ISTELive 26 was another energetic and inspiring conference. Held in Orlando this year, the event featured hundreds of sessions and exhibitors, offering attendees unparalleled opportunities for learning and networking.

The association also announced a name change. It will now be known as International Society for Transforming Education (ISTE), reflecting the merger of legacy ISTE’s focus on technology and ASCD’s commitment to instruction.

The exhibit hall showcased a vast array of new products and services. Our Tech & Learning judges scoured the show floor to rigorously review the nominations for this year’s Tech & Learning Best of Show at ISTELive 26 awards. The evaluation criteria included ease of use, overall value, uniqueness in the market, and clear proof that the product streamlines teachers' workflows and supports student achievement.

“AI took a back seat to discussions about the screen time debate at this year’s ISTE conference,” noted Christine Weiser, Content Director for Tech & Learning. “The overarching question from the show floor: How do we educate our communities about the difference between active screen time that supports student learning and passive doom scrolling?

“There were plenty of examples of edtech products that are supporting active learning on display, and our judges used this as one measure of their nominee evaluations. Below are their top picks. Congratulations to all our winners!"

Primary

Acer Chromebook 311 (C725T)

“The Acer Chromebook 311 is a solid option for younger learners, especially considering its price point. We found it to be durable, reliable, and well-suited for the daily wear and tear that comes with elementary classroom use, making it a strong value for schools.”

Adobe, Aqua by Adobe

“Aqua by Adobe is a thoughtful and timely entry into elementary creative technology. Rather than adapting professional creative software for younger users, it was designed specifically for children, balancing creativity, accessibility, digital literacy, and age-appropriate AI in a safe, free environment. The combination of educator input, strong early adoption, and the absence of cost barriers makes it particularly compelling for schools.”

Amplify Education, Amplify Desmos Math

“The new Desmos math tool from Amplify is an amazing platform to help students concretize the abstract concepts of math! This tool not only uses a project-based approach to learning, which solidifies complex math concepts, but also provides many opportunities to learn them in different ways. An added bonus is that many of the lessons that are available are available at no cost to any student!”

Amplify Education, mCLASS Math

“This new mClass Math product from Amplify is pretty solid at helping students analyze mathematical reasoning and thinking patterns and improve their overall math skills. It is particularly good for middle school students who have been struggling in the past, helping them catch up with their peers.”

Belkin International, Belkin Connect USB-C Keyboard with Stand for iPad

“The Belkin Connect USB-C Keyboard with Stand for iPad is a no-nonsense classroom tool built around the things schools actually need: durability, easy setup, and testing compliance. It is not flashy, but removing Bluetooth, batteries, and charging issues makes it a very dependable choice for shared iPad programs.”

BenQ RP05

“The BenQ Board RP05 feels like a standout interactive display because it brings AI tools directly into the classroom experience rather than treating them as an add-on. With on-device AI, 50-point touch, Google EDLA support, wireless sharing, and robust IT management features, it looks like a comprehensive solution for schools seeking to modernize instruction at scale.”

Boxlight Symphonic Series — Primary Education

“This series of notification and information products give the end user a variety of features to choose from. They appear to be very easy to install and maintain.”

Boxlight Symphony — Primary Education

“This is a powerful and very well thought out communication system. That it can be implemented on an existing IP network without the need for an Internet connection is a great value ad for school districts.”

ClassLink Suite

“ClassLink has been an efficient and impactful tool in our district for staff and students. Our workflow and student experience have been elevated using this tool

Clear Touch, Nova

“The 6000 Nova Series comes across as a very smart long-term classroom display, especially because the hot-swappable Core Module directly tackles the pain of costly refreshes and downtime. It feels well-rounded and future-focused, with strong hardware durability and a useful software suite that adds real value beyond the screen itself.”

Clear Touch, Command Studio

“Command Studio feels like a really practical way to bring high-quality broadcast into schools without making it overly technical or equipment-heavy. The portability, wireless setup, touchscreen control, and Clear Touch ecosystem integration make it especially valuable for campuses that want students or staff to produce polished live content with less friction.”

CTL Chromebook PX112C with Integrated 5G, 4G LTE, and CBRS Connectivity

“This is a very capable Chromebook. Although the broadband connectivity is not new or innovative, the use of the Citizen’s Band Radio Spectrum (CBRS) is a great feature.”

Curriculum Associates’ i-Ready Professional Learning

“i-Ready Professional Learning is a comprehensive and well-developed educator support system that goes beyond traditional workshop-based professional development. Its combination of coaching, leadership development, on-demand learning, and embedded guidance reflects current best practices in adult learning and implementation science.”

CyberNut - K12 Phishing and Digital Citizenship Training

“CyberNut is a strong cybersecurity tool built specifically for the needs of K–12 schools. We found it provides valuable protection while also giving district leaders the data and insights needed to proactively identify risks, strengthen security, and make informed decisions about keeping students, staff, and systems safe.”

Edmentum, Courseware Elementary

“Edmentum’s comprehensive Courseware digital curriculum for grade 6 through adult learners is based on the development of real-world skills, identifying students’ passions, and cultivating perseverance and grit. Our Courseware is rigorous, relevant, and aligned to state and national standards with over 400 courses covering core, elective, CTE, world language, and advanced subjects.”

Epson BrightLink 870Ei Ultra Short Throw Interactive Display with 4K Enhancement

“The Epson BrightLink® 870Ei is a strong evolution of interactive classroom display technology, combining the flexibility of projection with many of the collaboration features typically associated with interactive flat panels. Its ability to create a large interactive image on existing whiteboards, combined with 4K enhancement, wireless casting, and collaborative annotation, makes it an attractive option for schools looking to maximize instructional space while avoiding the size limitations of fixed displays.”

ExploreK12, Frax (ExploreK12)

“Frax is an adaptive, game-based design that emphasizes conceptual understanding rather than rote procedures. It is grounded in sound instructional research and is adaptive to the needs of the learners. It is a powerful supplement to math instruction in the intermediate grades.”

ExploreK12, Raz-Plus (ExploreK12)

“Raz-Plus is a comprehensive supplemental literacy platform that aligns well with current Science of Reading practices. Its greatest strengths are the breadth of instructional resources, assessment capabilities, and flexibility for differentiated instruction across K–5 classrooms. The refinement and expansion of an established product makes it a robust tool for reading intervention and supplemental literacy instruction.”

ExploreK12, Reflex (ExploreK12)

“An excellent supplemental math solution for building foundational fact fluency. Its greatest strengths are adaptive personalization, student engagement, and a clear focus on helping learners develop the automaticity needed for success in higher-level mathematics.”

Follett Software, Follett Destiny Library Manager

“The Follett Software Destiny Library Manager is the best tool on the market for managing school libraries and providing real-time usage reporting. Follett has become the gold standard for doing so in elementary, secondary, and even higher education.”

Follett Software, Follett Software AI

“Follett AI provides helpful analytics within Follett environments. It gives relevant insights to users within the context of district policies, all while protecting data and privacy.”

Forward Edge, Edge U Badges

“The Edge U Badges platform provides hundreds of self-guided courses with microcredentialing. It combines flexibility, instructional relevance, and meaningful credentialing opportunities. Its greatest strengths are the depth of content and its ability to personalize educator growth while supporting district professional development goals.”

HamiltonBuhl, HamiltonBuhl PowrePost

“The HamiltonBuhl PowerPost is a practical classroom product that solves a common operational problem: providing accessible charging where it's needed. Its mobility, mix of AC and USB ports, and thoughtful cable management make it useful in flexible learning environments.”

InfoCase, PermaLock XP Case

“The PermaLock XP case provides real protection for student devices. Its innovative design locks onto each side of the device, avoiding the need for hinges, typically the weakest point of the case. If I had a student with a 1:1 device, this is the case I'd get!”

IPEVO Inc., IPEVO Cast

“PEVO Cast is a clean, easy classroom solution for wireless sharing without the usual app downloads, logins, or device headaches. It is especially useful for schools with mixed devices, and the fast switching plus smooth 1080p sharing make it a practical fit for everyday teaching and student presentations.”

JAR SYSTEMS, Stack6 by JAR Systems

“The JAR Systems Stack6 is a thoughtfully designed charging station that focuses on portability, simplicity, and efficient USB-C charging for shared-device environments. Features such as integrated short cables, Quick-Sense charging, ventilation, and a modular stackable design address many of the day-to-day frustrations school IT teams face.”

Learning.com, EasyTech Digital Readiness Platform with Integrated AI Literacy — Primary Education (K–6)

“EasyTech Digital Readiness Platform presents a well-conceived approach to digital literacy. It embeds AI literacy into a broader K–8 progression rather than treating it as a standalone topic. It uses sound pedagogy and a strong developmental sequence—from foundational digital skills to AI ethics and algorithmic reasoning.”

LEGO Education, LEGO Education Science

“Everybody loves LEGO! These highly engaging kits draw students into science learning by providing hands-on, collaborative challenges. Teachers and students will love these inquiry-based, curriculum-aligned activities.”

LEGO Education, LEGO Education Computer Science & AI

“LEGO Education Computer Science & AI appears is an effective way to make coding and AI more approachable for younger students without making them feel like it is too abstract or intimidating. The hands-on kits, scaffolded lessons, and mix of icon- and word-based coding give it strong classroom value, especially for teachers who need something structured yet creative.”

Lexia, Science of Reading Classroom by Lexia

“Lexia has evolved to become one of the most comprehensive literacy ecosystems available for K–12. The suite of products covers a range of tools including adaptive instruction, assessment, AI-supported guidance, English language development, and professional learning, all in a unified platform.”

Lightspeed, Redcat by Lightspeed

“Lightspeed solutions are excellent and reliable. They are easy to implement in any classroom without a lot of IT intervention. They have the quality audio and feature set of more expensive hardwired classroom systems without the labor overhead or complexity.”

Lightspeed Systems, Lightspeed Insight - Screen Time Dashboard

“Lightspeed Insight seems like a very useful decision-making tool for districts that need clearer answers around app usage, screen time, and whether technology is actually supporting instruction. I like that it turns a messy, emotional topic into real-time data that leaders can use in board, parent, and policy conversations.”

LocknCharge

“The LocknCharge FUYL Smart Locker System addresses a real operational challenge for schools by automating device lending, charging, repairs, and asset management. Rather than functioning as a simple charging locker, it combines secure hardware with cloud-based workflow management, reducing the burden on IT staff while improving accountability. The integration of multiple authentication methods and real-time tracking makes it a mature and practical solution for 1:1 device environments.”

MagicSchool

“We piloted MagicSchool across our district and received very positive feedback from both staff and students. Teachers found it intuitive and easy to incorporate into their daily workflow, while students appreciated how it supported learning in meaningful and accessible ways.

MAXCases, MAXCases Extreme Shell-F Slide-On Case for the MacBook Neo

“The MAXCases Extreme Shell-F Slide-On Case for the MacBook Neo is custom designed to fit the new NEO by Apple. MaxCases brings their quality-designed protection to Apple's latest computer line. While this is a solid case, this case also does a great job of protecting the most vulnerable areas of the computer as well as protecting the keyboard.”

Moravia Education, Cubetto+

“Cubetto+ is a delightfully tangible way to teacher the littlest learners about coding. This tool provides developmentally appropriate learning with emphasis on storytelling, debugging, and hands-on exploration. No screen required!”

Otus

“Otus makes every step of the learning process more efficient for teachers, administrators, students, and families by using their portals that integrate grades, assessment scores, progress monitoring, and a full-fledged data warehouse. Their all-in-one platform, with integrated tools to gather, visualize, and act on student growth data, allows teachers and administrators to make decisions based on solid data that help students achieve significant growth and make strides toward reaching their full potential.”

Ozobot, K-2 Math Fluency Kit

“Ozobot's Math Fluency Kit brings together coding basics with deep math learning. Using Evo robots with common math manipulatives, students explore mathematical concepts in engaging, hands-on ways. Fully developed lesson plans and materials align to standards. This tool provides the perfect way to build computer science learning into math.”

Pitsco Education LLC, Echo Drone

“The Drone Maker Kit excellent STEM solution for grades 3 - 8. It authentically integrates engineering, physics, and problem-solving. Its greatest strength is immersing students in the complete engineering design cycle, making it much more than a drone flight activity.”

Prodigy Education, Prodigy

“Prodigy is a highly engaging learning platform because it turns math and ELA practice into something students actually want to keep using. The adaptive practice, teacher dashboard, free access, and new game modes make it a strong classroom support tool, though its biggest strength is engagement and skill practice rather than full curriculum replacement.”

Promethean, Promethean ActivPanel 10 (AP10)

“Promethean makes great products with the features students and teachers need to succeed as well as the flexibility to include multi operating systems. The included software are great additions too.”

Read Naturally, Inc., Read Live

“Read Live is an excellent literacy intervention platform distinguished by its strong research foundation, comprehensive intervention tools, and long history of success. Its greatest strength is consistent, evidence-based implementation rather than technological innovation. With the current trend towards less screens for young learners, their print option provides a relevant and appealing option for literacy learning.”

Samsung Electronics America, WAFX-P

“Not only does this new WAFX-P Interactive Panel by Samsung offer stunning, vibrant displays of life-like content for learning, but it is also amazingly versatile, accepting content from many curriculum companies and converting lessons created with other display brands and interactive software platforms. I especially like its AI Assistant capabilities, including Circle to Search, AI Summary, AI Quiz, and Live Transcript, which bring cutting-edge tools that are easy to use for teachers of all subjects!”

Seesaw

“Seesaw is one of the most established and versatile learning platforms for elementary education. Its combination of digital portfolios, standards-aligned instruction, family communication, and creative student expression makes it especially effective for PreK–6 classrooms. The addition of AI-powered instructional tools strengthens the platform, while third-party validation and broad adoption reinforce its educational impact.”

SMART Technologies, SMART SoundLift Voice Amplification Solution

“This helpful addition to the SMART ecosystem allows teachers to use natural voice without any students missing a word. Although it has a narrow use case, it works seamlessly to provide dual-microphone support for presentations.”

TORSH Talent- Professional Learning Platform for Instructional Coaches and Educators

“This is a coach's dream! Extremely helpful tool for tracking teacher learning and student outcomes. Made by a coach, it is intuitive and provides lots of info in a usable format.”

TouchView Companion Series: Portable Collaboration Without Boundaries

“I found the TouchView Companion Series to be a unique approach to projecting content, especially in small group learning environments. Instead of keeping instruction tied to the front of the room, it gives teachers the flexibility to bring content directly to students, creating more opportunities for collaboration and interaction, especially in primary grades and centers.”

TouchView Interactive ULTRA Series Gen 6: Secure, Future-Ready Collaboration for Every Learning Environment

“The TouchView Interactive ULTRA Series is a robust classroom solution that gives educators the flexibility to teach in a variety of learning environments. We found its ease of use, portability, and connectivity make it a strong option for supporting everything from whole-group instruction to small-group collaboration.”

Wayground

“This is a very good solution for elementary education. Its tool set is varied enough to address the needs of the modern classroom, whether it be special needs accommodations or language understanding. It also seems to use AI in a strategic and well thought out manner.”

Secondary

Acer, ProDesigner PE270K L1

“I found the ProDesigner PE270K L1 to be a solid monitor that delivers great value for the cost. Its high-resolution display makes it a strong option for classrooms where students and staff are creating graphics, digital media, or other visual content that benefits from accurate color and sharp detail.”

ASUS NUC 16 Pro Mini PC: Small Footprint, Big Impact in Education

“The ASUS NUC 16 Pro Mini PC is a strong fit for schools that want serious AI-capable performance without taking up much space. Its compact design, centralized management, rugged certification, and service-friendly build make it feel especially practical for classrooms, labs, and district-wide deployments.”

AVID Products, AE-15 USB-C Headset: Bridging the USB-C Affordability Gap

“The AVID AE-15 USB-C Headset is a smart, no-nonsense classroom audio solution that solves a compatibility and affordability issue for schools moving to USB-C devices. It’s not flashy, but the durability features, student-friendly design, low price, and 2-year warranty make it a strong everyday option for districts buying at scale.”

BenQ RP05

“The BenQ Board RP05 Interactive Display comes across as a powerful, future-ready classroom display that goes well beyond basic touch and presentation features. The on-device AI, 50-point touch, Google EDLA access, wireless sharing, and district management tools make it feel like a strong all-in-one option for modern learning spaces.”

Bluum, Redefining Career Readiness Through the Nation's First District-Wide Esports Program

“Bluum’s esports career pathway initiative is a well-executed example of turning student interest into a real district-wide learning opportunity. What stands out is that Bluum is not just selling equipment but also bringing together the space, technology, curriculum, partners, and implementation needed to make the program sustainable.”

Boxlight Symphonic Series — Secondary Education

“The Symphonic platform has the features and ease of installation that would work in any school district. Great solution.”

Boxlight Symphony — Secondary Education

“This is a powerful and very well thought out communication system. That it can be implemented on an existing IP network without the need for an Internet connection is a great value ad for school districts.”

Brisk Labs, Brisk Teaching

“Brisk Teaching is one of my favorite AI tools for teachers on the market today. Not only do they pay close attention to student and teacher data privacy as a process input for AI, but I also love that it already resides as an extension to your browser. This makes it a tool that teachers don't have to leave their workspace to use another web platform.”

Britannica Education, Britannica Studio: AI Teachers Can Trust

“I really like that this product is focused on appropriate use of AI. Britannica Studio helps teach appropriate and responsible use of AI as a tool to work alongside or in place of student work.”

Cellairis, Cellairis Cyber Pouch

“This is a simple, reliable, and low-tech solution to keep devices safe while blocking distractions. Making them large enough for additional items is a nice feature too. The device storage accessory also makes devices quickly accessible in case of an emergency. Not including locks takes away the added labor of managing them for teachers and lost keys/forgotten combinations for IT managers.”

Cidi Labs, DesignPLUS: Transforming Canvas Course Design at Scale

“DesignPLUS feels like a really helpful upgrade for Canvas users who want better-looking, more accessible courses without needing technical design skills. The mix of templates, design controls, content tools, accessibility support, and AI-assisted creation makes it feel both practical and scalable for institutions managing lots of courses.”

Cidi Labs, UDOIT Advantage: The Course Accessibility Tool for Canvas

“UDOIT Advantage appears to be a very practical accessibility tool because it meets educators directly in Canvas and helps them fix issues without requiring technical expertise. The smart filters, scorecards, file remediation, and AI-assisted SpeedFIXIT workflow make it feel both efficient and meaningful for creating more inclusive courses.”

ClassLink Suite

“ClassLink Suite gives high school teachers the flexibility to customize the look, layout, and content of their classes to meet the needs of their students. We found this level of personalization helps create a more organized and engaging digital learning environment while giving students quick access to the resources they need every day.”

ClassVR, EduverseSTEM from Avantis Education

“The ClassVR Eduverse Module is the total package for bringing and scaling Virtual Reality use in schools. ClassVR has not only made the hardware and its management easy for schools to adopt and implement, but has also created a phenomenal software platform to complement this amazing system.”

Edmentum, Accelerating Student Achievement with Exact Path

“ExactPath by Edmentum is a really nice tool for taking assessment scores and standards from annual and quarterly summative assessment companies and projecting a unique learning path for students to improve their areas of deficiencies.”

Epson America, Epson PowerLite L370E 3LCD Laser Projector with 4K Enhancement

“The Epson PowerLite L370E is a strong, flexible projector for classrooms and shared spaces that need bright, large-scale visuals with minimal maintenance. Its brightness, laser lifespan, wireless connectivity, and easy setup tools make it a dependable upgrade.”

ExploreK12, Gizmos (ExploreK12)

“Gizmos offers interactive experiences for rich math and science learning, including simulations, real world cases to analyze, and investigations that lead to sense making from phenomena. If you want your students to grapple with open ended explorations, Gizmos is the perfect tool!”

FACIL'iti, FACIL'iti Talents

“This is a great solution. I myself have vision issues and when I tried the features for low vision it made websites much easier to read. I also like that it is free for end-users.”

Follett Software Facilities Schedules“Facilities scheduling is always challenging and having an integrated system with built-in workflows is very valuable for school districts. The schedule visibility to all stakeholders ensures this information is easily available to avoid conflicts. This product would be a great addition to administrative, maintenance, custodial, and security teams.”

Forward Edge, Edge U Badges

“The Edge U Badges platform provides hundreds of self-guided courses with microcredentialing. It combines flexibility, instructional relevance, and meaningful credentialing opportunities. Its greatest strengths are the depth of content and its ability to personalize educator growth while supporting district professional development goals.”

HamiltonBuhl USBC-A Smart-Trek

“The Smart-Trek USBC-A Headset is a smart classroom workhorse, especially because the built-in USB-C and attached USB-A dongle solve a real compatibility headache. It is not trying to reinvent the headset category, but the durability touches and school-friendly design make it feel very useful and easy to standardize.”

Kahoot!

“We've had great success with Kahoot! in our district as a way to increase engagement while giving teachers quick, meaningful feedback on student learning. Like any instructional tool, it's most impactful when it's part of quality instruction rather than a standalone activity, helping reinforce learning instead of simply becoming a game.”

Learning Genie, Curriculum Genie

“Curriculum Genie is a strong AI curriculum tool because it is built around actual K–12 needs, not just generic lesson generation. The student-centered planning, standards alignment, UDL support, differentiation, and teacher-approval model make it feel practical, responsible, and genuinely useful for saving time without compromising quality. I love the community-based curriculum as well.”

Learning.com, EasyTech Digital Readiness Platform with Integrated AI Literacy — Secondary Education 6-8

“EasyTech Digital Readiness Platform presents a well-conceived approach to digital literacy. It embeds AI literacy into a broader K–8 progression rather than treating it as a standalone topic. It uses sound pedagogy and a strong developmental sequence—from foundational digital skills to AI ethics and algorithmic reasoning.”

LEGO Education Computer Science & AI

“An excellent middle school STEM solution that effectively combines engineering, coding, and AI literacy. Its greatest strength is making emerging technologies tangible through LEGO's proven hands-on learning approach while providing teachers with a structured, scalable curriculum.”

LEGO Education Science

“The LEGO Education Science Kit 6-8 is a strong hands-on science solution that makes middle school concepts easier to teach, explore, and actually enjoy. Its biggest strength is combining curriculum alignment, inclusive design, and playful learning in a way that feels useful for both teachers and students.”

MagicSchool's MagicStudent

“MagicSchool for Students provides a safe, education-focused space where students can get support, ask questions, and brainstorm ideas. We found it encourages independent thinking while giving students guidance throughout the learning process, helping them build confidence rather than simply giving them answers.”

Medal of Honor Foundation, Path to Honor Expansion

“Path to Honor is a compelling character education platform that uses authentic stories from the Congressional Medal of Honor Society to engage students in ethical reasoning, civic responsibility, and personal reflection. Its greatest strength is grounding lessons in real people and real decisions rather than hypothetical scenarios, making discussions about values more meaningful. This is a beautiful resource for teaching character in deep ways.”

Merge, The all-new Merge 3D Platform: Empowering the next generation to explore, learn

“The new Merge 3D Platform is literally ‘out of this world’ and is one of the most innovative products in EdTech today! All of the great individual Merge Apps from the MergeEDU world are now on one platform, making them easily accessible. Now, you no longer even need a MergeCube to do MergeCube activities, thanks to the addition of A.I. and you can take any real-world object, even a drawing, and turn it into a 3D digital model or asset. This platform is amazing!”

Microsoft Learning Zone

“Microsoft Learning Zone is a powerful classroom-ready AI tool because it integrates lesson creation, live delivery, personalization, and formative insights, rather than leaving teachers to piece them together. Its real strength is keeping educators in control while making AI feel practical, responsible, and useful in the flow of teaching.”

Moravia Education, Inc., HP Robots - Otto

“HP Otto is a well-rounded educational robotics platform that takes students beyond coding by having them build, wire, and program a functioning robot. Its progression from physical assembly to increasingly sophisticated programming provides an authentic engineering experience. The modular, customizable robots will have students iterating and creating again and again!”

Otus

“Otus makes every step of the learning process more efficient for teachers, administrators, students, and families by using their portals that integrate grades, assessment scores, progress monitoring, and a full-fledged data warehouse. Their all-in-one platform, with integrated tools to gather, visualize, and act on student growth data, allows teachers and administrators to make decisions based on solid data that help students achieve significant growth and make strides toward reaching their full potential.”

ParentSquare Attendance Plus

“Attendance Plus is a highly relevant and thoughtfully designed addition to ParentSquare. Rather than an isolated attendance management product, it tackles chronic absenteeism within an established parent communication system. Its greatest strength is connecting data, intervention, and family engagement within a single platform educators already use.”

Pitsco Education LLC, Seeker

“Seeker is a very strong middle school robotics platform because it combines hands-on building, real sensors, career-connected challenges, and a smooth path from block coding to Python. The built-in simulator, web-based portal, and teacher supports make it especially classroom-ready, while the rover-to-robot flexibility gives it more depth than a basic coding kit.”

Play Piper LLC, Piper Robotics Expedition Set: Physical Computing for Engaged Classrooms

“The Robotics Expedition Set is a lot of fun, an approachable way to get students building, coding, and thinking like engineers instead of just using technology passively. Its strength is the hands-on progression from guided builds to creative problem-solving, though it feels more focused on STEM exploration than on being a broad, all-subject classroom tool.”

Plugable PS-10CC 10-Port USB-C PriorityShare™ Charger

“The Plugable PS-10CC is a 10-port USB-C charging station is a great way to revitalize old and outdated charging carts or caddies that have older style charging cables. Not only does it update the cables but it brings modern fast charging technology to these older carts and caddies and prioritizes which ports should charge faster than others.”

PowerSchool

“Our district uses Naviance, and we've found it to be a valuable resource for college and career readiness. After reviewing a number of platforms, we appreciated the depth of information it provides to help students explore their options, set goals, and make informed decisions about their next steps after high school.”

Reading Horizons Elevate

“I really like the combination of teacher-led direct instruction with the use of the software. Also, that the product is specifically designed to meet the needs of learners from a variety of age levels and not something that teachers need to adapt to.”

Samsung Electronics America, WAFX-P

“Not only does this new WAFX-P Interactive Panel by Samsung offer stunning, vibrant displays of life-like content for learning, but it is also amazingly versatile, accepting content from many curriculum companies and converting lessons created with other display brands and interactive software platforms. I especially like its AI Assistant capabilities, including Circle to Search, AI Summary, AI Quiz, and Live Transcript, which bring cutting-edge tools that are easy to use for teachers of all subjects!”

Securly

“This product is different from solutions that block or detect if AI is used for an assignment. It actively monitors and reports on usage and sentiment in a safe, compliant environment. It would make enforcing district AI policies easier.”

Senturo

“The creators of this product were very smart in creating something that it used alongside popular MDM and device administration tools. The lack of good geolocation tools has long been an issue and these tools seem to help a great deal. It's a great tool for anyone who has to manage a fleet of devices.”

SMART Technologies, SMART MultiStylus: Untethered Teaching & Interactive Learning Anywhere

“The SMART MultiStylus feels like a genuinely useful upgrade for teachers who want to stay mobile while still controlling the board and lesson flow. The combination of precision writing, air mouse control, programmable buttons, and fast battery-free charging makes it feel thoughtful, classroom-focused, and more innovative than a standard stylus.”

Thames & Kosmos, Robotics Workshop with micro:bit

“I like this product. It incorporates a well respected block coding language which facilitates learners who want to go further learn more advanced programming languages. The basic kit seems to have the sensors and components needed for a variety of lessons to keep learners engaged. Furthermore, there are many add-on components to extend its capabilities.”

TouchView Interactive ULTRA Series Gen 6: Secure, Future-Ready Collaboration for Every Learning Environment

“We really liked the TouchView Interactive ULTRA in our district. The seamless connection to our existing devices made it easy for teachers to get started, and its lightweight design made it simple to move between classrooms and learning spaces when needed.”

TouchView Companion Series: Portable Collaboration Without Boundaries

“I found the TouchView Companion Series to be a unique approach to projecting content, especially in small group learning environments. Instead of keeping instruction tied to the front of the room, it gives teachers the flexibility to bring content directly to students, creating more opportunities for collaboration and interaction.”

Vasco Electronics, Vasco Audience

“Vasco Audience feels like a very practical equity tool for schools because it makes multilingual communication easier to access without extra hardware, downloads, or complicated setup. The real-time subtitles, audio streams, custom glossaries, and pay-as-you-go model make it especially strong for family engagement, though its impact depends heavily on translation accuracy in live settings.”

ViewSonic IFP41 Series Interactive Displays

“The ViewSonic IFP41 Series Interactive Display is amazing! Not only is it priced right, but it offers wonderful functionality to laptops or desktop computers by bringing the power of touch to these devices, as well as additional viewing real estate. The ViewSonic IFP41 Series Interactive Display series also offers a suite of device management and monitoring tools provided by Google Workspace. Packed with an upgraded octa-core CPU and high-bandwidth DDR5 memory, as well as now offering 64-point multi-touch screen with palm rejection, this series features native 4K Ultra HD resolution and a 5,000:1 contrast ratio for vivid visuals, which places it as one of the most powerful IFP's on the market today!”

