t the case, according to most reading experts. In fact, some have told me that listening to books supports reading books.

I’ve certainly found this to be the case personally, and I've discovered a great strategy to increase my reading is to listen to and read the same book.

Amazon offers Whispersync, a feature that allows you to seamlessly toggle back and forth between your audiobook and Kindle without losing your place. Even if you prefer to use a more independent bookstore-friendly platform such as Libro.FM, I find that with a little effort, it’s not too hard to go back and forth between the two and keep moving forward through the narrative. If I’m listening to an audiobook and want to find my spot in the ebook I’m reading, I just search a particular phrase.

One of the biggest hurdles to me finishing a book is momentum. If I spend too long reading any book, I tend to get tired of it. Listening and reading the same book really fights this and helps me get to 50 pages or so of progress without too much effort.

4. Chunking

As teachers, we are often encouraging our students to make small manageable goals and then start completing those. I believe the same sort of principle is behind what makes social media so addictive. It comes in bite-sized servings. We don’t have to commit to reading any particular text or watching any video, it doesn’t matter if we get interrupted.

I’ve tried to apply this to my reading habits and be less concerned about interruptions. If I have a few minutes to read, I’ll take that opportunity rather than scroll on social media. Audiobooks and ebooks lend themselves well to this technique because chapter and section breaks are less prominent as you read or listen, but the same idea holds true for traditional books as well.

5. Scrolling Past

Another lesson from social media I try to apply to reading is the idea of scrolling past something in which I'm not interested. On social media, the scroll never ends, and if what the algorithm is showing me isn’t interesting, there’s always plenty more to read. The same is, of course, true of regular reading. And those who study literacy say the idea that you must finish every book you start can halt reading progress.

Personally, I’ve started abandoning ship or scrolling past if I find my reading focus waning while reading a book. What I try to do is revisit the book after reading two or three other books, just to see if it was a matter of my being in the wrong mindset. This is occasionally the case, but more often than not, if I don’t finish a book, it’s because it is just not for me. Unless it is something I need to read for research, once I’ve given a book a second try, I move on for good.

A part of me still hates not finishing a book, but I’ve learned to silence that part of me and figuratively scroll past the book I don’t like. This is one of the most effective ways I've found for continuing to read overall.

ClickView is a video-learning platform that's been designed specifically to work in education class scenarios. That means this is a safe, classroom-appropriate resource that's loaded up with educators in mind.

Unlike the mine-field that can be YouTube, this is filled with curriculum-aligned content that is well-organized so teachers can find and use what they need with ease -- saving on time and effort.

Thanks to the vetted and curated content, along with interactive tools, this can be used as a powerful way to deepen or introduce learning in class and beyond.

This guide aims to lay out all you could need to know about ClickView as a potential tool for your class.

What is ClickView?

ClickView is all about video, specifically school-based video viewing. This education-focused video platform offers access to thousands of curriculum-aligned, curated videos that cover a range of subjects and topics.

Since this is built for education specifically, the content is all age-appropriate, curriculum-linked, and vetted for classroom use.

Usefully, it's all well-organized too. Teachers can browse by subject, topic, or learning level to get to video content that relevant and high-quality -- ultimately saving on search time. Plus, it's possible to add interactive, assessment elements to make this even more engaging.

Students can access this via a single sign-on, class code, or school credentials -- all meaning access through a secure and school-friendly system.

How does ClickView work?

ClickView is made to work as a tool that teachers can use to make their planning easier, more rich, and ultimately, faster -- while still giving students the most engaging experience.

Teachers start by logging in to their school account. They can then immediately search by topic, subject, or keyword as needed. Filters help to narrow results with results focused on level, content type, and topic.

When the video has been picked, it can be played in class, shared with students directly, embedded into lesson plans, or assigned for independent study at another time.

Teachers can give student access via a class code, or students can get in using their own login, depending on how the school is setup. This can mean in-class use but also at-home learning, if a hybrid model is being used with this setup.

Usefully, teachers can also add interactive layers to follow after the video has been watched. These include questions, annotations, and interactive timeline elements. All that should make for a more active learning experience that sticks.

What are the best ClickView features?

ClickView has thousands of videos that are all curriculum-aligned, so teachers can search by specific topic to quickly find ideal materials without the need to vet it themselves.

The interactivity of videos is a big draw here as it allows teachers to tailor the follow-up experience. That can lead to a more engaged viewer, knowing they need to answer questions after.

The search functionality is a big draw here as it allows for direct keyword searches but also a browse function. This can help stimulate lesson planning by browsing what's available, or offer direct results to save on time.

Since students can access these videos via a shared code, or school login, it makes for easy access across devices. Sharing these for in-class or at-home use is just as easy either way.

Analytics tools allow teachers to see how students have engaged with the videos and interactive elements. This should be useful in guiding help for students, adapting lesson plans, and generally tailoring support.

Teachers can even upload their own videos and resources to help build the customized library available across the school or class.

How much does ClickView cost?

ClickView pricing is not publicly listed and is typically offered via a school or district subscription model.

Costs vary depending on school size, region, feature access, and licensing requirements.

Schools usually need to request a quote or demo to get specific pricing details.

ClickView best tips and tricks

Use clips instead of full videos
Short segments keep attention high and allow for more targeted discussion.

Add questions directly into videos
Embedding quizzes help check understanding in real time without extra worksheets.

Flip the classroom
Assign videos as homework so lesson time can focus on discussion and application.

Dotstorming is a digital point of centralization for a class to help get everyone contributing as a team.

While real-world voting and brainstorming can leave out the quiet voices, this tool works to help everyone have a say. It's equal parts digital sticky notes and voting system, all working live in the room.

This is a simple tool at its heart, offering voting to the class, but in a way that's powerful in its potential output. With the option to span in class use and hybrid learning models, this is a helpful way to keep the class focused as a group.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about how Dotstorming could work for your class.

What is Dotstorming?

Dotstorming is a digital tool that is browser-based for easy access across the class and devices available. This works as a brainstorming and decision-making system that lets the group share ideas and vote in real time.

Use text, images, videos, and PDFs, as the virtual board system allows for a range of materials to be shared in the class for discussion purposes.

This, used in conjunction with the "dot voting" system, allows the students to participate in group decisions instantly. Teachers can then cut the debate and noise when trying to get directly to a group consensus, or gauge of class opinions on a matter.

Easy organization of these "boards," by popularity, allow for further streamlining of this process for use in class with minimal teacher effort.

How does Dotstorming work?

Dotstorming offers teachers a space to create boards that can then be shared with students via a link. Since there is no login needed, or special devices thanks to browser access, this can be used across student devices easily.

Students are then able to add their own ideas in a post-style system using text, images, and videos. They can see the contributions of others and vote on preferred ideas using their limited number of votes to pick and choose.

For teachers, there is the chance to manage the number of votes each student has before letting them take part. Control over chat and commenting is also available, with the option to disable. Finally, teachers can also lock submissions ready to move onto voting as the only option, for simplicity.

Once voting is all done, the results can be stored and used as part of future discussions or lesson planning. All that helps this become a useful formative assessment tool as well as prioritization pointer.

What are the best Dotstorming features?

Dotstorming works in real-time so group collaboration, at speed, is possible without getting lost in debate or counting of votes. That can result in high-energy and inclusive lessons while keeping everyone involved in voting.

The rich media support makes this a powerful tool to use across a range of subjects. That means using images, videos, text, and PDFs to help teachers bring in ideas but also to allow students a way to freely express themselves.

The sticky note-style layout on the board makes for a very visually engaging way to share information. It strikes the balance between digital and analogue that feels easy to use while still staying efficient and organized.

The fact students can join in with a simple link and their name, without account creation being necessary, is a hugely powerful part of how easy and effective Dotstorming is for use in classes, even for the first time. It also supports student data privacy.

How much does Dotstorming cost?

Dotstorming works on a freemium model. That means you have two levels:

Free: Limited boards and topics, but fully functional for basic classroom use.

Paid plans: Offer expanded usage and additional features (pricing varies).

For many teachers, the free tier is enough to run effective sessions, especially if boards are reused.

Dotstorming best tips and tricks

Start with a focused prompt
Clear, specific questions lead to better quality ideas and more meaningful voting.

Limit the number of votes
Restricting votes forces students to prioritize rather than select everything.

Use it for checks
Have students post what they don’t understand, then vote to surface key gaps.

Flint is an AI tool designed to offer personalized learning, and teaching, to students and educators in a very effective way.

Unlike many of the ever-appearing new AI tools out there, this is designed from the ground up as a way to make learning better. That's where this stands out. Rather than acting as a generic chatbot, it is designed specifically for classroom use, with guardrails, analytics, and structured activities that aim to keep teachers in control.

This is about extending teaching by giving each student something closer to one-to-one support, while still aligning with curriculum goals. Offering AI tutoring, assignment creation, and classroom analytics, this is built to make life easier all round.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about how Flint could work in your class.

What is Flint?

Flint is an AI-powered learning platform built specifically for K–12 schools, designed to support personalized instruction across subjects including math, science, English, and languages.

Two key parts are available here: one in the AI teaching assistant, to help create lessons, activities, and feedback. But there is also the AI tutor part, called Sparky, which helps students by adapting explanations and supporting individual needs.

Centered around class workflows, these tools help teachers make AI-driven assignments, upload curriculum materials, and define how much help the AI is allowed to give, ranging from gentle guidance to more direct support.

Usefully, this can be deployed across schools, with admin oversight and LMS integrations, as well as helpful analytics and engagement tracking, all as part of the package.

How does Flint work?

Flint lets teachers create or upload content using items such as worksheets, rubrics, lessons, or external resources as needed. Using that as a foundation, the AI is then able to generate interactive learning activities to be completed.

Students can then interact through the sessions, asking questions, working through problems, or getting writing feedback as they go. This is great for projects, in which structured support can help them work at scale without the need for lots of teacher-based scaffolding along the way -- potentially helping build confidence, too.

The system uses large language models with tools such as web search, code-based calculations, and translation to improve accuracy and flexibility.

Teachers keep control throughout, since they can design and implement guardrails. This includes preventing the AI from giving direct answers or requiring it to guide students through reasoning instead, for example.

Admins and teachers can also view interaction histories, allowing for transparency and safeguarding, with automatic flagging of inappropriate content.

What are the best Flint features?

Flint is all about that AI tutoring for students to feel supported and engaged with at their level -- helping high achievers progress at their pace while anyone struggling can be supported to grow comfortably.

The ability to implement guardrails is a huge positive for educators. They can define how the AI behaves, ensuring it supports learning without simply giving answers.

The use of content already available, such as teacher materials currently in use, is a really powerful way that this extends teaching and learning without going from scratch. It can also help sticking to current lesson plans and standards easily.

Feedback is powerful here with real-time looks at student performance and engagement. This is individual but also with a general overview across the class.

When it comes to assignments, this AI can help with deadlines, time limits, and follow-up activities. At the same time it supports multimodal learning tools with text-to-speech, speech-to-text, image processing, and even graphing and code support for STEM subjects.

All that, plus it integrates with LMS and SIS, such as Google Classroom, to make integration and deployment an easy part of the process also.

How much does Flint cost?

Flint offers a free tier for up to 80 users, making it accessible for individual teachers or small pilots.

Paid plans are structured by school size, starting at around: $3,000/year for smaller deployments. This scales to custom pricing for larger institutions.

Paid tiers add features including LMS/SIS integration, advanced analytics, and dedicated support.

Flint best tips and tricks

Start with one class
Pilot the platform with a single group to refine how you want the AI to behave before scaling.

Set clear guardrails early
Define whether the AI should guide, hint, or explain, to shape student learning habits from the start.

Upload your own materials
Ground the AI in your curriculum to improve relevance and reduces generic responses.

AI hype keeps getting bigger and the offerings more complex. It’s being pitched to schools from every direction, but what really matters when it comes to choosing the right tool for your school?

Some AI tools promise to reduce teacher workload while others claim to revolutionize tutoring, feedback, or family communication. You’ll also find platforms that use AI focused on district operations, reporting, and data analysis. The common thread is that these all look great when demoed–believe the hype, and you’d think they could transform a school overnight into some sort of tech-enabled teaching utopia.

And this is why it’s important to slow down, ask better questions, and focus on the practicalities.

Sure classic questions such as which platform is best or what are other schools using are fair, but not the right place to start. Schools need the right fit for their students, staff, systems, and priorities. That means being more pragmatic.

So before investing in AI, school leaders should ask different questions. What problem are we actually trying to solve? Who will use it? What data will it store? Do we have the capabilities to use it effectively? How much control will we have? What happens if we get this wrong?

Those questions matter more than the flashiest demo.

Start with the problem, not the product

The first question is the simplest: What do you actually need an AI for?

Identify your goals. Do you want to reduce teacher workload, support tutoring, help teachers adapt materials for different students, speed up admin tasks, improve family communication, or analyze attendance or grades more effectively?

If leaders can’t explain the problem they’re trying to solve, they’re not ready to buy a solution.

That seems obvious, but it’s an easy mistake to make. A platform may be enticing because it generates lesson ideas in seconds or gives polished responses on demand. But if it doesn’t meet staff and student needs, it will become underused and hard to justify.

Build practical use cases first and ignore the peer pressure to bring in AI without good reason.

Ask whether your current ecosystem already covers most of your needs

If your district is already invested in Google, Microsoft, ChatGPT, or another approved environment with AI capabilities, then take stock before adding more tools.

This matters because AI doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It can sit within all sorts of systems from identity, email, and documents to permissions, policies, and support structures. If you already have an approved AI in those systems, then it’s an opportunity to discover what features and functions you might not be using to full potential yet. Identify the gaps that will add real value before considering new solutions.

Adding more tools without a clear rationale can lead to overlap, confusion, and needless costs.

Be clear whether this is for the classroom or the district office

That said, a single AI tool may not be sufficient to meet all your needs. Not every school AI tool does the same job, and schools should be wary of products that claim to do everything brilliantly.

Some tools are geared toward teaching and learning–think MagicSchool, Khanmigo, or teacher-facing uses of platforms such as Google’s Gemini, Microsoft’s Copilot, or OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Others sit much closer to school and district operations, such as PowerSchool, SchoolStatus, attendance tools, reporting systems, family communication platforms, and products built around data rather than classroom practice.

This distinction matters. A tool that works well at a district level may offer little in the classroom. An AI that teachers love to use in class may be a headache for IT and governance.