Vivi Live Captions: Real-Time Translation for Multilingual Learners

“Vivi Live Captions feels like a highly practical accessibility and language-support tool that fits naturally into classrooms instead of adding another awkward layer for teachers or students. The real strength is giving each student live translation on their own device, which makes the product feel both inclusive and genuinely useful for day-to-day instruction.”

Vivi Device Alerts: Cross-Platform Crisis Response

“Vivi Device Alerts feels like a strong, practical safety tool because it closes a real gap in school crisis communication: making sure staff actually see and acknowledge critical messages. Its value is especially clear for larger campuses, though its innovation is more in execution and accountability than in creating an entirely new category.”

Wayground

“This is a very well thought out integrated platform with features that are needed for today's challenges, like AI cheating and integrated data analytics.”

Higher Ed

Airia

“Airia is a practical platform for higher ed teams that need control over AI sprawl without slowing down innovation. The value lies in bringing visibility, security, compliance, and auditability into one place, rather than forcing institutions to stitch together separate tools.”

ASUS Computer International, ASUS ROG G700

“The ASUS ROG G700 Desktop is a serious powerhouse for esports, gaming, streaming, and creative work where performance really matters. It brings a strong mix of top-tier components, smart cooling, upgrade-friendly design, and premium ROG styling, making it feel built for both immediate impact and long-term use.”

BenQ, BenQ WDC15

“he BenQ InstaShow WDC15 is a polished, classroom-ready solution for making wireless presenting less frustrating and more dependable. Its biggest advantage is the mix of broad device compatibility, strong 4K performance, touchback control, and robust security, all without adding subscriptions or extra IT complexity.”

Copyleaks, Copyleaks AI Logic

“The AI Content Detector by Copyleaks comes at an incredibly opportune time in the Age of ChatGPT! This product is the first company to release an AI content detection product onto the market, supplying a solution for academic institutions to make more informed decisions surrounding generative AI use.”

D2L, D2L Lumi: Trusted AI for Higher Education

“This is a very good add-on product to the Brightspace solution. It has all of the features and controls needed for a modern higher ed learning environment.”

Epson America, The LE-C1135 Epson 135-Inch All-in-One Direct View LED Display

“This is a very nice display. The use of Chip-on-Board technology ensures you get a quality image every time. The variety of AV ports and controls as well as the serviceable control box are great additions.”

Samsung Electronics America, WAFX-P

“Not only does this new WAFX-P Interactive Panel by Samsung offer stunning, vibrant displays of life-like content for learning, but it is also amazingly versatile, accepting content from many curriculum companies and converting lessons created with other display brands and interactive software platforms. I especially like its AI Assistant capabilities.”

TouchView Interactive, TouchView Interactive ULTRA Series Gen 6: Secure, Future-Ready Collaboration for Every Learning Environment

“We really liked the TouchView Interactive ULTRA in our district. The seamless connection to our existing devices made it easy for teachers to get started, and its lightweight design made it simple to move between classrooms and learning spaces when needed.”

Welcome to the July Edtech Show & Tell, in which our editors share some of the new edtech products that have caught our attention this month. These are not reviews or endorsements, but a showcase of education-friendly items, platforms, and more that we think might be noteworthy for you.

This month's new offerings, many of which are being showcased at ISTELive in Orlando, include financial literacy games, a remote presentation device, and a promising iOS app that turns students' notes into flashcards, quizzes, and games.

ASUS Education | Chromebox 6a, USB AI Accelerator

ASUS debuted the ASUS Chromebox 6a, its flagship ChromeOS compact desktop and the UGen300 USB AI Accelerator at ISTE+ASCD 2026.

Equipped with 14th Gen Intel Core 7 processors, the Chromebox 6a features Zero-Touch Enrollment, Google Admin console and the Titan C security chip. The ASUS UGen300 USB AI Accelerator is a USB edge AI accelerator for both classic and generative AI, delivering powerful, low-power local AI inference at the edge. Equipped with over 100 pre-trained models for rapid deployment, the UGen300 transforms standard devices into AI-ready tools.

Avantis Education | EduverseSTEM

Avantis Education, a provider of virtual and augmented (VR/AR) technology for schools, will give educators an exclusive first look at EduverseSTEM, its new immersive STEM solution at the ISTELive 26 conference June 28-July 1, 2026 in Orlando, Florida. The complete solution will be available to schools in time for the new academic year. EduverseSTEM, is a complete, immersive STEM ecosystem that combines ClassVR Xcelerate headsets, curriculum- aligned STEM content, classroom management tools and a Gold Standard Project-Based Learning Framework into one ready-to-teach solution for middle and high school classrooms.

BandLab For Education | 2 .0

BandLab for Education 2.0 music creation platform for schools is built to support the way music is taught and made today. Available at $2.50 per student per year, with free access for eligible Title I schools in the US and comparable support in other markets, 2.0 is designed to put professional music creation within reach of any classroom.

Cambium Learning Group | ExploreK12

ExploreLearning | Learning A‑Z today announced it is rebranding as ExploreK12, marking the next phase of its evolution as a unified organization serving educators across literacy, math, and science. Beginning with the 2026–27 school year, ExploreK12 is introducing a set of back‑to‑school enhancements for literacy, math and science, including strengthened assessments, expanded content, and new instructional supports that help educators monitor student progress and provide targeted support.

ClassDojo | Websites

ClassDojo Websites is a new school and district website platform designed specifically for K–12 systems. The platform automatically keeps school and district websites up to date by connecting directly to ClassDojo—the platform already used by millions of families and educators. ClassDojo Websites brings website management and district communications into one connected platform, reducing manual work while ensuring families always see accurate, consistent information. Post once, and it shows up everywhere. No double-posting, no stale pages, and no extra work for staff.

Coolmath Games | Financial Literacy hub

The new Financial Literacy hub is designed to replace abstract classroom explanations with games that require decision making in simulated financial situations. Users are dropped into scenarios where every choice has consequences. In games such as Investor Tower, players learn what it actually means to make money work for them, building an understanding of investing through progression and risk based decisions.

Coursera | Ollie

Ollie is an AI-powered microlearning app that delivers short lessons drawn from content by leading partners including AWS, Duke University, and Microsoft. Available to Coursera Plus subscribers, Ollie brings Coursera's university and industry content into a new learning experience featuring interactive practice and conversational AI support. Key features include: Short-form lessons; instant practice exercises; conversational AI support; and Flow Mode and Explore Mode for hands-free listening and topic discovery..

CTL | OPS All-in-One Desktop Computer with ChromeOS

Ideal for education, this solution leverages the power of ChromeOS for its built-in and proactive security and easy IT management via the Google Admin console. An AIO with ChromeOS enables IT directors to deploy the power of ChromeOS to desktops. You can create a singular, cohesive ecosystem that streamlines policies and configurations across all Chromebooks and AIO desktops with ChromeOS.

Dimensions | Citation Check

Citation Check is an API-based editorial tool that automatically detects self-citation in manuscript submissions, evaluates each instance, and returns a risk rating to support editors' decision-making before papers reach peer review. The tool is the latest addition to Digital Science's research integrity portfolio, alongside Dimensions Author Check – designed to help the research community uphold integrity and trust in the scholarly record.

Edlio | Edlio Agents

Edlio Agents are agentic workflows built into the Edlio CMS. Specialists with a defined area of expertise and the skills to handle complex tasks. These complete multi-step processes without needing to be micromanaged, so schools can get more done in less time within the same Edlio platform they are already using. Edlio Agents will be launching through the Edlio platform during the 2026-27 school year, starting this fall.

ELEGOO | Centauri Carbon 2 Combo

Elegoo’s Centauri Carbon 2 Combo is the best versatile/well-rounded option on a budget. It caters to beginners with its accessible price point (ranging from $449-489) and simplified user experience while also satisfying 3D printing vets because it doesn’t sacrifice speed, performance or hardware for its cheaper price tag. It’s fast at printing multi-colored items, stable while withstanding high temperatures, and has smart automations to make printing easy.

Epson | LE-C1 Series

The LE-C1 Series, powered by chip-on-board (COB) technology, is Epson's first all-in-one dvLED line. Offering high brightness of 600 nits and excellent high contrast performance, even in the brightest of spaces, the new LE-C1 Series includes the LE-C1135 135-inch and the LE-C1162 162-inch Full HD 1080p models, plus the LE-C14K135 135-inch 4K model for ultra-fine detail and comfortable close-range viewing.

Extron | DTP3 T 322 D

The DTP3 T 322 D is a two-input wall plate transmitter that sends USB-C and HDMI video, USB data, embedded audio, power, and control up to 330 feet (100 meters) over a shielded CAT 6A cable. It can provide up to 100 watts of USB-C power delivery to charge the connected device when used with the Extron UPI 100 Power Inserter.

iClever | QuietShield Q950 Kids ANC Headphones

The QuietShield Q950 Kids ANC Headphones have received the TÜV Hearing Care Protection Certification as well as the 2026 Red Dot Design Award for its child-centered design. Key features include an 80dBA safe-volume limit as per WHO recommendation, Hybrid ANC (up to 35dB noise reduction), Transparency Mode, Wear Detection, Bluetooth Audio Sharing, and up to 60 hours of battery life.

Logitech | Spotlight 2

The Spotlight 2 Advanced Presentation Remote supports: Natural teaching by helping educators move freely through any learning environment, without being tethered to a podium, desk, or screen; human connections as advanced digital highlighting, spotlighting, annotation and magnifying, and a physical laser pointer support presence and more direct interaction with students; and simplicity with purpose through haptic feedback.

Luxor Workspaces | CellGuard Phone Pouch

The CellGuard Phone Pouch is a signal-blocking storage solution designed to help schools enforce phone policies while keeping student devices secure and in their possession. The pouch is constructed from reinforced fabric designed for daily use and features a hook-and-loop closure that produces a loud, audible sound when opened, allowing teachers to quickly identify when a pouch has been accessed during instruction. A lockable D-ring allows schools or students to secure the pouch when needed.

Magewell | Director Plus

Director Plus is a broadcast-grade, all-in-one portable 4K production and presentation system for end-to-end live video workflows. Users can connect live AV feeds and media assets from a range of devices, networks, and third-party software platforms. With production features including telestration and instant replay, creators can produce visually engaging content for enterprise communications, education, podcasts and more.

NoteFren | NoteFren

NoteFren is an iOS study app that turns a student's own notes (handwriting, PDFs, audio) into flashcards, quizzes, and games in ~10 seconds, built around active recall rather than AI summaries. NoteFren uses scientifically proven methods including spaced repetition (SM-2 algorithm), active recall, and the Feynman method. These techniques are backed by decades of research showing 2-3x better retention compared to traditional study methods.

Philips | Signage 7000 Series

The Philips Signage 7000 Series is designed with a depth of 30mm for the 65” model and 28.5mm on all others, 60 per cent less deep than its closest Philips Signage counterpart – the Philips Signage 4050Q. The 43”, 50” and 55” models are 10 per cent lighter than their 4050Q size equivalents, and the 65” model weighs 20% less than its 4050Q comparison.

Photon Education | Classwise Student Engagement System

Classwise, a student response system from Photon Education made its official U.S. debut at ISTELive 26, June 28-July 30 in Orlando, Florida. Classwise combines formative assessments, game-based learning, and data-driven instruction in a single platform, providing with a larage library of lessons, educational quizzes and teaching resources, plus a classroom set of Classpad handheld controllers. Students engage in learning in a screen-free way, using the Classpads to answer questions and respond to prompts

Smart | MultiStylus and SoundLift

MultiStylus and SoundLift are two new classroom accessories designed to extend the SMART Board experience by supporting collaboration, accessibility and engagement in learning environments. The MultiStylus puts full board control in their hand wherever they are in the room — switch pen modes, advance slides, or activate the air mouse to control the board without walking back to it. SoundLift routes the teachers voice through the SMART Board's integrated speakers, so no separate amplifiers, mixers, or cabling is required.

Telycam | Explore 100, Explore 300 and Explore 500

Building on the hallmarks of the Explore family, these new models deliver outstanding image quality, precise focus, and smooth mechanical movement across a wide range of production scenarios. Ideal for sports broadcasts, corporate events, educational applications, and live production environments, the new launches reinforce Telycam's commitment to empowering professional productions with high-performance, reliable, and versatile PTZ cameras.

Vivi | Live Captions and Device Alerts

Live Captions is a new feature that converts speech into real-time captions and translations across classroom displays. It provides students with translations in their native language with just a single click. Vivi Device Alerts has been upgraded to extend emergency notifications to Windows, macOS devices, and Webapp. The feature includes location-based targeting, mandatory acknowledgment tracking, and a complete audit trail to support compliance reporting.

• Edtech Show & Tell

Watch above or listen/download below.

For years, the promise of AI in education has outpaced the evidence. But a new research project—funded by the Gates Foundation and anchored by researchers at the University of Virginia and the University at Albany, SUNY—is working to change that equation.

The AI for Advancing Instruction at Scale (AI2S) project, developed in partnership with edtech company Edthena, uses a multimodal neural network trained on thousands of hand-coded classroom videos to analyze both the audio and visual dimensions of math instruction. The result is a system that can classify teacher questioning patterns, assess cognitive demand, and detect student engagement—with an accuracy that rivals trained human observers.

Rather than generating a dashboard of metrics, the system guides teachers through a structured coaching cycle—helping them identify a focus area, review their classroom data in context, and build a concrete action plan. Edthena CEO Adam Geller frames the distinction plainly: "We're not trying to build teachers a Fitbit. We're trying to build them a coach."

Critically, all teacher video and feedback remains private to the teacher. The system does not use classroom data to train its models—an assurance that researchers say has been central to teacher trust and adoption.

Peter Youngs, professor at UVA's School of Education and Human Development, sees broader implications for district leaders who have long struggled with the cost and scale of instructional coaching. "If we can show that certain patterns of machine learning output are consistent with how a human would have rated an entire lesson, that could be a game changer—making the process more efficient for principals, teacher educators, and researchers alike," he says.

With districts in Texas, New York, and Virginia currently piloting the tool, the research team is collecting data on feedback quality, changes in teaching practice, and teacher trust. Plans are already underway to expand the methodology to reading and language arts instruction.

To learn more about the AI2S project and the research behind it, visit the University of Virginia's School of Education and Human Development, where Peter Youngs leads work on teacher learning and instructional improvement. To explore Edthena's AI Coach platform — the production tool built on the AI2S research — visit edthena.com. Districts interested in participating in the ongoing pilot can reach out directly through the Edthena site.

Critical thinking really can be taught, suggests a new study led by Michael Bishop, a professor of philosophy at Florida State University.

For the study, published earlier this year in the Journal of American Psychology, Bishop and his collaborators split 397 students into two groups. Students in one group took a critical thinking class while students in the second group did not. The students who took critical thinking saw significant advantages over the students who did not.

As Bishop and his co-authors note, “the results suggest that an appropriately designed critical thinking class can dramatically reduce four common biases in judgment and decision making: honoring sunk costs, inferring causation from correlation, ignoring regression to the mean, and overlooking opportunity costs.”

Bishop is currently working on a book about teaching critical thinking. He discusses some highlights from the study as well as his experiences teaching the topic to students.

Teaching Critical Thinking: Defining What Critical Thinking Is

Attempts to teach critical thinking frequently fail, Bishop says. He believes this is because most approaches don’t follow the proper steps to teaching the topic, the first of which is defining what it means for somebody to be a better critical thinker.

“A lot of people who try to teach critical thinking go wrong on this first step,” Bishop says. This is because Bishop believes common definitions of critical thinking often focus on the wrong things.

"One wrong answer is that a rational thinker uses good rules or rational methods," he says. "Or you might think a rational thinker is an expert debater." But he says these definitions of critical and rational thinking are incomplete. Instead, with students, he focuses on providing them with effective strategies for engaging more deeply and accurately with various topics.

“I think that, really, a rational thinker in the end, it's not somebody who wins a lot of debates or the person who's most well-informed about issues," Bishop says. "It’s somebody who asks helpful and fruitful questions. These are questions that tend to lead to better answers.”

Emphasizing that it's about learning the proper process, Bishop adds, “I’m not teaching them rules. I'm not trying to teach them to win debates. I want them to ask fruitful questions.” 

Implementing Critical Thinking Lessons

Once you define what critical thinking looks like, you have to accurately assess why your students are not asking fruitful questions.

Bishop says that often students can ask fruitful questions in idealized situations yet fail to understand the implications of these strategies in real-world scenarios. For instance, Bishop has a scenario he asks students about in which they have to imagine their country is going to war with an unfriendly country. Students are told that ultimately, the war will be beneficial for their country with rewards outweighing costs.

Putting aside the non-financial costs of war for the sake of this argument, most students say that going to war is a good idea. However, in giving this answer, they’re making a potentially costly assumption that becomes clear if they think about the problem another way.

Instead of going to war, Bishop asks students to imagine they’re given three envelopes and told they can have the contents of one of the three envelopes. If they look in the first envelope and see a $5 bill, they can stop the game then, and they’d be $5 richer than they were before the game started. But since seeing the contents of the other envelopes before making their decision is permitted, students realize that taking the $5 is a bad choice because there could be much more money in the other envelopes. 


Part of what Bishop tries to convey to students is that the envelope problem and the war scenario should be treated the same way. “When I argue that ‘Hey, we should go to war because it's going to bring us this benefit,' all of a sudden it's harder to see. It's harder to recognize.”

Critical Thinking in Different Contexts

The three-envelope and war example Bishop provides is a variant of the operational cost fallacy in which we tend to ignore the cost of pursuing alternative strategies — for instance, the benefits we miss out on by a course of action we could take instead of going to war. Each of these fallacies can take some time to understand and then implement in the real world.

This is part of why Bishop calls his strategies for overcoming these fallacies in real life "cheat codes.” Once students do the initial work to learn them, they tend to have more informed decision-making.

While this research focused on a handful of fallacies, Bishop says that teaching good critical thinking skills involves teaching additional fallacies and mistakes. For instance, another thing students should look for is confirmation bias. This occurs when people use good critical thinking when opposing ideas they disagree with, but throw all that out the window when examining their side of the argument.

This is so common that Bishop wrote a short ditty about it that serves as a quick and important critical thinking lesson all on its own. It goes: “Low standards for my views and high standards for yours/Make us bad thinkers, extremists, and bores.”

Blended learning is a teaching approach that combines both traditional in-class instruction with digital technologies for lessons, assessments, feedback and more. In other words, face-to-face teaching is supplemented and supported by online lessons and content.

The advantages of blended learning include flexibility, student engagement, and the ability to personalize lessons.

The following blended learning sites, many of which are fully free, provide a variety of features through which educators can implement their blended learning approach.

Best Sites for Blended Learning

FREEMIUM

Newsela
A multiple award-winning platform, Newsela includes ELA, social studies, and STEM topics, and is particularly strong for differentiated reading and current events. A 45-day free trial of premium Newsela is provided to educators with no credit card required. The free version, Newsela Lite, provides a new leveled article each week, standards-aligned skill-building activities, and access to the Binder to review student work.

Pear Deck Learning
From its beginning as a Google Slides add-on, Pear Deck has expanded to now offer three additional services: Pear Start, Pear Practice, and Pear Assessment. Pear Start offers more than 40 AI tools to save teachers time, while Pear Practice allows teachers to build, share, and assign practice sets for individuals or groups, and Pear Assessment enables formative and summative assessments and automatic grading. The original Pear Deck’s free educator plan offers generous features such as lesson creation, differentiated learning, Immersive Reader, and student participation controls. Each program provides a free account for educators and premium accounts for schools and districts. Well worth checking out.

Parlay
Parlay, a powerful platform for discussion and debate in classrooms, makes it easy for educators to sign up and explore its features. Create a new discussion (written or verbal), browse more than 7,000 discussion prompts, and select grades. Topics can be entered directly as text, or though a link or PDF. The output will feature everything needed for a productive classroom discussion, including learning goals, questions, and peer feedback instructions. Students can be invited via code, roster, link, or Google Classroom. Basic Parley Free for teachers includes up to six roundtables with 50 students per roundtable.

Kahoot
One of the oldest and best-known quiz game platforms, Kahoot offers millions of ready-made gamified quizzes as well as the ability to create your own. Kahoot offers four paid plans ranging from $36 to $228 per year. Kahoot’s free basic account for educators and others allows creating and hosting a limited number of games, as well as joining games and exploring public kahoots.

PREMIUM

Canvas LMS
A complete learning management system providing tools for course creation, grading, collaboration, and mobile learning. Canvas integrates with multiple other platforms, including Microsoft Teams, Nearpod, Google Assignments, Discovery Education, Skyward SIS, and Slate. Unfortunately, the popular Free-for-Teacher accounts are currently unavailable, as Canvas rebuilds the backend, aiming for a fall 2026 launch.

Starfall
Starfall’s easy-to-navigate site and modest membership cost makes it ideal for both home and education, while its gamified interface will engage young users. Aimed at preK-5 students, Starfall’s games are research-based, standards-aligned, and cover reading and math topics from rhyming to factor pairs. While they don’t offer a free trial, each topic provides one or two free games for interested users to try. Education accounts are modestly priced at $70-$355 annually for individual teacher, classroom, or school accounts, and include student access on campus and at home.

IXL
Offering a comprehensive, skills-based K-12 curriculum, the award-winning IXL platform also includes diagnostic, assessment, and analytics tools for language arts, math, science, and social studies. Unlike many other such sites, IXL permits generous exploration of skills and lessons without joining. A full, free 30-day trial is offered for educators.

WeVideo Classroom
Designed for education, the video-editing platform WeVideo Classroom includes a wide range of built-in tools for video editing and export, and the ability to upload and integrate text, audio, image, and other files. Teachers can create classes, add multimedia assignments and projects, and provide feedback. Webcam, screen recording, templates, interactive videos, storyboarding and podcasts, and more are all part of the WeVideo ecosystem. Free seven-day trial with no credit card required.

FREE

Khan Academy Kids
This educational app for kids aged 2-8 has earned a five-star rating from the independent nonprofit Common Sense Media. Friendly animal characters and the gamified interface create a welcoming and engaging atmosphere for kids to learn early literacy and math skills, as well as to explore the natural world. Teachers can assign lessons and track progress in the app, which is 100% cost- and ad-free.

CK-12
A robust education nonprofit that started by providing open source digital textbooks in 2008, CK-12 has steadily added digital teaching resources for the past 10 years. Their products include new AI teaching tools and agents, customizable, interactive digital textbooks and science simulations, PLIX (Play-Learn-Interact-Explore) interactives, and much more. A wide range of subjects and grades are covered, from K-5 science to college algebra to adult education. Integrates with Google Classroom, Canvas, and Schoology.

OpenStax
From Rice University, OpenStax claims to be the world's largest publisher of free, peer-reviewed digital textbooks. Although I can’t confirm that claim, I can attest to the diversity of K-12 subjects for which digital textbooks are provided. OpenStax’s textbooks are written by experts in their fields, peer-reviewed, and standards-aligned. Digital books can be viewed online or downloaded as PDFs. A free educator account with your school email is required for full access. Available in English, Spanish, and Polish.

TEDEd
Not only does TedEd offer a wide range of educational videos, it also offers lessons built around these videos. Even better, educators can customize video lessons according to their teaching goals or upload their own video as a lesson foundation. Each lesson includes questions as well as a discussion forum.

Nowcomment
A free collaboration platform that allows for the discussion and annotation of online documents, Nowcomment offers an easy signup process and a fairly intuitive site. Teachers can upload documents, create private groups of students, and invite them to add comments. Files accepted for upload include Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, image, video, copy-and-paste from HTML, and text entry. For security and privacy, only invited users can comment on documents and private groups are not searchable by search engines.

iCivics Education
Top-notch collection of K-12 civic and social studies games, lesson plans, simulations, mystery-themed curriculum units, and more, iCivics Education allows educators to assign games, monitor student progress, and manage classes in one place. Integrates with Google, Clever, and other single sign-on solutions.

Khan Academy
A free learning platform that allows teachers to create and manage classes, assign courses, and monitor student progress, Khan Academy now also features Khanmigo Tools, free AI-powered tools for education. Courses include math, test prep, ELA, science, social studies, computing, professional learning, and more.

Prodigy
Fully free for teachers, schools, and districts, the game-based Prodigy platform gives educators the ability to create classes, assign lessons, monitor student progress, and identify learning gaps. Students play math and English learning games as individuals or in teams. Integrates with Google, Classlink, and Clever.

The rapid evolution of AI is fundamentally transforming the educational landscape, offering unprecedented opportunities alongside new responsibilities. This recent two-part webinar series was designed to guide education leaders through this shift, moving from the "what" of cutting-edge innovation to the "how" of workforce preparation and the "why" of data security.

It featured two sessions:

The Cutting Edge: New Features from Top AI Solution Providers: This session explores the most impactful new features from industry-leading AI solution providers that support curriculum, lesson planning, streamlining administrative tasks, and more.

The Integrity Infrastructure: How to Ensure AI Solutions are Safe: This session dives deep into the architecture of safety, exploring how leading AI providers are prioritizing student data privacy and institutional security.

Watch on demand here

The Cutting Edge: New Features from Top AI Solution Providers

The recent Tech & Learning EdTech to Watch Virtual Playground featured lightning round demonstrations of three influential educational technology tools: Brisk Teaching, Copyleaks, and Inquire.

Hosted by Tech & Learning’s Christine Weiser, the event highlighted how generative AI is being leveraged to enhance curriculum management, ensure academic integrity, and facilitate deeper learning through project-based instructional design.

Brisk Teaching

Presented by Content Marketing Manager Elisabeth Bostwick and Manager of Curricular Solutions Architecture Whitney Noel, Brisk Teaching is an AI education platform designed to assist teachers with creating materials, providing feedback, and adapting instruction directly within existing Google and Microsoft tools.

Brisk Teaching’s central focus is Curriculum Intelligence, which ensures AI-generated outputs align with district priorities and high-quality instructional materials, mitigating the risk of misalignment.

The platform's "Brisk Brain" is built on two foundations:

• District Guidance: Content-agnostic priorities such as instructional focuses and a Portrait of a Graduate.
• Curriculum Libraries: Resources mapped directly to a district’s high-quality instructional materials.

“Brisk works where you do,” said Bostwick. “You can always leverage the extension to open up over top of anything that you are creating. You can see how easy it is to open the extension right over top of any YouTube videos, docs, web pages, slides, and more.”

The Curriculum Intelligence framework ensures generated resources, such as lesson plans and assessments, are aligned to state standards and district-level goals. A forthcoming feature, Planning Mode, will facilitate dynamic conversations between teachers and Brisk, suggesting district instructional strategies based on student needs.

For differentiation, Brisk offers student-facing tools such as Boost activities and a Tutor that apply customizable guardrails and scaffolds. This helps maintain "productive struggle" while meeting diverse learner needs through multi-language support, speech-to-text, and read-aloud functionality.

For curriculum directors, Brisk provides the benefit of one secure AI layer across all adopted curricula, saving time and capacity by customizing static core materials with district priorities. Brisk is safe and secure, adhering to COPPA, FERPA, and GDPR compliance.

Copyleaks

Senior Solutions Engineer John Michael Perla demonstrated Copyleaks, an academic integrity platform designed to guide students in the responsible and ethical use of generative AI. It integrates directly into the LMS environment, such as Canvas.AI Detection and Customization.

Copyleaks’ AI detection settings are customizable by the school—a top-down approach—with three levels available:

• Level One: Detects content copied directly from LLMs with no modifications.
• Level Two (Default): Identifies submissions in which minor edits were made to the LLM-generated text.
• Level Three (Strictest): Designed for high usage of LLM-modified content, including content generated with sophisticated prompts or evasion tools.

“Within Copyleaks, you can also customize the plagiarism settings,” said Perla. “So if you want to pull in data, we can identify content from the entire Internet, which is like seven billion web pages. We could also create a private cloud hub for your school, which will be all your school's data, in one cloud repository.”

A key differentiator for Copyleaks is its use of logic to explain the AI detection score, preventing instructors from relying solely on a percentage. This logic is provided through two patent-pending tools:

• AI Source Match, which identifies specific web pages or articles that the LLM used as a reference to generate the student's submission.
• AI Phrases, which detects phrases used with high frequency by AI tools.

Copyleaks is a top-tier partner with Canvas and D2L, and also integrates with Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace, Schoology, and Sakai.

Inkwire

Dr. Julianne Ross-Kleinmann of Ulster BOCES demonstrated Inkwire, an early-stage, project-based learning (PBL) AI tool that supports deeper learning and accelerates authentic instructional design.

Inkwire consists of two main components:

• The PBL AI Copilot, which helps educators design PBL experiences aligned to state standards
• The Portfolio Platform, through which students can capture and showcase evidence of their learning.