Before buying, ask the simple question: Is this mainly for teaching and learning, or for operations? That will help you refine your list of candidates.

Ask whether staff have the knowledge to use it well

School leaders need to think beyond a few professional development sessions when it comes to embedding a new AI tool into existing systems and workflows.

A school can buy the perfect AI tool and still struggle if staff lack confidence or digital skills. Be honest about whether teams and individuals have the basic knowledge to use the tool well, question its weaknesses, and stay within policy.

That includes knowing:

• What the tool is good at
• When not to trust it
• What data should never be entered
• How to spot weak, biased, or invented outputs
• When human review is essential

This isn’t just about knowing where to click, but about digital and AI literacy, critical thinking, and understanding AI’s limitations. This will be an ongoing task as new releases and updates will regularly offer new functionality but also potentially new issues.

It’s important to question whether you have in-house knowledge and discipline to use AI responsibly. If your school has clear guidance and confident staff then it will get more value from AI than one with patchy, uncertain usage.

That question applies differently across the organization. Senior leaders, classroom teachers, support staff, IT teams, and students don’t all need the same depth of knowledge, but they do all need enough understanding to reduce risk and use the tool effectively.

Ask data questions early

Privacy and data use needs to be included from the start.

Schools should ask:

• What data goes into the tool?
• Where is that data stored?
• Is it used to train the model?
• How long is it retained?
• Who can access it?
• Can it be reviewed and deleted?
• What visibility do administrators have?

These aren’t just compliance questions, but trust questions as well.

If staff aren’t sure what they can safely enter into a system, adoption becomes inconsistent very quickly. If leaders can’t explain how the tool handles student data, it becomes much harder to build confidence among teachers, families, and other stakeholders.

AI tools can look simple and user-friendly, but schools still need to understand what’s happening behind the scenes before they commit, especially since student data in these tools is extremely sought after by hackers.

Take extra care if the tool analyses student data

The appeal of AI for some schools goes beyond lesson planning. It’s the potential to spot patterns in attendance, grades, behavior, or assessment data more quickly than staff could on their own. In theory, that means spotting issues earlier and acting faster.

That may be useful, but it’s also one of the riskiest areas.

Schools should ask:

• What data is being analysed?
• How reliable are the patterns or predictions?
• Is the tool flagging signals for staff to review, or is it making clear recommendations that teams might feel pushed to follow unquestioningly?
• To what extent does it reinforce biases or overstate weak correlations?
• How transparent is its reasoning and confidence, particularly when it comes to suggestions?
• Who is ultimately accountable if the AI flags something incorrectly or misses a student who needs support?

While an AI can help surface useful signals about attendance, attainment, intervention, or student support, it should not sit in a technological black box. Human professional judgment still matters. In fact, it matters even more once AI is involved as school leaders need to be clear about where that line sits and ensure an overreliance on tech doesn’t lower standards.

And this is where schools need to be especially careful not to confuse pattern detection with judgment. For example, some AI detection tools used to check whether work has been generated with the aid of AI can be extremely aggressive, leading to a much higher percentage of false-positives than vendors claim.

Look at real-world accuracy, not just the demo

Which leads us into claimed accuracy. AI tools can seem utterly authoritative until you question outputs, which can be unreliable in the situations schools care about most.

The real question is whether the AI meets the school’s requirements. Can it help teachers draft useful classroom materials? Support student revision? Summarize factual information without adding hallucinations or confusion? Can it save time without creating extra checking work?

Schools should also think about the cost of mistakes.

An AI-generated worksheet with a few weak questions may be inconvenient. A tool that mishandles attendance information, behavior summaries, grading, special education support, or safeguarding-related communication creates a much more serious problem.

That’s why buying decisions should be informed by realistic testing. Schools should test tools against real-world scenarios and decide when human oversight has to remain absolute.

Ask whether it improves the work or just speeds it up

Don’t judge AI by how quickly it completes tasks. Instead, ask whether it improves the quality of the work, supports better decisions, and reduces pain points, especially in areas of low-value admin and bureaucracy.

A tool that saves time on paper may still be a poor fit if it encourages generic planning, weak feedback, or an overreliance on samey AI-generated drafts. The risk isn’t just introducing minor mistakes into lesson plans; it’s a gradual reduction of originality and human judgment.

AI should be there to either improve current work or reduce repetitive or time-consuming admin tasks. What it shouldn’t do is replace real value, expertise, subject knowledge, or meaningful interaction with students. Faster isn’t better if the work becomes thinner, flatter, and less human.

Check the admin controls before the marketing claims

One of the least glamorous parts of AI procurement is also one of the most important: control.

Before signing for anything, anyone buying an AI should ask:

• Who can use the tool?
• Can access be limited by role or age group?
• Are staff and student experiences separated?
• What is logged and flagged?
• What can administrators turn on or off?
• How does identity management work?
• Does it fit with existing sign-on and rostering systems?

A strong school AI product isn’t just one that produces impressive outputs, but one that leaders and IT teams can actually manage.

Think beyond the pilot

Many schools are willing to trial new tools. The harder question is what happens afterward.

How much training will staff need? What guidance will be required? Will policies need updating? How much support does the vendor provide? What will this look like after one term, not one week?

A successful rollout goes beyond choosing the right platform to whether the school has the capacity to use it well over time.

If a tool requires constant explanation, provides unreliable results, or adds another layer of work for already stretched staff, its value may look very different once the initial excitement fades.

Look at the full cost

So you’ve asked all the right questions and made a choice. Now you need to understand the full cost of the solution, and for that you need to look past the headline license fee.

Some costs will be monetary, others related to time and effort. Training, integration work, admin time, support, security review, policy development, and the time staff spend learning a new system should all be considered. A low-cost tool can end up feeling much more expensive if it adds unnecessary complexity or doesn't end up delivering value.

One of the most useful procurement questions is: “What will this cost in practice over a year, not just on paper at the point of sale?”

Ask what happens if you do nothing

This may be the most overlooked question of all, but before buying an AI, schools should ask: “What would happen if we didn’t buy this?”

Would an existing tool already cover much of the need? Could a simpler process change solve the same problem? Is the issue actually about training, workflow, or staffing rather than missing technology?

This question helps schools test whether the purchase is genuinely necessary or simply feels timely because AI is dominating the conversation.

What happens when schools don’t ask these questions?

When schools rush into AI purchases without asking the harder questions first, the same problems tend to appear: You end up with a solution looking for a problem; staff use it inconsistently; the benefit is overstated; data risks are misunderstood; confidence drops.

The most awkward outcome is that a school becomes dependent on a tool it doesn’t fully trust or understand. By the time the limits become clear, the system may already be embedded.

Leaders may also want to think ahead to related issues, such as parent trust, equitable use, academic integrity, and how they will evaluate impact over time. Those questions may sit beyond the initial purchase decision, but shouldn’t be an afterthought once a tool is already in place.

That’s why the early questions matter so much. These are not there to stunt innovation or slow change but to stop schools from making avoidable mistakes.

Since the early days of ChatGPT, educators have talked about how AI can be used as a writing tutor or coach that doesn’t write for students but helps them organize their ideas and clean up their efforts.

I liked this idea when I first heard it. I’d love to live in a world where every student has access to a high-quality writing instructor. But in practice over the past few years, I haven’t noticed my students' writing improving; it's been the opposite. While the grammar has gotten much better, the content has suffered.

Today, in my classes, on social media, and through many emails I receive, I see writing with fewer technical errors, but this comes at a terrible cost. Generally, our writing is more boring, less individualized, and conveys far less meaning than it did a few years ago. The cause is AI, of course, but it’s more than that.

I think many of us have uncritically bought into the idea that AI can be an effective writing tutor. I’m no longer convinced it can be, and here’s why.

AI Is Not Actually Good At Writing

Even though people are taking writing advice en masse from ChatGPT and other AIs, we all acknowledge, subconsciously at least, that AI is terrible at writing anything original. That’s why we call AI-generated content AI slop, and when we read something and say it sounds as if AI wrote it, we are not complimenting it. Why then are we asking it to give us extensive notes, revisions, and suggestions on our writing?

AI doesn't transform our writing into William Shakespeare; when it takes on the role of a writing tutor, it’s still that same unimaginative writer. The fact that so many people are taking advice from a robot writer whose writing they hate is just another example of the cognitive dissonance of our times, and I'm genuinely puzzled by it.

AI Doesn’t Partner With You, It Takes The Wheel

A common refrain is that AI can help a student or educator brainstorm or help clean up their ideas. In this way, it can work with you like a good writing tutor, providing instant and unlimited feedback on your work.

This is another concept that sounds okay in theory but doesn’t hold up in practice. Unlike a good writing tutor, AI has a tendency to take the wheel of your writing. Even models specifically tuned toward teaching tend only to start by asking questions before offering detailed examples of what your answer can look like. Often, these suggestions are bland and lifeless, but even if these were more creative, this process is hijacking the writing process.

AI Gives Too Much Feedback

Even if the problems mentioned above could be programmed out of future AI models, I’m increasingly convinced that having an on-demand writing coach on your shoulder isn’t a good thing.

Throughout my career as a writer, I’ve benefited from feedback from editors and mentors who have read my work and altered and strengthened it--productive struggle. Seeing how they changed and improved my writing helped me get better as a writer, and continues to help my work. For example, this article will be better than the one I initially submitted, thanks to changes made by my editor.

Some thought AI could mimic this process, but I think that’s a false comparison. If I asked my editor what I should write after each sentence, and he sat next to me and rewrote my work as I was writing it, I wouldn’t be deserving of the byline associated with this story, and I probably wouldn’t earn many more writing assignments. (Editor's note: You would not!)

Even If AI Was Better At Writing, It Still Wouldn't Make Our Writing More Engaging

The fantasy author Brandon Sanderson once explained the problems with using clichéd writing in a way that really stuck for me. I’m paraphrasing here, but the idea is that clichés are not inherently bad; in fact, the first time someone hears one, it is often a great way of describing something, which is why it resonates. The problem is that over time and overuse, it becomes stripped of its power and meaning. For example, the first time I heard the phrase "X is like Y on steroids,” it was descriptive and funny. By the ten thousandth time I heard it, I started to groan.

The same thing is now happening with any writing techniques AI uses regularly. Even if it's non-objectionable to begin with, it starts to be intolerable as it spreads everywhere and everyone is doing the same thing.

Right now, AI writing is lifeless and stale to begin with, but even if it improves its writing voice, without more variation in style and tone, any of its techniques are destined to become overused almost instantly.

I do think AI’s writing will continue to get better, but I’m skeptical it can create the kind of variation necessary to uniquely power the voices of a majority of writers on the planet. And without unique writing voices, I’m not sure why we’re writing in the first place.

I have written previously about dealing with challenging staff and community members as a school leader and teacher.

This article was motivated by a reader reaching out to thank me for sharing hands-on, practical methods I offer. But she wanted one more: “What about difficult bosses? Aren’t they in a position of power, where I have little control over the outcome, even and especially if I disagree with them?”

I’ve written about a boss who missed the single biggest moments when leading. He never praised our accomplishments. It was remarkable; he was working harder not to acknowledge those of us that led our schools and needing support on the hardest of days.

Lack of worthy praise is one thing. How do we handle a boss who uses intimidation, blame displacement, and worse, steals credit for our work? I would love to tell you that they are far and few between, but I am writing this because that is untrue. Decades of research shows how we can lead successfully and help staff feel supported, acknowledged, and accessed in those important moments. The research keeps coming and I keep writing about it because the problem stubbornly persists.

We might think the issue is less pervasive in the education profession. After all, we are educators at heart. We came into this profession because we care about kids. In many instances, this is true, and we enjoy decent, ethical leaders. Too many times, educators became leaders because they possessed a greater desire for personal achievement and power. The first part is not the issue, however, power can change leaders. I have seen it happen.

I spent years riding out the kinds of leaders and leader-colleagues who made the organizational environment toxic, unproductive, and very, very CYA (cover your a--). We can all recall the days bosses such as this finally left the organization–there were parking lot parties while "Celebration" played as well as this easy-to-hum song as you waved them “good bye.” These are not environments in which children win, and that is the root of the problem. Secondary to that is our own wellness, which matters so we can lead learning environments, in spite of the incompetence above us.

Practical Ways to Survive Difficult Bosses

What do you do when you have to deal with difficult bosses day in and day out, knowing there is no end in sight? This can be a major stressor, let alone translating to obstacles they put up in our attempts to help students thrive.

Here are practical steps to hang in there, manage your wellness so you can lead and teach well and interrupt their influence from behind.

1. The 80/20 Principle

Keeping my side of the street clean empowers me to focus on the aspects of a situation you can control (the 80%) while letting go of the uncontrollable (the 20%). Instead of wasting time and energy fighting insurmountable challenges such as bureaucracy, difficult colleagues, or uncooperative leaders, it is more productive to adjust my approach, sidestep obstacles, and focus on progress within my sphere of influence. This mindset helps save time, resources, and frustration while moving toward goals more effectively.

2. Mind Games

I am always surprised at how little is known about methods for tuning the brain for wellness that are rooted in decent science, such as binaural beats. These sound like sci-fi gimmickry yet there is strong evidence supporting the effectiveness for effectively reducing anxiety and modulating emotional states. These are easily accessible, if you have a pair of earphones (we all do!). So why not try it?

Here’s how these work: When the brain processes two different frequencies played simultaneously in either ear, it compensates for the discrepancy by perceiving a third, rhythmic "phantom" frequency known as a binaural beat. This audio hack works in calming the mind and reducing anxiety, and gives you a shot of what you need in those most stressful moments. Evidence shows 6-9 minutes of listening does the trick, so why not? Here’s a free online example.

Now that you’ve got your wellness honored, let’s take a look at practical strategies, with a well-mind you can use to approach the difficult boss…

3. Use AI (YES, AI!)

In my work, I have discovered that using AI can make my work more effective and efficient, which means I can offload unnecessary tasks to focus on qualitative experiences, interactions with staff, students, and parents, and yes, even that boss.

I have written about making use of AI as a school leader, and I characterize it as remarkably imperfect productivity. AI is remarkable for its ability to produce what appears to be high-quality work at immense speed, yet it remains imperfect because it acts as convincingly knowing while tricking users into accepting "workslop" that lacks substance or accuracy.

Employing AI wisely helps offload work that bogs me down, so I feel less stressed, and far more prepared to manage ineffective bosses. Be strategic, refer to “source grounded” materials and use it to make your work better quality and far more efficient, such as I did incorporating AI into writing better evaluations for teachers.

3 Other Strategies to Consider

In addition to what I’ve described above, consider these actions to help manage an unwieldy manager.

1. Document Everything (Build a Paper Trail)

• Confirm Conversations: After verbal instructions, send a follow-up email saying, "As we just discussed, I will do X by Y date.”
• Keep Records: Maintain a private log of projects, instructions, and outcomes to prove your actions if needed. Case notes, detailed and dated hold up well, if and when needed.
• Outline Responsibilities: Start projects with a written review of discussion, outlining who is responsible for what, signed off by everyone, suggests Robert Hosking via Fortune.

2. Manage the Interaction

• Stay Calm and Neutral: Do not react defensively immediately. Do not match their energy.
• Use Fact-Based Language: When blamed, focus on the facts. Ask questions like, "Can you walk me through the timeline so I can understand what happened?" (YouTube).
• Redirect to Solutions: Instead of defending yourself, focus on fixing the issue. Say, "You're upset, I'm upset. What do you think we should do?" suggests Quick and Dirty Tips.
• Don't Take it Personally: Understand that a blaming boss often behaves this way due to their own incompetence and insecurities.

3. Take Action

• Have a Direct Conversation: If the behavior continues, discuss it privately. Start with positive feedback, then use specific examples to show how the blame-shifting affects your work, recommends Dr. Pollack.
• Involve HR or Superiors: If the behavior is bullying or threatens your career, consider involving HR or a higher manager. However, warn your boss first to avoid being seen as "going behind their back."
• Find a New Job: If the environment is toxic, start looking for a new position. Do not feel compelled to stay in a situation that damages your mental health and career.

Our work as educators and school leaders is too important to let bad bosses funnel down from us to staff and kids. Too many people need us and stopping the cycle of bad leadership poisoning student growth starts with practical wellness and protective factors. Be strong and remember, our work is too significant to let bad management disrupt our control, and we have 80% control -- most is better than none!

Buzzmath is, as the name suggests, creating a real buzz around the subject of math for young students. The idea is to bridge that gap between students who thrive on problem-solving, naturally, and those that struggle to grasp the sometimes abstract ideas.

By offering live feedback and gamified math interactions, Buzzmath works to help bring all students into a fun and engaging digital environment for learning.

Aimed at students from ages 6 to 16, this inclusive learning platform offers curriculum-aligned content that's made fun through the gamified process. They are allowed to explore at their pace, crucially, so they can feel in control while also giving teachers useful insights into their learning.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about how Buzzmath could work for your class.

What is Buzzmath?

Buzzmath is a digital math practice platform that offers gamified tasks as a way to help students gain mastery in math.

The platform offers more than 14,000 math-based questions for students to tackle. This is very much useful as a tool to complement teaching, rather than to teach directly. Educators can assign activities, for example, as a way to reinforce learning after something new has been taught.

While teachers can tailor learning to individuals or groups, in either case there is storytelling and gamification involved with missions, rewards, and challenges to keep students motivated.

Teachers can use this to have students practice curriculum-aligned skills and see progress to then better tailor future sessions as needed.

Since Buzzmath is web-based, it should be easy to access across devices and internet connections -- both in school and at home.

How does Buzzmath work?

Buzzmath can be used freely, by students exploring the activities at their own pace. Or it can be utilized to assign tasks to students or groups specifically.

Students answer questions and are immediately given feedback with answers marked as correct or incorrect. In the latter case, guidance can be triggered to help them grow through productive failure.

Students can retry questions as needed and access hints or examples to help them progress. Teachers are then able to monitor progress using a detailed reporting dashboard. This can help to spot learning gaps from data such as time spent on task, attempts made, and overall accuracy.

Accessibility features include audio narration and visual glossaries to help students with varied learning needs get the most out of this service.

What are the best Buzzmath features?

While there are a huge selection of questions on the platform, thanks to dynamic variables, students are able to practice without the problem of repetition fatigue holding them back.

The real-time feedback and ability to retry allows students to feel supported while working at their own pace. This also equates to direct support that allows for independent working without teacher time being required. That should also lead to deeper levels of learning rather than surface-level answering.

Since teachers are able to personalize learning to suit individuals or groups, this can work as a very specific tailored learning support system.

Educators have access to a powerful dashboard that allows them to monitor student progress. Data such as time spent on tasks, attempts made, completion rates, and concept-level performance, can all help teachers define future learning requirements.

The gamification of everything -- with stars, badges, and missions -- can really help to keep students engaged and come back for more practice, naturally.

How much does Buzzmath cost?

Buzzmath varies in pricing based on usage. A limited 30-day free trial is available for teachers who want to give this a go before committing to any particular plan. The plans break down like this:

Schools and districts: Typically licensed per student, with pricing starting around $1 per student annually (minimum spend applies).

Families: Around $20 per month or $120 per year for home use.

Custom quotes are often required for institutional use, particularly outside the US.

Buzzmath best tips and tricks

Start with diagnostic assignments
Use early tasks to identify gaps before tailoring future work.

Use retries as learning moments
Encourage students to reflect on mistakes rather than rush through answers.

Assign differentiated pathways
Target individuals or groups with specific activities to support mixed-ability classes.

NASA Space Place is a digital resource that's built to help educators bring space and earth science into the classroom in an exciting way.

Also, crucially, it combines the rich resources of NASA is a way that offers depth but simple access for teachers. The fact this has been up and running since 1998 is clearly reflected in how well it has been refined and tailored to suit children over the years. The result: a powerful tool for the upper-elementary-aged students.

This free resource blends scientific accuracy with playful, engaging layouts, making complex concepts feel intuitive rather than intimidating.

The curriculum-friendly resources cover science topics from climate and the solar system to space tech and more. For a STEM-focused offering that comes from a credible source, this is a really wonderful option to have.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about how NASA Space Place could work for your class.

What is NASA Space Place?

NASA Space Place is an education platform that offers a free way to teach upper-elementary students through inspiration and engagement -- all provided by the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Science-specific areas covered include the solar system, Earth sciences, the Sun, and the universe, plus broader science and technology topics. Topics vary in depth and complexity to suit different student abilities, going from black holes to climate change.

Usefully, this is all set up as an engaging exploratory environment, rather than just a static set of tools. That means there is reading, there is watching, but there is also doing. Students can read about a topic, then play a game on what's been learned, followed by a hands-on activity in class or at home.

Educators have a dedicated section with materials such as printables, resources, and guidance across English and Spanish.

How does NASA Space Place work?

NASA Space Place is browser-based, so it can be accessed from most devices and internet connections. Everything is arranged into helpful categories that allow teachers and students to navigate by topic or activity type, for example.

So a student might browse a subject such as Earth then filter into articles, games, and hands-on activities -- ideal as it can be suited to how that particular student prefers to learn.

Articles break down scientific concepts into simple, digestible explanations, often supported by visuals or animations. Games reinforce learning through interaction. While DIY activities encourage practical application, such as building simple models or conducting experiments at home or in class.

Teachers have a few ways to take advantage of the platform. They can use it as a lesson starter, a supplementary resource, or even a flipped learning tool through which students explore topics independently before class discussion.

The material is aligned with real NASA missions and scientific research, so it also offers a level of authenticity that can deepen student engagement.

Plus, it can all be scaled. It's aimed at younger learners but the clarity can be helpful to older students who need to work on foundations.

What are the best NASA Space Place features?

NASA Space Place takes often complex scientific ideas and makes each one easily accessible and digestible -- but, crucially, without oversimplifying anything. This is thanks to those different formats available that can suit varying learner styles.

The games, which offer an interactive way to learn, are a powerful feature. Students can explore satellite tracking or planetary motion in a hands-on way, turning abstract ideas into something tangible. Then, the short videos and animations help visual learners grasp topics such as eclipses or space weather.

For teachers, the hands-on activities can be very useful with crafts and experiments offering experiential learning that can reinforce theoretical knowledge.

A wide range of subjects are covered here, from climate change and Earth systems to deep space exploration. The platform connects classroom learning to real-world science and ongoing NASA missions.

Educators can access the resources, such as printables and guidance, as a way to enhance teaching and make using this platform even more valuable and time-rich.

It's also worth mentioning that the bright visuals, simple language, and general sense of curiosity-driven exploration can all help to maintain student engagement.

How much does NASA Space Place cost?

NASA Space Place is completely free to use. No subscriptions, paywalls, or premium tiers to navigate. Everything on the platform is openly accessible to students, teachers, and parents.

In addition, there are no hidden requirements in terms of hardware or software. Because the platform runs in a web browser, it works across most devices, including desktops, laptops, and tablets. This flexibility makes it suitable for classroom use, remote learning, and homework alike.

NASA Space Place best tips and tricks

Hook with play
Start lessons with a quick game or animation to spark curiosity and ease students into complex space concepts.

Guide exploration
Set focused tasks that have students navigate specific sections of the site to build independent research skills.

Make it hands-on
Use the DIY activities as the core of lessons to turn abstract science into practical, memorable learning experiences.

Pathwright was created as a modern learning management system, LMS, that could work in education on all levels.

Spawned from an idea back in 2010, this was what co-creators Paul and Mark came up with as a far more usable solution. The space then was cluttered, wordy, and chaotic. Their design-focused solution birthed the far more user-friendly Pathwright.

Built over a decade alongside creative educators, the goal was to offer a personal learning experience for others. At time of publishing, this system has helped more than 2 million learners who have completed 80+ million steps on these learning paths.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about how Pathwright could work for your class.

What is Pathwright?

Pathwright is an online learning platform that's design-led -- it offers a way to make instruction easy for teachers and engaging for students.

This course-building platform lets educators create what the company calls learning paths, which guide students through lessons, activities, and discussions.

Teachers can design courses as needed with details such as deadlines, milestones, peer interaction, mentorship, and more, all included.

As such, this can work for schools delivering courses as well as individual educators selling online courses, for example. Not only can educators create courses but this also allows them to take advantage of student management features, monetization options, and more.

This digital classroom, professional development hub, and school learning platform is a versatile tool built for a wide array of uses.

How does Pathwright work?

Pathwright is primarily an online course creation and learning management platform. Teachers can be guided through the process of creating their own pathways, using video content, written lessons, assignments or projects, discussion prompts, plus quizzes and assessments.

This works with self-paced learning but also with cohort based programs. The latter sees students move as groups though the courses, which can be run with defined start and end dates, releasing lessons over time and encouraging students to progress together.

This model allows teachers to lead discussions, provide feedback, and create a more classroom-like experience online. Teachers can then track progress to see completion rates, areas of struggle, and discussion activity.

What are the best Pathwright features?

Pathwright offers a broad selection of tools that can be tailored to work across subject and topic ranges, inside and outside of school.

The way this works is that by using paths, it allows students to stay focused with a clarity from seeing what's coming next across the sequence of the course ahead.

The cohort-based learning is a helpful way to release lessons over time, allowing students to work through the tasks together, interacting with one another along the way.

That interaction moves into the community with an ability to post comments on lessons, join in discussions, and ask questions -- much like being in a physical world lesson.

The system allows for mentors. This can work with teaching assistants or other students, as a way to oversee groups of learners with support throughout.

For those selling in courses, this also offers a built-in payment system and the ability to integrate other apps, such as Stripe, as needed.

How much does Pathwright cost?

Pathwright uses a tiered pricing model designed for educators, small teams, and larger organizations. A free trial or free account option is available that allows educators to start building courses before committing to a paid plan.

Starter Plan: Around $99 per month for up to 1,000 members and one administrator.

Essentials Plan: Around $199 per month with more staff accounts, custom domains, and additional course features.

Complete Plan: Around $499 per month with unlimited cohorts and advanced capabilities.

Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing starting around $1,499 per month for large organizations requiring integrations, APIs, and advanced management tools.

Pathwright best tips and tricks

Start with a clear learning path
Outline the sequence of lessons and learning objectives so students move logically through the material.

Use cohorts for engagement
Run courses with start and end dates rather than leaving it fully self-paced. Cohorts encourage discussion, accountability, and higher completion rates.

Mix content types
Combine videos, text, and assignments to keep lessons engaging. Short interactive activities can help reinforce learning better than long lectures.

Confession time: I've fallen in love with AI music generators.

Google recently made a version of its AI music generator tool Lyria 3 available through Gemini. This is one of many AI generators available that can create real-sounding, if not particularly artistic, music in various styles in a few moments based upon short prompts.

These AI-generated clips offer some fun, if gimmicky, applications that I’ve started to consider using in my class. First though, a few caveats.

AI music, as impressive as it may be, is still a lifeless, soulless product that tends toward the corny and, at its best, sounds like uninspired pop. It therefore cannot replace music created by actual musicians who put their hearts and souls into their musical creations.

Even if AI music tools were better, it would still be morally questionable to use any commercially. Like other forms of AI “art,” these generators mimic and plagiarize the work of human artists without providing proper credit or royalties. But as a pastime and as a sonic sandbox, AI music generators are some of the most fun generative AI tools I’ve come across.

I believe these also offer some teaching opportunities, albeit in a gimmicky, "pass a few minutes of class time" type of way.

Ways To Incorporate Music AI Generators

I’ve been using AI music generators to create short songs inspired by the personality traits of people I know. For example, I had AI write a song about my sister's propensity to always request menu substitutions when she orders at a restaurant, plus some goofy songs for my kids.

These are admittedly not laugh-out-loud use cases, but I enjoy them and have started doing similar things with students.

Here’s a song I created to remind my writing students to start working on their papers earlier. Will this annoying, but somehow catchy, song help students actually start working on their papers sooner? Probably not, as starting to work on a paper early is a piece of pretty standard advice that most students already know. However, it’s maybe a more fun way of reminding them to do that.

I can also see creating songs based upon student research and various topics covered: young students, in particular, might have fun with this type of thing.

But as with most things AI-related, you can take all this too far. Using AI-generating tools, I started thinking about the potential power of an annoying jingle for memorization. I tried a few different ways to get Gemini to create a song reminding students of the basics of thesis writing. This is the best it did after I told it to do this in a traditional Celtic manner. I’m not sure if this song really has traditional Celtic vibes, and even I’d be too embarrassed to share this song with students.

Are All AI Music Generators More Or Less The Same?

No. After experimenting with a few various free ones, I found a wide range of quality with the same prompts.