“What stood out for us is that Inkwire is focused specifically on teaching and learning and not just a generic AI tool letting educators figure it out on their own,” said Ross-Kleinman. “Instead, it helps teachers think intentionally about authentic learning experiences.”

The design process utilizes the High-tech High Graduate School of Education kaleidoscope framework, which is customizable to a district's own instructional frameworks. Teachers can input a design idea, upload files, and then ask the AI to generate core project elements such as essential questions, launch ideas, and assessment types.

The output is a "one-pager report" that includes learning goals, including state-specific standards, competencies (which can be aligned to standards such as Portrait of a Graduate), and a day-by-day or calendar-view plan.

Inkwire is designed for teacher collaboration, allowing educators to co-design interdisciplinary projects. The portfolio section is crucial for assessment, as it can house student work and artifacts, supporting statewide initiatives by following students as they move between schools and tracking seals of alignment.

The Integrity Infrastructure: How to Ensure AI Solutions are Safe

Tech & Learning’s second "EdTech to Watch" webinar, hosted by brand manager Christine Weiser, explored responsible AI integration in K-12 education. The event showcased a pair of product solutions–TrekAI and Lightspeed Systems Insight–and emphasized the importance of safety, governance, and personalized learning. Attendees got to see demos of both tools and ask questions, and then were treated to a discussion of vetting AI tools from AI consultant Greg Bagby.

TrekAI

TrekAI functions as an on-demand, Socratic tutor for students. Designed to replace chaotic or unvetted AI usage, it serves as a "walled garden" that provides students with a supervised "learner's permit" experience.

“We're just handing the keys over to our students, and we're just kind of like, ‘Okay, just go figure this whole AI thing out,’” said Erin Burchik, Chief Growth Officer for TrekAI. “ChatGPT and other platforms kinda feel like this chaotic, overwhelming, unsafe interstate. And I don't know about you, but when I taught my kids how to drive, we started on back roads and parking lots. We didn't go straight to the interstate. And so we want to advocate for the time that students are in your care, you give them an environment to learn how to navigate this new world of AI safely.”

TrekAI aligns with district standards and curriculum, resisting plagiarism by guiding students through problems rather than providing instant answers. It is FERPA and COPPA compliant to protect student data privacy. It also includes social-emotional alerts that notify counselors and administrators if student interactions indicate risks such as self-harm or violence.

Another offering, Trek Adventure, is a hyper-personalized literacy tool that transforms standard curricula into choose-your-own-adventure books. By integrating specific educational standards (such as math concepts involving fractions) into the narrative, the tool reinforces classroom learning while keeping students engaged. It offers accessibility features, such as dyslexic-friendly fonts, and provides teachers with insights into student reading progress, making it a practical tool for guided reading rotations and literacy blocks.

“Almost all of our team are former educators, so when we're building out new products like Trek Adventure, I think about my sixth grade science class when I was a teacher for fifteen years,” said Joe Edlhuber, account executive, “I would have used Trek Adventure every week during my guided science rotation. It's really practical, not just fluff tech. It is really something that teachers should be using and students wanna be using every week.”

Lightspeed Systems

Insight from Lightspeed Systems provides districts with total visibility into their digital ecosystem, allowing administrators to identify exactly which AI tools are being used, by whom, and for how long. Given that schools often struggle to manage the hundreds of apps present in their environment, Insight’s analytics hub helps identify usage trends and distinguish between productive AI engagement and potential misuse.

“What people find is whether you've built an approval system or not, AI is already in your environment,” said Sergio Villegas, former educator and current regional sales manager for Lightspeed Systems. “What we need to be able to do is answer questions better. So our dashboard is gonna show you everything.”

Insight also offers automated monitoring of vendor privacy policies, alerting districts of changes in terms to ensure ongoing compliance.

Lightspeed Alert automates safety monitoring by analyzing student interactions in real-time. It focuses on identifying concerning behavior, such as indicators of self-harm or violence, across AI platforms and web activity. When an incident occurs, the system shows evidence—including screenshots and transcripts—to administrators, allowing for rapid, human-led intervention.

“This is kind of the wrap-around story of why having a consistent ecosystem matters because these systems need to talk to each other,” said Villegas. “It's hard for schools because we're all being tasked with too much on our plate and not enough people and resources to do it. So having a single ecosystem that can surface information, that can let you search deeper, that can automatically notify you, is important.”

By connecting directly to student information systems, the tool ensures that school staff can reach out to families or take appropriate action quickly, moving schools away from reactive, "he-said-she-said" scenarios.

Strategic Context: The AI Vetting Framework

To complement these tools, AI specialist Greg Bagby outlined a strategic roadmap for vetting AI technologies.

“Before adopting any tools, districts should ask this question: What problem is it solving?” Bagby said. “Is this a tool with clear goals for tech that we need to support? Is it gonna give personalized feedback? Is it for lesson design, assignments, tutoring? And who's gonna benefit from this tool? Is this for the teachers, the students, the school leaders ? We need to have all this in mind before we start jumping into tools because we have access to many, many tools, and why not understand the why before we jump in.”

Bagby said that districts should avoid working in silos and instead form inclusive task forces that include stakeholders from IT, curriculum, and, crucially, students.

Bagby’s framework underscores that AI must prioritize human-in-the-loop oversight, cultural bias testing, and rigorous data privacy agreements. He concluded that because AI technology evolves daily, district policies should be viewed as living documents, requiring constant dialogue to ensure they remain safe and reflective of the current learning environment.

“Just make sure that you avoid vendors who won't disclose how student data is being used and how AI is being trained,” Bagby added. “If it's using the student data to be trained on, that's one of those things that we wanna make sure that we always step away from and be cognizant of.”

Watch above or listen/download below.

Cybersecurity has topped CoSN’s annual State of EdTech report for at least eight consecutive years. For Jeff Carlson, Head of Education Strategy and Advocacy at Clever, that streak is not a failure of imagination — it’s an honest reflection of how hard the problem actually is.

“Even if you’ve solved one thing, there’s another thing,” Carlson said during this week’s Tech & Learning podcast conversation. “K-12 has become one of the most targeted industries for cyberattacks, and the threats keep evolving.”

Clever, which provides single sign-on and rostering services to between 75 and 80 percent of U.S. schools — both public and private — has watched that threat landscape shift in real time. What once centered on credential theft and unauthorized access has expanded to include third-party vendor vulnerabilities, with Carlson citing an eightfold increase in two years of districts worrying about attacks on vendors that then cascade into school systems. The data at risk is not just administrative: it includes student health records, special education documentation, and mental health communications.

“The biggest concern we hear from tech teams is that student data is going to be released,” said Carlson, who spent time as a special education teacher before moving into ed-tech strategy. “You’ve got health data, comments going back and forth about mental health challenges. That’s not just a technical problem.”

The arrival of AI has added a new layer of complexity. Carlson described a moment that has become familiar to many district leaders: waking up to find that an app updated overnight and now includes student-facing AI features no one vetted or approved. His advice is pointed — focus on enabling AI for educators before enabling it for students, prioritize tools built specifically for K-12 over consumer products retrofitted for classrooms, and establish clear data minimization standards that apply whether or not a vendor calls itself an AI company.

“We’re pretty quickly moving from having AI companies to just companies that are using AI,” Carlson said. “We used to have internet companies. Everybody has a website now. We can’t assume that just because somebody hasn’t told you they’re using AI that they’re not.”

For district leaders feeling overwhelmed, Carlson’s closing message was direct: take a breath, communicate openly with families and staff before a crisis forces the conversation, and treat AI governance as an ongoing dialogue rather than a policy set once and forgotten.

“The best thing you can do with fear is try to understand where it’s coming from,” he said. “And see how you can get over it one step at a time.”

Recent data from the 2024–25 school year continue to illustrate the persistence of academic achievement gaps for K-12 students. In response, headlines have blamed "screen time" and the purported detrimental effects of technology for much of this decline. From EdWeek to the New York Times, articles have presented a gross oversimplification; the story is more complicated.

Digital tools and programs present schools and systems with more durable, sustainable strategies to accelerate learning. During the 2024–25 school year, FullScale (formerly The Learning Accelerator) funded and evaluated 10 innovations through the Accelerating Adoption Network — six edtech tools, three programs, and one microschool model — each designed to scale promising, technology-enabled, evidence-based solutions.

Through this initiative, we learned about the complexities that emerge when evidence-based tools meet reality at scale.

3 Critical Lessons About Scale

The Accelerating Adoption Network sought to evaluate how these innovations scaled in terms of breadth, depth, and durability, as well as the impact on student learning, using a combination of teacher surveys, leader focus groups, and student outcome data (e.g., standardized assessments or course grades).

While the networks successfully scaled their breadth — expanding across 33 states, 130 sites, and impacting more than 3 million students — the depth and consistency of implementation varied significantly both across and within schools. Consequently, though student outcomes showed improvement over the course of the school year, the gains were not statistically significant. Regardless, most educators reported durable changes to instruction, with 62% reporting that the innovation positively influenced their instructional practices and 82% indicating that they wanted the work to continue.

The networks scaled, but the more interesting question is how. Three core learnings from the evaluation point to barriers that successful scaling need to overcome:

1. Implementation incoherence: The timing of the rollout, competing interventions, infrastructure challenges, or lack of consistency between the innovation and school or district priorities led to variation in implementation.
2. System conditions: Teachers largely found the innovations beneficial and easy to use, but system conditions such as from insufficient devices and bandwidth to competing tools and unclear expectations influenced implementation.
3. Research and evaluation infrastructure: Data-sharing agreements and institutional review processes, combined with rigid study designs, prevented agile and responsive decision-making, and limited our ability to gather interim data or revise research questions based on reality.

Despite current narratives about “screen time” and edtech efficacy, the Accelerating Adoption Network produced evidence of successful scaling. The included innovations reached more students, demonstrated growth on academic outcomes, and led to teachers making durable instructional changes, but this evidence is incomplete.

Evidence-Based Is Necessary, But Not Sufficient

Successful scaling depends on more than just having a high-quality, evidence-based tool. It requires a set of system conditions to be in place.

In our work with the Accelerating Adoption Network, we identified five interrelated elements that enable scaling. These cut across contexts and roles, offering actionable guidance for funders, policy-makers, and system-level decision makers.

• Strategic Alignment Before Adoption: Decision-making and conversations about edtech should begin with instructional strategy, not procurement. Clearly communicate how an innovation advances priority goals, what it replaces, and what it deprioritizes.
• Protected Time and Instructional Coherence: Make explicit decisions about when, where, and for whom an innovation should be implemented, not just used, and how it connects to curriculum, pacing, and instructional goals.
• Implementation Capacity: Build implementation capacity deliberately at multiple levels, ensuring educators have access to timely coaching, technical assistance, and leadership support within sites, while establishing routines that surface implementation patterns across sites.
• Enabling Infrastructure and Operational Readiness: Before scaling, ensure schools have reliable access to devices and connectivity as well as technical support.
• Continuous Improvement and Learning: Use formative data such as usage patterns, educator feedback, and interim student indicators to guide adjustments throughout implementation rather than waiting for end-of-year results.

Scale requires conditions that go beyond individual tools to include broader system readiness. As funders, policymakers, and leaders take an ever more critical look at the efficacy of edtech, the focus should include both selecting strong innovations and creating the conditions that allow educators and systems to learn, adapt, and improve over time so that the field can move beyond isolated successes and toward durable, equitable learning for more students. To do so, before adopting or scaling a new tool, it is critical to first ask these three questions:

• How does implementation of this tool fit coherently into our context?
• Do the necessary system conditions exist to ensure successful implementation?
• What research and evaluation needs to occur to support continuous improvement and to determine whether the tool achieves its intended outcomes?

Back in 2010, my school district embarked on the first-of-its-kind (in Texas at least) one-to-one device roll-out. The device du jour at the time was the Apple iPad. While billed as a consumer device, its price point (back then 16GB went for $499) and ease of use made it an intriguing option for education. Sure, there were no real ways to manage it back then (I don’t think the phrase MDM had even been invented yet), but the increased access to our students was a major bonus as we stepped deeper into the 21st century.

The next year, Google decided to enter the market and introduced its own education-inspired device, the Chromebook. These devices were a little more robust than the previously attempted cheap laptop market (anyone remember those little “netbooks”?). While those initial models didn’t offer the touch-screen benefit of an iPad, they did have a better price point (around $299) and could be managed through the Google Admin Suite.

Where Apple tried to distance itself from comparisons, spouting its design and creativity-first belief, it was inevitable there would be a standoff. “Creativity is nice and all, but what about state testing?!” the people would shout. “What about a keyboard!?” the masses would cry. Add to that the nearly $200 in savings and the ability to manage, and it's no wonder why the iPad would lose out to its keyboard cousin. According to Ed Week’s Market Brief report, the Chromebook overtook the iPad in terms of preferred educational student device sometime in 2014.

While myself and many other tech leaders waited for Apple’s response, the ChromeOS market continued to dominate, fueled even more by a global pandemic and quick access to funds (ESSER) for devices.

“The One” Arrives

As of 2025, ChromeOS currently dominates the global education market with a 60% adoption rate. Apple’s response? It lowered the price of the iPad, but schools still needed third-party MDM systems to manage all the intricacies of these devices.

Flash forward to this year. Now fully 17 years since the debut of the iPad, Apple has re-entered the education market with its 13” Macbook named . . . Neo. Apparently this isn’t a nod to the mercurial Keanu Reeves character from The Matrix, but rather to convey a sense of “fun, friendly, and fresh.” According to Meriam-Webster, “neo” is a prefix defined as new, recent, or different.

Whatever the reason, the announcement on March 4, 2026, sent shockwaves through the education market. Its price for education buyers? $499 – the same as those first iPad2s I bought way back when. So after all these years, Apple is back.

The question isn’t whether the Neo is a good device, but if the conditions that doomed the iPad’s educational takeover have changed enough for Apple to finally win.

Unlike 2010, Apple enters back into a market that is highly volatile on multiple fronts. Education funding is in disarray and we are in the midst of “the Great Edtech Backlash” in which families are insisting that schools crack down on screen time. Some, such as LAUSD, are complying with their own guidelines, but the truth is, the device market in education is ever-fragile at the moment. Heck, even the new villain in Toy Story 5 is an educational tablet device called a Lilypad.

It’s at this moment when Apple decided to reengage with the education market. While timing isn’t great, some schools are already starting to put in orders for Neos for their students. Kansas City Public Schools recently purchased more than 4,500 of the budget-friendly Macbooks and now proudly claim to be an “all-Apple district.”

While KCPS have placed their flag firmly in the ground with the Neo, other schools are looking at how to stretch their limited funds. Some have said that replacements are starting to run low, a combination of less funds and greater supply chain issues due to global tariffs and trade disputes. Unlike previous Chromebook refresh cycles, the tariff-related pricing volatility and procurement uncertainty are forcing technology leaders to place orders earlier or get more creative around their deployment schedules and scope.

Helping To Stretch Dollars?

We can sometimes be a victim of the latest new, shiny object in education, but given the current landscape I mentioned above and our previous forays into student device deployments, it's wise for technology leaders to take a more cautious approach this time around. Procurement of the Neo doesn’t seem to be an issue yet, even though early demand has surpassed expected supply.

Apple also seems to be addressing the MDM issue. While they do have their own Apple School Manager platform, they also have partnered with Jamf to develop a more seamless approach to deploy, track, and maintain devices. They are also touting the longer shelf-life of their devices, which I have experienced first hand.

Typical Macbooks can last as long as 8 years, which dwarfs the 3-5 years many Chromebooks typically last (dependent on the model type). While modern Chromebooks can now receive up to 10 years of ChromeOS updates, most school districts still budget for replacement after approximately 4-5 years because of physical wear and tear, battery degradation, and student use patterns. Will the Neo have the same issues? Not if it keeps with Apple’s previous track record.

In an era when educational funding is short, anything schools can do to stretch dollars may be enough to put Neo on top. One of the hidden benefits of our iPad one-to-one program was that after we had used them for 4-5 years, we could still sell them at a decent rate to recoup some of our costs. Based on the historical performance of MacBooks and other Apple hardware in secondary markets, there’s no reason to believe the Neo will be much different.

The true cost of a device isn’t necessarily what you pay on day one; it’s what the device costs after accounting for its value at the end of its lifecycle. If your $350 Chromebook is worth almost nothing in four years but your $499 Neo can be sold for $200, which device actually costs the district less?

Gearing Up For The Head-To-Head Battle

The aforementioned “Total Cost of Ownership” is a conversation schools should be having anyway, but one that Apple feels it will win out on in the long run. That and the same argument it made during the launch of the iPad.

For the everyday student tasks, both devices do pretty well. Whether it’s accessing the Learning Management System (LMS) or writing and researching online, both devices handle that without much difference. Chromebooks excel at using Google’s suite of tools (not a shock there), but struggle when you start getting more involved in creative pursuits. Activities such as video editing, podcast production, music creation, graphic design, and software development are areas in which the Neo leaves the Chromebook in the dust. And . . . it can handle state testing! (Sarcastic cheers of rejoice.)

Of course, none of this matters if districts can’t absorb the additional upfront cost. A superintendent facing budget cuts may have a hard time convincing a school board to spend $499 today in order to save money four or five years from now. Even with the Total Cost of Ownership argument.

On paper, both devices make compelling arguments. The Chromebook wins on familiarity, price, and ease of management. The Neo counters with longevity, creativity, resale value, and Apple’s growing AI ambitions.

But spec sheets don’t tell the whole story.

Over the next few weeks, I’m going to put both devices through the kinds of tasks students actually perform every day. Writing, research, video creation, coding, offline work, state testing, battery life, and yes–the inevitable moment when a student manages to have 47 browser tabs open at once. Since I already mentioned The Matrix, I would be remiss if I didn’t put both devices through the paces with AI-empowered functionality, too.

In some ways, the bigger question isn’t which device is better, but which one makes more sense for schools to infinity and beyond (yes, another Toy Story reference). And after spending the last fifteen years watching Apple and Google trade punches in the education market, I’m not entirely sure I know the answer yet.

We’ll find out together.

Watch above or listen/download below.

About two-thirds of U.S. districts and states have some form of AI policy in place. The other third is, as Sasha Luks-Morgan puts it, the wild west. And even many of the policies that do exist, she argues, aren't doing what they're supposed to do.

Luks-Morgan is a policy analyst at SchoolAI, a K-12 AI platform they say is built around teacher visibility and student engagement, and she spends her days meeting with districts across the country helping them figure all this out.

In this conversation with Tech & Learning, she offers a clear-eyed framework for where AI policy in schools stands — and what it's going to take to move it forward.

Her three-pillar framework for any district starting from scratch: understand how your students and teachers are actually using AI right now; lock down student data privacy and personally identifiable information; and address academic integrity in a way that keeps students in the driver's seat of their own learning rather than offloading cognition to a machine.

"Systems only move as fast as the humans in them," she says. "That's the starting point."

She also draws a sharp distinction between two policy philosophies that often get conflated. Acceptable use policies, she says, are essentially lists of prohibitions. Responsible use policies are something different — these model good behavior, explain the reasoning behind expectations, and treat students as participants in the process rather than subjects of it.

On the vendor side, she is equally direct: the edtech industry has not taken enough responsibility for making tools work in ways that support good policy. SchoolAI's response is a free policy-writing service — available to any district, partner or not — in which a member of the team will sit with administrators, hear their concerns, and draft or revise a policy document they can take to legal counsel and implement.

"Bad policy is worse than no policy," she says. "We really want to see districts succeeding."

She also addresses district scale: the fundamentals — student privacy, ethical use, data governance — apply universally, from a 108-student K-8 district in the Mid-Atlantic to New York City Public Schools. What changes is implementation, committee structure, and who carries the weight. In small districts, that often means one superintendent or tech director holding the entire AI portfolio alone.

Her advice for the path forward: review your policy annually, build teacher expertise so your bench runs deep, and accept that the technology will always outpace the paperwork. The goal isn't to catch up but to stay close enough to matter.

Since AI came onto the scene, a lot has changed with it while some recurring themes have sustained. AI continues to act as a broad tool that provides remarkably imperfect productivity.

While significant cautions abound assuming its reliability, understanding AI’s usefulness while recognizing its limits makes my day as a principal more efficient AND effective. This brought me to consider what a typical day looks like for me using AI tools to offload administrivia.

With so many options, I wanted to break it down for your use. I don’t expect to use all these tools everyday, but try a few and walk away liberated, with more time and availability for students, staff, and parents. That’s a win for everyone.

I start my day thinking about rising concerns by my faculty over religious opt outs, based on a Supreme Court decision this fall. They were receiving template emails people find online (hilarious when they forget to replace ‘student name’ with their child’s name). My nervous teachers want guidance, so I use AI to clearly and comfortably provide them with direction:

DOE Memo Converted To Slides (Time spent: 8 minutes)

I google my state's DOE guidance on handling parental opt outs and find a state memo that is a great antidote for insomnia. It is the standard boring, lengthy legalease. I add the link to Gemini and select canvas mode.

What I like is it follows my prompt to be pleasant and supportive. The slide deck gets me “mostly there,” my common phrase for AI giving me a terrific start that I edit, ensuring my voice is present. I then export the slides and edit as needed.

This process takes me under 10 minutes, during which I transform a dry, boring memo into a meaningful presentation for my faculty. This would have taken about an hour analog-style, so I get back 50+ minutes to be present for my school community!

Text-To-Email Blast To Parents (Time spent: 5 minutes)

Principals are mediums of communication, and often, are expected to funnel information into a digestible explanation, even when that information is shared in fragmented bursts, as it typically is.

Next on my list is a field day announcement. I need to communicate to ensure everyone is prepared for our big day of events. My physical education teacher sends me this text (at right).

It is timely, but to stop and rewrite it in a cohesive format will take time I often don’t have during a busy day. (Time that is better spent outside my office as improvement doesn’t happen there but in classrooms.)

I copy and paste the phys ed teacher’s text with a simple prompt: Convert this into a message for parents of our school, Central elementary for our field day.

The output is thorough, better than I expect, done in about a quarter the time it would normally take. Better, to get all this into a 140-character text message, I prompt from the output, “140 characters” and voila! This way, parents get an email and a text, increasing the likelihood they see it. All from a single text message!

Letter Of Recommendation (Time spent: 7 minutes)

I can write fast but when I get asked to write letters of recommendation, these all happen within weeks of each other. Drafting a good letter with fidelity takes time. This is the next task on my list.

For this, I have the requester send me their resume, copy it into my chat, and prompt the AI to write a letter of recommendation based on the information–2 minutes!

The other 5 minutes is me editing, revising, removing those weird AI words, and most importantly, adding a sentence or two about something I know personally regarding the candidate. What took a half hour now takes a quarter of the time, and the quality is sound.

Email Summary and Reply (Time spent: 5-10 minutes)

Every principal gets the dreaded email that is seven pages long, often emotional and hard to decipher. It is nearing lunch time and I need to get through it fast!

Typically, I prompt the AI to summarize the email, and then reply in a tone that is kind but firm, or whatever is necessary. This is a big time saver! I am not glued to my laptop, reading and rereading run-on sentences to find the essence of a message buried deep. AI does a great job of siphoning this off and producing a quality reply. Onward!

Sensitive Guidance (Time spent: 5 minutes)

Speaking of emotional challenges, every principal has gotten a charged call or email from a parent upset that a school official called the Division of Child Welfare. This is my next task, after lunch.

While school personnel are compelled by strict legal guidelines, parents see it as a personal attack on their parenting. Understandable. I didn’t get this one right the first time, and have to add my state specifics, as well as the tone: sensitive, understanding, pragmatic, etc.

What is produced is excellent. I am provided references to the legal obligation, integrated with an ideal tone. I edit it, print it, and show the parent. Its well-organized format helps me work through the document, and the parent expresses acknowledgement of my understanding.

Picture Of Calendar Events Added To My Calendar (Time spent: 3 minutes)

My day has to have some fun mixed in, right? It’s mid afternoon and I think of that dentist post card for my next visit that I always lose.

I just take a picture and prompt Gemini to add it to my google calendar. This works with Copilot users, too. Even better, I can use it with an email with a series of meetings or events, or my Penn State football schedule from this ugly screen capture–and instantly, I have 12 events (games) added. That’s fast and reliable!

NotebookLM for navigating lengthy documents (Time spent: 3 minutes)

My day is almost over and I spent most of it out of my office because of the AI tricks above. Next, I decide to check on a contract question.

I head over to Google’s NotebookLM, into which I upload a pdf of the teacher contract, and ask how many minutes of pupil contact time a teacher can have. Boom, 287 minutes with the link to the direct reference!

This is priceless for the administrator who often gets questions and different interpretations of contract language. Time-saver, and response can be within the spirit of contracts.

A few more AI time-savers that I have embraced, but not all on the same day, include PD planning, form feedback, and evaluation feedback referencing our evaluation model. I estimate a few hours saved daily–not minutes–and my school wins when I’m present!

Note: Much of the information I use with AI may contain names or other personal data, so I am sure to remove any of that before prompting.

We’ve all been here. A speaker steps to the front of the room at a conference, workshop, school event, or leadership meeting, and everything stops. The screen is dark. The audio does not work. No one knows the WiFi password. Someone calls for “the tech person.” The device goes to sleep. The audience waits while everyone acts as if this is just part of the program.

It should not be.

Every event space, from classroom to boardroom, should have a dedicated presentation station with a device that belongs to the room. Not the speaker. Not the organizer. Not whoever remembered to bring the right adapter.

The presentation station should be part of the space, the same way the projector, screen, microphone, lights, and chairs are part of the space. When people walk into a room to learn, present, or lead, the basic setup should already work.

The BYOD Presenter Model Is Broken

The bring-your-own-device (BYOD) presenter model turns every speaker transition into a new technical gamble with a different laptop, adapter, audio setting, sleep setting, software update, notification popping up at exactly the wrong time, etc.

That is not a presenter problem, but a room design problem.

A well-run event space should not depend on every speaker plugging in, pairing, restarting, authenticating, and hoping for the best. The better model is simple: one room device, many speakers. Get the device working before the event starts, keep it working throughout the program, and stop making every presenter start from scratch.

That means the host provides a presentation station that is already connected, tested, and ready. The WiFi, browser, display, audio, and shared materials should be checked before anyone is standing in front of the room. The device should not go to sleep mid-session or require a password no one in the room knows.

As I shared in Presentation Checklist: 5 Ways to Prepare for Presentations, presenters have preparation to do, but the device setup belongs to the host. The presenter should be focused on the message, not on troubleshooting the room.

Put The Materials In The Cloud, Not Someone’s Laptop

Speakers should submit materials ahead of time and access these through a shared agenda with a short, easy-to-type link. The room device opens the agenda, each speaker clicks their own materials, and the event moves on.

I have been writing about digital agendas for years. In Anatomy of a Killer Agenda and 7 Benefits to Ditching the Paper at Meetings + Events with a Great Agenda, I explain how a strong agenda keeps links, materials, and next steps in one place. The same logic applies here. Put the work in the agenda, and put the agenda on the room device.

This is not about being fancy but reducing failure points. If the only copy of a presentation is trapped on one speaker’s personal laptop, the event is more fragile than it needs to be. If that laptop will not connect, loses power, needs an update, or has the wrong setting, the whole room pays the price.

Access Matters, Too!

A shared agenda also makes the event more accessible. Participants may need to open slides on their own devices, use screen readers, translate text, enlarge content, follow links, or review materials later. That does not happen easily when the content lives only on one presenter’s machine.

In Checklist for Accessible Teaching & Presenting, I explain why digital materials, microphones, links, and accessible design matter. A presentation station does not solve every accessibility issue, but it removes one unnecessary barrier: the idea that access depends on whatever device the speaker brought.

A QR code can help, but it should not be the only way. As I wrote in QR Codes in Education: Use with Care, Not Just Because They’re There, QR codes are useful when they reduce friction. They become a problem when they create one more barrier. Use the QR code, but also provide a short link for anyone who cannot or does not want to use a phone camera.

The goal is not to look high-tech; it is to make access simple.

What Every Presentation Station Should Include

A strong presentation station should have:

• A dedicated room device connected to the display and audio
• Stable internet already connected
• No unknown password barriers
• Settings adjusted so the device does not go to sleep during the event
• Easy access to the agenda and all presentation materials in the cloud
• A browser ready for commonly used platforms such as Google Slides, PowerPoint online, Canva, YouTube, and shared documents
• Sound, camera, microphone, and screen sharing tested in advance
• Accessibility features available, including captions when possible
• A backup plan that does not require switching to random personal devices
• A designated person responsible for checking the setup before participants enter the room

Use this checklist as the standard operating protocol for successful presentations.

The Bottom Line

A presentation station should belong to the space, not the speaker.

When the room is ready, presenters can focus on their ideas, participants can focus on learning, and hosts can run events that feel smooth, professional, and welcoming. The fix is not complicated: provide a reliable room device, stable internet, accessible cloud-based materials, and settings that support the event instead of interrupting it.