Gemini is the only one I’d currently recommend. It’s user-friendly but limited and only creates 30-second clips. Other music generators could potentially outperform Gemini with prompt adjustments. The ones I tried did better with the instrumentals but struggled more with the lyrics, and that kind of defeated the purpose of the tool for me.

What About The Bigger Picture

When teaching with AI in general, it’s important to discuss the implications of this technology with students. Much as I’ve been enjoying using AI to “create” music, this technology unsettles me a bit. I have multiple family members who went to music school and work as professional musicians. I don’t think their jobs performing live music are currently imperiled by this technology or will be in the foreseeable future. However, down the road, I could see it making the already difficult profession of being a musician more difficult.

As I keep only half-jokingly saying, AI music generators and other similar generative AI tools may ultimately destroy art and therefore what makes us human on a fundamental level. But on the bright side, I do like using AI to create annoying musical jingles.

On a more serious note, AI music generators are a fun-to-use generative AI tool that, like other forms of AI, have some associated thorny ethical questions. Those aside, there are some potential classroom uses, and AI-savvy teachers will want to start exploring this aspect of AI in addition to others. They'll also want to start delving into some of those thorny questions with their students as we navigate the ever-changing realities of AI's impact on the world.

ChatDOC is an AI-powered tool designed to let users “chat” with various documents they upload. I recently wrote about research examining how college students use ChatDOC and similar AI tools to engage with assigned texts. This research found both positives and negatives to the technology, so I decided to check out ChatDOC myself.

After using it with a variety of research documents, I ultimately found it a useful tool for searching within a document for specific items and for doing something such as quickly summarizing a research paper. Though it was also easy to see how certain students could become over-reliant on it and just ask ChatDOC questions about an assigned reading rather than actually read the assigned text.

Despite this potential drawback, I think ChatDOC can be a useful tool for both students and teachers, in specific instances.

What Is ChatDOC?

ChatDOC is an AI designed to help users interact with PDFs of various types, be it research papers, short stories, or chapters from larger works. Users upload a PDF and then have the opportunity to “chat” with that document, that is speak with a chatbot that bases its answers off of the uploaded text.

ChatDOC can perform tasks such as provide a short summary, search for specific terms, explain the overall theme if it’s a work of literature, or unpack the science in a research paper.

Other similar tools are out there, but ChatDOC is definitely one of the better PDF readers I’ve used. Its free version is quick and easy-to-use, and delivers on its promise of providing an AI that can discuss a given document with users and even quiz them on it.

What My Experience With ChatDOC Was Like?

I found the web version of the tool user-friendly and appreciated ChatDOC’s laser focus on performing one task: reading texts. This is not an AI for everything you might use AI for, but it’s good at what it does in terms of helping with research.

I uploaded a fairly dense essay, “On the Failure of Oracles" by Plutarch, from which I was looking for specific information. ChatDOC summarized some of the key arguments and searched for the sections for which I was looking.

Additionally, I uploaded a famous paper on quantum mechanics by Albert Einstein and others, in which he pointed out unexplained aspects of quantum mechanics. ChatDOC summarized the key arguments and answered questions I had about physics terminology.

On the whole, ChatDOC was helpful despite some limitations. It wasn’t ever inaccurate in its explanations, but it also wasn’t always entirely correct or helpful in its summaries, which tended toward repeated abstract-like statements.

On the plus side, ChatDOC always provided citations for its statements, and when you click on these citations, it takes you to the relevant text and even highlights it. I love this feature, as it's an example of what I think AI is most useful for: helping humans find relevant bits of information.

ChatDOC could also quickly generate good short answer, multiple-choice, or essay questions based upon documents you upload to it. I could see this helping teachers get started with assessment work based upon a reading, and it could also be a way for students to test their knowledge and understanding of a work, though paradoxically, any student putting in that level of work on their own to understand a reading probably doesn't really need a tool such as this.

What Does ChatDOC cost?

The free version lets you upload 5 files per day and a total of 10 per month, as well as ask 20 questions per day and no more than 100 per month. It has a 300-page limit to the documents you can upload as well as other limitations.

The Pro account costs $8.99 per month and is free of most of these limitations.

The free version is pretty restrictive, and I found that I quickly met my daily and monthly limits. It’s unfortunate that there is no intermediate tier between the free version and Pro version, which has a fairly steep monthly fee.

Would I Use ChatDOC?

Yes. It’s a useful tool and I would encourage educators to take a look at it, specifically if they are personally conducting research often.

I have mixed feelings when it comes to using it with students. As mentioned, in a small study researchers found that students would often read this type of summary rather than the text itself if given the option. This is obviously less than ideal, but if this feature could somehow be avoided, I could still imagine certain students would find it comforting to have this specific text-type tutor with challenging texts.

So, as with many AI tools, if used the right way, it could potentially be helpful, though there is a real potential for abuse. That said, many students are regularly using other AI tools that are less effective overall than ChatDOC. At least this tool is constantly citing and referring to what is hopefully a high-quality text and potentially getting students to engage with it in new ways.

Knoword is a gamified platform that's built to help students progress in building vocabulary. The idea here is to make things so fun that students want to come back for more.

This learning-while-playing setup is designed to work across age and ability levels so that it's widely accessible to help all students, and educators, when it comes to vocabulary building.

The platform is already widely used and can be applied across subjects to allow for an uptake, which works school-wide, rather than specifically for English learning, for example.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about Knoword to see how this could work for your class.

What is Knoword?

Knoword is a web-based game so it's easily accessible across a wide range of devices and internet connections. It uses game-based learning to help develop vocabulary expansion. This is done with immersive word games and customizable activities.

The most basic offering here is vocabulary practice being turned into interactive challenges. This blends learning with gameplay to keep students engaged, and even eager for more.

Thousands of community-made packs to pick from are available. These range from academic-specific vocabulary to trivia packs. You also have the option to build custom packs, or edit pre-existing ones, to get the perfectly tuned result for a certain subject or unit, for example.

That all makes this useful both for self-guided learning as well as in-classroom use and even remote assignments.

How does Knoword work?

Knoword comprises thousands of word packs that are interactive sets of definitions and answers. These are broken down into several play modes to allow students and educators to pick the format, which includes multiple choice, typing mode, or pairs/recognition matching.

Educators can pick from a selection of pre-created packs in subject-specific areas, make their own from scratch, or duplicate and edit packs as needed. Helpful parameters are available, including setting time limits, answer strictness and more, to help teachers build ideally suited sessions. Then, once completed, educators can track student progress using detailed analytics.

The system also uses AI as a way to help generate text clues from lists to help automate pack creations -- saving time for teachers.

Students can get playing right away without the need to create individual accounts, making it an easy option to introduce into the class.

What are the best Knoword features?

Knoword offers a great selection of packs that can be aligned to subjects or topics. Crucially, these are adaptive and allow students to go at their pace so as to grow but at a rate that feels fun, comfortable, and engaging.

The immediate feedback and multiple play modes make this a stand-alone tool for students to work with on their time, but also with teacher assistance and interaction as wanted.

The AI-powered Magic Import feature is a helpful way to generate clues with ease. This allows educators to convert lists of terms into engaging gameplay in minutes.

Assignments offer a way to provide structured options to guide learners through material, while giving educators insights such as trends in accuracy and areas needing reinforcement.

Offline materials are also available, including printable worksheets. Any pack can be turned into customizable worksheets or physical flashcards, ideal for off-screen practice or differentiated learning.

The various game modes help to make this varied and fun while staying engaging over longer period of use. The different gameplay formats -- typing, multiple choice, match pairs -- appeal to varied learning styles, from visual to recall practice.

How much does Knoword cost?

Knoword operates on a freemium model. But there are tiers for more.

Basic (Free): Create up to five packs, generate content with AI, assign activities, track basic student progress, integrate with Google Classroom, and download worksheets.

Pro ($9.99/month): Allows unlimited packs and assignments, creates image and audio clues, and removes branded watermarks on cards.

Team Plan (~$80/year): Designed for schools or departments to manage multiple educator accounts.

Knoword best tips and tricks

Kick off with curated packs
Before creating your own, explore the community library. Thousands of packs across subjects are already available -- and bookmarking makes future reuse easy.

Use assignments strategically
Assignments let you control the learning environment: time limits, modes, and even answer strictness (capitalization, punctuation). Tailor these to your learners’ proficiency.

Blend digital and printable exercises
Export packs as worksheets for class use or homework -- great for reinforcing vocabulary with written practice.

Google’s VEO video-generating AI tool is now available through Gemini for Pro subscribers. I recently began experimenting with the tool and exploring potential teaching opportunities.

Overall, it’s a wild new science fiction-level technology with some fun, if gimmicky, teaching potential I could see using in the classroom.

More importantly, however, I think being aware of what this type of video-generating technology can do and discussing this with students is critical. This new generation of AI has massive potential for misinformation and will likely have implications for the entertainment industry and the future job market, and it's our job to help prepare students for all this as best we can.

How To Use VEO Through Gemini

For users with Gemini Pro, which costs $19.99 per month, accessing VEO is simple. You can just ask Gemini to “make a video” or click on the “create video” tool, which puts you in video mode and gives you more control.

Just remember, the Gemini Pro tier only permits you three video prompts per day.

You can also upload photos that VEO can use to add action etc., which is both very cool and very scary. I made a short video of myself shoveling snow using a headshot, and it looks pretty legit if a little artificial.

Prompting the creation of a video isn't as forgiving as a text-based chat with a chatbot. My first few prompts were nonspecific and resulted in poor-quality videos.

That said, I quickly learned where I went wrong and didn’t have a long learning curve. The secret, I found, is to provide as many specifics as possible. This was much more enjoyable than my experience with OpenAI’s Sora early last year. Using Sora was a consistently frustrating experience, at least for someone who was new to the world of AI video prompt writing.

VEO, on the other hand, doesn’t always do what you want but generally creates something interesting that is at least roughly based upon what you prompted.

Teaching With VEO

I enjoyed experimenting with having VEO recreate moments from history. I asked it to create a scene about the New York City Fire of 1776. The first attempt went very poorly. For some reason, Gemini/VEO had a dragon start the fire, but this tool isn’t exactly claiming to be an accurate purveyor of history.

Once I got more specific and asked it get rid of the dragon and show a person saving a child, it created a better video (see below).

This isn’t a fantastic work of visual art by any means, but it was interesting to watch and more fun then it should have been to "create." It has some subtle inaccuracies, and I could envision an exercise asking students to spot these. For instance, there are no wooden buildings even though wooden structures were common in New York City at that time.

I also tried to get it to create a realistic video of an electron traveling through a cloud chamber in the style of a vintage early 1900s science show. Separately I asked it to create this in as realistic a way as possible. Both of VEO’s attempts left something to be desired in terms of accuracy, but that can also be a useful teaching tool.

Here is one of those videos:

Using Gemini and VEO can also provide good examples of the importance of word choice.

Teaching with this AI could also be an interesting classroom activity for a creative writing class. I could see a situation in which students write short stories and then select three from which to generate videos.

Broader Implications of This Technology

Beyond these admittedly somewhat frivolous direct teaching applications, this is a serious and potentially game-changing technology that I’m taking note of and reminding my students to keep an eye on.

I truly don’t think Hollywood or society will turn to AI-generated movies any time soon, but there will be fewer people working in special effects, and those jobs will look very different and will probably involve a lot of AI prompting and fine-tuning. This raises questions about equity, copyright, and all-around fairness, all of which are important to discuss as a class.

Even more pressingly, creating these videos myself has already given me a better ability to discern the tell-tale signs of AI generation. This can help students learn digital literacy and how to spot misinformation and deep fakes -- skills that are becoming increasingly important.

Bottom Line: Would I Teach With VEO?

Yes, I would teach with VEO, but with some caveats.

I wouldn’t give students direct access or encourage them to use it, but I would share videos I generated with my class as a way to illustrate the technology’s strengths and weaknesses, and potentially as a subject matter tie-in, if and when appropriate.

Groovelit is a classroom platform created to help encourage writing through gamified guidance that works alongside teachers.

The idea here is to tap into the creativity in every student that might otherwise go underused in the face of literacy challenges. By gamifying the writing experience, and adding direct feedback, this can help to draw every student into the world of writing.

Creative prompts are used to help get started while a scoring system can work to progress students along toward mastery. This can be used to improve writing skills and fluency in a way that allows this to benefit students across a range of subjects, from ELA and social studies to science.

This guide aims to explain all you need to know about how Groovelit could work in your class.

What is Groovelit?

Groovelit is a gamified creative writing platform aimed at use by students from fourth to tenth grade. Through guidance and gamification, this works to ignite the creative spark in all students while empowering them by helping to learn how to use that effectively as a writer.

Groovelit prompts a student to produce written response -- be it narrative, persuasive, or vocabulary-rich -- within a short, structured time frame.

The system uses AI to evaluate submissions against criteria such as grammar, relevance, vocabulary usage, and adherence to the prompt. Points are awarded in ways that feel immediate and game-like rather than punitive.

This idea should help writing to feel less like work and more like play. Competition and natural reinforcement also help to shift student perspectives toward writing to be sought more readily, by choice.

How does Groovelit work?

Groovelit works a little like a quiz game, yet students don't select answers, instead they write answers. A teacher can pick a genre such as narrative or argumentative, for example, before setting prompts and aligning to curricular goals. Then they can send a link to students to begin.

Students work with a countdown timer, responding directly from within a browser window. They are assessed, live, by the AI, which uses criteria such as vocabulary, grammar, and engagement levels to provide feedback to students as they go.

Once the timed round is complete, the results are shown right away with scores. Teachers can later assess aggregated data, or spotlight certain areas to celebrate success.

This cycle continues with quick writing, instant feedback, and visible achievement, motivating students to progress further and faster toward mastery.

What are the best Groovelit features?

Groovelit gamifies learning but in a way that stays fresh thanks to a selection of game modes. These include narrative storytelling, argumentative responses, vocabulary connections, and root-based word games.

Teachers can also tailor the experience to suit needs, including adapting pacing, content focus, and student readiness.

The AI scoring works well as a way to offer immediate feedback and guidance that's tailored to suit the student where they are in their learning. This can help sustain focus and reinforce teaching moments.

For teachers, the formative data analysis options help offer actionable insights. The system offers growth areas, word-choice creativity, and standout sentences that exemplify strong writing.

The platform supports English language learners (ELLs), with customizable prompts and difficulty adjustment that should make this helpful for a wide range of language abilities.

How much does Groovelit cost?

Groovelit is free to sign up for and to use. Teachers can sign up from a school account, or it's possible to sign in with third-parties such as Google, for example.

This has no ads or tracking, and remains free to use for as long as needed.

Groovelit best tips and tricks

Alignment
Align prompts directly to your current unit of study so students see the activity as meaningful reinforcement rather than a standalone game.

Learnings
Review the formative data after each session to identify patterns in grammar, vocabulary, or comprehension that may need reteaching.

Wins
Spotlight strong student responses (anonymously if preferred) to model effective writing and build classroom confidence.

When I first became a school leader, one of the first realities I had to confront was email volume. Not a handful of messages but sometimes dozens before 8 a.m., sometimes hundreds by day’s end. Staying on top of it required strategies, routines, and discipline as I had to learn how to triage, delegate, and protect attention so the inbox did not become my only job.

But even so, I never assumed silence was the answer. Not every email deserves a long reply, and some do not deserve any. Still, for legitimate questions tied to work, decisions, and people, I’ve always tried to respond because email is often how others experience your leadership when they cannot access you in the moment.

‘Digital Snubbery’

I hear from my educational leadership students all the time that their school leaders do not answer emails. Messages go unanswered for days or weeks, sometimes indefinitely.

This may sting for some readers, but that is not acceptable. Not because leaders should be available 24/7, and not because instant replies are the standard. It is unacceptable because sustained non-response communicates something, whether you intend it or not.

Adam Grant has called this “digital snubbery,” the online equivalent of walking past someone who waved at you. His point is not that every email is urgent. It is that silence of a non-response that is interpreted. And in schools, interpretation becomes culture.

What makes this especially tricky in schools is the power dynamic. When a leader does not respond, the silence carries more weight than when a peer does. People hesitate to follow up because they do not want to appear needy, impatient, or out of line, and wait longer than they should, even second-guessing themselves. In some cases, they stop asking altogether.

This lack of communication creates blind spots for leaders. The very people closest to the work begin to go quiet because experience has taught them not to expect a response. Over time, this weakens feedback loops and slows organizational learning.

Some consequences are obvious: Work slows, decisions stall, and people follow up repeatedly or escalate issues that did not need escalation. Non-response also erodes trust, discourages initiative, and can delay a problem until it is bigger, messier, and harder to solve. Over time, people start working around you instead of with you. That should worry any leader who values coherence, collaboration, and shared ownership.

Not Time Management, But A Disposition Problem

Perfection is not the point here, nor is inbox zero the target. The goal is a mindset shift: email is not just administrative or technical, it is part of your leadership presence. You can and should have boundaries, but these must be communicated.

It is also worth naming the emotional labor involved in email. Many messages carry frustration, urgency, or disappointment, so avoidance is sometimes less about time and more about discomfort.

Leadership often requires engaging with discomfort early, when issues are still manageable. Delayed responses allow tension to grow and misunderstandings to harden, so a short acknowledgment can de-escalate more effectively than a perfectly crafted response sent too late.

Sometimes this is not just a personal habit, it is structural. If a leader is hard to reach by phone, unavailable on video, and inconsistent in person, then email becomes the only door. When that door stays closed, leadership becomes something people cannot access, only assume.

If you want a staff that takes initiative, raises concerns early, and brings you solutions, you can’t train them – explicitly or implicitly – to expect no response.

5 Practical Ways To Handle Email Without Breaking Trust

1. Schedule response time and put it on your calendar. If it matters, it gets scheduled. Two short blocks a day can produce meaningful changes.
2. Set up folders and prioritize on purpose. Keep it simple. Examples: Urgent Today, This Week, Waiting On, Read Later. The goal is not a perfect system. The goal is not losing important messages.
3. Acknowledge quickly, then follow through. “Received. I’ll get back to you by Thursday.” Then actually do. Trust is built in the follow-up.
4. Use AI to draft non-sensitive, non-confidential correspondence. Let AI create a first draft for routine updates, confirmations, next steps, scheduling, thank-yous. Add your personal touch, correct tone, and keep confidential content out of the prompt.
5. Create a routing plan so you are not the bottleneck. Some messages should go to a point person or team. Proper routing is not avoidance, it is clarity.

Responsiveness is not about replying to everything instantly. It is about accountability. Whatever system you choose, protect your time, but do not disappear. Email silence may not be a visible leadership trait, but it is felt – and it shows up as trust, or the loss of it.

OpenClaw, formerly known as Moltbot and Clawdbot, is an agentic AI assistant that has surged in popularity with the tech-savvy first adopter crowd in recent months. According to some of these early users, OpenClaw is the first tool to live up to the promise of agent AIs.

I’ve recently tried some AI agent tools and haven’t been particularly impressed, but was intrigued enough by OpenClaw, which is open source and free, to give it a whirl and see how it stacked up. Ultimately, I found the process of using it to be a bit more complex than the AI agent tools I’ve tried.

One of the selling points of OpenClaw is that it operates on your computer, which is supposed to alleviate some privacy concerns and give you more control. But that also comes with its own inherent security risks, and makes setting up the tool more complicated and above my technical know-how. As a result, I used a browser-based version of OpenClaw.

True techies will be dismayed by this as it defeats the purpose of the tool in the first place, but even in this more limited version, I found it outperformed other AI agents I’ve used, including Google’s new Auto Browse, and could indeed help with my research and class prep.

What is OpenClaw?

OpenClaw is the one true AI agent that will rule all the other pretenders, or at least that’s the impression some of its earliest adopters give. The initial version is free and open source, and designed to integrate with your digital life, acting as a true digital assistant.

Launched in November 2025 by Peter Steinberger, an Austrian coder, he named it Clawd as a playful nod to the popular AI chatbot Claude. However, Anthropic, the company behind Claude, asked Steinberger to change the name. He briefly changed it to Moltbot, inspired by the “molting” process in which lobsters shed and regrow their shells, before settling on OpenClaw.

This AI agent gives users the ability to do tasks such as order groceries or monitor and summarize emails. For a teacher, it might help with lesson planning and class management, and if it could be made fully secure, could even be used for activities such as monitoring class participation and trends, though that would require many more safeguards around student data.

OpenClaw is designed to run on a computer that you own. If you leave on your device, you can then communicate with your AI assistant via various messenger apps and have it perform tasks for you regardless of where you are.

All these features do come with some inherent risks. Giving a tool that can behave in unexpected ways complete access to your computer can be dangerous, and there's something equally insecure right now about having an AI communicate with others or use your credit card to purchase things. In fact, a number of tech companies recently put restrictions on OpenClaw use due to security concerns.

What Does It Cost?

The standard version of OpenClaw is free and open source. It does require some degree of technical know-how to get set up, and takes a little time even for those with this know how.

Tools are emerging that allow you to access the tool on a virtual browser. This makes using it easier, but arguably defeats some of the purpose. Additionally, in my experience, some of these sites seemed suspect.

I won’t link to the OpenClaw site, which I ended up using, because I felt that its design intentionally mimicked OpenClaw’s web design so you would think the two companies were linked—they are not. This makes me worried about paying for their services personally, and even more worried about directing readers there.

How Good Is OpenClaw At Its Job?

By not operating OpenClaw on my device, I couldn’t access some of its best features, but still was fairly impressed overall. OpenClaw was able to do things such as look up Airbnb options for an academic conference I’m going to, and actually did a great job of summarizing the strengths of each listing, unlike some other AI agents that had failed in this task.

It was also able to find and summarize various lesson plans on teaching writing, and was as skilled at research as any AI tool I’ve found. It could quickly find, summarize, and categorize research on AI tutors, quantum mechanics, and more.

I was left with the strong impression that I could get more with this tool, with more thought and perhaps a version more customized to my use and to teaching.

Bottom Line On OpenClaw

OpenClaw is not essential, but it’s a strong-performing AI agent and one that tech-savvy teachers will want to explore with caution from their personal, non-school issued devices. Nothing I was able to do with it was any kind of game-changer, but if you’re looking for an AI agent to experiment with and see how it might help you and your teaching practice, this one is worth adding to your list of tools to check out.

For those of us who are less tech-savvy, it’s a good idea to keep an eye on these types of tools as they’re likely to continue to improve and get more user-friendly and integrated into teaching as they do.

Artsonia is the solution to the problem of storing and showcasing artwork in a digital age. This free do-it-all platform was created as a place for students to store and display their artwork in a digital portfolio.

This is one of the world's largest online galleries for student artwork, built to operate as part of the school ecosystem. At time of publishing, this is used by tens of thousands of students with more than 100 million pieces of artwork being hosted.

So while this allows students to collate their work, it's also a place for teachers to manage and showcase class work with easy uploading and sharing options. They can even make money from it to fund future art classes, too.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about Artsonia and how it could work for your class.

What is Artsonia?

Artsonia is a digital art storage and sharing space that is designed specifically for K-12 environments with a focus on safety, privacy and compliance -- with support for both COPPA and FERPA requirements.

This free online-based platform is a permanent and searchable archive of student work. Students can choose to share with approved viewers and are able to collate their efforts right through their school lives.

While this is primarily created for use by students and teachers, it's also possible for parents and family members to create accounts and follow students' progress -- as well as leave supportive comments.

A class portal makes submitting work for teachers to moderate a simple process that should help reduce administrative workload. Many more features are available, including social and lesson supportive, but more on those below.

How does Artsonia work?

Artsonia is easy to setup for a teacher account, which can be done by registering the school. Class rosters are then established and artwork can be published immediately using the website or dedicated apps.

Students or teachers can use a smartphone camera to photograph the artwork for direct upload to the platform. Students are then able to submit their work using a class portal. Teachers can then moderate before publishing.

Approved work appears in the student personal online gallery, which family can access through secured logins. Parents get notifications when new artwork is published so they can comment and encourage student progress.

Artsonia is COPPA and FERPA compliant, includes moderation tools, and allows teachers to manage permissions and visibility, so it's suitable for a wide range of school contexts and age groups.

What are the best Artsonia features?

Artsonia is for teachers, students, and family. Features such as the ability for families to order keepsakes of the work -- mugs, prints, magnets, jewelry, etc. -- help add to the richness of this platform. Schools can even earn 20% on the sales of these offerings.

But on a more class-practical level, this is a really helpful way for students to collate all their work, across the years, for future self-reflection and assessments.

The class portal lets students submit artwork independently, significantly reducing teacher workload while encouraging learner autonomy and reflective thinking.

Teachers approve all submissions before publishing, maintaining quality and safeguarding standards. Parents can then view the gallery, strengthening school-home relationships and student motivation.

COPPA and FERPA compliance, along with moderation workflows, mean that student data and imagery are handled responsibly. This makes Artsonia suitable for large-scale use in schools.

How much does Artsonia cost?

Artsonia is free for teachers, students, and families to use. No subscription fees are required to create student portfolios, upload artwork, manage classrooms, or invite parents to engage.

Revenue is generated through the optional sale of custom keepsake products featuring student artwork. When families buy items such as mugs, prints, magnets, or jewelry, Artsonia returns 20% of the purchase price directly to the school’s art program.

Artsonia best tips and tricks

Use student uploading early
Introduce the class portal from the outset to empower students to take ownership of documenting their work and reduce teacher admin time.

Create consistent photography stations
A simple backdrop or light box setup can significantly improve image quality and presentation, making digital galleries more visually impactful.

Encourage reflective writing
Ask students to add titles and short artist statements to help develop metacognition, creative thinking, and literacy skills alongside visual art.

Google recently unveiled its new Auto Browse AI feature that integrates with its Google Chrome browser. Think of a self-driving car, but for your internet browser. In Auto Browse, an AI agent takes the driver's seat using a tab in Chrome to explore the internet at your direction.

Other AI agents exist that browse the internet, but Auto Browse marks Google's biggest public-facing entry into this arena. Auto Browse fully integrates with your browser and across Google’s other services, undertaking tasks such as searching your calendar and email and using information contained there to complete other tasks.

For educators, the tool is, at least in theory, well-placed to do things such as complete spreadsheets, help with travel plans, lesson planning, and finding teaching resources and materials.

In practice, after experimenting with Auto Browse, I didn’t find it to be a revolutionary step over existing AI services, though its integration with Gmail and Google Calendar was pretty seamless and impressive.

Here’s a closer look at Auto Browse.

What is Auto Browse?

Auto Browse is the latest and greatest AI agent tool from Google that works with Gemini. The idea is that you can use it to open Google Chrome tabs for you and complete tedious web tests in autopilot.

That being said, there are some caveats. As soon as you start using Auto Browse, a warning appears saying, “You are responsible for Gemini's actions during tasks.” I found this kind of unsettling. What if my AI agent starts ordering pizzas, convinced (probably correctly) that that would be the best way to keep me happy?

Because you are ultimately responsible, you have the option to take control of the browser. But sitting there watching what Auto Browse is doing really defeats the purpose of using it in the first place.

Additionally, cybersecurity experts say Auto Browse and other AI agents are at risk for “prompt injection attacks,” malicious instructions hidden on websites that can trick AI agents into putting your computer or accounts at risk.

That said, Auto Browse does have some cool features that some teachers, particularly AI enthusiasts, will love.

How Much Does Auto Browse Cost?

Auto Browse is available for subscribers to Google AI Pro ($20 per month) and Ultra ($250 per month).

I subscribed to Google AI Pro to gain access. The interface is fairly user-friendly. You can activate it by clicking on the Gemini option in the right-hand corner of Chrome, which opens the Gemini AI sidebar. You can then ask Gemini to open Auto Browse within that, or it will open automatically depending on your query.

How Helpful Is Auto Browse?

For this story, I asked Auto Browse to undertake a series of education-related tasks, including looking for an Airbnb for me in Boston when I attend an academic conference, looking for open academic positions, and generating some teaching materials based on old talks I gave.

On the whole, the performance was mixed. I was impressed by how the AI agent was able to look up the date I was going to be in Boston from my Google Calendar, and could search my email for contacts I’d communicated with on certain topics. But in some other areas, it fell short. It did not help me find an Airbnb rental, for instance. Though it provided a list of potential rentals that fit the criteria I had given it, the links to these rentals provided by the AI did not work. I was able to find the properties it had discussed by searching for them myself, but that defeated the purpose.

More impressive was the response to my query asking it to find specific types of writing professor jobs available in New England. It created a nice list of all the jobs and what was required to apply for each. This was pretty cool, but other than this, I had trouble finding tasks I wanted done that Auto Browse was uniquely qualified to help with.