Get the room ready. Put the presentation station in place. Make the materials easy to access. Then let the speaker do what they came to do: connect with the audience and deliver a message worth hearing.

“We have been on this planet for a very long time and we've evolved,” says Kimberly Zajac, a speech language pathologist at Norton Public Schools in Mansfield, Massachusetts. “Society changes with time. Communication has always been a basic human right. Too often we put the onus of the work onto the wrong people to be able to access, engage, and be part of the community and what's happening in this world.”

Zajac aims to end this burden by smoothing the road for all students using technology and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles. She has developed a replicable model for integrating Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) as an inclusive practice, providing comprehensive professional development and embedded coaching, ensuring that all educators—not just special education staff—are equipped to support students with complex communication needs. This dismantles systemic barriers, creating a learning environment in which students who have been historically marginalized are given the tools to thrive academically and socially.

Zajac, who was recently recognized with a Tech & Learning Innovative Leader Award for this and other efforts, shares her “Guide to Preparing for Title II Accessibility Requirements” as well as tips for those interested in creating the best program possible.

An Evolution in Education

“The work I do around accessibility and inclusion and communication in tandem with policy that we've gotten from the DOJ with the ADA Title II and the WCAG guidelines really elevates this idea that we need to take a long, hard look at what we're doing and how we're doing it,” Zajac says. “We need to redesign that to be more accessible and eliminate the barriers in order to evolve as a human race.”

As communication continues to evolve alongside technology, Zajac suggests it was “a ripe time” to learn about the new developments and new ways to support students with their alternative and augmentative communication needs, and to fill in any gaps. Collaborating with district leadership, Zajac and her team did a survey and came up with a five-year plan to build capacity and elevate access and inclusion through communication from pre-K to 12 plus.

“We were able to articulate and apply to grants on a local level, which were well received,” Zajac says. “We received a significant amount of funding locally and at the state level to not only purchase hardware and software, but also to invite professional development and coaching, which is really the glue to helping things turn into actions and experiences for our students and their families.”

This effort brought positive results for everyone.

“The stewards along that path — the teachers, the stakeholders, the parents — are all in it together to bring our learners into the future and make sure their full capacity is realized,” Zajac says. “The point is that it takes a village. The stakeholders are far, wide and vast — they bring valuable individual-lived experience to the table that creates connection and benefits the learners we serve.”

5 Reasons Digital Accessibility Is Important Beyond Compliance

• One in Five People Have a Disability - Actions help more than you think.
• Legal Risks - ADA complaints, costly investigations, and lawsuits with private right of action.
• Educational Barriers - Digital inaccessibility means students with disabilities cannot access the same education.
• Reputational Damage - Non-compliance signals that equity is not a true district priority.
• Universal Design Benefits All Learners - Accessible design principles — captions, clear contrast, keyboard navigation — improve the learning experience for every student, not just those with disabilities.

How Implementation Looks in the Classroom

Zajac hasn’t reached the end of her five-year plan and is realizing it to be just the tip of the iceberg.

“We've experienced a wonderful transformation,” she says. “We have seen increased use of alternative and augmentative communication processes, systems, devices, strategies and assets within a great number of classrooms in our target range of pre-K to 12. It's making significant impact in the way that students are able to be engaged in and included in all aspects of their day.”

Zajac is seeing improvements in academics as well as in social-specific areas, ranging from circle time to snack time, lunch time extending into extracurriculars. Increasing inclusivity into these social-centered elements of a school day are critical to giving all students a sense of belonging.

“I just can't say how important it is that we inspire educators and families and stakeholders at scale to think about learners from the margins as we develop our systems and policies,” she says. “It's a human process to have blind spots. It's impossible not to have them, but that's where the stakeholders come in. Lived experience can inform who might have accidentally been excluded. You can then move forward with policies and strategic system approaches that do honor all the voices that should be represented.”

This has led to more participation from students, who are more eager to contribute to the conversation. Students who do not face communication issues are also curious and interested about how the technology works.

For example, Zajac says, “I was in a group this morning that included one of my non-speaking students who uses an iPad to support the expressive communication element of his participation. Every single student involved in the activity was choosing to utilize the iPad in addition to their verbal communication. Each time a student reached for the iPad, the non-speaking student’s smile grew bigger.”

The 5-Step Compliance Plan

• The Audit Comprehensive review of all digital properties to understand scope.
• The Roadmap Timeline to bridge gaps; prioritize high-leverage systems first.
• Procurement Reform Update RFPs to include accessibility requirements for all vendors.
• Staff Training Build internal capacity so accessible content is created from day one.
• Documentation Record all actions; publish a public accessibility statement online.

Zajac feels one of the most important things we need to establish for students in schools today is that when they arrive, they feel like they belong there—that they are seen, that they are heard, and that there are more things in common among their classmates than there are differences.

“We've known about UDL in the past, but there hasn't been this call to action for the tools to actually have features that make it possible for teachers to design, deliver, and execute the end goal with the student,” Zajac says, adding there's nothing more exciting than seeing it coming together.

“Today, my student— his face just lit up when other students were choosing to use the iPad,” Zajac says. “It hit me, ‘Oh my goodness, he feels so comfortable here. He's letting his emotions out.’ That's that ‘sense of belonging’ indicator. There is no finish line. You just have to commit to that dynamic ongoing process. But we're doing things right when students can let their guard down and be who they are in the space.”

Compliance, Whose Responsibility Is it? Know Your Role

• IT & Technology System configuration, assistive tech support, platform audits.
• Curriculum & Instruction Accessible lesson plans, screen-reader-friendly materials.
• Procurement Vetting vendors for WCAG compliance before purchase.
• Special & General Ed Aligning classroom tools with individual student needs.
• Leadership Steering the cross-functional team; accountability to the board.
• Families & Community Providing feedback on real user experience.

Tools They Use

• Google Gemini
• Glint by NerChat
• Lightspeed
• Everyway
• Canva

Educational technology teams are often evaluated based on uptime, system reliability, ticket closure rates, and, of course, cybersecurity compliance. Those metrics matter. Schools and universities depend on secure, stable digital environments to support teaching, learning, and operations. Yet, many IT departments unintentionally overlook the most critical metric that directly shapes trust in technology services: customer experience and usability.

When faculty, staff, students, or families contact an IT help desk, they are not simply engaging with a technical system but interacting with people. They almost certainly have a problem and often feel frustrated or rushed for time because they need a piece of technology for a meeting or a class. The tone, responsiveness, empathy, and professionalism displayed during those interactions often determine whether users see the IT department as a collaborative partner or as a barrier to getting work done.

Technology support in education is ultimately a service profession. When I used to hire frontline IT staff, the customer service orientation was what I looked for, as technical skills can be taught. Developing customer service skills is much more difficult.

The Human Side of Technical Support

Educational institutions increasingly rely on technology for every operational and instructional function. Learning management and student information systems, classroom presentation tools, cloud storage, multifactor authentication, and digital assessment platforms have become foundational infrastructure.

At the same time, many educators and staff members are under significant pressure, so when systems fail or access becomes difficult, frustration escalates quickly. In those moments, customer service matters as much as technical expertise.

A help desk interaction may only last a few minutes, but it can influence a user’s perception of the entire institution. Small gestures of professionalism and courtesy make a measurable difference. For example, many institutions now require users to verify their identity through live video before account recovery or password reset procedures can occur.

Security concerns make these processes understandable and often necessary. However, if an IT staff member asks a user to turn on their camera and display identification, basic professionalism suggests the support staff member should activate their own video feed. The interaction should feel reciprocal and respectful.

Turning on a camera, introducing oneself, and explaining the process helps establish trust and transparency. Such actions are simple examples of customer-centered thinking.

Courtesy Is Not Optional

In many educational environments, IT departments unintentionally adopt cultures focused primarily on compliance and enforcement, rife with rigid policies, transactional processes, and impersonal communication. This can result in users avoiding support interactions, faculty members delaying the reporting of problems, students disengaging from required security processes, and staff members creating risky workarounds.

Effective IT support teams understand that professionalism includes patience, clarity, and empathy. Users do not always understand technical terminology, nor should they be expected to. An educator struggling with multifactor authentication during class preparation is not primarily concerned with the underlying architecture of identity management systems; they simply need to regain access quickly so they can teach.

Ultimately, support interactions should minimize stress rather than increase it.

Simple practices can significantly improve service quality:

• Introducing oneself to the customer.
• Explaining why a security procedure is necessary
• Using plain language rather than excessive technical jargon; however, don’t talk down to the user
• Providing realistic timelines for resolution
• Sending routine satisfaction surveys, as nothing is more frustrating than getting an email saying a ticket has been closed when the problem has not been resolved.
• Designing support procedures around user workflows rather than institutional convenience

Educational institutions often speak about relationship building in classrooms and student services. The same philosophy should apply to technology support.

Cybersecurity Must Support the Mission

Cybersecurity threats facing schools and universities are real. Ransomware attacks, phishing attempts, credential theft, and data breaches continue to affect educational institutions nationwide. IT leaders are correct to prioritize strong security controls.

However, institutions sometimes implement security practices that significantly impair usability without meaningfully improving protection. In 1755, Benjamin Franklin wrote, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

IT leaders need to consider this concept when tightening security to the point that it is difficult to use the system being protected. Balance becomes essential. As my favorite university registrar has been known to say, he builds systems that address the needs of 90% of the students and faculty. One of the reasons he is my favorite is that he understands there needs to be enough flexibility in systems to address the needs of the remaining 10%.

If security measures or any institutional processes become excessively burdensome, users predictably seek ways around them. Faculty members may store passwords insecurely. Staff may rely on unofficial tools. Students may disengage from institutional systems altogether. Ironically, overly rigid environments can create additional vulnerabilities.

Edtech exists to support learning, communication, research, and organizational effectiveness. Functionality cannot become secondary to process or systems. This requires IT leaders to ask difficult but important questions:

• Does this security process genuinely reduce risk?
• Is the burden on users proportional to the threat?
• Have we designed this procedure from the perspective of the end user?
• Are we building trust or creating frustration?
• Would reasonable people view this process as respectful and transparent?

Strong IT organizations understand that security and usability are not opposing concepts. Effective security should integrate as seamlessly as possible into the user experience.

Leadership Sets the Tone

Leadership shapes customer service cultures; they do not emerge accidentally. If institutional leaders reward only ticket closure counts and compliance metrics, staff members naturally focus on speed and enforcement. If leaders instead emphasize professionalism, communication quality, and relationship building alongside technical competence, they support cultural change.

IT leaders should regularly review support practices through the lens of user experience. Mystery shopper exercises, satisfaction surveys, and direct feedback sessions with faculty and students can provide valuable insights into how support interactions are actually perceived.

Technical expertise alone does not automatically produce strong customer service skills. Help desk professionals should receive training in communication, conflict management, accessibility, and customer interaction strategies just as they receive technical training. In educational settings, especially, technology teams should remember that every interaction contributes to institutional culture. At the end of the day, users rarely remember the specific technical details of a support ticket but how they were treated.

As noted earlier, Benjamin Franklin famously warned against trading essential freedom for temporary security. The digital world presents a similar challenge. Educational institutions must protect systems and data while still preserving accessibility, usability, transparency, and trust. Technology support should help people accomplish their work, not create unnecessary obstacles to it.

Watch above or listen/download below.

More than 550 students from the United States, Estonia, Taiwan, and Thailand descended on the University of Wisconsin-Madison last month for the 2026 World KidWind Challenge — and for KidWind founder Michael Arquin, the event was proof of something he’s believed since 2009: give kids a wind turbine to build and they will find a way to get there.

“Despite my best attempts to kill it, it keeps going,” Arquin said with a laugh during this recent Tech & Learning podcast conversation.

The 2026 World KidWind Challenge drew 125 teams of 4th–12th graders competing across wind turbine and solar home design categories. Teams were scored on four dimensions: turbine or solar home performance, a presentation before a panel of judges, an “Instant Challenge” requiring on-the-spot problem solving, and a timed Knowledge Test on clean energy concepts.

The structure is deliberate, Arquin says, because clean energy careers are not only for engineers. “There are lots of careers in the energy space that are non-STEM related,” he says. “We’re trying to tell kids: yeah, you might like the engineering side, but you might like the design part, or the communication side.”

For Morgan Berkgren, a physics teacher from Oakley, Kansas, that message landed years ago. Berkgren, who attended graduate school for biology before being handed a physics class in a small Western Kansas district, discovered KidWind around 2018 and built what became one of the program’s most celebrated multi-team programs.

This year she brought four teams to Madison — one middle school squad, the Twisted Sisters, and three high school teams, Power Breeze, Spirit Winds, and Sea Breeze — all competing in the open home-built generator division for the first time. “I looked at them and I’m like, 'Dude, I went to school for biology,'” Berkgren says. “And they’re like, 'Yeah, Ms. Berkgren, but we want to go to the next level.'”

Teachers and coaches interested in bringing KidWind into their classrooms can get started at kidwind.org. KidWind offers funded virtual workshops and will ship a starter kit directly to educators. Local and regional challenges run throughout the school year, with top teams qualifying for the World KidWind Challenge each spring.

Arquin’s advice for anyone on the fence: “Just start. You’re going to learn a lot along the way — and so will your students.”

For Lauren Harwood, becoming Director of Instructional Technology and Operations at

Dighton-Rehoboth Regional School District in Massachusetts has truly been a homecoming.

“My dad was a science teacher here for 40 years, and in the summer while my mom was at work, I was always with him when he'd come in,” Harwood says. “So, I would be roller skating in these hallways in the summer! It's just such a part of my life.”

And it even continues to be, as in addition to supporting the district she grew up in, her oldest daughter teaches science in the classroom across the hall from where her dad's classroom was.

Still, returning had its bumpy moments. At Harwood’s previous position, she had been a “one-man band” tech director at an agricultural school, which meant she was constantly on call and responsible for resolving any and all issues. Changing that mindset has been a work in progress.

“One of the hardest parts for me in the transition was not jumping up to fix everything because I now have people to do that,” she says, adding that the rural district of 2,600 students poses a mixed bag of new challenges, from coordinating route changes with bus companies and learning about HVAC systems. “I now get to learn something new every day and I enjoy that.”

Harwood, recently recognized by Tech & Learning with an Innovative Leader Award, has focused her energy on three primary areas: creating an AI strategy for the district, expanding its CTE programs, and boosting security and communication.

AI Strategy

Under Harwood’s leadership, DR (as the district is known) has taken a stance against immediately blocking AI sites, choosing instead to focus on teaching students and staff how to use AI responsibly.

“We need to make sure that we're teaching responsible use and that we're teaching respect for it,” she says. “Just because you ask ChatGPT a question, you need critical thinking skills when you look at the response. You still need to know how to find the answers. You can't just assume it can do your work for you.”

Like many districts, vetting and finding the right AI tools and platforms also continues to be a challenge.

“That's what drives us when we're looking at tools, you know, ‘How good is it?’ ‘How can we learn to use it in a mindful way?’” Harwood says. “Being mindful of how we're using it is probably the biggest key. Keeping in mind that potentially everything that it spits out is incorrect. I do think there's a lot of misunderstanding around that. Like, people think, ‘Oh, this is what AI told me, so this must be right.’ And it's not always.”

That includes being constantly vigilant and aware as AI continues to be added to tools that have been already vetted, which requires making sure that security and data privacy is always part of district-wide education efforts.

AI is also a focus during the district’s “DReam Seminars,” PD events featuring teacher-led sessions on using tools such as Brisk AI and Google Gemini, as well as external training on appropriate tool use.

CTE Program Expansion

Harwood is also helping to spearhead expansion of the district’s recently reimagined career and technical education (CTE) program, which is going to include three new career tracks: medical assisting, criminal justice, and culinary arts.

“When our freshmen go through exploratory, they do that for the first half of the year. They try all the different programs and then if they find one that they would like to continue in, they do so,” says Harwood. “This year, 100% of the kids that went through exploratory stayed in a program, so the retention is growing.”

Harwood has also been involved with upgrading all the support tech. For example, the engineering track recently received new computers, monitors, 3D printers, and projectors, which the engineering students used to design the spaces for the new tracks, a hands-on exercise that included real-world implications.

“We had a blizzard and they lost a week of school and they came back in and they said to the engineering teacher, ‘Are we going to get an extension on our deadline?’ And she said, ‘No, this is real. We need these plans,’” says Harwood. “And they did them and they presented them and they were so creative!”

Harwood was involved in the district’s recent purchase of VR headsets for the medical assisting track, which students use to learn how to draw blood.

“The software requires them to go through all of the steps–washing your hands, putting on your gloves,” says Harwood. “It’s not real, but it's also not like just, ‘Oh, I'm looking at it in a textbook, I'm watching a video.’ They're practicing it even though it's virtual. And it's pretty powerful.”

Security and Communication

Like all school districts, cybersecurity remains a priority for DR and Harwood. The district employs various security measures, including multifactor authentication, but understands that no system is foolproof.

“We've all learned that, sometimes the hard way,” says Harwood, who adds that she is constantly discussing potential issues with teachers and staff. “We do provide PD on scams as they come up, but a lot of times if I see a new phishing scam that's going around, something I know people are going to fall for because if it's almost catching me, it's definitely catching others. So I'll send out an email and illustrate what's happening.”

In addition to stressing constant vigilance and educating staff on how to look for warning signs, such as incorrect email addresses in scams, and noting that even large companies such as Cloudflare and Amazon Web Services can experience attacks, Harwood focuses on being engaging with her cybersecurity messaging. “I do try to do it with a little bit of humor like or or just make them a little more personable so people know when I send an email, maybe they want to read it or see what dumb things she's going to say now,” she laughs.

'Make The Most People Happy'

Ultimately, Harwood sees technology as a tool that should empower teachers and students. “It's not that we should be working toward supporting it,” she says. “It should be supporting us.”

She also emphasizes the need to be transparent with everyone as to the “why” behind any edtech or PD she implements.

“I get a lot more buy-in when I say, ‘This is why I would like you to do this, and when I am buying it or trying to do something with a new tool,’” she says.

For example, she cites the recent implementation of a communication platform. She created a committee of teachers and administrators from every school, vetted numerous tools, and then as a group decided on one. Consequently, those who participated in the process were able to go back to their colleagues and champion buy-in, which supported a successful implementation.

“You've always got resistance,” Harwood says. “And those people might come around or they might not. You can't please everybody. And I think in my career, I've finally had to learn that I can't make everybody happy, but I'll try to make the most people happy that I can.”

Tools They Use

• ParentSquare
• Apptegy/Thrillshare
• Google Education Suite
• Aspen SIS
• Open Architects
• Operations Hero
• Lexia
• ST Math
• Wonders
• Renaissance
• Brainpop
• Noodle Tools
• Edpuzzle
• Kahoot
• IXL
• CrisisGo
• Verkada

Education budgets are tightening, screen-time debates are intensifying, and AI has dominated every industry headline. How can today’s education companies break through the noise?

One word: relationships. As in humans talking to humans. And listening to humans. In a crowded marketplace, the vendors who survive and thrive are those who stop pitching and start partnering.

This theme is at the heart of Tech & Learning’s EdExec Summit, taking place in Chicago September 10-11. While the agenda will focus on the key components of developing a strategic plan–including sales, marketing, research, and compliance–what makes this event different is the opportunity for education company executives to have deep conversations with their buyers and create meaningful relationships.

To offer a sneak peek into these conversations, Tech & Learning has partnered with the Ed-Tech Leadership Collective to present an Industry Briefing that will explore how current market pressures are fundamentally reshaping how districts choose—and stay with—their vendors.

Event Details

• Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2026
• Time: 2:00 PM ET
• Registration Link: Secure Your Virtual Seat Here

What You Will Learn

By attending this briefing, education executives will gain actionable insights on how to align their strategies with district realities:

• Understanding District Priorities: Discover how current district challenges directly shape their buying decisions and partnership expectations.
• The Relationship Pivot: Learn how to transition your sales approach from cold, transactional outreach to value-driven, relationship-focused engagement.
• Network Maximization: Strategies to leverage your current district successes to build organic exposure across peer networks.
• Pilot Programs with Purpose: How to structure pilots that deliver clear ROI and cultivate long-term partnerships rather than forcing a heavy, upfront investment.
• Flexible Commercial Models: Creative ways to think about pricing, packaging, and budget alignment in a tight economy.
• Proving Impact: Why vendors must demonstrate measurable, high-quality outcomes rather than superficial engagement metrics to retain district business.

Featured Speakers

Hear directly from the leaders who make the purchasing decisions:

• Joe Ayala | Director of Information Technology, Santa Clara Unified School District, CA
• Trina Reaves | Director of STEM and Innovation, Clayton County Schools, GA

REGISTER FOR THE WEBINAR NOW

Join us for this conversation on June 16 to learn how your company can become an indispensable district partner, and in Chicago on September 10-11 for the Tech & Learning’s EdExec Summit to meet one-on-one with buyers and put those relationship-building strategies into practice.

• Navigating the ESSER Cliff: Why Education Company Leaders are Heading to the 2026 EdExec Summit

It is graduation season, which also means it is time to remind busy school leaders and administrators about what families actually remember most. Families may appreciate the speeches, decorations, music, and venue, but what they truly care about is the moment their student walks across the stage and hears their name announced properly. That is what they record on their phones, celebrate with relatives, and fondly look back on years later.

Recently, an Arizona community college faced intense backlash after an AI-powered system reportedly malfunctioned during commencement and skipped several graduates while reading names. Too quickly, the conversation shifted toward blaming “AI system failure.”

No, I see this less as a technological issue and more as a failure in school leadership and planning. And candidly, if this critique sounds harsh, it is because this feels like such an avoidable and unforced leadership error. No one should have been asking AI to handle this responsibility in the first place.

The reason this failure resonated so strongly is because commencement is not simply an operational event, but a milestone centered on recognition, dignity, and belonging. Names carry culture, history, sacrifice, and identity, particularly for multilingual families, immigrant families, and first-generation graduates whose educational journeys often represent years of perseverance and hope.

Pronunciation is part of inclusion as names matter. Culturally responsive leadership includes taking the time to learn and say names correctly. That is why this responsibility should receive more care, not less.

Using AI to Support, Not Replace, People

Schools spend months preparing commencement ceremonies. Leaders rehearse speeches, coordinate seating charts, organize music and photography, and carefully plan countless operational details. Yet somehow in the example cited above, the reading of student names was treated as a task that could simply be handed off to automation. Even more troubling was the apparent absence of a meaningful backup plan.

Every experienced administrator understands that technology can fail, which is exactly why safeguards and human oversight should have been built into the process from the start. Graduation season is not the time to experiment with new AI systems in ways that directly impact students and families.

Ironically, AI could have supported this process in far more thoughtful ways without replacing people. Institutions could have used AI tools to:

• Help announcers practice difficult pronunciations
• Review student-submitted recordings of their names
• Identify names that may require additional preparation
• Support multilingual pronunciation coaching
• Give human announcers more confidence and accuracy before the ceremony

This is the kind of AI use education should embrace: technology that supports people rather than replaces them.

The best uses of AI in education should help educators and leaders become more thoughtful and prepared. Instead, too many organizations are using AI to distance themselves from the moments that deserve the greatest care. In the process, schools risk damaging traditions and violating the rightful expectations families bring to these ceremonies.

Ultimately, this was leadership failure rooted in poor judgment, poor planning, and the mistaken belief that a deeply personal moment could be outsourced to automation. Graduation did not fail because of technology, but because leaders failed to protect the experience students and families deserved.

Due to a technical issue, this podcast is only available in audio format, which you can "watch" above or listen to/download below.

Kris Hagel has a blunt take on the state of educational technology in his district — and probably yours. "Ed Tech Got Away From Us—and It's Kind of Our Fault" is the title of a talk he delivered at a conference the same afternoon he sat down with Tech & Learning. It's also a pretty accurate summary of where a lot of districts find themselves right now.

Hagel—a K-12 CIO with 25-plus years in education and CoSN Board Member— returned from this year’s convention energized by two conversations dominating the hallways: the screen time debate and the growing interest in districts using AI to build their own edtech tools. Both, he says, are wrapped in fear—from parents, from teachers, and from edtech vendors watching their clients start to build around them.

His prescription for the fear? Communication, transparency, and a hard look in the mirror. Hagel's Washington State district of nearly 10,000 students is in the middle of a deliberate pullback from what he describes as a pandemic-era "whatever works" posture toward technology—one that left his team with thousands of approved apps and no clear rationale for most of them.

"I look at our catalog of approved edtech apps and I'm like, 'oh my gosh, that is way too many things,'" he says.

Working alongside his chief academic officer, Hagel has begun re-establishing what purposeful technology use actually looks like in a classroom. He is also planning a district-wide transparency report, using AI to aggregate and synthesize usage data across grade levels and share it publicly with families.

On the parent communication front, Hagel credits ParentSquare as a key partner, citing its ability to route messages to different constituent groups in whatever format they prefer — app, text, phone, or push notification.

"You've got to get out there in front of it and tell the story," he says. "Once you tell those stories, parents get behind it."

He also draws a distinction that more district leaders would do well to internalize: consumer technology and education technology are not the same conversation. Conflating them, he argues, is a big part of how fear takes root — and how trust erodes. The average student, he noted, spends roughly 70 minutes per day on a device in school. Not six hours! Seventy minutes — mostly purposeful.

That number alone, he says, changes the tenor of almost every parent conversation.

In their new vision for public schools, Randi Weingarten and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) are right: students need more active, human, hands-on learning. They need projects, movement, collaboration, civic engagement, career-connected experiences, and chances to tackle real problems.

That is the strongest part of the AFT’s 10-point plan. The emphasis on career and technical education (CTE), experiential learning, and preparation for the future of work deserves attention. If we are serious about preparing students for modern careers, students need learning experiences that reflect the tools, practices, and expectations they will actually encounter beyond school.

The 10-point plan’s name, “Devices Down, Eyes Up, Hands-On,” may sound appealing, especially to adults exhausted by distraction, low-quality screen use, and Big Tech overreach. The problem is that it aims at the wrong target. Devices are not the enemy of active learning. Passive, drill-and-kill learning is.

A drill-and-kill worksheet on a Chromebook is still a worksheet. A lecture with a slide deck is still a lecture. A multiple-choice test on a screen is still a multiple-choice test. Technology did not create passive learning. In many cases, it exposed how much passive learning was already there and made it easier to scale.

Not every lesson needs a device. Rather than considering whether screens are up or down, the better questions are: what are students doing, why they are doing it, and whether the tool helps them learn, create, connect, solve, or demonstrate understanding.

The AFT plan includes several worthwhile ideas: stronger privacy protections, independent research, limits on manipulative technology, more hands-on learning, and adequate public school funding--all of which is important. But when the frame becomes “devices down,” schools risk confusing a management strategy with a learning strategy.

While the plan’s name is misguided, it is worth looking at each of the 10 points directly. Some parts are right, some need a better frame, and others would create the opposite of what our students and schools actually need.

What follows is where the plan gets it right, where it falls short, and why “devices down” is not the path to meaningful learning.

Point 1. No screens for pre-K through second grade

The AFT calls for no screens for students in pre-K through second grade unless there is a compelling reason, such as support for a student with special needs.

The instinct is understandable. Young children need play, language, movement, stories, relationships, manipulatives, exploration, and hands-on learning. They do not need to spend large parts of the day watching videos or completing low-level digital tasks.

But “no screens” goes too far. A child passively consuming content is not doing the same thing as a child using literacy tools to hear a story, build vocabulary, practice phonics, illustrate writing, translate a word, enlarge text, or share a recording with family. Those are different experiences and policy should treat them differently.

Accessibility should not be treated as an exception or afterthought. Some students read, write, listen, speak, translate, caption, enlarge text, dictate, or produce work more effectively with digital tools. That includes students with disabilities and multilingual learners, but it also includes students who may not have a formal accommodation. A policy that says “no screens unless you have special needs” can unintentionally stigmatize the students who benefit from access.

The standard should be higher than “screen or no screen.” Screens should be purposeful, adult-guided, developmentally appropriate, and never allowed to crowd out human interaction, play, movement, stories, and hands-on work. That is more demanding than a ban. It requires educators and policy makers to consider thoughtful choices.

Point 2. No student-facing AI in elementary schools

The AFT also calls for no student-facing artificial intelligence in elementary schools, supervised AI use for older students, and a ban on social companion chatbots for students under 16.

Most would agree that social companion chatbots do not belong in elementary schools. Schools should not help companies simulate relationships with children. But banning all student-facing AI in elementary school is too broad. There is a difference between a child forming an emotional attachment to a chatbot and a teacher using an AI-supported tool for translation, accessibility, vocabulary support, feedback, or differentiated practice under supervision.

There is also a difference between using AI to avoid thinking and using AI to strengthen thinking. Responsible AI use should start with the learning goal, not with the tool. Teachers need to help students understand when AI supports learning and when it gets in the way.