That aside, I was impressed with the AI integration of Gemini with other Google products, including Gmail. I use a personal Gmail account, but could see using Gemini to do quick searches of things “every student who had a question for me over the past week . . . .” Or every student who asked about a specific assignment. Gemini was really strong at completing these types of queries and it didn't even need to go into Auto Browse mode for many of these.

Bottom Line: Is Auto Browse Worth Exploring As A Teacher?

Auto Browse has a lot of potential and is fun to experiment with, but it’s not superbly useful. It does indeed act as a personal assistant as it's supposed to, just a personal assistant that’s not particularly good at its job.

Nonetheless, I have hope that it could get better as time goes on, and I might get more ideas of how best to use it. Ultimately, educators who are obsessed with the latest and greatest in AI should take a look, but others may want to wait until the technology matures a bit.

Most Likely Machine is the teaching solution to a very real and modern gap in learning, around how algorithms work and the ethical ramifications.

As algorithms become more prevalent in more areas of our lives, it becomes ever more important to understand these key decision-making automations.

Critical to the learning here is how these systems can lead to bias and the importance of ethical design when writing algorithms. This is especially so in the age of AI when the complexities coming from a single coding decision can reach very far indeed.

Artefact, the design firm behind Most Likely Machine, has built this free multi award-winning learning service as a fun and gamified way to help 10-14-year-olds understand just how algorithms work. This should help them see more clearly in an age of automated feeds and decision-making search results.

This guide aims to explain all you need to know about Most Likely Machine in your class.

What is Most Likely Machine?

Most Likely Machine is a free teaching tool designed to help educate 10-14 year-olds about algorithms. This is not only about how these are made and used, but also the effects that these can have in our daily lives. That should help empower young people to make more balanced decisions in the future.

Using a game-style environment, students are able to build their own algorithms to observe consequences and reflect on the social impact of automated decision-making.

So while some tools focus on algorithm-writing specifically, this is more about conceptual understanding -- how data is weighted, how choices shape outcomes, and why no algorithm is ever truly neutral.

The Fast Company’s Innovation by Design Award and the Core77 Interaction Award have both been given to this tool. The project has been piloted in real classrooms with strong engagement from both teachers and students.

How does Most Likely Machine work?

Most Likely Machine is browser-based, so it's super easy to access from nearly any device -- allowing you to work on this as a class or individually.

Initially, you're introduced to the idea of a class designing awards using algorithms, what these are, and why these exist. Then it's down to the students to work on creating algorithm-based choices and seeing how outcomes are affected.

Students meet a host of characters based on famous historical figures, including Albert Einstein and Rosa Parks. These are presented as classmates competing for awards such as “Most Likely to Go to a Top University,” “Most Likely to Go Viral,” and “Biggest Troublemaker.” By choosing which traits matter most and weighting those characteristics, students construct algorithms that automatically select winners.

Students select traits such as intelligence, popularity, creativity, or leadership, and assign weightings that determine how much influence each factor holds.

As a result, students can see directly how personal assumptions, social stereotypes, and data selection choices influence outcomes.

The setup aligns well with computing, digital citizenship, and PSHE curricula, while also linking naturally to discussions around ethics, media literacy, and social responsibility.

What are the best Most Likely Machine features?

Most Likely Machine is very fun and friendly in its story-led design. That makes it engaging for students while still teaching how algorithms are built, tested, and refined. Only in the context of a reality, which helps them understand outcomes.

Otherwise abstract computational ideas suddenly become a tangible and fun experience.

The bias reflection section is particularly helpful as this focuses on social assumptions influencing technical decisions.

Real-world case studies are also used as a way to offer examples that students can critique, covering areas they may feel passionate about, including unfair grading systems, harmful social media, and racial bias in law enforcement tech.

How much does Most Likely Machine cost?

Most Likely Machine is totally free to use and is widely accessible via a browser. As such, this can be used across schools, subjects, and by teachers of varying technical abilities, with ease.

No subscriptions, licensing fees, or premium upgrades are required for classroom use.

Most Likely Machine best tips and tricks

Use it as a discussion starter
Run the activity first, then allocate dedicated time for group discussion. The richest learning often emerges from debating why certain results appeared and what that reveals about bias.

Connect it to real-world technologies
Link student reflections to everyday systems they encounter, TikTok recommendations, YouTube feeds, Spotify playlists, or school assessment software, to deepen relevance.

Pair it with ethics-based writing tasks
Ask students to write short reflections or debates on whether algorithms should be trusted in sensitive decisions like policing, hiring, or university admissions.

KQED Teach is a free media literacy platform that's designed to help empower students, via teacher training, in an age of media overload.

The idea is to help prepare young people for a world of misinformation, generative AI, and student voices. While students can learn on the fly, this tool aims to help educators guide students to be more confident in the media world.

This is a free professional development platform from KQED, the public media organization behind PBS and NPR. The idea is to teach educators by doing -- creating their own media -- before using those skills to help teach students similarly.

Thanks to a blend of pedagogical frameworks and applied creativity, this is a really unique and powerful offering to help bring media literacy into classrooms more effectively.

What is KQED Teach?

KQED Teach is primarily a free professional development platform, aimed at teachers. The idea is that by teaching them how to be more media literate, they will pass on that learning, understanding, and mastery to students.

KQED Teach works across K-12 subjects and grade levels. The point is to help teachers to integrate digital media creation, analysis, and civic dialogue into classroom learning. This is done using a library of ever-growing self-paced online courses and live workshops. The courses include topics such as video storytelling, audio production, fact-checking, misinformation, infographic design, and the ethical use of generative AI.

A focus is on both reading and writing media across the courses. Thus, educators can learn critical analysis including examining bias, credibility, and persuasive techniques. They can also develop media creation skills across the likes of podcasts, graphics, and interactive content, too.

Teachers can attain certificates for professional recognition having completed these courses. Many courses allow participants to earn graduate-level credits through university partnerships.

How does KQED Teach work?

KQED Teach is a very practical platform built on creating, sharing, reflecting, and applying. All that should mean teachers are creating in a way that allows them to experience the challenges that their students could be facing.

The courses themselves usually offer a combination of short instructional videos, guided activities, peer discussion, and classroom-ready planning tasks. The courses should leave teachers with tangible skills, not just knowledge.

Teachers might analyze real-world news examples, design media-based lesson plans, produce short videos or podcasts, or experiment with AI-powered tools under structured guidance.

KQED Teach also uses collaborative learning via community sharing. Participants can exchange ideas, showcase their projects, and discuss classroom strategies with other educators, fostering professional dialogue around best practices.

This peer-based approach is highly valuable in emerging areas such as generative AI literacy, in which classroom norms and ethical frameworks are quickly evolving.

KQED provides structured district and school-wide training programs.

What are the best KQED Teach features?

KQED Teach comprises several tools that include hands-on media creation, misinformation and media literacy, generative AI professional development, youth media challenges, and certification.

For media creation, teachers are guided through producing videos, podcasts, infographics, and interactive graphics, allowing teachers to build genuine creative confidence before implementing similar projects with students.

For misinformation and media literacy, courses explore how students can evaluate sources, detect misinformation, and understand algorithmic influence. All of which are deal right now as generative AI tools increase the scale and sophistication of synthetic content online.

On that subject, there is a section focused on AI bias, ethical AI use, and teaching students how to critically analyze AI-generated media.

Plenty of classroom ready content is also available, including lesson plans, student media challenges, and youth publishing platforms that allow learners to share work with authentic audiences.

Finally, there are those certificates, through which educators can gain graduate-level credits, supporting both career development and institutional professional learning requirements.

How much does KQED Teach cost?

KQED Teach is totally free. That makes this ideal for schools and districts looking to expand in this area while keeping budgets safe.

That also applies to educators who want to earn credits and certifications without spending money for the privilege.

KQED Teach best tips and tricks

Start with a single media project
Begin with a short, contained media task such as a short video explanation or podcast reflection to build confidence and classroom routines.

Integrate media across subjects
Science teachers can use infographics for data storytelling, while humanities teachers can explore audio documentaries or student journalism.

Use AI modules as discussion starters
Generative AI courses are especially effective when framed as ethical and critical thinking discussions, helping students understand bias, reliability, and responsible use.

Some educators are responding to artificial intelligence (AI) by retreating to “safe” strategies, such as requiring all writing to be done by hand on paper. That move may feel like a responsible guardrail, but it is neither responsible nor future-facing. It also has real equity consequences. It disadvantages students with disabilities and learning differences who rely on assistive technology, as well as multilingual learners who may need translation, vocabulary support, or language scaffolds to fully express what they know. If the goal is authentic student thinking, removing tools that increase access does not protect learning. It restricts it.

Responsible use of AI in schools does not begin with tools. It begins with clarity.

Before students ever open an AI-powered app, innovative educators ask a foundational question: What is the learning goal? From there, decisions about whether, when, and how students use AI become far more intentional and far less controversial.

This goal-driven approach is something strong teachers have been modeling long before AI entered classrooms. The difference now is that AI gives educators new opportunities to personalize feedback, extend creativity, and support learning.

Writing First. AI Second.

Imagine a teacher who is explicit with students about the purpose of their learning and how technology fits into it.

If the goal is for students to learn and gain experience in how to write an “About Me” story, including understanding structure, voice, and clarity, then AI is not part of the initial drafting process. Students begin by writing on their own because the skill they are developing is writing. They also end up with a class set of stories that helps classmates get to know each other better, which is part of the purpose, too.

Once that learning goal is met, AI becomes a support rather than a shortcut.

Students can paste their completed drafts into an AI tool and ask targeted questions such as:

• Are there places in which the story is unclear?
• What questions does a reader still have?
• Is anything missing that would help a reader understand me better?
• Are there grammar or structural issues I should fix?

At this stage, AI functions like a personalized writing tutor, offering feedback that helps students revise with intention. From there, students might push their work further by asking AI to help them transform the story into a poem, a song, or another format. This is not about replacing student thinking. It is about extending student work.

This mirrors what I outlined in The New Writing Process in the Age of AI, in which writing is no longer a single linear act but a cycle of drafting, feedback, revision, and reimagining. AI does not replace writing. It expands what happens with the students and their work.

The key is transparency. Students understand why AI is being used and why it was intentionally excluded earlier in the process.

Math, Struggle, and Support

The same principle applies outside of writing.

In math, the learning goal is often reasoning, not simply arriving at an answer. Students need space to wrestle with problems, test strategies, and make mistakes. AI should not short-circuit that productive struggle.

This is where tools such as Khanmigo can play a valuable role when used correctly. Students attempt a problem first. Only after that initial effort do they turn to AI for guidance.

Instead of giving answers, AI can ask probing questions, explain alternative approaches, or help students identify where their thinking went off track. Used this way, AI functions as a tutor, not a solution engine.

Again, the distinction matters. The learning goal drives the use of the tool, not the other way around.

The Conversation Matters More Than the Tool

Across subjects, what separates responsible AI use from misuse is not the sophistication of the technology, it is the conversation educators have with students.

Students become far more thoughtful users of the technology when they understand:

• What they are learning
• Why they are learning it
• How AI can support that learning without replacing it

This approach pushes back on the simplistic narrative that AI is something schools must either ban or blindly adopt. When educators design learning intentionally, AI becomes another tool students learn to use with judgment, purpose, and creativity.

The question is not whether students will use AI--they already are.

The real question is whether schools will help students understand when it strengthens learning and when it gets in the way.

NotebookLM was developed at Google by bestselling science author Steven Johnson and members of Google’s AI team. I’ve long admired Johnson’s work and compelling ways of thinking on a variety of topics, so it’s no surprise that NotebookLM has become one of my favorite AI tools.

It’s also unsurprising that it’s also a favorite of many educators with whom I speak. That’s because NotebookLM does all the things we normally associate with good education-focused AI use. It puts teachers in the driver seat, allowing them to decide which sources the tool draws upon for all the materials it creates.

Even more significantly, NotebookLM is, at its heart, a research assistant, and is fundamentally designed to help users organize and learn from various sources they gather rather than do their thinking for them. In other words, it truly works as a notebook for the AI age.

Here are some ways in which teachers can use NotebookLM.

1. Teaching With NotebookLM: Use It As A Research Tool

These days, NotebookLM is a good starting point when you begin researching any topic. It gives you the option of choosing “fast research” or “deep research.” Deep research takes more time but goes more in-depth. Regardless of which option you select, you are then given a series of sources that you can choose to keep or discard.

Below, I talk about some of the cool things NotebookLM helps you do once you’ve gathered this research, but before getting to that, I want to say how helpful this tool is in its own right. Sure, other AI tools can search the internet for sources, but here you not only get the sources, it all is automatically saved and organized within an easy-to-use interface. I find this helpful when doing research for books and articles as well as for research for class prep, but of course, this organization is only the beginning.

Both deep and quick research options work very well, depending on your needs. I've found that starting with a quick research option, exploring those sources, and then having NotebookLM do deeper research to unearth more resources, can be very effective.

2. Interact With Research and Educational Materials

Once you get research results or add your own documents and materials, which is also a great option within NotebookLM, you get a whole bunch of AI-enhanced ways to organize and learn from this research.

First, you can interact with a chatbot that uses these sources, and only these sources, as the basis for its responses to you. This can be a fun way to delve into a topic and, literally or figuratively, interrogate a text.

For example, I was reading a paper about a complex physics experiment and didn’t fully understand certain implications. I asked a few questions, and the NotebookLM chatbot read through this paper and other similar ones I had selected and clarified various points.

Of course, even with the guardrails that NotebookLM inherently places on these interactions, it might not be perfect, but it’s still a helpful learning tool as you conduct and think through research. It could also theoretically be a good and fun way for students to explore class materials you assign, though I don't personally use NotebookLM in that way.

3. Create Class Materials From Specific Documents

You can also then use these documents to do many of the tasks AI is already helping teachers with, such as generating quizzes, flashcards, mind clouds, and even slides. This can be either a tool for organizing your own thoughts and research, or the first step to creating some class materials.

None of the materials I've used NotebookLM to create are perfect, but it is generally better than other programs I’ve tried. Since it is based on specific materials I had approved, I also feel much better about using this as a starting point than I would working with a more general AI tool.

4. Create Podcasts and Videos

Creating on-demand podcasts and videos that summarize documents and readings you select is one of the features for which NotebookLM is known. The podcast feature, in particular, drew the lion’s share of press after the tool launched, and from a purely technical standpoint, it's amazing.