Young children should not be using AI freely. However, that does not mean they should learn nothing about AI or never encounter an AI-supported learning experience. They need age-appropriate digital and AI literacy: this includes what responsible and appropriate use is, how it should be questioned, and how to think critically before tools are placed in front of them without context.

Avoidance is not preparation. Guardrails, judgment, and age-appropriate instruction are.

Point 3. Redesign schooling around active and career-connected learning

This is where the AFT plan is strongest. Active learning, project-based learning, experiential learning, and career-connected learning should be at the center of the conversation.

If students are bored, distracted, and disengaged, the answer is not simply removing devices. The answer is to design learning worth paying attention to..

This matters most in CTE. Students preparing for healthcare, media, construction, design, engineering, business, computer science, culinary arts, public service, or green energy will not enter device-free workplaces. They will use digital tools to research, design, diagnose, communicate, manage projects, analyze data, create media, document work, collaborate with teams, and solve problems.

If we say we value career-connected learning while making “devices down” the default, we are sending mixed messages. Modern CTE requires meaningful technology use. Students should not just learn about careers, but practice with the tools of those careers in authentic ways.

Every lesson does not need a screen. But when a device helps students do the work more authentically, collaboratively, creatively, or effectively, putting it away makes no sense.

Point 4. Build literacy, numeracy, and civic engagement

Students need strong literacy, numeracy, and civic engagement. But “devices down” is not how students build those skills for the world in which they live.

Students need to read deeply. They also need tools that support vocabulary development, translation, accessibility, feedback, publishing, and access to high-interest texts at different reading levels. Learning to write in a world with AI, or using a strong digital reading platform well, is not the same as random screen time.

Students need number sense. They also need opportunities to explain their thinking, use data, create tutorials, and learn from one another. When students create a video explaining a math concept, they are not just answering a problem. They are making their thinking visible.

Students need civic knowledge. They also need to understand how algorithms, misinformation, surveillance, platforms, AI, and online communities shape public life. Digital citizenship is civic education now. It cannot be treated as an extra lesson after something goes wrong.

A device-down approach does not teach students how to evaluate information, protect their privacy, manage their digital footprint, communicate responsibly, or participate thoughtfully in online spaces. Schools should recognize students are in these spaces.

Point 5. Focus on well-being

The AFT is right to connect learning with student and family well-being. Students do not learn well when they feel unsafe, unsupported, isolated, anxious, sleep-deprived, or disconnected from school.

But well-being is not simply a screen-time issue. If students are struggling, schools should look at schedules, relationships, homework loads, sleep, movement, food insecurity, school climate, mental health support, family communication, social media, and the habits students are developing in digital spaces.

Digital well-being belongs in the curriculum, not just in the device policy. Students need to understand how notifications affect attention, how platforms are designed to keep them engaged, how to protect their privacy, how to communicate respectfully, when to disconnect, and when a face-to-face conversation, movement, rest, or quiet focus is the better choice.

A ban can make adults feel as if they acted meaningfully while leaving the deeper issues untouched. The goal should be healthier learning environments and healthier digital habits, not simply less device access or fewer minutes with screens.

Point 6. Protect academic freedom, intellectual property, and educator judgment

Educators should not be handed technology because a vendor made a good pitch. They also should not be blocked from safe and useful tools because policymakers are scared. Academic freedom matters. Teachers should have the professional judgment to decide how their students learn best. That includes the ability to choose when a digital tool supports learning, when it gets in the way, and when a mandated curriculum or platform is not serving their students well. A district-approved tool is not automatically good instruction. A required platform is not automatically the right fit for every learner, lesson, or classroom.

Educator judgment should be central, but teachers should not be left alone to evaluate every app, platform, privacy policy, accessibility claim, AI feature, and instructional promise. That is not sustainable, and it is not fair.

Schools need trusted public-facing reviews, privacy ratings, accessibility information, safety indicators, AI risk assessments, and quality signals that help educators make better decisions before tools reach students. Common Sense Media, ISTE+ASCD, Digital Promise, and similar organizations have all contributed pieces of this infrastructure, but the work is fragmented, unstable, and unevenly known.

Teacher judgment matters most when it is supported by reliable information and respected in practice. The answer is not to tell every educator to vet everything alone, but to build stronger, transparent systems that help educators understand risk, quality, accessibility, privacy, and instructional value, while still trusting teachers to make the final instructional call for the students in front of them.

Point 7. Establish a gold standard for AI safety and privacy

Schools should demand strong safety and privacy protections from AI providers. Companies that cannot meet those standards should not serve K-12 education.

Student data should not be the price of participation. Schools should know what data is collected, how it is used, who has access to it, how long it is retained, whether it is used to train models, and what happens when a tool is discontinued or sold.

This is where clear standards matter. Schools need transparent contracts, strong data rules, parent communication, accessibility review, bias testing, security review, educator training, and ongoing monitoring. They also need the will to say no to tools that do not meet the standard.

Safety and privacy standards should not become a back door to blanket avoidance. The right response to risk is governance. If AI is going to affect the future of work, schools need to teach students how to use it safely, ethically, and critically. That starts with adults making informed decisions before tools are placed in front of students.

Point 8. Create an independent research consortium

There needs to be independent research on AI, screens, and educational technology, research that is not funded by the industries selling the products. Schools have been flooded with products that make big promises and provide thin evidence. Too often, districts are left to figure out impact on their own while vendors move on to the next sale.

Some useful work already exists through organizations such as Common Sense Media, ISTE+ASCD, Digital Promise, and the EdTech Evidence Exchange. Again, the issue is that this work is scattered, unevenly used, and not always connected to the decisions schools make every day.

The research questions also need to improve. “Are screens good or bad?” is too shallow. We should be asking which kinds of screen use support learning, which kinds undermine learning, for which students, at what ages, under what conditions, with what teacher support, and for what goals.

Passive consumption and active creation should not be treated as the same thing. A student scrolling through entertainment content is not doing the same work as one using a device to interview a community member, analyze data, produce a podcast, translate materials for a family audience, or document a science investigation. That is why the goal should not simply be more research. Educators do not need another disconnected report that treats all screen use the same. They need trusted evidence they can actually use to make better decisions about tools, teaching, and learning.

Point 9. Adequately fund public education

Public schools need adequate funding. That includes staffing, facilities, professional learning, mental health supports, libraries, arts, athletics, career pathways, accessibility tools, modern infrastructure, and technology that works.

It also includes the basics too many people skip over: reliable WiFi, adequate bandwidth, devices that function, enough technical support to keep systems running, and clear guidance on how to use educational technology well. It is not enough to hand schools devices and platforms and then blame teachers when the infrastructure, support, or instructional guidance is not there.

Too often, schools are told to prepare students for the future while being funded for the past. That is especially damaging for CTE. Students need access to current tools, not outdated simulations of work. They also need educators who have the training, support, and time to use those tools in ways that strengthen learning rather than digitize old assignments.

The AFT is right to warn against AI and vouchers becoming another excuse to defund public education. But this is also why the “devices down” frame is risky. Wealthier families will still provide access, tutoring, devices, AI tools, enrichment, internships, and networks outside of school. If public schools pull back from teaching students how to use modern tools well, students with less access outside school lose the most.

That is not equity. That is retreat.

Point 10. Tax Big Tech

The AFT calls for a tech tax on Big Tech earnings and some business operations to address harms and disruptions caused by technology and AI.

A real argument exists for that. Technology companies have profited enormously from public attention, public data, public infrastructure, and public institutions. If their products create costs for schools, workers, communities, and the environment, they should not get to externalize those costs while public systems clean up the mess.

But a tech tax should not become a substitute for better education policy. If money comes from Big Tech, it should support public-interest goals: independent research, educator professional learning, privacy enforcement, accessibility, digital citizenship, AI literacy, CTE infrastructure, and public accountability.

It should not become another funding stream that sends public dollars back to the same companies with minimal oversight.

The better frame is purpose first

The AFT is right about a lot. More hands-on learning. Stronger privacy protections. More scrutiny of Big Tech. Better protection for children from manipulative platforms and simulated relationships. A renewed insistence that education is human work.

But “devices down” is the wrong goal. It makes the device the problem when the deeper issue is often learning design, adult guidance, infrastructure, privacy, safety, and support.

Devices can distract students. Notifications distract. Poorly designed platforms distract. So do boring lessons, unclear tasks, weak relationships, irrelevant assignments, and classrooms where students are asked to comply rather than think.

Removing the device may solve an immediate classroom management problem, but it does not prepare students to manage attention when the device comes back. And it will come back. In college, at work, in civic life, in relationships, and in nearly every modern career, students will need to focus, create, communicate, and make good decisions in technology-rich environments.

Students need explicit practice with digital well-being, attention management, purposeful tool use, and knowing when technology helps and when it gets in the way. They need to learn when to close the screen, when to use it, when to silence notifications, when to collaborate face-to-face, when to use AI, when to question it, and when to do the thinking without it.

Sometimes devices should be down. Students should discuss ideas face-to-face, build with their hands, play outside, conduct experiments, write privately, make art, and listen to one another without a screen in sight.

Other times, devices should be up. Students should use them to research, create, collaborate, publish, translate, document, code, communicate, design, get feedback, and solve problems.

The goal is not more technology or less technology, but better learning, healthier habits, and students who know when and how to use the appropriate tools to think, create, communicate, collaborate, and solve problems.

Welcome to the June Edtech Show & Tell, in which our editors share some of the new edtech products that have caught our attention this month. These are not reviews or endorsements, but a showcase of education-friendly items, platforms, and more that we think might be noteworthy for you.

This month's new offerings include online tutoring, HD/4K projectors, payment collection solution, ad-free streaming educational platform and more.

Ace Scholarships | EmpowerEd by ACE Scholarships

EmpowerEd by ACE Scholarships is the only white-label, end-to-end scholarship management technology built by a national SGO. The platform handles the administrative complexity behind the scenes, including application processing, eligibility, awards, donor tracking, secure compliance, and reporting. With scholarships and contributions managed in one place, partners have a clear, real-time view of scholarship and donor operations.

Acer | Swift Spin 14 AI

The premium Swift Spin 14 AI convertible is a military-grade 360-degree powerhouse delivering an industry-leading 80 TOPS of AI performance and up to 23 hours of battery life. Alongside this premium ultraportable, Acer makes history as the first PC maker to introduce a laptop powered by the all-new Snapdragon C processor, bringing affordable, efficient, everyday computing to the mainstream market.

ClassDojo | Dojo Tutor expansion

ClassDojo is expanding access to its private, online Dojo Tutor, which connects students with more than 2,500 certified and vetted teachers for one-on-one tutoring tailored to individual learning needs. The focus is on helping students make meaningful academic progress as tutors begin by understanding where each student is, identifying gaps, and building a plan to move them forward.

Cobalt | blueCORE Multi-Function Standalone Signal Processing

The new Cobalt blueCORE family of fully featured standalone signal processors is designed to bridge SDI and ST 2110/IPMX environments with exceptional versatility. blueCORE combines the audio and video processing functions required for live production and AV signal management into a single 1RU device. The self-contained architecture makes deployment fast and simple: power up the unit, connect signals, and it is ready to operate with or without a computer.

Common Sense Media | Youth AI Safety Institute

The Common Sense Media Youth AI Safety Institute is an independent research and testing organization dedicated to ensuring the AI that children use is safe and developmentally appropriate. The Institute will establish safety standards, build open-source evaluations that AI developers can run against their models, independently test AI products, and publish the results to provide transparency and accountability.

Epson | PowerLite and BrightLink projectors

Epson now has 10 new PowerLite and BrightLink projectors, offering Full HD and 4K Enhancement, across standard throw, ultra short throw and portable options. Built on Epson’s proprietary 3-chip 3LCD technology, the new lineup delivers higher resolution and brightness with larger image sizes, enhanced connectivity, intuitive software, updated controls, and improved casting to simplify installation and maintenance while enabling collaboration and larger-than-life visuals.

Extron | XTP II 8K Fiber Series

Extron's new XTP II 8K Fiber Series takes performance to the next level with industry-leading capabilities for XTP Systems. Four new products are now available: XTP II FT 402 8K – Fiber optic transmitters for HDMI and DisplayPort; XTP II FR 401 8K – Fiber optic receivers with local HDMI input; XTP II CP 4i F 8K – Input boards with assignable XTP Fiber or HDMI inputs; and XTP II CP 4o SF 8K – Output boards with scaled fiber and local, unscaled HDMI outputs. These new boards leverage the 50 Gbps backplane of XTP II CrossPoint Series matrix switchers to deliver the highest level of performance and reliability in the industry.

iCEV | Certification Readiness Tool

The Certification Readiness Tool allows educators to view readiness indicators for students enrolled in aligned coursework for certifications that are tested for on the iCEV Platform. Teachers can view student reports to understand performance, identify skill gaps, and take action before students sit for exams. The tool analyzes patterns from previously successful test-takers alongside current student data to provide meaningful readiness insights.

Lightspeed | Redcat and Topcat updates

The Redcat and Topcat systems now feature updated designs that simplify classroom use. Additionally, the company’s wireless Media Connector now pairs directly with Bluetooth devices, enabling wireless audio streaming from phones and tablets, making it easier to integrate classroom multimedia audio sources. The Redcat all-in-one speaker system is ready for use right out of the box, while the Topcat’s all-in-one integrated design and wireless audio capabilities make installation simple.

Parentsquare | Cashless Guide playbook

ParentSquare's Cashless Guide playbook for K12 leaders offers best practices and strategies to help districts reduce cash handling, simplify payment collection, and improve family response. Many districts are looking for ways to streamline payment collection for school activities, from field trips to extracurricular fees. This new guide provides a step-by-step framework to help districts transition to online payments without disrupting existing workflows.

PlayKids Learning

PlayKids Learning is an ad-free streaming educational platform for young children, bringing together favorites like Paw Patrol, CoComelon, Numberblocks and Alphablocks alongside interactive games and learning content designed around skill development. COPPA-compliant, and kidSAFE-certified, the platform combines 250+ hours of children’s TV with 150+ games and activities focused on communication, creativity, emotional learning and problem-solving, while also encouraging offline activities like drawing, dancing and singing.

TeacherForge

TeacherForge is an AI-powered material generator for language teachers. It produces structured, print-ready worksheets across grammar, vocabulary, reading comprehension, writing tasks, listening sets with audio, and multi-domain exams, all with answer keys. Teachers configure CEFR level, topics, and exercise types. Teachers choose specific exercise types per section, adjust difficulty per CEFR level, and get professionally formatted output ready for the classroom, not raw AI text to clean up.

Turnitin | Google Classroom Add-On

Turnitin's new integration with Google Workspace for Education brings Turnitin Feedback Studio features directly into Google Classroom. The new integration helps educators incorporate AI responsibly into written assessments, while building students' AI literacy, critical thinking, and writing skills. Educators gain visibility into students’ writing process, and students learn to use AI thoughtfully, ethically, and transparently.

Zedbud | Unified Platform

Zedbud now offers a unified learning and communication platform designed for K–12 schools. Zedbud brings learning, communication, collaboration, and family engagement into a single FERPA-compliant environment. Key highlights include: communication embedded directly within assignments and learning materials; real-time translation in 50+ languages; district-level oversight and role-based controls; integrations with tools such as Google Classroom and Google Drive; and support for family engagement from pre-K through graduation.

• Edtech Show & Tell

As a journalist who writes about education tech, my kids' favorite education apps are those that have been tested and stand out above the rest. Over the many years of doing this there are some that really jump out, are loved by my kids, and get used continually over longer periods of time. Crucially, these also have a noticeable effect on their schooling and progress.

The apps I've written about have largely fallen across a few categories, some feeling too like homework, others repetitive when the novelty wears off, and some which strike the balance between playful and instructional while staying engaging. That last category is from where these app recommendations are coming.

So these are the apps that my kids genuinely returned to, out of choice, over the last year as I've been trying them out in our home.

Best of My Kids' Favorite Education Apps

Best overall

Wayground

Wayground is one of our favorite apps, bar none. This manages to combine the best of quiz-style platforms in a way that plays to the needs of the child.

So, in my house for example, one child was drawn to using it in a competitive way while the other was a lot more exploratory. It supports both, allowing them to enjoy it their way while still getting the learning from being on here.

While a lot of apps can feel built for the classroom and teacher-first, this is also good as an at-home app. It's easy enough to setup and use for parents and children, but that it can also be a bridge between class and home use.

Since this works across devices, using a browser, I could have one child on the laptop and another on my phone so they get their own experience, at their level. The pre-built quizzes make it as easy as handing over the device and letting them explore.

That said, the addition of AI now makes adapting to each child far more accessible as an option that's easy. Crucially, for me as a parent and for teachers, this isn't time consuming so you actually use it and -- as a result -- so do the kids.

To be clear, this is designed for teachers to setup and use, and works best that way. So if this is something your child's school is offering, or considering, I'd very much encourage you to take advantage of this and have your littles ones give it a go.

Best for literacy

IXL

IXL is a literacy app that's far less repetitive than many similar platforms by breaking learning into smaller, achievable chunks that build confidence steadily over time. Covering everything from spelling and vocabulary to grammar and reading comprehension, it offers a huge amount of structured practice while still feeling approachable for younger learners.

What worked well with my kids was the sense of progression. They could complete shorter activities, earn rewards, and immediately see improvement. The adaptive system also helped keep frustration levels lower by adjusting difficulty as they worked, which made it easier to maintain engagement.

The platform’s clean layout and focused exercises keep distractions to a minimum. While it still feels academically solid underneath, IXL avoids becoming overly classroom-heavy, which helped it slot naturally into home use. It became very useful for quick daily practice sessions that never felt too demanding.

Best for math

Buzzmath

Buzzmath feels much closer to puzzle-solving over traditional drills, which immediately made it more appealing in our house than many worksheet-style alternatives. Designed for middle school learners, the platform combines interactive challenges with visual learning tools that encourage experimentation and problem-solving -- rather than memorization alone.

One of the strongest features is how it handles mistakes. Instead of simply marking answers wrong, Buzzmath encourages students to retry, rethink, and work through problems independently. That helped reduce frustration levels, particularly with more difficult topics.

The game-inspired structure also works well without overwhelming the educational side of the experience. Progression feels rewarding, but the learning remains central throughout. Visual explanations and interactive feedback helped make more abstract concepts easier to grasp, especially for anyone that struggles with text-based instruction.

For kids who normally disengage quickly from math practice -- my daughter -- Buzzmath offers a far more approachable and confidence-building alternative that still delivers strong educational depth underneath the playful presentation.

Best for STEM

NASA Space Place

NASA Space Place stands out because it captures the sense of curiosity that great STEM learning should inspire. The platform introduces complex ideas through playful activities, bright visuals, games, videos, and short articles that make science feel approachable and exciting.

Space is naturally engaging for my and most other kids, and this platform uses that brilliantly to pull learners into wider STEM topics, including engineering, climate science, physics, robotics, and astronomy. One minute my kids were exploring planets, the next they were learning about satellites or weather systems without really noticing the educational shift.

The platform also feels refreshingly straightforward. Plus, no subscriptions, pop-ups, or overly gamified distractions competing for attention. Instead, the focus remains firmly on exploration and discovery.

For younger learners especially, NASA Space Place strikes an excellent balance between education and accessibility. It offers great STEM learning while still maintaining the excitement and imagination that often gets lost in more formal educational platforms.

Best for gamification

Roblox

Roblox may not look like a traditional education platform at first glance, but the creative side of the experience offers far more learning potential than many parents initially realize. Beyond simply playing games, children can build environments, experiment with coding concepts, design interactive experiences, and collaborate creatively with others.

What stands out most, watching my kids use Roblox, is how naturally problem-solving becomes part of the experience. Whether adjusting game mechanics, building worlds, or figuring out systems together, there is a constant layer of experimentation underneath the entertainment. It encourages creativity in a way that feels self-directed rather than instructional.

That said, Roblox still benefits from active parental involvement and sensible controls, particularly given the scale of the platform. The educational value depends heavily on how children engage with it.

Used thoughtfully, though, Roblox can become a surprisingly effective gateway into coding, digital creativity, collaboration, and design thinking. For children already interested in gaming culture, it offers opportunities to shift from passive consumption into active creation, which is where its strongest learning potential can emerge.

Best for AI

aiEDU

aiEDU offers one of the most accessible introductions to artificial intelligence I’ve seen for younger learners, managing to explain a fast-moving and often intimidating subject in a way that feels clear, balanced, and genuinely useful. As AI tools increasingly become part of everyday life, helping children understand the technology behind it all feels more important than ever.

Rather than focusing purely on flashy demonstrations, aiEDU places a strong emphasis on digital literacy and critical thinking. Lessons explore how AI systems work, where biases can appear, and why understanding the technology matters, all without becoming overly technical or difficult for younger people.

The platform also offers a clean design that keeps the focus firmly on learning rather than distractions. My kids engage particularly well with the real-world examples and discussion-led style of the content, which encourages curiosity rather than passive consumption.

Considering the quality of the material available completely free, aiEDU feels really valuable for families and schools looking to introduce AI concepts without adding yet another expensive subscription service into the mix.

Best for video

ClickView

ClickView takes the strengths of video-based learning and packages it all into a far more focused educational experience than the open-ended chaos of general video platforms. With curated educational content, interactive quizzes, and classroom-ready resources, it creates an environment in which children can stay engaged without constantly being pulled toward unrelated distractions.

What works particularly well with my kids is how effectively video helps unlock topics they might normally avoid in text-heavy formats. Complex ideas often becomes easier to understand once presented visually, especially through shorter clips and structured explanations designed specifically for learning.

The platform also feels thoughtfully designed for both school and home use. Teachers can integrate lessons easily while parents benefit from knowing the content has been curated with education in mind.

Importantly, ClickView avoids making video learning feel passive. Interactive elements throughout encourage participation and reflection rather than endless watching. The result is a platform that manages to feel engaging and educational in equal measure, which is surprisingly difficult to achieve consistently.

The high school tech department of RSU 22, located along the Penobscot River near Bangor, Maine, offers traditional programming, such as woodworking and shop, as well as a bringing variety of engineering tech tools and an extremely well-equipped makerspace secured through grant funds. However, through a series of community partnerships and funding opportunities, it was able to launch its Higher Vision Drone Program.

“One of the things that appealed to me is that we already have nine community partners, which represent a range of businesses and organizations,” says Jennifer Nickerson, the district’s Director of Curriculum, who saw an opportunity to add drones to its career pathways. “A little local blueberry farmer in one of our four towns uses the drone to inspect her crops and plan what she needs to do for work that day. The Maine Forest Service visited, sharing stories about their advanced, expensive drones. But they use the same skills our kids are learning to use the drones to find missing people or protect forests and Maine’s natural beauty.”

ESSER funds enabled the school to create an esports lab, tech which served perfectly to accommodate the drone program’s flight simulators. Nickerson worked with Charlie Huff, a technology teacher at Hampden Academy and the department head, Todd Moore, to implement the Higher Vision Drone Program. Title II funds secured out-of-state training for the pair to get certified to teach the young prospective pilots.

“Each certified instructor can have eight kids fly under their license,” says Nickerson. “The first year, they co-taught the intro class together with 16 kids in the program for the fall semester. Of the 16, 14 continued on to take the Commercial Drone course for the spring semester. We have 11 students scheduled for their FAA Part 107 tests, with two passing this week.”

And from there, the program has taken flight.

“Now other students are seeing all this hard work pay off and next year's course enrollments have jumped up,” says Nickerson. “To be fair, some of it is probably because when you are sitting on the second floor in your English class and you see a drone fly by outside, it’s pretty good advertisement."

For this and other efforts, Nickerson was recently honored with a Tech & Learning Innovative Leader Award. She shares her “Higher Vision Drone Program” implementation successes and tips for those interested in creating a similar program in their district.

Enrollment, Enlistment, Employment

RSU 22 dates back to 1803, and Nickerson’s family has long been a part of it.

“We like to say, ‘We’re rooted in tradition, but focused on the future,’” says Nickerson. “My kiddos are fifth-generation Broncos, I joke that I bleed purple. The success of RSU 22 is really personal to me and my family and to the four towns in our district. One of which is more affluent than the other three, which can cause issues with programming. However, it was also an inspiration to seek out the Teach with Tech grant from the Maine DOE, which includes a requirement to support underserved students.”

Nickerson saw it as a real way to level opportunities within her district.

”We have tons of AP classes in our high school, Hampden Academy, and we add to them every year,” she says. “But we wanted exciting opportunities for kids who don't fit in that AP niche. I went to a conference which leaned heavily on the concept of three paths for kids, all being equally valuable. Enrollment, enlistment, employment — we need to honor those kids by supporting them with a clear path to success. This was a great motivation to create our drone program.

One very exciting opportunity has presented itself from Cianbro, a nationwide construction company.

“They learned about our program and told me, ‘If you get kids to take and pass the FAA Part 107 test to earn their drone license, we will hire them the day of graduation,’” says Nickerson. “We want those opportunities for our students, because not everyone is going to go to college.”

The Importance of Community Partnerships

A distinctive feature of Hampden Academy’s drone program is its collaboration with nine community partners who share their expertise directly with students. These partnerships include:

• Hampden Public Safety: Demonstrating emergency response applications and public safety uses for drone technology.
• Cianbro: Showcasing industrial applications in construction and infrastructure development.
• News Center 2: Illustrating journalistic and media applications of drone photography and videography.
• Haley Ward Civil Engineering: Providing insights on surveying, mapping, and engineering applications.
• American Forestry Management: Highlighting environmental monitoring and forestry management techniques.
• Matt Thomas Media Productions: Sharing expertise in commercial drone photography and cinematography.
• Allan Gordon Jr Surveying: Demonstrating precision mapping and land surveying applications.
• United States Military: Offering perspectives on drone operations and career opportunities in defense.
• Maine Forest Service: Showcasing thermal imaging and precision aerial surveillance in public safety and natural resource management.

These partnerships provide students with real-world context for their learning and exposure to potential career pathways within their own communities.

“You can't just do it alone,” says Nickerson. “When your community gets behind you to share their expertise and open kids’ eyes to possibility, that culture can be one of your greatest resources even in small, rural, less affluent parts of the world. That’s one way this drone program will be sustainable for the future.”

Ultimately, Nickerson’s goal is just to do the right things for her students by securing the best tools for success.

“No one wants to build a house with a hammer that doesn't have a handle,” Nickerson says. “We need to have the best tools to do the best by our kids. Fortunately, this district has always put technology at the top of their priorities. We have a really supportive superintendent and assistant superintendent who believe in thinking outside the box. It’s just really great, because we need to prepare them. They are going to leave us one day, so we need to help them learn how to fly.”

4 Tips When Starting a New Tech Initiative

Nickerson offers advice to others who might be interested in launching a similar initiative:

• Don’t let lack of funds stop you. Think outside of the box and be creative and you will find the support.
• When securing grants, read the fine print. Some funds require specific choices in tech, such as drones that need to be made in the USA.
• Find your North Star and stay true to it. Think about what is most valuable to you and persevere. Don’t let setbacks stop you.
• Lean on your community. Resources don't have to be financial, expertise is invaluable.

Tools They Use

• Parrot ANAFI Drones
• Claude
• MagicSchool
• Google Suite
• Kibo Robots (Kinderlab)
• zSpace
• edWeb
• Chalk
• Smore
• SWIS/PBIS Apps
• Canva

If districts want to strengthen trust, improve engagement, and protect their reputation, communication strategy can’t start in the central office — it has to start in the classroom.

In district communications, it’s tempting to focus on what the central office sends: board updates, emergency alerts, strategic initiatives, press releases, policy changes. These messages matter. They shape public perception and provide essential information to families and staff.

But ask most parents how they actually experience their school district, and the answer is far simpler: through their child’s teacher.

For many families, their perception of a district begins and ends with classroom communication. They may never speak with the superintendent or interact with district administrators. Trust is built — or eroded — through the daily interactions between teachers and families.

Start With the Base Layer

Communications leaders across the country consistently describe the same challenge: keeping a pulse on what’s happening across schools. Major events are easy to track, such as athletic championships, large theatre or concert performances, board recognitions, and grant awards. But the daily classroom wins that quietly build trust are harder to surface–and those small moments matter!

When teachers regularly share classroom successes such as a creative writing project, a science experiment, a milestone achievement, or even a joyful themed dress-up day, they create consistency, demonstrate transparency, and reinforce partnership. Over time, those seemingly small updates build a reservoir of trust that becomes critical when more serious or complex conversations arise.

From a communications perspective, these moments also provide the most authentic storytelling opportunities. These reflect culture in action and humanize the district in ways that top-down announcements cannot.

Seeing What Families See

One of the most promising developments in district communication tools has been the ability to virtually “walk the halls.” With a tool such as ClassDojo for Districts, I have a real-time view of classroom activity across our schools—without requiring additional reports, extra submissions, or new workflows for teachers.

I can see all those little moments as they unfold. I’ve watched a student-written novel project take shape chapter by chapter. I’ve seen transitional kindergarteners celebrate the 101st day of school dressed as Dalmatians. I’ve spotted creative science experiments, collaborative art displays, and the everyday interactions that define the heart of a school community.

Instead of waiting for a principal to forward a story idea, I can see classroom learning and engagement in real time. Instead of missing a joyful milestone quietly happening in one grade level, I can elevate it while enthusiasm is high. Instead of relying solely on formal submissions, I gain organic insight into the daily experiences shaping our district’s culture.

For a geographically large district like ours, that virtual presence is especially powerful. I can stay connected to multiple campuses without physically traveling between them. The result is more timely storytelling, stronger relationships with our school sites, and a greater sense of cohesion across the district—because we’re not just sharing the big wins. We’re celebrating the small moments that truly matter.

Balancing the Narrative

Another overlooked benefit of classroom-level visibility is equity in storytelling.

High schools naturally generate attention through athletics, performances, and large-scale events. Elementary classrooms often have fewer headline-making moments, even though extraordinary learning happens there every day. Without intentional effort, district communications can unintentionally skew toward the most visible campuses and programs.

A districtwide classroom feed allows communications leaders to intentionally balance representation, across grade levels, across schools, and across student groups. It ensures that the joy of a transitional kindergarten celebration receives as much attention as a varsity championship.

From Duplication to Alignment

Many districts face communication fatigue, not because they communicate too much, but because they communicate across too many disconnected platforms–teachers use one tool, the district uses another, and emergency alerts are on yet another. Freestanding websites and social media just add more layers. Families are asked to download multiple apps and monitor multiple streams of information.

When district announcements are aligned with platforms families already check daily, engagement improves naturally. Leaders report stronger read rates and more immediate responses when communications build on existing habits rather than trying to create new ones.

Trust in a Complex Media Landscape

Today’s communications environment is increasingly complex. Social media policies continue to evolve, privacy expectations are heightened, and misinformation can spread quickly in public forums.

Closed-loop communication environments offer a compelling alternative for everyday updates. Families experience a familiar, feed-based interface, but one that is limited to their school community. Teachers benefit from appropriate oversight and documented communication histories. District leaders gain visibility without intrusion.

The goal becomes smarter communication, rooted in relationships that already exist.

Bottom-Up Strategy Is Sustainable Strategy

For communications leaders rethinking their approach, the most important shift may be philosophical. Instead of beginning with the question, “What should the district office send this week?” consider asking, “How are families already receiving communication every day?

”Strengthen that foundation first: support teacher-family communication; increase visibility into classroom moments; and use those authentic stories to inform broader district messaging. Then layer strategic announcements on top of that established trust.

When communication starts in the classroom and scales outward, it feels cohesive rather than imposed and relational rather than transactional. And in K–12 education, in which trust shapes everything from engagement to attendance to community support, that distinction matters.

District communication is most powerful when it reflects what families already see and experience daily. Sometimes, the most strategic move a central office can make is simply to walk the halls.

The recent trend of pushback against tech in the classroom is seeing schools across the country moving away from emphasizing 1-2-1 digital devices and focusing on old-fashioned classroom and group activities.

Dennis R. Willingham, superintendent of Walker County Schools in Alabama, recently realized how this trend has touched his own district when a principal told him about witnessing student behavior that had not been seen in years: the passed note.

“A little tear came in my eye that the kids were actually writing instead of texting,” this educator told Willingham.

In addition to reviving the once-extinct practice of students writing notes to one another, the new trend is cutting back on distractions in the classroom and helping support student learning, Willingham says. It’s been pushed by a combination of events, including decreased funding for 1-2-1 programs in the post-COVID era and a general fatigue among teachers and students that we’re all spending too much time looking at screens.

Willingham discusses the benefits of screen-free time he’s seen in his district as well as the challenges around continuing to provide device access to students, which remains a necessity.

Less Screen Time, More Social Interaction

Back in 2018 and 2019, there was a big push to provide every student access to a digital device, Willingham says. That intensified during the pandemic, but now many in the education world are realizing the embrace of digital devices may have been a little too enthusiastic.

“Now the trend seems to have shifted back the other way, and people are calling for more direct instruction from the teacher, going back to more cooperative learning groups, and more student engagement within the classroom,” Willingham says. “The big reason for that is for the sake of social skills. Because not only in the schoolhouse but also outside of school doors, kids are absorbed by electronic devices, with their phones, with laptops. And so we are seeing that students are lacking in social skills.”

In Willingham’s district, this movement has been facilitated by state legislation banning cell phones in schools, which went into effect at the start of the academic year. Most people, including Willingham, have applauded the new policy.

“We’re receiving positive feedback from just about every stakeholder about these electronic devices being banned in our schools,” he says.

The Need For Devices

Despite the benefits of cell phone bans, the larger movement away from 1-2-1 devices isn’t all positive. Walker County Schools still has a 1-2-1 policy in place that is needed, Willingham says, but funding for the program long-term is in question since COVID-era funds have dried up and federal funding for education is currently uncertain.

“We have state-mandated assessments starting in second grade. And those state-mandated assessments are electronic,” Willingham says. “It’s kind of a Catch-22. The trend now is going away from 1-2-1, but at times you need the 1-2-1.”

Federal funds are crucial to continuing to provide that access in Walker County Schools.

“It is going to be a challenge going forward. It is not feasible to continue finding 1-2-1 because of the upgrades and updates. That's not only with the hardware, but also with the computer systems and the software as well,” Willingham says. “We are a poverty district. We are about 70% poverty. And so we do rely on federal funding to keep our heads afloat.”

Advice On Going Device-Free

Ongoing uncertainty about federal funding notwithstanding, Willingham believes there is real benefits right now for teachers to provide more screenless activities in the classroom.

“Cooperative learning and student engagement, that's really where it's at. It's proven to be effective for learning, and it's also great for social skills, which we're seeing that our students greatly need,” he says.

Perhaps ironically, AI can help educators prepare more old-fashioned, pen-and-paper and group activities.

“It’s fantastic you can type in, ‘I want to teach a lesson on standard A3, and I want to involve cooperative learning and group activities,’ and boom, you’ve got all of that at your fingertips," Willingham says. "All you’ve got to just tweak it and make it your own.”

These types of group and in-person activities have the added bonus of limiting students’ increasing tendency to rely on AI themselves in unproductive ways, such as making it write a paper for them.

In a less digitized classroom, for instance, when students are writing notes back and forth to each other, you know, regardless of the content, that at least the students wrote the notes themselves.

The transition from traditional instruction to AI-enhanced learning is often met with a mix of excitement and trepidation. However, for Dr. Gyimah Whitaker, Superintendent of the City Schools of Decatur (CSD), the path forward isn’t about racing to adopt the newest tool. It’s about moving “slowly to go fast”—building a foundation based on intentionality, policy, and, most importantly, the amplification of student voice.

Located just outside Atlanta, CSD serves a population of 5,400 students. The district faces a unique challenge: it was identified by Stanford University as having one of the greatest wealth achievement gaps in the nation. For Whitaker, integrating AI is an equity imperative.

To ensure all students graduate ready for a world that includes AI, leadership must be thoughtful, secure, and collaborative.

Moving Slowly to Go Fast: A Policy-First Approach

While many districts might jump straight into purchasing AI-driven curriculum tools, Whitaker and her team took a step back to focus on the framework. In collaboration with the national ILO Group, CSD chose to prioritize AI from a policy standpoint rather than just a curricular or workforce one.

“We have come along slowly because we have the safeguards in place around privacy for students and student data and what we call the 'Swiss cheese' for cybersecurity,” says Whitaker. “But at the same time, we understand our students need to graduate ready to engage in the world, and the world does include AI."

By focusing on policy first, the district ensures that safety and privacy concerns—raised by teachers, parents, and students alike—are addressed before tools are deployed at scale. This intentional movement allows the district to vet filters and privacy protocols, creating a secure environment in which innovation can eventually thrive without compromising data integrity.

Fostering a Symbiotic Workforce

Integrating AI also requires a shift in how the district views professional development. Whitaker envisions a symbiotic relationship between the digital natives who are more comfortable with AI entering the profession and the veteran educators who hold deep pedagogical expertise.

“My greatest hope is that we will begin to recognize that our newest teachers are able to help us and our veteran teachers are able to grow," says Whitaker. This reverse mentorship model acknowledges that while AI can assist with lesson differentiation or administrative tasks, it cannot replace the human element. Even as the district explores AI agents for cybersecurity and administrative support, Whitaker remains a staunch advocate for human connection, noting that while an AI might manage a calendar, it lacks the emotional intelligence to know when a colleague needs a break or a little encouragement.

3 Tips for District Leaders Implementing AI

For administrators looking to begin their own AI journey, Whitaker offers three pillars of advice:

• Don’t Be Afraid of the Unknown: “Understand that you don’t know what you don’t know,” she says. “This is a work of unknown. But that’s okay. Be comfortable in that.”
• Lean into the Tension: Every district feels the pull between the benefits of AI and the doom scroll of digital distraction. Use that tension to spark honest conversations with stakeholders.
• Identify Your Entry Point: Whether you start with a curricular focus, a workforce support strategy, or a policy framework, ensure it aligns with your district’s specific needs.

A National Stage for Student Voice

One of the most innovative aspects of CSD’s strategy is the elevation of students into high-stakes leadership roles. By appointing both a Student Representative and a Student Apprentice to the School Board—a rarity in Southern school systems—CSD has sent a clear message: students don’t just observe; they lead.

This commitment to student agency served as the perfect prerequisite for an invitation from the National Superintendent Association (AASA) to join the National Leadership & Innovation Fellowship Focused on AI and the Future of Learning. Hosted in partnership with Day of AI and MIT RAISE, this fellowship invites designated superintendents from every state to receive cutting-edge AI training at MIT, and allows them to bring two students to the Edward M. Kennedy Institute in July for an immersive experience focused on ethical AI use, systems-level leadership, and policy.

The Edward M. Kennedy Institute features a full-scale replica of the U.S. Senate chamber. Participating students will act as “senators” for their respective states. Their objective? To develop a National AI Policy.

To prepare, students are completing 8 to 10 hours of pre-work, analyzing artifacts that the Institute will synthesize into a working template. This sets the stage for an authentic legislative process, mirroring the deliberation of the Senate.

The resulting student-developed policy will be distributed nationally to all superintendents by AASA. This model holds the potential to be replicated in local districts, providing a framework for involving parents and stakeholders in governing this powerful technology.

“I think the most amazing part about this event is I honestly have no idea what the kids are going to come up with,” says Jeff Riley, Executive Director of Day of AI and former Massachusetts Commissioner of Education. “Kids are digital natives. This is an opportunity where their voices can really be heard as leaders in the field.”

Whitaker was thrilled to receive the invitation, viewing it as a natural extension of CSD’s core mission. “The stars really aligned,” she says. “This experience will take the work we do at CSD to elevate student voice to the next level."

By giving students a seat at the table both locally and nationally, CSD ensures that AI policy isn't just something done to students, but with them. This leadership experience ensures that the district’s Portrait of a Graduate includes the ability to navigate and actively govern the technologies of the future.

As Whitaker says, the ultimate goal is both simple and profound: “To ensure you’re graduating students who are ready to engage in the world knowing that AI is there.”

A recent Sports Illustrated article described how some high school football players are using artificial intelligence to fabricate highlight plays in recruiting videos. Generative tools can now insert touchdowns, tackles, or explosive runs that never actually occurred, creating a misleading picture of an athlete’s performance.

At first glance, the story reads like another example of technology being used to gain an unfair advantage. But in many cases, these videos are not as convincing as students might think.

Experienced recruiters, coaches, and even knowledgeable fans can often tell when something is off. The flow feels wrong. The movement does not match the context of the game. What appears impressive at first glance can quickly raise questions.

The real problem is that students may not realize how easily these videos can be spotted. They may overestimate how convincing these tools are and underestimate how quickly credibility can be lost. When that happens, it is not the technology that carries the consequences, but the student–and their integrity.

The Stigma of Consequences

To be fair, authenticity challenges in sports are not new. Highlight reels have always been curated, with athletes and coaches selecting the best moments, angles, and plays. Recruiting videos have never been neutral.

At the same time, experienced evaluators bring a trained eye to the process. They understand the rhythm of a game, the timing of movement, and the mechanics behind each play.

Manipulated clips raise immediate suspicion as it is not that hard for trained adults, and even knowledgeable fans, to recognize one. And when one is exposed, students are the ones who carry the consequences. The loss of trust, the damage to reputation, and the stigma of being caught can follow them well beyond a single video.

In that sense, integrity and reputation are not secondary concerns, but the foundation of the entire process.

Discouraging Shortcuts

AI did not create this challenge, but it has made it easier to act on poor judgment. What once required significant effort can now be done quickly and with little technical skill. The tools are more accessible, and the temptation is greater.

And that makes the response even more important.

Since I am not a recruiting expert, my suggestions here may be overly simple or not fully informed. Still, it seems reasonable that technology could help protect integrity. For example, recruiting platforms or video services might use AI tools to detect manipulated footage or verify highlights against full game recordings uploaded by schools. If AI can generate fabricated highlights, it can also flag these or confirm authentic ones. Even a basic verification layer could serve as a deterrent. Technology alone, however, is unlikely to solve the issue.

Coaches and athletic programs play a critical role in shaping how athletes understand the purpose of highlight reels. AI can be used to analyze performance, break down game film, and identify areas for growth, which support student development. Fabricating plays does none of that, so helping athletes understand that distinction is part of the work.

The cultural layer also cannot be ignored. Highlight videos now live on social media, where attention can become its own reward system. Likes, shares, and visibility can create pressure to produce more impressive content. When attention becomes the incentive, exaggeration can follow.

Coaches and programs can push against that pressure by reinforcing that highlights are meant to reflect real performance, not manufactured moments. Clear expectations and consistent messaging can discourage shortcuts before any take hold.

Opening Doors

Integrity in high school sports is not enforced by rules alone, but is shaped by culture, expectations, and the adults who guide young athletes. When those signals are clear, athletes are more likely to understand that how they represent their performance matters as much as the performance itself.

AI did not create the integrity challenge in high school sports, but has made the consequences more immediate and visible. The real question going forward now becomes if student athletes will understand how easily manipulation can be detected and what is at stake when it is.

In high school sports, performance may open doors. Integrity and reputation determine whether those doors stay open.

Watch above or download/listen below.

Karl Rectanus has a new mission: change the trajectory of U.S. literacy. The edtech veteran — best known for founding Learn Platform, the evidence and edtech management company — has taken the helm as CEO of Really Great Reading (RGR), one of the country's oldest and most established science of reading organizations.

I was lucky enough to catch Karl for a few minutes. He made it clear that his arrival at RGR is not simply a leadership transition — it's a strategic pivot toward accountability. "Two-thirds of our kids cannot read by the end of third grade," he says. "And they're not reading at grade level by the time they graduate."

RGR was doing science of reading before it became a buzzword, Rectanus notes, tracing its roots to Learning Without Tears around 2005–2006. The organization has evolved from print-first materials — letter blocks, syllable boards, classroom posters — into a full suite of digital tools, professional learning, and coaching. Now, under Rectanus, the organization is going further: positioning itself as the first literacy outcomes company in the space.

Central to that ambition is outcomes-based contracting, a model Rectanus says has never been applied to literacy at scale. Rather than selling books or apps and hoping for the best, RGR will tie its agreements to measurable student progress. "We will be holding ourselves accountable," he says, pointing to more than 5 million foundational skills learned by students using RGR tools in the current school year alone.

Rectanus cites Mississippi's dramatic rise in reading scores — from 49th to 18th nationally — as proof that the model works when implemented with fidelity. "It's not a miracle," he says. "It's a Southern surge. They focused on three things: aligned curriculum, a caring adult, and a feedback loop."

He also addresses the pending federal Read Act, cautioning that legislation alone won't move the needle. "Unless states and districts do something with whatever happens there, it will not mean anything," he says.

His prescription for tech directors and curriculum leaders: stop asking for content, start asking for outcomes.

In a recent interview with child and adolescent development expert Ellen Galinsky, we discussed why developing executive functioning in our youngest learners is the “secret sauce” to lifelong success. To see how these theories translate into the classroom, I spoke with Michelle Miller, Superintendent of the South Fayette Township School District, about how her district is operationalizing this mindset.

South Fayette is currently one of 10 pilot sites testing a new curriculum focused on executive functioning, developed in partnership with Galinsky and the School Superintendent Association (AASA).

Miller, an educator with nearly 30 years of experience, notes that while these foundational skills have always been important, these became vital following the social isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the younger grades, Miller observed a visible gap in regulation skills.

“Kids missed a year or two of critical social development,” Miller says. When schools returned to in-person learning, she and her colleagues found students who were capable of memorizing facts but struggled to navigate social friction or manage their own cognitive loads.

By prioritizing executive functioning—the mental processes that allow us to plan, focus, remember instructions, and juggle multiple tasks—students (and adults) can better manage emotional well-being and academic rigor. As the global workforce shifts its demand toward adaptability and self-regulation, these are no longer soft skills but the tools students need to navigate the futures they choose.

The Case for Early Intervention

Miller agrees with Galinsky that the foundation for these skills must be laid long before high school. While elementary environments naturally embrace the whole child, Miller notes a common disconnect as students move up the academic ladder.

“If we wait to start talking about these skills in high school, we’ve missed nine years of schooling and opportunities,” Miller explains.

Valuing executive functioning is one thing; operationalizing it within a complex school system is another. Miller suggests districts move away from the traditional “Portrait of a Graduate” toward a “Portrait of a Learner.” This subtle shift ensures that goals such as collaboration, communication, and grit apply to a kindergartner just as much as a senior.

Here are three ways South Fayette Township School District brings their “Portrait of a Learner” to life:

1. Building a Common Vocabulary

Systemic change begins with linguistics. Miller’s district uses a shared vocabulary to create a culture that supports their strategic plan.

“Our plan is rooted in being ‘future-focused,’” Miller says. “We are always looking at what our students need to be successful beyond our walls. Strong executive functioning aligns perfectly with the attributes companies look for in their employees.”

The district’s focus centers on two key pillars:

• Student-Centered: Keeping the “whole child” at the center to ensure well-being in all areas of life.
• Innovation-Driven & Embracing Failure: “As an innovative district, we want to be a model for failure,” Miller says. “When we fail, we fail fast and fail forward. We celebrate failure here. That’s a tough thing to instill in families used to measuring success by traditional grades, but it's essential for the growth of our students' executive functioning skills.”

2. Creating Space: "Flex" and "WIN" Time

Executive functioning requires the ability to self-assess and prioritize. To foster this, Miller builds intentional time into the school day:

• WIN Time (What I Need): At the elementary level, this allows students to work through academic struggles before any trigger paralyzing anxiety.
• Flex Periods: In high school, these periods allow students to choose their focus—whether visiting a math lab, collaborating on a project, or taking "down time" to regulate.

3. The HEART Curriculum

The district is planning a course titled HEART (Health, Emotion, Awareness, Relationships, and Tech Safety). It addresses the physiological roots of executive functioning—such as nutrition and sleep—alongside emotional regulation.

Miller shares an example of helping a student reframe anxiety before a football game: “I told him, 'Getting butterflies is okay. That stress is just a chemical reaction to doing something important to you.' We need kids to identify that being nervous doesn't have to be paralyzing.”

Advice for District Leaders

For leaders looking to implement similar shifts, Miller offers a roadmap rooted in intentionality:

• Start With Why: Ground initiatives in brain research. When stakeholders question the shift away from traditional metrics, cite the science: regulation and attention are prerequisites for learning.
• Focus On Specificity: You cannot be everything to everyone. “If we focus on one skill, such as dysregulation at the elementary level, I bet we'll see attention, social interaction, and persistence increase," Miller says. Pick one or two skills to start; these will serve as a foundation for all other cognitive growth.
• Support Educators: South Fayette uses tools such as TeachFX, an app that gives teachers real-time feedback on high-leverage instructional practices such “teacher talk time” versus “student talk time.” When teachers reflect on their own engagement practices, they are better equipped to mentor students in theirs.

“Executive functioning skills are not soft skills anymore," Miller emphasizes. "They are essential skills."

You can watch the video above or download/listen below.

Andrew Marcinek remembers the moment social media stopped feeling like a community. It was around 2015 and 2016, when he was finishing a stint at the U.S. Department of Education and coming back into schools. He was also headlining Tech & Learning events. I’ve been lucky enough to keep in touch with Andrew since then. He continues to keep a keen eye on this incredibly complicated and harrowing landscape.

His personal reckonings from that time became the foundation for his book Teaching Digital Kindness, and it's the lens through which he's watching the current wave of lawsuits against Meta and other social media companies. For Marcinek, these cases aren't a surprise — they're a long-overdue reckoning. The comparison to Big Tobacco, he argues, is apt: years of denial, a product engineered to be addictive, and mounting evidence of harm to the most vulnerable users.

The burden of dealing with that harm, he notes, has fallen almost entirely on schools — institutions that were themselves manipulated by the same algorithms and given no roadmap for what to do.

Marcinek's prescription isn't a phone ban or a screen purge. It's intentionality — building technology programs in schools with deliberate purpose, communicating transparently with parents about how and when devices are used, and treating the current AI moment as a second chance to get the foundational work right.

"Schools need to lean in and have conversations around AI," he says. "If you're not, you are doing your school community a disservice — sending kids out into the world without knowledge of probably one of the most powerful technologies in anyone's lifetime."

He points to employer signals as the clearest argument for AI literacy: companies, including Microsoft and Anthropic, are explicitly looking for workers who understand how to use AI alongside strong soft skills. Schools that treat AI primarily as a cheating threat, Marcinek contends, are asking the wrong question — and risking the same institutional failure that defined the social media era.

A second book, tentatively titled Untangled, is in progress — it focuses on how individuals and institutions can find their way out of the algorithmic knots of the last two decades. I’m looking forward to it.

Artificial intelligence has rapidly shifted the instructional landscape. Tools that can generate explanations, draft essays, and summarize complex topics are now readily available to students. This accessibility has led some to question whether deep instructor content knowledge still holds the same importance. The answer is an unequivocal yes.

AI amplifies access to data, but it does not replace the need for human expertise to validate, structure, interpret, assess, and model disciplinary knowledge. In many ways, the instructor’s role becomes more dependent on strong content knowledge because they serve as the critical mediator between AI-generated information and meaningful learning. Many generative AI tools even articulate it at the end of a response, such as what Google’s Gemini recently told me: "AI may provide inaccurate information, so double-check its responses.” It is not a piece of window dressing; it is a sincere and serious warning.

For instance, in a recently published text about using AI in the classroom, I found an example in which AI was comparing the concerns around excessive civilian deaths in Gaza in 2024 with those at the Battle of Gettysburg. The example made it through the editorial process, but it lacks historical analysis. Someone with a strong historical knowledge base would know that, though Gettysburg remains the bloodiest battle in the Civil War and the Civil War was the bloodiest war in American history, only a single civilian death has been documented. Many historians articulate that the number is most likely underreported, but Jennie Wade remains the only documented civilian death in a three-day battle that caused 50,000 military casualties. The concerns about Gaza included that the military and civilians were often interspersed, and most of the fighters were not regularly uniformed troops; therefore, opposing troops were often unsure of their enemy. This was not an issue at Gettysburg, a battle between two regularly uniformed and disciplined armies, making the AI comparison factually inaccurate.

Information Itself Does Not Equal Understanding

One of the most persistent misconceptions in AI-rich environments is the assumption that access to data equates to understanding. AI tools can produce fluent, coherent responses across nearly any subject area. However, these outputs are fundamentally probabilistic, often reflecting patterns in data rather than verified truth or disciplinary consensus.

Students often lack the background knowledge needed to distinguish between accurate synthesis and plausible error. Without a strong knowledge base, they are vulnerable to accepting AI output at face value, which creates a new instructional imperative. Teachers must understand their content deeply and be able to identify subtle inaccuracies, omissions, and misrepresentations in AI-generated material.

Content knowledge becomes the filter through which AI is evaluated. Without that filter, both instructors and students risk confusing fluency and responsiveness with accuracy.

From Content Delivery to Knowledge Architecture

As with the advent of previous technologies, it seems that some believe AI will reduce the need for instructors to function as primary sources of information delivery, not unlike how a speaker at the opening of Heidelberg University in 1500 anticipated teachers being replaced by books. Obviously, that has not come to pass, and instead, new sources of information delivery have reframed the role of the teacher.

Effective instruction now centers on the design of coherent knowledge systems. Strong instructors sequence content intentionally, emphasizing foundational concepts and building toward more complex applications. This structured progression is not something AI inherently provides. AI delivers fragments, and instructors need to construct the architecture for the overall arc of any content. Fully understanding vertical and horizontal curricular alignment (how courses fit into the bigger picture) is essential to effective instructional development.

Students require guidance in understanding what matters within a discipline, how ideas connect, and why certain knowledge is foundational. These decisions depend on deep familiarity with the field. In this sense, content knowledge is about knowing how knowledge within a given subject is organized.

Interpretation and Context in an AI Environment

AI responses often lack context and may provide correct information but fail to situate it within appropriate contexts. This limitation becomes especially significant in disciplines in which interpretation is central.

Instructors with strong content knowledge bring nuance to the learning process. They can explain competing perspectives, highlight areas of debate, and connect ideas to real-world applications. They can also help students understand when AI outputs oversimplify complex issues. This interpretive role is essential and ensures that learning moves beyond surface-level engagement and into deeper disciplinary understanding.

Assessment in the Age of AI

Assessment practices are under increasing pressure in AI-rich classrooms. Traditional assignments that rely on recall or basic synthesis are easily completed with AI assistance.

This reality demands a more sophisticated design. Instructors must create tasks that require application, judgment, and contextual understanding, which are areas in which content knowledge is indispensable. Designing meaningful assessments requires a clear sense of what constitutes deep understanding within the subject area.

Evaluating student work also becomes more complex as instructors must distinguish between superficial correctness and genuine comprehension. This distinction is only possible with a strong grasp of the content. AI raises the stakes of assessment since it makes shallow tasks obsolete and elevates the importance of disciplinary expertise.

Modeling Disciplinary Thinking

Students do not just need information but also to learn how experts think. AI can generate answers, except it does not model the reasoning processes behind those answers in a way that supports learning.

Instructors play a critical role in making their thinking visible by demonstrating how to approach problems, analyze evidence, and construct arguments within a discipline.

This modeling extends to the use of AI itself. Students must learn how to question AI outputs, refine prompts, and evaluate responses–all skills are grounded in content knowledge. Without this, students cannot effectively engage in this process.

Equity and Access to Knowledge

The implications of content knowledge extend beyond instructional effectiveness and are deeply connected to issues of equity. Students who enter classrooms with a strong background knowledge are better positioned to use AI tools effectively. They can ask better questions, recognize stronger answers, and build on existing understanding. Students without that foundation are more likely to rely on AI passively.

This dynamic risks widening existing gaps. Knowledge-rich instruction becomes a critical lever for equity by ensuring that all students develop the background knowledge necessary to engage meaningfully with AI and other information sources.

Instructors’ expertise allows them to identify essential knowledge and ensure it is taught systematically and coherently.

The Reinforced Role of the Instructor Moving Forward

The net effect of AI integration is a reinforcement of a teacher’s role, as it increases the premium on content knowledge because it raises the stakes of interpretation, validation, and meaningful use. Instructors are now becoming validators of accuracy, designers of knowledge systems, interpreters of complexity, and architects of assessment. The presence of generative AI makes these roles more visible and more critical.

Educational conversations about AI often focus on tools, policies, and academic integrity, but none of this should overshadow a more fundamental truth: Strong instruction in an AI-rich classroom depends on strong content knowledge.

Investing in teacher expertise is essential. Professional learning, curriculum design, and instructional planning must all prioritize deep disciplinary understanding. Technology will continue to evolve, and as it does, strong teachers remain key to effective instruction.

Welcome to the May 2026 Edtech Show & Tell, in which our editors share some of the new edtech products that have caught our attention this month. These are not reviews or endorsements, but a showcase of education-friendly items, platforms, and more that we think might be noteworthy for you.

May's edtech roundup features several AI-powered offerings, from Google's AI Educator Series to a multi-touch interactive display to edtech monitoring and more. AV standouts include an interactive 3D AV planner, a USB extender and a media hub for managing networks in real time.

BenQ | Pro RP05 Interactive Display

The RP05 is BenQ's most advanced AI-ready interactive display, featuring a dedicated 10 TOPS Neural Processing Unit. Powered by Android 15 and Google EDLA certification, the display offers secure access to Google Workspace and the Play Store. Key features include AI-assisted whiteboarding, automated transcription, and a 50-point multi-touch interface. Additionally, ClassroomCare technology provides germ-resistant surfaces and Eyesafe 3.0 certification.