You put in a few documents and, soon after, you can listen to a casual podcast with multiple hosts, breaking down the topic for you in the manner of a modern laidback podcast. The video is somewhat similar but offers visuals and graphics along with narration.

As mind-blowing as both features are, neither is my favorite, as I still don’t trust this kind of summary from AI. That said, this feature is one that a lot of teachers use. So even though it’s not my personal favorite feature, I’m intrigued by it and agree there’s a lot of educational potential for this kind of tool.

I also recommend everyone try creating their own podcast using NotebookLM because, from a pure wow factor perspective, it's still hard to beat.

Since the 2026 semester has started, I’ve noticed a disturbing trend: I’ve been receiving regular emails from students that I’m convinced are AI-generated.

This presents a strange conundrum to me. Using AI to write emails is not strictly forbidden at the institutions at which I teach the same way using AI to generate an assignment is, but in many ways, I find this trend to be more concerning than AI assignments, and I'm not a fan of those either.

While I disagree with using AI to cheat on writing assignments, I understand the rationale. Writing assignments are difficult and time-consuming, and students often believe ChatGPT can do a better job than them in a few moments of work.

Writing an email can be annoying, but for most college-level writers, it is not a particular challenge, so having a computer impersonate you and write one is another level of inauthenticity in my mind. This is one that goes beyond merely cheating on a test and feels more fundamentally off on a human level.

Put another way, getting AI emails make me sad and is a little disturbing. But that's a strong reaction to spring on a student for using a tool that is now often integrated with their school-issued email platform, so here's how I am responding to the trend of AI-generated emails.

1. Understand The Perspective Of Students Who Use AI To Write Emails

Much as I hate this latest trend, I know students, in many cases, are being actively encouraged to use AI by tech companies, and human writing is increasingly looked down upon by many outside the education field--and even some within it.

In other words, having AI write your emails for you is a semi-accepted practice in modern society. So calling out individual students and/or others isn’t helpful or fair, and might make things worse.

Instead, I'm trying to ask more questions and learn about the mindset that is leading students to turn to AI-generated emails.

2. Call Out The Content, Not The Origin

That said, while responding to student emails, I think I'm perfectly justified in highlighting strange AI-generated phrases. I may ask a student to offer more specifics or point out exactly why a particular sentence or phrase doesn’t make sense.

Here is an excerpt from an email I generated with AI as an example. In my prompt, I asked to ask my professor for an extension on an upcoming assignment because of all the recent snow in my home state. The response was typical of what I've been seeing lately, and reads in part as follows:

We’ve been experiencing significant snowfall here in Connecticut, and the weather has made it difficult to maintain my usual work schedule and access quiet, reliable time to complete the assignment to the standard I aim for. I want to be sure I submit work that reflects my best effort and understanding of the material.

In my response, I’d ask them to describe what their definition of “reliable time” is, and ask them to tell me a little bit more about the standards they for which they are aiming for, before granting such a request.

3. Model Authentic Behavior

Many books have started to include an authenticity statement in which the human-written nature of the work is asserted. I think this is something those of us who care about genuine human expression should consider doing the same.

It can be as simple as adding an email signature such as: "This email was 100 percent human-generated."

4. Fight The Culture of AI Email Writing

It’s time for those of us concerned about AI writing to get more vocal. AI writing is bad writing, period. It doesn’t enhance human writing or communications skills, and, instead, robs human warmth and voice.

More to the point of this article, using AI to write an email is inauthentic, and I’d even argue fraudulent. I'm all for saving time and cutting back on the annoying emails many of us need to keep up with to function in modern society, but this isn’t any kind of solution.

5. Offer Alternatives To AI Email That Save Time

To avoid spending this whole piece just complaining, I think the problem of AI emails, unlike AI-generated student work, has an easy solution: We should normalize the use of AI assistants who speak for us, not as us.

If a student's email began “Hi, this is your student Wesley Crusher’s AI assistant. Wesley is confused about the recent midterm assignment . . . .” I’d be a little surprised, but I’d have no personal problem with this type of AI use. In fact, I might have my own AI assistant send a response.

I’m all for using AI to save time in otherwise mundane and informative communications, but let’s cut this AI-human impersonation nonsense off before it goes much further.

DocsTeach goes beyond teaching history and helps students to learn how to become discerning scholars with genuinely useful analytical skills.

The idea here is to offer a host of primary sources so that students can learn how to search and analyze that material in real-time. In that process students get to become historians, carrying out research to feel immersed in the excitement of uncovering the past.

This online platform is hosted by the National Archives Foundation to give educators these original materials. It is backed by tools to help get the most out of that, including a slew of learning activities.

This guides aims to lay out all you need to know about how DocsTeach could work for your class.

What is DocsTeach?

DocsTeach is an online primary sources teaching platform developed by the U.S. National Archives to bring archival documents into classrooms in interactive ways.

The original materials consist of letters, speeches, photographs, maps, posters, and videos. A suite of tools and activities are also available, designed to help teachers guide students to get the most out of all those sources.

The platform offers more than 13,000 primary source documents and hundreds of activities ready to use, plus a host of customizable teaching tools. From George Washington's draft of the Constitution to Richard Nixon's resignation letter, this is crammed full of excitingly powerful documents.

Everything is freely and globally accessible to help teachers explore as well as create and customize document-based activities for student needs.

How does DocsTeach work?

DocsTeach is both a resource library with original documents as well as a teaching creation suite with pre-made and customizable tools.

Teachers can create a free account to log in so that it's possible to explore, save, and organize documents and activities.

Start out by browsing the archives to find primary sources that are relevant to what's being taught. Helpfully, search is filtered by era, skill, or topic, as needed.

Then you can use the interactive tools to create personalized lessons comprising selected documents, activities, and instructions.

Finally, teachers can assign or share these activities with students using common tools such as Google Classroom or dedicated LMS systems.

Students can access everything directly using the website so it can be worked on using a mobile device, tablet, or laptop, as is available.

What are the best DocsTeach features?

DocsTeach has some great pre-made activities that can make turning a primary source into a lesson a simple process. These include Compare & Contrast, Mapping History, Weighing the Evidence, and Interpreting Data, to name a few.

Crucially, teachers can customize these to suit their specific needs for a lesson. Or start an entirely new one from scratch and save it for later -- editable if that is needed for another type of subject, for example.

The documents themselves are something to get excited about as there are not only thousands available but some rarely seen originals.

Since everything is free and openly accessible, it all can be easily accessed, reused, modified, and shared without copyright limitations.

The fact everything can be distributed using classroom codes or URLs makes it very easy for teachers to share and for students to complete and submit responses.

How much does DocsTeach cost?

DocsTeach is totally free. It has no ads or tracking. While you can use it without giving any details, by signing up for an account you can access more features.

A login allows teachers to save custom activities, organize primary sources for reuse, and share assignments with students.

DocsTeach best tips and tricks

Start with ready-made activities
Explore the existing library in which hundreds of activities are already aligned with historical thinking skills and curriculum topics.

Customize for context
Take advantage of the creative tools to tailor instructions or groupings to your students’ reading levels and interests.

Sequence activities
Use Finding a Sequence or Making Connections tools to build multi-lesson units that scaffold understanding and deepen inquiry skills.

Pink slime journalism is a term that refers to websites that masquerade as genuine local news sites, all the while pushing a specific political agenda. While the information in pink slime stories can be accurate, it often carries significant bias and doesn't qualify as real journalism.

Like other forms of AI slop and misinformation, pink slime is on the rise, which is troubling because it can be more subtle and difficult to spot than more direct falsehoods. For instance, as part of recent research at Yale University, participants were shown AI-generated news sites and real, legitimate news sites, and asked which they would prefer to get their news from. Just under half of the participants preferred the pink slime sites.

That research, as well as general common sense, highlights why identifying pink slime is so important and can be somewhat tricky. As a journalist and professor of journalism, here are some of the key ways I advise students and anyone else to avoid falling for pink slime.

Keep An Eye Out For AI

First and foremost, we all need to hone our inherent AI detection abilities. I’ve written about this from the teaching perspective, but these days I see AI writing everywhere--in the comment section of Facebook Groups, in emails, and in Instagram summaries.

After reading a sentence or paragraph, it's important to ask yourself if it sounds as if a real person would've written it. For example, is there an unusual amount of repetition, or is it riddled with clichés?

Then, whenever you detect the lifeless, cold voice of AI, remember to stop and take a look at how accurate that information is, particularly when reading a news story.

Follow Old-Fashioned Digital Literacy

One of my favorite memes features a quote that reads “Don’t believe everything you read on the internet,” and then attributes it to Abraham Lincoln. It’s a witty reminder that it’s easy to just make something up and post.

While things such as the quality of writing can cue us that something is off, that’s not always an indicator. Well-written pink slime can easily get past us, so checking the background of a site's publisher, especially one with whom we are not familiar, is a key part of consuming news these days.

Follow Even More Old-Fashioned General News Literacy Practices

Going a step further, we need to get back to even older-fashioned digital literacy questions that we ask students to consider as part of building critical thinking skills: Who is writing this? What perspectives were left out? Was that because the writer didn’t have time, or are they trying to support a particular agenda?

If students stumble onto a new news site, we should encourage them to always look at the "About Us" section to assess who is writing the article, what sources they are providing for their information, and whether the article itself seems to be trying to convince us of something. If these details are not included anywhere that’s easy to access on the site, that’s a red flag.

This type of objective interrogation helps you realize when you’re reading pink slime, and can also make you a more critical and thoughtful reader of more legitimate news sites as well.

Remember Your Cybersecurity Training

Another way to avoid pink slime is to think about what you read in posts and from unknown sites the same way you would think of emails and spam calls or texts from people you don’t know. I get emails from people I don’t know all the time, and while I don’t automatically dismiss these, I view any with a healthy dose of skepticism, particularly if it is political in nature in any way and/or makes bold claims on any topic.

Mandatory cybersecurity trainings over the years have made many of us wary of the potential of being tricked and taken advantage of through digital communication. We need to expand that wariness to everything we read online, and remember that old email security adage: If something feels off, it probably is.

Boclips is the world's largest library of education-specific video content, according to the company. This is essentially a school-safe version of YouTube, designed specifically for teaching.

At a time when video learning is becoming more powerful, more useful, and more in-demand than ever, Boclips is the natural answer to the question of how to make sure videos are school-friendly.

The result is a single place with a huge range of videos that are made from more than 650 trusted content creators. It features ad-free, safe, and non-distracting video alternatives to YouTube.

This guide aims to lay out all you need to know about Boclips and how it could serve your class needs.

What is Boclips?

Boclips is a curated, education-specific, video platform. Hosting around 1.8 million educational videos, this aggregated collection is ideal for schools.

The 650+ trusted content providers include SciShow, PBS, CrashCourse, Bloomberg, TED, and others. The key here is that this content is available without the adverts or distracting linked video suggestions that may cause students to go off topic, such as when using other systems.

Teachers can quickly find and share videos that students are able to access and view, distraction free. These are all curated and aligned for class use, making it a safe and risk-free video teaching tool that's ideal for schools.

How does Boclips work?

Boclips is a stand-alone library of video clips that can be accessed by teachers and shared easily.

Crucially, all these videos are organized with educators in mind. Consequently, it's possible to search using categories such as age, subject, pedagogy, and even standards such as Common Core or Next Generation Science Standards.

Using filters and tags, it's possible to find the relevant videos fast that are educationally relevant.

Teachers are then able to share using links, embedding in an LMS such as Google Classroom, or by curating playlists for units or projects.

Students then only see the video that was sent to them by the teacher, so no linking distractions or ads getting in the way.

What are the best Boclips features?

Boclips has around 1.8 million curated videos available to be used and viewed by teachers and students. Since all the content creators are vetted, everything in the library is education appropriate.

The fact everything is ad-free and there are no other linked videos means that students can use videos while staying focused solely on the task at hand. That makes this ideal for a wide range of ages and abilities.

Teachers can filter results not just by topic but by curriculum standards, pedagogical use case, age level, and language proficiency level. All that results in an efficient process for educators and the end result should be the most relevant materials, quickly.

Playlists are a helpful way to build materials around a subject area. These can work collaboratively allowing teachers to work together but also for students to do so, perhaps as part of a group project.

Integrations with tools such as WeVideo and BenQ Boards make this even more accessible, and the company is continuing to expand and integrate in this way, making it easier to access.

How much does Boclips cost?

Boclips offers free trials to educators but then there are fees.

Since this uses institutional licensing, pricing is offered on a bespoke basis to suit use cases.

This generally includes unlimited teacher access, admin dashboards, usage analytics, professional development and support, plus integration assistance and custom solutions.

Boclips best tips and tricks

Start with subject collections
Use Boclips’ curated subject collections when short on planning time. These pre-built collections make it quick to find relevant videos for common topics.

Map videos to curriculum standards
Filter and search by specific curriculum standards so video content aligns directly with learning objectives, rather than just being engaging.

Clip segments for focused learning
Use the segmenting tools to share only the key portions of a video that match your lesson aim. This keeps students focused and saves instructional time.

Every leader faces the same challenge: how do you make your team's work visible and valued at the highest levels of your organization? The answer lies not in presenting more data, but in weaving that data into compelling narratives that directly connect to what boards care about most: the organization's mission and strategic priorities.

The Power of Strategic Alignment

School boards and administrative teams don't remember statistics. They remember stories that illuminate progress toward goals they've committed to achieving, especially those that illustrate how the students are improving through your auspices. When advocating for library and IT programs, for example, don’t focus on the equipment or software but on what the students and teachers will be able to do now that they were not able to do previously.

The most effective advocates understand that every board has articulated priorities, whether that's closing achievement gaps, preparing students for college and career, advancing equity, or fostering innovation. Your task is to position your department's contributions within this existing framework, showing what you do and why it matters in the context of the district's strategic educational goals.

Finding Your Story in the Data

Begin by examining your department's metrics through a strategic lens. Raw numbers, website visits, training completions, tickets resolved, number of books checked out, etc., tell an incomplete story. The narrative emerges when you ask, “What change do these numbers represent, and how does that change advance our mission?”

Consider an instructional technology department that increased learning management system adoption from 45% to 92% of faculty. The data point alone is impressive, but the story becomes powerful when connected to strategic outcomes. If the board's strategic plan emphasizes "personalized learning experiences," that increased adoption translates into 15,000 students now accessing differentiated content, real-time feedback, and flexible learning pathways. That directly advances the district's equity and achievement goals.