Extron | UCS 910 Series

The UCS 910 Series of twisted pair USB 5Gbps extenders send USB data signals from peripheral devices to a host computer up to 330 ft over a CAT 6A cable. Compatible with USB 3 and previous standards, 910 Series extenders support data rates up to USB 5Gbps. The UCS T 911 features a USB-C host connection and can be powered from the receiver or locally. The UCS R 912 receiver features a two-port USB hub with USB-C and USB-A ports for connecting remote peripherals.

GoGuardian | Discover

GoGuardian Discover gives district technology leaders a unified, trusted view of their entire edtech ecosystem. It addresses three critical needs for district administrators: automated compliance and risk management; AI-powered identification of cost savings; and clear, actionable insights across the entire district. GoGuardian is offering free use of Discover for up to 60 days through July 31 for new and existing customers.

Google | AI Educator Series

Google has teamed up with ISTE+ASCD to create the Google AI Educator Series (GES)—a free, ISTE standards-aligned program designed to help use tools such as Gemini and NotebookLM. In just 15 minutes for K-12 and 45 minutes for Higher Ed, learn a classroom-ready Gemini use case and earn a badge to demonstrate your new skill.

Kiloview | AVX24-4 Media HUB

The AVX24-4 MediaHub enables operators to visualize, control, and trust their networks in real time. It provides full visibility of network topology and device status, intelligent diagnostics, and media routing with prioritized NDI streams and synchronization. AVX24-4 features broadcast-grade hardware design, built-in redundancy, and optimized cooling architecture.

Learning.com | K-8 AI Literacy Curriculum

Learning.com is making a free AI literacy experience available now: 18 lessons across grades K-8, open to educators, students, families, and district leaders. Districts using EasyTech can begin foundational AI awareness instruction immediately, with professional learning embedded to support students and teachers learning AI together. The full AI Literacy curriculum is available to schools and districts through EasyTech, Learning.com's digital literacy platform.

LearningSpring| LearningSpring

LearningSpring is an end-to-end school choice management platform. Co-founded by Cecilia Retelle Zywicki and Alex Paul, the company aims to empower families to discover and access their best-fit learning options by providing the critical infrastructure required to turn complex school choice laws into functional, auditable programs for states, and transparent programs for schools and families.

Lexia | Science of Reading Classroom

Science of Reading Classroom by Lexia provides aligned literacy instruction grounded in the science of reading, including LETRS-aligned explicit instruction embedded into daily student activities; flexible, modular learning paths that target skills; real-time insights and integrated assessment data; professional learning, including LETRS Coaching and LETRS Connect, alongside core ELA instruction; and systemwide visibility that helps monitor progress and inform decisions.

McGraw Hill | AI within McGraw Hill Connect

The new AI capabilities within McGraw Hill Connect, the digital learning and course management solution for higher education, offers extended personalized support for students, featuring Learning Coach; tailored reading experiences, including a translation tool; and AI literacy modules to help students learn how to apply GenAI thoughtfully and effectively.

Pleneo | Planner

Built on standards from AVIXA, Pleneo Planner allows users to enter room dimensions and generate a fully designed space. The system automatically places microphones, cameras, loudspeakers and processing based on optimal coverage, sightlines and performance. The result is an interactive 3D environment. Users can visualize microphone pickup zones, speaker coverage and camera fields of view and even step into the camera perspective to see what participants will see.

ProjX360 | AI Assistant

The ProjX360 AI Assistant is integrated into the platform, giving users immediate access to answers, guidance, and best practices directly within their workflow. Whether users need help navigating features, understanding processes, or finding information quickly, the AI Assistant acts as a real-time support resource—eliminating delays and reducing dependency on traditional support channels.

swXtch.io | swXtch.ai and the swXtch AI Router

swXtch.ai and the swXtch AI Router combine to bring AI into live media production through a chat-driven interface. The AI Router acts as a virtual broadcast engineer by translating operator intent into production-ready AI pipelines without requiring AI or networking expertise. The platform integrates with Microsoft Fabric and NVIDIA AI infrastructure to connect enterprise data and real-time AI inference directly into live workflows.

Typing Agent | Blizzard Type Essentials

Blizzard Type Essentials is a significant evolution of its core typing platform for students grades 3-12. The update preserves the standards-aligned curriculum teachers rely on while introducing a modernized interface, rebuilt Chromebook performance, and a new adaptive learning engine called SummitPath. Current Typing Agent schools and districts have free Beta access through the official summer release.

Vivacity | V Guide

V Guide provides schools with expert, consultative support that helps districts confidently navigate, secure, and optimize Google Workspace and ChromeOS environments without adding pressure to already stretched IT teams. It assists with all aspects of Google environment management, support for configurations, long-term strategy, deployments,audits, and training.

• Edtech Show & Tell

A recent analysis from Stanford University looked at more than 150,000 prompts from more than 4,400 K-12 teachers interacting with AI. The research provides a rare look at how teachers are actually using AI in practice, and most of these uses are fairly positive.

Teachers, the research suggests, are generally using the tool to help them build curriculum content and as a sounding board, all with an eye toward better helping students.

The research was conducted in partnership with SchoolAI, an AI-powered educational platform. Though it was based on data from Fall 2024, it still provides a compelling snapshot of how, where, and when many students are turning to AI.

Cynthia Chiong, Principal Research Scientist at SchoolAI, recently shared some of the highlights of the research with me.

1. Ways Teachers Are Using AI: More Than 40% of Teacher Prompts Focus On Curriculum

Chiong says this is a good sign, as it suggests teachers are using the tool to explain learning and not just automate tasks. In separate conversations with educators, she has found that many of these efforts are geared toward personalizing learning for students.

"For example, these three students here really want to focus on the sun,” she says. "While these other students are struggling with something else or are interested in another topic."

Chiong says that for a lot of teachers, being able to meet all these students where they are is the biggest draw of using AI.

2. AI As A Sounding Board

The research found that about 1 in 7 prompts involved a teacher reflecting or processing without making a specific request. This includes sharing a frustration, thinking through a challenge, or working something out.

Chiong says that these types of conversations and others teachers had with AI show that it’s an active process for educators. They might start with a question such as, “'How might I assess this math project that we've been working on?' but then they immediately go to a next thread of, ‘Okay, now, how do I put this back into a lesson to teach?’” she says.

Chiong adds, “So it's not like a one-and-done, but they're really thinking through the trajectory of learning for their students, and that was really cool to see.”

3. More Than 50% of Prompts Ask It To Generate Materials Such as Lesson Plans, Assessments, or Feedback

Teachers obviously find AI helpful when it comes to generating class material, but Chiong suggests that the data also shows teachers are not just plugging in a prompt and settling for the first output.

“The teachers are really driving the content,” she says. “It's not that the AI is like, ‘Oh, here is a lesson, this is how you should teach it.' But rather a teacher is saying, ‘Hey, I really want to teach something about evolution or whatever,' and that idea of how to teach it is still coming from that teacher entering that prompt.”

4. Half of Teacher AI conversations Include Fewer Than 10 Prompts

Teachers, by and large, are keeping their conversations with AI short, sweet, and to the point.

“They have a good sense of what they want to teach, and they have the curriculum already,” Chiong says. “So it's more a matter of translating what they already do into this new AI platform, and so it shouldn't take all that much time, and it is meant as more of a time saver and not a time taker.”

As artificial intelligence moves from a futuristic concept to a fundamental classroom tool, education leaders face a dual challenge: harnessing its immense potential while safeguarding the students they serve.

To address this shift, Tech & Learning is hosting an essential three-part webinar series designed to move beyond the hype. This series provides a roadmap for building a resilient, AI-augmented academic community, focusing on practical implementation, workforce alignment, and rigorous security.

In this series, attendees will get a sneak peek at some of the newest AI tools designed to improve teaching and learning, and get students prepared for the futures they choose.

Watch how this works:

Phase 1: The Cutting Edge

Date: May 20, 2026

Focus: New Features from Top AI Solution Providers

This session is a deep dive into the latest innovations from industry-leading AI providers. Rather than focusing on abstract theories, this webinar highlights the high-impact tools currently reshaping the day-to-day operations of schools.

REGISTER HERE

Phase 2: Future-Proofing Students

Date: June 3, 2026

Focus: Solutions That Support Career Readiness

As the global economy shifts toward automation and algorithmic intelligence, the definition of "career ready" is evolving. This session addresses the "how"—specifically, how educators can bridge the widening gap between traditional classroom settings and the modern, AI-integrated workforce.

REGISTER HERE

Phase 3: The Integrity Infrastructure

Date: June 10, 2026

Focus: Ensuring AI Solutions are Safe and Secure

Innovation without protection is a liability. The final installment of the series pivots to the "why" and "how" of institutional safety. This session explores the "Integrity Infrastructure" required to maintain trust within a school community.

REGISTER HERE

Whether you are an IT director, a principal, or a district superintendent, these sessions provide the tools and safety frameworks necessary to lead your community into the future with confidence.

Join the Conversation: Equip your institution with the strategies needed for an AI-augmented world. Register now to secure your spot in this transformative series hosted by Tech & Learning.

WITH THANKS TO OUR PARTNERS

Tech & Learning's Best of Show Awards at ISTELive 2026 are back to celebrate the products, and businesses behind them, who are transforming education in schools around the world. The awards have been running for a number of years and have increased in popularity, proving to be a must-have for any companies looking to maximize their exposure at the show.

DEADLINE EXTENDED! Companies now have until 11:59 PM ET on Fri, June 19 to submit their nominations HERE.

We're welcoming entries from any company that has announced and/or launched an edtech product since ISTE 2025, or any company who has brought a significant new feature, upgrade, or variation to a product since the last show. Entrants are required to have a presence at ISTE, whether this is at the manufacturer's booth, a partner booth, demo space, or a session.

The Best of Show accolade is awarded to those who show the greatest promise to the industry, judged by some of the U.S.'s most tech-savvy and knowledgeable educators, and awarded by one of the leading names in the education technology industry.

Benefits of entering:

• Winners will be announced during ISTE on techlearning.com. All award winners will be featured in a special digital issue distributed to the Tech & Learning audience, reaching 72,000 school district decision makers.
• Crystal glass trophies will be sent directly to winners after ISTE, so you can continue celebrating your success after the show.
• All winners will receive a winner's marketing package. This will include a fully licensed winner's badge for in-house promotion, a social graphic, and press release.
• NEW for 2026! Winners will receive a marketing toolkit, with tips and tricks on how to utilize your winner assets, as well as a template press release.
• NEW for 2026! Receive a testimonial from our judges for in-house marketing purposes!

Why should you nominate your product?

• Nominating a product is easy. No shipping of products or setting up guest user accounts. Just complete a simple form that includes your product's name, image, and a brief description.
• Winning a Best of Show award signifies that your product has, or will have, an incredible impact on teaching and learning experiences. Our judges are looking for the best of the best in edtech innovation.
• Winners of the Best of Show award will be featured in Tech & Learning’s digital magazine, reaching industry professionals who will see your product showcased in a special section of educator-endorsed products.

FAQ

What are the ISTE Best of Show Awards?

The program recognizes products exhibited at ISTELive 26 which are believed to be changing the way we educate around the world. Winners are selected by a panel of professional users and editors based on product descriptions provided in the nomination form, as well as on judges' inspection at the show.

Who can enter?

Entrants are required to have a presence at ISTE, whether this is at the manufacturer's booth, a partner booth, demo space, or a session. You don’t need a product that’s already shipped — but it must be a product that’s been shown publicly either before or during June 2026. Previous entrants are welcome to enter this year's program. If you have any questions regarding your eligibility please email beckie.sirs@futurenet.com, and we'll be happy to assist.

DEADLINE EXTENDED: When are entries due?

All entries must be submitted by 11:59 PM ET on Fri, June 19. A single entry costs $625, with discounts available for multiple entries. We reserve the right to consider late applicants as circumstances dictate

What are the entry categories?

The categories are broken down into Primary (Tools for K-6 grade education), Secondary (7-12), and Higher Education. You may enter the same product into multiple categories.

May I enter more than one product?

Yes, there is no limit to the number of products you may nominate. Each requires a nomination form and entry fee(s).

How are the products evaluated?

All entries are reviewed by a panel of judges and editors - chosen in advance by the editors of our publications - who will review nominations and choose the winners on a points score against a range of criteria. Judges use a combination of on-site inspection and the online nomination information to build their scores.

What do I get if I win?

If selected as a winner, you’ll receive:

• A physical winner’s trophy shipped directly to you after ISTE
• A digital winner’s pack, including badges, graphics, and banners for your in-house promotion
• Features in online articles, social posts, and newsletters with Tech & Learning

Winning a Best of Show award is a great accomplishment for any organization, and the benefits go far beyond just an announcement at the conference. For more information, contact Beckie Sirs, beckie.sirs@futurenet.com.

Syracuse University has gone all in on the AI revolution, deploying Claude AI to 30,000+ students, faculty members, and staff. Along the way, school leaders say they've developed effective AI use cases both in the classroom and beyond, ranging from test practice to course schedule management.

Syracuse University Chief Digital Officer Jeff Rubin, and Andrew Joncas, Assistant Vice President for enterprise data and artificial intelligence, recently shared how they were able to develop effective uses for AI, get student, staff, and educator buy-in, and talk through and work to rectify some of the concerns around AI use at their institution.

Using AI To Increase Text Scores By Adjusting Questions

Rubin knows firsthand that just adding AI to the classroom doesn't always enhance learning. When he first started using Claude AI himself, he had the idea of uploading his recorded lectures and then having Claude generate practice questions for students. The thinking behind this strategy was sound as he teaches an intro to information technology course with several hundred students enrolled in it. “Personalized learning is always hard, and really trying to meet students where they're at is challenging in a large class,” Rubin says.

Students have long wanted detailed and varied practice test questions, but creating enough questions to meet the demand was a challenge. “Without AI, it is actually really hard for my brain to come up with thousands of different ways of asking questions,” Rubin says. But once he shared his previously recorded lectures with Claude AI, the tool was able to generate a virtually unlimited supply of multiple choice questions and work through them with students.

In theory, this seemed perfect. However, in practice, when Rubin surveyed his students, he found that those who were extensively using Claude AI to study weren’t doing any better than the others. After meeting with members of Syracuse University's education department, Rubin realized that this lack of results was likely because Claude AI was asking students multiple-choice questions that didn't require them to think. He reworked his prompt to Claude AI so it would ask short answer questions and then engage with students about what they got wrong, all drawing from his lectures.

“It'll throw out a term that we've talked about in class in the form of a question and ask, basically, what do you know about this?" Rubin says. "Instead of just picking an A, B, C, or D, the student would type out their response. And then what Claude does is it grades the response and basically says, ‘Hey, this is a B type of response. Here’s the things you got right,’ but Professor Rubin also said, ‘These are the things you should know about.’”

This time Rubin saw an immediate impact with initial exam scores jumping by 12 points on average. While he just started using the system this semester with students, he believes the positive trends he has seen so far will continue.

Other AI Uses and Buy-In

Other uses for AI at Sryacuse include Clementine, a recently launched course search tool powered by Claude Opus. This system queries millions of rows of institutional data in real time and provides results tailored to each student’s schedule, grades, and goals. Another tool the university also deploys allows staff members to efficiently search for potential data about university donors.

The university has also launched a pilot program using Claude Code, Anthropic’s agentic coding tool. Joncas says they’ve been surprised and pleased by the interest in this tool from various members of the university community.

He adds that while sometimes there is pushback in using AI among coders who take artistic pride in their work, he says meeting with stakeholders and showing them what the tool can do often alleviates these fears. He’ll often demo it by having Claude Code quickly create a tic-tac-toe game.

“It sounds ridiculous, because nobody needs to make tic-tac-toe. It's already been made a thousand times,” he says, but the demo shows people the tool’s potential. “They see the light and they go, ‘Oh, I could do that now.’”

Handling Academic and Environmental Concerns

AI ethics is a big topic these days, from concerns about the technology’s environmental impact to potential misuse and AI plagiarism from students and faculty members. Rubin and his team have invited conversations around this at various AI training events, including some focused on AI at work more generally and others specifically built around AI and teaching pedagogy.

“We also started a whole AI governance, which is led by somebody in IT but is inclusive of folks from around the university,” Rubin says. “We talked about things like AI and mental health. We talk about AI and data privacy. AI and job loss, AI and sustainability, all things that are big, deep topics.”

As far as concerns around inappropriate AI use by students, right now Syracuse University syllabi include a statement on AI that essentially is either you can use AI in this class, you can't use AI, or you can use it under these circumstances.

“That, to me, is a band-aid. It's not an answer,” Rubin says. “The answer is, 'How do we think about AI from a pedagogy standpoint?'” He adds, “If you integrate AI from a pedagogical standpoint, we're going to have fewer of these concerns."

In that vein, instead of having students write essays on some aspect of World War II, he'd like to see more active assignments. For instance, "'You are a commander of this unit who went into this situation in World War II. What would you do?’” he says.

In the meantime, Rubin also advises faculty members to be forthright with how they are using AI.

“We have a responsibility to let students know if we're using AI. Are we using AI to generate our lectures? Are we using AI to generate our exams?” he says. “I don't think there's something wrong with it. I just think there's a level of transparency that is needed to show, 'Hey, we're still owning this, but I'm using AI in certain aspects of it.’”

AI enthusiasm amongst educators hasn’t evaporated, but it's not as intense as it once was, says Carl Hooker, educator and author.

The former district tech director regularly speaks to educators around the country (often during Tech & Learning regional leadership summits) and polls them on their feelings about AI. He says that while school leaders are still interested in the potential of AI, they are being more cautious about how they are spending money on AI products. They are also more concerned about AI's impact on the environment.

In many ways, this waning enthusiasm is familiar to educators from previous tech innovations. It follows the Gartner hype cycle, a graphic of how at first a new technology is embraced, then people pull away from the tool when it doesn't quite live up to the promise. Ultimately, society learns how to best make use of the new technology.

With AI, Hooker says, there was initially intense excitement. “I think we hit that peak, probably, in the summer of '24; now we're in what they call the zone of disillusionment,” he says. AI’s limitations are becoming clearer, and educators are realizing that simply throwing AI at various problems is not always an effective solution.

On top of this, financial analysts are increasingly warning of a potential AI bubble burst based on the scale of investment and theoretical limits to the return on that investment. Time Magazine recently noted that analysts predict more than $5 trillion being invested in AI by the end of the decade, a staggering number that far outpaces the AI industry’s profits. For instance, Time Magazine notes, "OpenAI and Anthropic have annualized revenues of about $25 billion and $19 billion."

AI will be a part of education going forward, but the ways schools use it and engage with it is evolving, says Hooker, who is a proponent of using AI in ways that support deep learning.

The AI Bubble: Fewer Screens and Less Screen Time

One reason some districts are focusing less on AI, Hooker suggests, is funding. “We just ran out of all of our ESSER funds a year-and-a-half ago to replace all those devices that we bought, so now we have to figure out what to do with that,” he says. “Schools are shifting away from one-to-one.”

Beyond funding realities, there is a growing effort in many states and districts to prevent students from using their phones during school time. “Cell phones have been banned in 21 states,” Hooker says. “So now you're saying we don't have money for more devices, plus you can't bring your own.”

Generative AI went mainstream at the tail end of Covid, just after most districts had invested in one-to-one devices, which allowed schools to implement the technology in ways they wouldn’t have been able to otherwise, Hooker says. “If that doesn't happen and generative AI happens, we're like, 'Oh, it's cool. The high school kids get to use it.’”

The Future of AI In Schools

The AI hype cycle reminds Hooker of previous hype cycles around other technologies.

“I've lived through a couple of different eras with Web 2.0 and then mobile devices. I was a tech director when all of those came out, and everything was the App Store, and everybody was buying apps; it was this huge explosion of everybody spending money on that,” Hooker says. “Then it went from that to software as a service, and everybody needed to get subscriptions to everything, which is kind of where we're still at."

He notes that past tech bubbles never burst, "But they definitely deflated.”

That’s what he sees happening with AI: It will remain a thing in education, just not necessarily THE thing.

“It doesn't mean there's not going to still be adaptation, because there's still lots of schools that haven't adapted it at all,” he says. “I just think the fanfare and the buzz and the hype are probably way past their peak, and we're going to eventually get to a settling point.”

What that will be like is anyone’s guess. Hooker notes the field is still discovering what AI “looks like in a highly impactful way when it comes to learning. So we're still kind of figuring that out, because we're all learning this at the same time.”

In other words, AI is here to stay in education, but the AI gold rush in education may have run its course.

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness

These provocative and powerful words are familiar to most 21st-century Americans. But to truly appreciate their radical and revolutionary meaning, we must understand what political and social ideas were commonly held during the Colonial era.

These semiquincentennial lessons and activities provide a broad range of pathways through which educators can teach the founding of our country, its remarkable exceptionalism, and equally remarkable divergence between ideals and practice.

A note about the word semiquincentennial: As the semiquincentennial approaches, you may be feeling nostalgic for the days of the bicentennial, which was easier to pronounce and spell. But the word is actually quite logical in both. Based on Latin roots, semiquincentennial deconstructs as follows: semi meaning half; quin meaning five and centennial meaning hundredth. It’s pronounced sem-ee-kwin-sen-TEN-ee-uhl. Happy 4th of July!

Best Lessons and Activities for the Semiquincentennial

National Constitution Center: The Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights
What’s the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution? And what about the Bill of Rights – how does that fit? Although the U.S.Constitution and Bill of Rights didn’t exist in 1776, it’s best to understand these documents as part of the same striving toward democracy and freedom. This in-depth article, written by constitutional experts Jeffrey Rosen and David Rubenstein, explores and clarifies the similarities and differences among these three crucial founding documents. An ideal place to start for students in grades 6-12.

American Battlefield Trust: Declaration of Independence Lesson Plan
A detailed, standards-aligned lesson plan for use in middle and high school classrooms. Students will learn about the process of creating and adopting the Declaration of Independence as well as its importance in history. Includes a teaching guide, PowerPoint presentation, student worksheets, and digital versions of primary source documents.

PBS: The American Revolution Learning Resources
Based on video excerpts from Ken Burns’ The American Revolution, these standards-aligned lessons explore topics such as: demographics and economy of the colonies; causes of the American revolution, key events and figures; and consequences and legacies of the era. Lessons are classified by grade and include teacher guides, discussion questions, vocabulary, and handouts. Shareable to Google Classroom with a free PBS account.

DocsTeach America 250 Activities and Documents
From the National Archives, a selection of downloadable digital versions of the key primary source documents related to America’s founding and early years. Each document is accompanied by explanatory text as well as a complete transcript so readers don’t have to try to decipher faded old- fashioned handwriting. Activities for selected documents serve as grade-leveled lesson plans and formative assessments, and include suggested teaching instructions. Sharable to Google Classroom.

Bill of Rights Institute: Declaration of Independence Lesson
What were the philosophical bases and practical implications of the Declaration of Independence? This complete, scaffolded lesson plan takes a deep dive into these questions about our country’s founding document. Includes all required readings, activities, educator answer key, lesson extensions, student handouts, and graphic organizers. A free account is required to download the full lesson plan in a single PDF.

Museum of the American Revolution Mini Lesson Plans
Ten American Revolution lesson plans that while concise, nonetheless include everything needed to cover topics including historical object analysis, dissecting the Declaration, Alexander Hamilton, the people of colonial America, and George vs. George–a comparison between King George III and George Washington.

Museum of the American Revolution: Season of Independence
To Americans of our modern era, it may seem “self-evident” that all colonial Americans would have supported their states’ efforts toward independence. While the majority did support independence, this was not universal. Explore how the demographics of Revolution supporters vs. Loyalists changes over the first six months of 1776. Map-based interactive with links to further inquiry about people and places.

Beyond the Battlefield: A Virtual Field Trip to the Museum of the American Revolution
An enthusiastic and engaging virtual visit to the Museum of the American Revolution, hosted by Lauren Tarshis, author of the bestselling I Survived children’s book series. The video appears to be aimed at younger learners but the classroom kit that accompanies the video contains readings for students in grades 2-8. Downloadable PDFs include vocabulary, discussion questions, and answers. An excerpt from Tarshis’ I Survived the American Revolution 1776 is also provided. This would be a great place to start with younger learners or any students who respond well to a people-centered approach to history.

iCIVICS Education Investigation Declaration Game
Oh no! A criminal enterprise, known as Baddies Against Rights and Freedom (B.A.R.F.) has hacked into the Bureau of Ideas with the intent to destroy files related to freedom, democracy, and rights. Enlisted as Special Agents, players will collect clues from 1776 to restore the ideas and damaged files of the Declaration of Independence. This absorbing game is intricate enough to keep older kids involved, while also providing a glossary for younger learners. Available in English and Spanish. A free account is not required, but does allow users to save in-game progress and compete with others.

National Humanities Center: The American Revolution as Civil War
We think of the conflict that led to American independence as a revolution—and we commonly refer to it as the “American Revolution.” But at its heart, wasn’t it actually a civil war? In this lesson for grades 10-12, students will read and analyze a travel journal from 1775, written by a Scottish woman who visited her brother in North Carolina and observed patriot and loyalist activities. Provided are a teacher’s guide, close-reading questions, and a fillable PDF assignment for students. An excellent lesson for advanced students.

Gilder Lehrman Institute: The Declaration of Independence at 250
A wealth of activities devoted to the Declaration’s 250th anniversary. All activities are grade-leveled and include formative quizzes, teacher’s guide, and interactive elements. Explore topics such as whether the revolution was justified, how and why Congress changed Thomas Jefferson’s initial draft, and the reaction of British people to their colony’s assertion of rights.

iCivics: Why Do We Have So Many Governments?
In this inquiry-based, standards-aligned lesson plan, students will learn about the three levels of government, the principle and practice of federalism, and how life in the colonies and the Articles of Confederation affected the founders’ decision making. Includes Google Slideshow, PDFs, and student handouts. With a free account, educators can create a class and assign this lesson.

Abigail Adams and “Remember the Ladies”
Abigail Adams is famous for appealing to her husband John Adams during the months prior to the signing of the Declaration. Students will read her letters and analyze their words in response to close-reading questions. A teacher’s guide, fillable PDF, vocabulary, interactive exercises, and follow-up assignment are all included.

Discovery Education: Free Classroom Resources to Commemorate the U.S.'s 250th Anniversary
Organized by grade level and theme, this downloadable guide offers selected K-12 social studies resources relevant to the semiquincentennial. Topics covered include the Declaration of Independence, origins of the U.S. Constitution, equal protection under the law and more. Video, slideshow and interactive text materials are included.

Repetitio est mater studiorum.

Or to say it another way, repetition is the mother of learning.

And while repetition sometimes gets a bad rap (as in “drill and kill”), properly utilized, repetition can help cement foundational concepts and allow students to advance to more deeper and nuanced forms of learning.

The learning platform I Know It provides a wide range of activities and exercises for K-5 math and English language arts practice, as well as progress reports for educators and parents and gamified feedback for students.

What is I Know It?

I Know It is a math and English language arts practice site that provides extensive, individualized exercises for students in grades K-5.

The platform includes some of the most engaging features of gamification, such as congratulatory graphics and animations, sound effects, awards, and badges. I think it strikes an excellent balance between fully gamified interactives on one hand and dry data-driven instruction on the other.

I Know It goes beyond simple practice modules by aligning the majority of its exercises with Common Core Standards or selected state standards. Plus, its student-friendly features will encourage timely assignment completion as well as exploration of additional, unassigned problem sets.

How Does I Know It Work?

I Know It makes it easy for educators to sign up for its generous free trial. Simply provide your name, school name, phone number, and email and you’re ready to explore the site. Once signed in, teachers can set options for the following parameters:

• Standards (Common Core, Texas or Florida)
• Hints (none, three or unlimited)
• Animations (on/off)
• Students may explore on their own (yes/no)
• Questions may be read aloud (on/off)
• Progress report to parents via email (yes/no)

Given the level of control and optimization provided, I Know It has a remarkably clean interface with intuitive navigation. It’s also very easy to edit any of these parameters at any time later.

CREATING A CLASS

Create and name your class from the My Students tab. The easiest way to populate your online classes is to use the Rapid Roster feature, which accepts text input, or copy-and-pasted names from a text file, spreadsheet, or email. The system will then create the user names and passwords for you. These can be edited later if you wish. You can also print out a PDF with all student names and passwords.

GETTING TO KNOW THE EXERCISES

I Know It offers two categories of practice: math and English language arts. To start exploring practice sets, select a category and grade from the top menu or from the teacher dashboard. Now you’ll see the entire range of problems for that grade, with large bold print headings so you can easily find your preferred activities.

To get a quick view of a problem type, mouse over the description and an example will pop up. To try it yourself, click to open the problem. Your view will be identical to the student’s view, so you can see what happens following a correct answer or an incorrect answer.

Note the animation option toggle in the lower right corner. Students who prefer not to have graphic or animated feedback can adjust their own settings.

If you’d like to experience and test the platform exactly as a student would, sign in as a student in a separate browser. First add a student; e.g.; Test Student. Open a new browser (for example, use Edge if your teacher account is open in Chrome) and sign in as Test Student, logging in with user name, the class code and the password. A separate student email is not required.