For a library media center tracking resource usage and information literacy instruction, rather than simply reporting that digital resource access increased by 80%, frame this within the board's college and career readiness goals: "Our expanded digital library and embedded research instruction reached 3,200 students this year, with 89% demonstrating proficiency in evaluating source credibility. The improvement in this critical skill for academic success and informed citizenship directly supports our graduate profile."

Crafting Your Narrative Arc

Effective board presentations follow a narrative structure that creates emotional resonance while maintaining analytical rigor. Start with context that grounds your story in the organization's strategic landscape. What challenge or opportunity existed? Why did it matter to the mission?

Next, illuminate your department's response. This is where you integrate data, but always in service of the story. Show the progression: where you started, the interventions your team designed, and the measurable changes that resulted. Use concrete examples that humanize the numbers. If your library services team launched a maker space that served 800 students, share a brief story about a reluctant reader who discovered graphic novels through your new browsing displays and went on to check out 23 books that year, reigniting a love of reading that had dimmed.

The climax of your narrative demonstrates impact aligned with strategic priorities. This is where you explicitly connect your department's outcomes to the board's goals. Use their language. If the strategic plan mentions "closing achievement gaps," show how your instructional technology initiatives enable differentiated instruction at scale. If they prioritize "innovative learning environments," demonstrate how your library transformation created collaborative spaces where students develop critical thinking and creative engagement.

Making the Strategic Connection Explicit

Don't assume board members will automatically draw connections between your data and their priorities. Make the alignment explicit and direct. Consider creating a simple visual framework that shows the strategic goal, your department's contribution, and the measurable impact.

For example:

Board Priority: Prepare all students for post-secondary success.

Our Contribution: Implemented one-to-one device program with an embedded digital citizenship curriculum and expanded library database access.

Impact: 94% of seniors now demonstrate college-level research skills, up from 67%, and digital tool proficiency increased from 58% to 91%. This directly supported the goal of eliminating barriers to post-secondary readiness.

This approach transforms you from a department head requesting technology budgets or library materials into a strategic partner demonstrating return on investment in terms the board values most: student outcomes and achievement of educational goals.

Building Long-Term Visibility

Improving your department's identity with leadership isn't about a single presentation either. It is about consistently demonstrating strategic value. Create a rhythm of communication that keeps your contributions visible. Share monthly or quarterly updates that track progress on specific strategic metrics. Advocate for regular opportunities to present to the board to highlight accomplishments. Work with building principals to highlight how you have supported their goals as well. When organizational wins occur, proactively identify your department's enabling role.

Perhaps most importantly, invite board members into your work area or encourage them to participate in programs your department manages and observe your team in action. These experiences create advocates who understand your value firsthand.

The Transformation

When you master the art of wrapping data in a strategic narrative, something shifts; your department moves from being seen as a support function to being recognized as a strategic asset. Budget conversations then become easier because you have demonstrated clear connections between your resources and organizational priorities. Recruitment also improves because talented professionals want to join teams doing meaningful, visible work. Most importantly, your team gains the recognition and support they deserve for their contributions to the mission.

The data has always been there. The impact has always existed. Your task is to tell the story that makes both impossible to ignore.

Quakertown Community School District is a diverse suburban district of 5,000 students 40 miles north of Philadelphia.

“We find that many generations of families have gone through our district,” says Superintendent Matthew Friedman. “As a long-time professional in education, that’s always a good sign that people like the school system. When I arrived, I listened to all the internal and external stakeholders to learn the strengths, the pain points, where we needed to grow. What I really wanted to focus on was life beyond the walls of the schools.”

For Friedman, who was recently recognized with an Innovative Leader Award at the Northeast Pre-NYSCATE Summit in Verona, NY, there was one important question to answer: What are kids going to do when they graduate?

“We have a mix of white-collar and blue-collar families and a separate technical high school with about 1,000 kids that feed in from three different districts,” he says. “A lot of our kids go into trades. We support two-year paths, four-year paths, trade school, workforce, military — all the different options. But we really had no dedicated exposure to STEM education at that elementary level.”

To start, Friedman helped design and implement an elementary computational thinking and design thinking course for K through 5.

“It gave the students an opportunity to be hands-on in their learning, to understand the computational thinking process and have exposure to STEM education at the younger level,” he says. “I always use the analogy from a leadership position of building a house. You can build the biggest house in the world, but if you don't have a strong foundation that house is going to collapse."

Friedman saw a lot of schools try to implement things from the top down. He wanted to try to do things from the bottom up, starting conversations in kindergarten to set kids up for success in high school by having K-8 CTE exposure. To do that, he wanted to have career conversations with a common career language K-12 and to take a dialogic approach using the RIASEC taxonomy of career interests.

Far from a one-off concept, RIASEC is now used by many universities such as U of Hawaii, Purdue, FSU, and Michigan State to help students determine prospective majors that speak to their true talents, interest and abilities.

“If you put in your RIASEC results, it will show you what majors align with your letters and what courses you could potentially take,” Friedman says. “It takes a lot of the guessing out and really helps to frame it for students.”

The 6 RIASEC Types to Guide Students

Friedman explains the RIASEC taxonomy:

• Realistic (The Doers): These people are often good at mechanical or athletic jobs (e.g., mechanics, engineers, farmers).
• Investigative (The Thinkers): These people like to watch, learn, analyze and solve problems (e.g., scientists, researchers, data analysts).
• Artistic (The Creators): These people like to work in unstructured situations where they can use their creativity (e.g., artists, musicians, writers, designers).
• Social (The Helpers): These people like to work with other people, rather than things (e.g., teachers, nurses, counselors).
• Enterprising (The Persuaders): These people like to work with others and enjoy persuading and performing.(e.g., managers, salespeople, entrepreneurs).
• Conventional (The Organizers): These people are very detail oriented, organized, and like to work with data (e.g., accountants, clerks, administrative assistants).

Some schools use simple questionnaires to ask students to consider their strengths, dislikes, talents and interests — making it clear there are no wrong answers, as seen here.

Deeper Conversations and Deeper Culture

Friedman has seen a positive change not only in the classroom but the greater school culture.

“We were talking about Martin Luther King Jr's birthday coming up and instead of very low-level factual information, we can integrate career conversations such as, ‘What letters do you think Dr. King would be? What letters are you? Find two or three in the room to have a conversation. What are the similarities between you and Dr. King? What are the differences? Why do you think he would be these letters? Does that align with your strengths and your interests, could you do something similar to what Dr. King did one day?’ It takes the conversation to a whole other level,” Friedman says.

Friedman explains how a third-grade Veterans Day classroom conversation he overheard discussing RIASEC letters in regard to an Army Ranger visitor in the classroom might have affected a student’s career path.

“Students really have to understand all six letters in order to understand where they fit in the framework,” he says. “Their letters could change daily, weekly, yearly. The letters you have in kindergarten are probably not the letters you have in 7th or 12th grade. But if you continue to think about your strengths and your interests, teachers can flexibly group students in classrooms based off of their dominant letter.”

The success stories that are most satisfying to Friedman are those involving helping a student find their own right future path. For example, one strong student admitted he was considering dropping out of school because he didn’t see a fit with what was happening in the classroom. Now an engineering major at a top school, he shared that after being introduced to RIASEC and career conversations using a common language, he realized that his strengths and interests actually had a pathway beyond K-12.

From a leadership perspective, Friedman always wants growth and achievement from his students. A common language is changing the culture of the program.

“We’ve had the kids say, ‘I'm having conversations with people I never thought I would talk to in school,’” he says. “That’s so great. It shifts the paradigm.”

The use of RIASEC also helped in a recent career and jobs fair.

“We’ve created different types of pathways students can take,” Friedman says. “They can take courses and get externships and job shadows and internships throughout high school with local businesses. Integrating Riasec into their decision-making process was invaluable at a recent college and career fair in our high school. We had 96 colleges, universities, businesses, military and trades. Six weeks before the fair, our college and career counselor contacted all 96 attendees. ‘This is the Riasec framework. We want you to list your top 10 majors or job roles with appropriate letters.’"

When students arrived at the fair, rather than wandering aimlessly, they could instantly target the best fit and have productive conversations about their future.

“It’s just such a helpful tool, at any age,” Friedman says. “When we introduced this to parents, a number of adults came up to me afterward and said, ‘I might rethink where I am in my life and my career.’"

The Tools They Use

• Google Gemini
• Google Gems
• Notebook LM
• Streamable Learning
• ClickView

Flat for Education is a cloud-based solution to music teaching in a digital world. As such, this combines all you could need to teach music in a way that transcends the page and even any one device.

The idea here is to offer a teaching system that works for educators and students across and range of instruments and musical styles, while remaining accessible from any device.

This music theory and composition space serves to let students and teachers create, edit, share feedback, and engage on musical work all in one place.

Designed for classroom use, this makes for easy class management, music assignment generation, progress tracking, and more. This guide lays it all out so you can see how Flat could be of note in your class.

What is Flat for Education?

Flat for Education is beyond your basic notation editor as this goes way further to encompass music education support across a range of systems.

This offers notation, composition, collaboration, and assessment tools all in one place. That allows students and teachers to create, edit, and share musical scores, complete assignments, receive feedback, and engage with classmates in real time.

Beyond that, this also allows for schools and districts to manage classes, generate music assignments, track progress, and integrate with popular learning management systems such as Google Classroom, Canvas, and Microsoft Teams.

So while this is a music theory and composition workspace, it's also a lot more.

How does Flat for Education work?

Flat for Education is web-based so it can be used across devices without the need to install any software. Everything runs within the browser so it can be accessed from a laptop, tablet, or phone with ease.

Students can start working on making music using a notation editor, which supports more than 100 instruments. This offers instant playback, and tools to customize notational symbols and layouts.

Students immediately hear what they write, to deepen their understanding of pitch, rhythm, harmony, and musical structure.

Teachers can set assignments, with auto-grading worksheets and collaborative shared writing project options. After students have worked on an assignment, or co-edited in real-time, it can be easily shared and assessed easily thanks to LMS integration options.

What are the best Flat for Education features?

Flat for Education works across a wide range of users, from beginners to more advanced musicians, from writing melodies to creating full scores. Notes, rests, articulations, and dynamics are all easy to place and edit.

The ability to collaborate is a big part of the appeal here. Student groups can co-compose in real time, with teachers observing live edits and offering feedback. This can help to foster teamwork and mimic real-world creative workflows.

Integration with LMS options allow teachers to sync student rosters and share assignments directly within Google Classroom, Canvas, Microsoft Teams, and more.

Tasks are varied with options that include composition tasks and performance assignments with video and audio uploads, plus auto-graded theory worksheets that are ideal for assessing fundamentals.

Real-time feedback is helpful as teachers can comment on scores and rate submissions, and provide formative feedback live.

How much does Flat for Education cost?

Flat for Education offers a 30-day free trial, after which a paid plan is required.

Quotes are generally on a per institution basis so the price per user per year will vary depending on the needs. But there is a minimum of 50 users required for one of these plans.

Flat for Education best tips and tricks

Embed music theory
Use auto-graded worksheets to reinforce fundamentals such as intervals, key signatures, and rhythms. These can quickly check comprehension and free up class time for deeper discussion.

Use shared writing
Assign students into small groups to co-compose original pieces. Shared writing turns composition into an interactive teamwork experience.

Blend performance and notation
Have students not only compose but also perform their pieces by uploading audio or video recordings of themselves playing the scores.

Google Scholar Labs is a major new AI interface for Google Scholar that launched in late November 2025.

Instead of using key terms to search academic studies, Scholar Labs lets teachers, academics, and their students ask research-related questions such as, “What are some recent research papers about mindset?" Google Scholar Labs then finds relevant research studies and summarizes.

Experimenting with the tool, I was struck by its speed and convenience. It’s a quick way to get a broad overview of any research topic, and while it doesn’t replace a more traditional research search, it can definitely help with one. It also furthers Google Scholar’s mission of making academic research more accessible overall.

What is Google Scholar Labs?

Scholar Labs is an AI-powered search tool designed to assist users in searching Google Scholar, Google’s search engine for scholarly resources such as research papers.

The tool's purpose is to simplify the process of finding relevant research. As such, it’s a useful tool both for seasoned academics and newbie researchers.

To use Scholar Labs, go to scholar.google.com/scholar_labs and then type in a search query. For instance, you can ask it to summarize all the recent research on flipped learning and whether it impacts student achievement. Within a few moments, you’ll get a type-annotated bibliography with links to various research papers on the topic and summaries of these papers.

How Well Does Google Scholar Labs Work?

Scholar Labs works as advertised. Despite some limitations, I found it to be great at providing a quick snapshot of research into a topic without requiring me to spend a lot of time searching.

For instance, in the example I gave above about mindset research, it provided me with 10 or so pieces of research on the topic that quickly let me know there are a good deal of questions around whether growth mindset is really as linked to student achievement as many educators believe. The tool led me more quickly to this takeaway than a traditional Google Scholar search might. I got similarly helpful results on queries about flipped learning and other topics.

You can also use Scholar Labs to compare and contrast different interventions, such as flipped learning vs. traditional classroom settings. In addition, you can get specific about the types of research you want it to include in its search summary with instructions such as, “include only randomized control trials.”

Despite all these great features, Google Scholar Labs is not perfect. By default, it tends to include a lot of old research, and can miss important studies. So while it provides a quick overview of research, it’s not a replacement for a deep dive on a topic.

Additionally, the tool is less a chatbot and more the Google Scholar version of Google Search’s AI summary tool. So your queries should be framed as questions, and it struggles to do more than provide broad research summaries.

When I asked it to find the first study linking Growth Mindset to education, it provided me with another summary of research into Growth Mindset’s impact on learning overall. This was not at all what I asked for.

Despite these minor drawbacks I find myself using the tool more and more as a starting point for my research.

How Can Teachers Use It?

Teachers can use Google Scholar Labs for quick overviews of pedagogical research and for research related to the subject matters they teach, as well as with students, provided such use is in accordance with their institution's data privacy and AI policies.

I plan on recommending it to my graduate students who are working on research. It’s the rare AI tool that is relatively free of drawbacks, provided students don’t over-rely on it and use it in addition to, rather than instead of, more traditional research methods.

Bottom line: Is Google Scholar Labs Helpful for Education?

Google Scholar Labs is an easy-to-use new AI tool that makes research more efficient, effective, and therefore accessible.

If you can’t tell already, I’m a big fan of Scholar Labs.