ASSIGNING EXERCISES

To assign activities from the teacher dashboard, select grade and subject (math or ELA), then select the desired exercise. The Assign Lesson window gives you multiple options for the assignment, including number of questions (1-80), which students to assign, display options, auto reassign, and several others.

What Are the Best I Know It Features?

LESSON DIFFERENTIATION

One of most useful features built into the I Know It platform is the ease with which teachers can differentiate lessons. This can be accomplished in two ways:

1. Assigning a lesson of a lower or higher grade level to individual students.
   Instead of assigning fourth grade math sets to Jane Doe, you can assign second grade problem sets, since she's currently working at that level. You can then quickly assign grade-level work to the rest of the students if desired. Importantly, there will not be a grade level displayed on assignments.
   
2. Setting the "ability level" to a lower or higher grade.
   The "ability level" is an optional feature that, if set, will guide the level of exploration exercises offered to a student. These are the optional activities displayed underneath the student's assigned work.

PROGRESS TRACKING AND REPORTING

Student progress tracking allows teachers to see overviews of a class or student, or drill down into details if desired. "Recent Activity" lists students, lessons worked on, and scores, with a link to a detailed view for each student. Here teachers can view all of a student's questions and answers as well as time spent on tasks.

Teachers may also export a printable PDF progress report for selected intervals, or view awards won by students for completing lessons. Weekly progress reports will be emailed to parents if enabled in Settings.

BUILT-IN ACCESSIBILITY TOOLS

Each activity window sports a sound icon in the top left corner, allowing questions to be read aloud. Incorrect answers yield explanations clarifying the correct answer and offering the chance to view the question and answer again.

Does The Robot Have A Name And Why Is It So Much Fun?

Maybe it's just the fifth grader in me, but I love the animated robot character that responds to answers (if animations are permitted in settings). The variety of playful animations for correct answers—all with apt and amusing sound effects—include: blowing bubbles; barking dogs; flying birds; rain; rainbows; rocket ship taking off, circling the moon, parachuting back to Earth; juggling; a flower garden springing from the head; eating an apple that turns into a pie; and more.

My guess is that most kids will enjoy these animated rewards and hopefully, be more motivated to complete their work. Sadly, the riveting (and no doubt, riveted) robot is nameless.

How Much Does I Know It Cost?

I Know It offers three account types: Family, Single Teacher and School/District, with varying pricing and features. A 30-day free trial, with no credit card required, makes it straightforward to discover if the platform is right for your class.

The Family membership allows one parent and up to four children, using a single login, for $45 annually.

The Single Teacher account includes one teacher and 25 students (each of whom has an individual login) for $150 annually and the option to add additional student licenses at $7.50 each.

The District/School account provides additional benefits, such as a unlimited teacher accounts, a dedicated account manager, teacher training, phone tech support and others. The cost is per student and varies depending on the size of the school or district.

Either watch above or listen/download below.

For school districts weighing whether to invest in esports, the conversation often stalls at cost. But according to Jason Bond, who has spent more than 20 years focused on K-12 AV at Extron, the real question administrators should be asking is simpler: what else can that space do?

"It's dual purpose, and that's the key to the return on that investment," Bond explained to me—in person!—at an Extron open house. "You're going to use that esports space for something like graphics design or cybersecurity training during the day, and then in the evening or after school hours, it becomes the esports playing facility."

Bond, who has tracked K-12 AV trends since the early days of classroom projectors, sees esports as the latest inflection point in how schools think about technology spaces. Where AV was once primarily about equipping individual classrooms, districts are now investing in large gathering spaces, media centers, and purpose-built esports facilities — all of which require more sophisticated infrastructure including AV over IP, multi-graphic processing, and specialized audio routing.

The engagement returns, Bond argues, are measurable. Esports programs have been linked to improved attendance, better grades, and stronger community involvement. "It keeps kids in school. It keeps kids getting better grades," he says. "And it's not just a bunch of kids sitting around playing video games — there's a lot of team coordination that promotes communication and engagement."

For districts just starting, Bond's advice is to resist the urge to go big immediately. A computer lab retrofit using existing data and power infrastructure can serve as a functional first step. From there, districts can grow incrementally, layering on technology as budgets allow. AV over IP, he notes, is the foundation worth investing in early — it provides the flexibility to scale in directions a district may not yet have anticipated.

As education budgets tighten and federal relief funding expires, arts programs across the country once again find themselves on the chopping block. Recent federal and state budget proposals reflect a familiar pattern: when policymakers have to make difficult choices, creative subjects are often viewed as supplemental rather than essential. All the while, educators and district leaders continue making the case that the arts support academic achievement, engagement, and whole-child development.

But at a moment defined by rapid AI adoption and ongoing debates about screen time, the argument for protecting and investing in arts education needs to take on a new tone. The arts continue to be one of the most effective places in school for students to build healthier, more intentional relationships with technology.

In short, in the age of AI, we need the arts more than ever.

What Sets Arts Education Apart

While many conversations about classroom technology focus on access, guardrails, or efficiency, arts classrooms offer something different: a model for how digital tools can serve creativity, deepen thinking, and expand opportunity without replacing human judgment. In an era when AI can generate essays, compose music, and create images in seconds, students need structured environments in which technology is used responsibly and reflectively. The arts already provide that structure.

As a district arts coordinator, I have seen this firsthand. A band student of mine who had been uninterested in traditional instruments completely changed when we introduced digital music tools, becoming not only one of the most engaged learners in the class, but also a composer of original music. The introduction of digital tools didn’t replace musicianship — it revealed it. Technology gave this student an accessible entry point into the creative process, and once they had it, their confidence and artistry blossomed.

Digital composition software, notation tools, and recording platforms allow students to experiment, revise, and refine their ideas in ways that would have been far more time-consuming a decade ago. Students can layer tracks, hear immediate playback, annotate their own scores, and collaborate across devices. The same is true in other contexts besides music; in visual arts, for instance, a variety of digital drawing and painting platforms enable students to practice with new mediums, styles, and techniques without having to worry about supplies or messes. But in either case, the core intellectual work of looking and listening critically, understanding structure, and making aesthetic choices remains entirely human and part of the learning.

At every step, technology is embedded within a framework of authorship. Even – and especially – with the help of new tech-enabled tools, students are creators, not just consumers or editors of machine-generated content.

Practically speaking, teachers should encourage students to experiment with tech-enabled arts and music tools. For example, how can each student use the same set of sounds, samples, or colors to create a piece that uses their own unique voice? How can technology be an accelerant for creativity, instead of putting a damper on it?

Tech Also Frees Up Time

Technology in the arts also plays a less visible but equally important role: reducing logistical burdens so teachers can focus on higher-order instruction. Platforms such as MusicFirst streamline assignment distribution, submission, assessment, and feedback with a particular focus on the arts. Instead of collecting paper scores, managing physical recordings, or juggling disparate tools, teachers can handle routine tasks—organizing files, timestamping submissions, tracking revisions—which frees us to spend more time on musical interpretation, technique, and creative problem-solving.

Creating such efficiency also allows for more one-on-one conferencing, more targeted feedback, and more opportunities to guide students through complex artistic decisions. Rather than troubleshooting formatting issues or managing classroom logistics, teachers can ask deeper questions: Why did you choose this harmony? How does this dynamic shift change the emotional arc? What alternatives did you consider?

Cycles of Experimentation

Perhaps most importantly, arts technology creates safe, structured spaces for iteration and failure. In arts software, students can revise endlessly without wasting materials or losing prior drafts — whether that’s tempo and instrumentation in music or color and line in visual art. The experience of creating art enables students to manage pace, embrace iteration, and develop delayed gratification — skills that are increasingly rare in digital environments built around instant results.

The creative process will always require patience and sustained attention. Arts instruction gives students a structured, supportive space to slow down, revisit their thinking, and understand that excellence emerges from cycles of experimentation rather than immediate perfection. That’s an idea that teachers can encourage by dedicating time for students to review their own (or their peers’) work, or to make changes to tempo, color, or tone just to see what happens. They may very well like the result.

Arts Education: Tech At Its Best?

As education leaders navigate AI policies, digital citizenship frameworks, and technology procurement decisions, they should look to arts classrooms as proof of concept. The arts demonstrate what technology integration at its best can look like when it is grounded in human intention, structured creativity, and professional educator guidance.

If we want students to use technology with intention, creativity, and integrity, we must protect the classrooms that already teach all these how. The future of digital citizenship may depend on keeping the arts in our schools.

As the founder and director of Tech Camp for Teachers, Eva Harvell, Director of Technology, Pascagoula-Gautier School District in Mississippi, designed and led a multi-day institute that includes multiple presenters, reaching K-12 and higher ed educators from across the U.S.

The program focuses on practical ways to bring digital tools into the classroom, helping attendees move from basic usage to high-level digital pedagogy. By creating scalable learning opportunities, for both school-level and university-level educators, Harvell and her team ensures technology was a powerful tool instructors at all levels felt confident using.

“It started off with us just wanting to provide teachers technology training for those who were not able to get tech training, or who just wanted more than was made available to them,” Harvell says. “The presenters were actual teachers in the field. Vendors were showcasing what they used in the back of the gym where we met. It was just two days of pre-K all the way to higher education professors getting together, talking about edtech and how to incorporate tech tools in the classroom.”

The Pascagoula-Gautier School District spans 19 campuses serving roughly 6,300 students. As Technology Director, Harvell’s commitment to innovation is best seen through her work in empowering others to master new technology. For this and other efforts, she was recently recognized with a Tech & Learning Innovative Leader Award.

Cost-Cutting Creativity Meets Generous Helpers

Smart planning and letting a program grow organically builds a budget-friendly way to connect with big impact.

“Our very first year, I went to vendors we had a very good relationship with and said, ‘Hey, we're looking to do this for two days and I need to provide food. Can you help me?’” Harvell says. “Our presenters were teachers on contract with us, so we worked with their principals to borrow them. It was a professional learning day for them, so they got some PD time as well. It was zero out-of-pocket for anybody who attended.”

A partnership with William Carey University provided an extra bonus, with teachers from the state of Mississippi earning free CEUs. Educators from other states received documentation to qualify at home.

“This started in our unused former high school building with word of mouth from my emailing tech directors and asking them to share with any teachers who were interested,” Harvell says. “We met in the gym and did trainings in the classrooms. It just stayed very grassroots. Anything we needed, we would ask one of our vendors or just figure out how to do it for free.”

4 Tips for Creating a Tech Camp for Teachers in Your District

Harvell shares advice for others considering such a program.

• If you're thinking of doing it, do it. “Don’t be afraid to go for it,” she says. “There can always be hiccups. At the end of the day, you are bringing teachers together and giving them a community so they can have the conversation — that’s what matters.”
• Build relationships and don’t be afraid to lean on them. “You never know unless you ask, but I didn’t think they would say yes,” Harvell says. “They didn’t even hesitate. I’m not sure that would have been the case if we didn’t already have that communication and established relationship.”
• Make it a day of fun — not just your normal PD. “Brand it, name it something cute,” she says. “Get teachers excited to attend by thinking outside of the box.”
• It will grow. They will come. “I was so nervous that first year,” Harvell recalls. “And now we have people driving eight hours to be a part of it. But even if it had been eight people, it would have been worth it. The goal was to provide resources and training. The goal was to help teachers.”

Too Much of a Good Thing is Still a Good Thing

With such an initial resounding success, Tech Camp for Teachers faced a new challenge when they were forced to step away from their in-person model during the COVID-19 pandemic to go remote. Some might have wondered if the infectious, fun element would be too diluted to still draw the crowd.

”It really ballooned when we went virtual,” Harvell says. “Everyone from pre-K to university professors across many states signed up. I have two technology integration specialists who help do this. It suddenly became a full-time job above the full-time job.”

All of the Tech Camp for Teacher training videos were pre-recorded for the virtual event. They were scheduled and then presented with a video live chat.

“Leading up to it, getting the presenters, maintaining the branding, getting all the videos ready to go,” recalls Harvell. “We spent hours upon hours getting it all loaded and put together. It was daunting but it was something that we loved doing, because we knew we were helping teachers.”

Harvell and her presenters have discovered that facilitating the camp has raised their visibility in unexpected ways.

“Now, when we go to our Mississippi state conference — people recognize us as ‘those tech camp people,’” she says. “WLOX, the news station here on the coast, even did a story on it. I’m working on my doctorate at William Carey University and I hear from my professors that they sat in on Tech Camp! I thought that was great because they are teaching pre-service teachers.

Harvell says the event is a win-win for everyone.

“Ultimately, providing resources for teachers is what we were all there to do,” she says. “It's grassroots. It's not a conference, it is just a big group of teachers getting together and sharing what they do.”

Tools They Use

• Acer and HP Chromebooks
• Fortinet
• Incident IQ
• Clever
• MagicSchoolAI
• Google Workspace for Education

Located near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Highline Public Schools serves many students and families from around the world, including some who are new to the United States. Families across Highline speak more than 89 languages, reflecting the rich diversity of the Highline community. At the center of the district’s work is the Highline Promise. From classrooms to front offices to transportation and AI committees, staff across Highline play a role in bringing that promise to life.

“Highline Public Schools Promise is that every student is known by name, strength, and need, and graduates prepared for the future they choose,” says Teshon Christie, the Highline’s Chief of Digital Transformation and Innovation, and recent Tech & Learning Innovative Leader Award winner.

It is a statement that Christie refers to not as a mission, but as a living accountability measure. “The amazing thing about that is that regardless of who you go to in our system, you know this promise,” Christie says. “Everyone from our bus drivers to nutrition services workers—everyone at Highline knows this promise and that it is our focus.”

Scaling the Personal Touch

For a district of more than 16,500 students across 34 sites, “personalization” is often a buzzword that loses meaning at scale. For Christie, scaling this promise isn’t about software alone, but about leadership consistency and human connection.

“We scale our promise through humans,” Christie says. “When you break down each part, it’s easy for a person to see what their role is. If a bus driver gets to know their students by name, they can identify strengths and needs during the ride and communicate those back to the office staff. It makes sense operationally and instructionally.”

This human-centric approach is organized around four board-adopted goals:

• Culture of Belonging: A culture where all are welcome, valued, and safe.
• Innovative Learning: Academic experiences that engage, empower, and challenge every student.
• Bilingual and Biliterate: Multicultural skills that enable students to live, work, and communicate across cultures.
• Future Ready: Students explore possibilities and develop mindsets that prepare them for a changing future.

Navigating the AI Frontier

As the Chief of Digital Transformation, Christie’s job involves managing everything from data assessment to instructional technology, as well as navigating the ethical and practical implementation of AI.

Highline is now two years into its AI journey, anchored by a group of AI ambassadors who have developed vision and guidance documents. Rather than banning the technology out of fear, Highline is focusing on future readiness.

“We’re really starting to shift the language from ‘cheating’ to a student’s ‘passive vs. active use of AI,’” Christie says. “Cheating is so binary that it doesn’t describe the whole story. If using a tool is seen as cheating, then what needs to change about education in order to support our ability to move forward with any tool?”

One of Highline’s most successful implementations is Colleague AI, a tool developed out of the University of Washington. Highline currently has 300 teachers actively using the platform.

Christie is particularly excited about involving students in the policy-making process, noting that their insights are often more nuanced than those of adults.

“I was at one of our high schools where they did a unit on AI policy,” Christie recalls. “The students were very specific. They said, ‘I don’t want to be graded by AI because that breaks the relationship.’ They actually mentioned 'culture of belonging.' They want their teachers to have grace and support them in ways that help them get better—things an AI currently won't do.”

Building Trust Through Authentic Engagement

For Christie, the success of any digital initiative depends on the strength of the district’s relationship with its community. He advocates for authentic family engagement, which moves beyond simply inviting parents to a meeting.

“Just being at the table isn’t enough,” Christie says. “You want people to be able to give input and then see their input reflected in whatever comes out. Even if it’s, ‘We weren’t able to do this because of these reasons,’ you still need to be honest and transparent so that trust is built over time.”

This trust is vital when tackling sensitive topics such as screen time. Christie points out that for many Highline students, a school-issued laptop is their only access to a large-screen device.

“Not every student using a district device after hours is on social media,” he says. “They might be learning how physics works on YouTube in a way that makes sense to them. You can't just say they spent eight hours on YouTube and assume it was wasted time.”

A System, Not a Set of Divisions

Ultimately, Christie’s goal is to dissolve the traditional silos between IT and instruction. By focusing on shared bodies of work rather than departmental responsibilities, Highline ensures that no stakeholder is left out of the conversation.

“It’s about how we intentionally involve everyone in our system so it feels more like a system rather than divisions, departments, and people who work on separate things,” Christie says.

By keeping the “Promise” at the center of every digital and operational decision, Highline Public Schools is proving that even in a high-tech world, the most powerful tool in education remains the human connection.

In traditional American education, there has long been a "middle school mandate" for workforce readiness. The prevailing logic suggests that once students reach the cusp of adolescence, we should begin equipping them with the skills necessary for the professional world.

Waiting until middle school to focus on these abilities is a mistake, says Ellen Galinsky, president of Families and Work Institute and author of The Breakthrough Years and Mind in the Making.

Galinsky’s extensive research in this area has proven that to prepare students for an unknown, rapidly evolving workforce, parents and educators need to shift their focus to include the early development of executive functioning skills—the neurocognitive processes that allow us to manage ourselves and our resources to achieve goals.

Developing these skills in early childhood isn't just about better classroom behavior, but builds the foundation for lifelong career success.

What is “Executive Functioning”?

Executive function is a suite of four core cognitive processes or what she called the New Basics:

• Working Memory: The ability to hold information in mind and mentally work with it.
• Cognitive Flexibility: The ability to switch perspectives or focus and adjust to changed demands or priorities.
• Inhibitory Control (Self-Control): The ability to resist impulses and stay focused on a task despite distractions.
• Reflection: This capacity involves pausing, stepping back and considering alternatives before acting.

"These are attention-regulation skills," Galinsky explains. "What we pay attention to, what we focus on, is what we learn. They are the skills that underlie all intentional learning and well-being. These are the skills that underlie learning to read and to do math as well as the skills that you use to handle challenges when something gets tough."

The Early Start Advantage

The push to start executive functioning development in preschool and early elementary years is rooted in biology, Galinsky says. This is a sensitive period during which the neural connections for executive functions are being wired.

“If you really want children to have these skills, you have to start in the early years," she says. "Two, three, four, five… these are the ages of huge brain plasticity when the connections among various parts of the brain are being formed and the skills learned can be more lasting."

By the time a student reaches middle school, their cognitive habits are becoming more ingrained. While Galinsky emphasizes adolescence is another sensitive period for strengthening these skills and that it is “never too late” to learn them, building the foundation early ensures that when students face the high-pressure environments of modern careers, they aren't struggling to build the engine while already driving the car.

Translating Classroom Skills to the Boardroom

Galinsky notes that in the modern workforce, technical knowledge has a shorter shelf life than ever. The ability to learn, unlearn, and relearn is the ultimate competitive advantage.

“I know from years of working with companies and surveys are increasingly showing that employers look for kids who can communicate, solve problems, and work in teams much more than they look at grade point averages,” Galinsky says. Executive functioning skills are the cognitive building blocks for the real skills that power high-level professional competencies. Some examples:

• Perspective Taking: Built on cognitive flexibility, this allows a salesperson to understand a client's needs or a manager to resolve a conflict.
• Critical Thinking: Built on working memory and reflection, this allows an analyst to see patterns in data rather than just repeating facts.
• Collaboration: Built on inhibitory control, this allows a team member to listen to others' ideas instead of just “blurting out the first thing in their mind.”

The Power of Reflection: “The Active Ingredient”

One of the most practical takeaways from Galinsky’s research is the role of reflection. In a rapid-paced society, we often prioritize checking boxes over meaningful integration. Galinsky sees reflection as the “active ingredient that makes all of the skills work together.”

For a math teacher, this might mean moving away from “right vs. wrong” and asking a student, “How did you remember that formula?” or “Why did you make that error and what can you learn from this mistake?”

This metacognition—thinking about one's own thinking—is what separates a worker who follows instructions from a worker who innovates.

Real Skills for Real Life

The AASA (The School Superintendents Association) has recognized the importance of focusing on executive functioning by making “Real Skills for Real Life” one of its five Public Education Promise pillars for transforming public education. Galinsky is currently working with the organization to launch a curriculum for educators that spans from birth through age 18, ensuring that these neurocognitive muscles are exercised throughout a student's entire journey.

“Executive functioning is the most important asset we have,” Galinsky says. "It has to be reinforced throughout our lifetimes. Nothing is a vaccine forever, but starting in the early years will make a significant difference to kids’ academic success and to their positive mental health”.

The K-12 education market has reached a critical inflection point. As the ESSER cliff shifts from a looming threat to a present reality, the easy money of the stimulus era has vanished. For edtech companies, the fundamental question has changed: How do we drive growth when the budget rules have been rewritten?

Now in its fourth year, Tech & Learning’s annual EdExec Summit heads to The Old Post Office in Chicago on September 10–11, 2026. This isn't a sprawling convention, but a curated, high-level strategic exchange designed specifically for the executives and functional leaders who must navigate this new landscape.

“No other event compares to the Tech & Learning EdExec Summit,” says 2025 attendee Allison Maudlin. “The intimate setting created space for real, candid conversations about the business of education, and the sessions provided the kind of depth and insight that most conferences overlook."

If you are responsible for the long-term health and scalability of an education company, here is why the 2026 Summit is an essential addition to your calendar.

Decoding the Post-Stimulus Economy

The era of rapid-fire spending is over. District leaders are now forced to justify every dollar through the lens of efficacy and essentiality. The 2026 agenda is built around a practical Executive Playbook to help you survive this scrutiny.

The session “State of the Education Market: What to Expect in 2026 and Beyond” provides a 360-degree view of an $800B+ market in transition. You won't just hear about funding; you’ll learn how to navigate the shift toward a skills-based economy and career-connected learning—the two primary drivers currently reshaping district priorities.

Direct Intelligence: The Modern Buyer Persona

The Summit’s most valuable feature is the removal of the barrier between vendor and customer. Every session is co-facilitated by district administrators, ensuring you receive candid, real-time feedback. Each day concludes with a panel of district administrators who share their reflections on the day’s conversations and explicitly state what they need most from their vendor partners.

Tracks for Functional Leaders

Success in 2026 requires total alignment across your leadership, sales, marketing, and product teams. The EdExec Summit is engineered to develop your entire bench of functional leaders through table discussions co-facilitated by district administrators and industry veterans. Key focus areas include:

• The Complex District Sales Cycle: Navigating longer procurement timelines.
• Privacy, Cybersecurity & AI Governance: Moving beyond simple compliance.
• Product Market Fit: Meeting the "Evidence" imperative.
• Marketing Trends: Breaking through the noise in a saturated market.
• From Pilot to Enterprise: Strategies for usage, retention, and expansion.

The AI Paradigm Shift: Hype vs. Market Reality

For an executive, the AI gold rush presents a dangerous fork in the road: Do you pivot your entire roadmap toward Generative AI, or do you wait for the dust to settle?

The session “The AI Paradigm Shift: Hype vs. Market Reality” separates VC-driven buzz from classroom reality. Our panel of experts will explore whether districts are actually shifting budgets toward AI tools or if they are blocking these due to privacy and safety concerns. You will leave with an understanding of where the actual revenue opportunities lie, ensuring your R&D investment is grounded in market demand.

Moving from Pilot to Enterprise

Perhaps the greatest friction point for edtech today is "pilot purgatory." Many companies have products in thousands of classrooms but struggle to convert those footprints into sustainable, district-wide contracts.

The Summit tackles this head-on with sessions such as “From Pilot to Enterprise Adoption” and “Creating Outcomes-Based Contracts.” In an era of skepticism, you will learn how to translate complex academic data into high-impact narratives that convince superintendents your tool is "un-swappable" during budget cuts.

Turning Compliance into a Competitive Advantage

Privacy and cybersecurity are often viewed by sales teams as hurdles. We reframe them as strategic advantages. Through sessions such as “Trust as a Brand Anchor” and “The Third-Party Data Leak,” executives will learn how to lead their teams toward “Privacy by Design.” By the end of the event, you will know how to position your company as the safe choice in a market increasingly wary of "Techlash."

The Bottom Line

The EdExec Summit is timed perfectly for September 10–11—just as the back-to-school season provides its first set of real-world data and before the primary planning cycle for the next fiscal year begins. Attendees will leave Chicago with a roadmap for leading through uncertainty.

“As both a sponsor and speaker, I left with new and growing relationships, validation of our market approach, and intelligently informed insights that will shape our strategy,” writes Trevor Minton, CXO of Openfield. “The EdExec Summit truly delivers on connecting EdTech companies with the decision-makers who matter.”

Ready to join the conversation? Visit tledexecsummit.com to view the full speaker lineup and register today.

For Newton County Schools, a district in rural Georgia of more than 19,000 students spread across 24 buildings, ensuring that innovation is not isolated but systematically embedded into daily teaching and learning, can be a challenge.

Nonetheless, a comprehensive, district-wide digital learning ecosystem that measurably expands access, strengthens literacy, and prepares students for future careers has been developed under the leadership of Jennifer Williams, Director of Instructional Technology and Media Services.

“We do everything in my department based on ‘3E’--engagement, exposure, experience,” says Williams, who was recently honored with a Tech & Learning Innovative Leader Award for her efforts.

The 3E approach ensures students do not passively consume technology but actively use it to build literacy, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills.

• Engagement features high-level activities that make students creators and producers rather than just consumers, keeping a global focus.
• Exposure involves taking students on field trips to places as simple as the Microsoft store to more college- and career-focused destinations such as nearby Spelman Innovation Lab and Georgia Tech.
• Experience is providing hands-on opportunities in class, on field trips, and through partnerships.

“We want to engage our students, we want to expose them to new things, and give them experiences,” says Williams, adding that they’ve taken more than 20,000 students on field trips over the past three years alone. “We have to think of everything as not just a Newton County focus but a worldwide focus. They're in a global society. So we want to constantly engage them with different perspectives, different outlooks, different ways of learning.”

Newton County Schools has a scalable, future-ready digital ecosystem that prioritizes safety and compliance with federal laws, with Williams’ department vetting and re-vetting digital products. To ensure equity and access, all activities are free to all students, via grants and partnerships, which Williams and her team aggressively pursue.

The Rule of 3

Williams has worked to develop three major programs in the district: the Inspire program, which addresses the gender gap in coding; Read Across Newton, a district-wide literacy initiative; and Teach for Tomorrow, an annual technology conference providing training. All are underpinned by the 3E approach.

The Inspire program is a year-long effort focused on getting girls involved in science and coding through hands-on opportunities, visits to nearby Georgia Piedmont Technical College, a week-long coding camp, and a trip to a coding conference, much of which is sponsored by Amazon, who Williams has partnered with and who has provided grants. Students also get to explore 3D printers, LEGO robotics, and more.

“It's one thing telling them, ‘Oh, this is computer science,’ but actually taking them to a college, taking them on these field trips, working with the computer science department, all make a real impact,” Williams says. “They have the world-renowned computer science program nearby and they didn't know about it or think about going there, and it's only 45 minutes from their house.”

Read Across Newton is another year-long initiative during which students participate in book clubs, have people from across the district read to them, and have local authors present reading and writing workshops. During the district’s literacy extravaganza, celebrated the first Saturday in February, students get books to take home.

“So this year we had 3,600 people come and we gave away 55,000 books,” says Williams. “So, if you want to know what 55,000 books feels like, ask my back!”

Teach for Tomorrow, the district’s annual technology PD event right before the school year begins, drew more than 850 teachers last year, which is more than half of those in the district. The event is led by the instructional leadership team and the district’s vanguard teachers, who pilot tools and guide technology integration at the schools. Attendees learn about the district’s LMS, various digital tools, and of course, AI.

“It was amazing because these teachers came, sat, and did full technology learning, like a little mini ISTE conference,” says Williams. “We try to make it so when we do professional development, we help people fall in love with technology so they can help students fall in love with literacy and technology.”

Living The Dream

When it comes to leadership, Williams recommends being a constant student, and continuously learning about new products and understanding the relevant laws. Her best advice, however, is not to be “a lone wolf.”

“Be a part of a group of people who are like-minded, who can share with you and give you advice on how to do things,” she says, suggesting joining a professional networking group such as CoSN. “Find a tribe, a group that is going to help you be your thought partner as you make changes. You don't want to make a big change in your system without getting advice from others who are also in the same job because you're usually one of one in your district.”

In that vein, Williams says she’d be remiss if she didn’t mention “the secret sauce” in everything she does: her team. “I have some spectacular people that I work with,” she says, also citing the support of Dr. Sheila Thomas, Chief Strategy and Support Services Officer.

She also mentions the importance of having a collaborative team, which she also cross-trains. “We sit down and we talk about things,” she says. “And I hire people who are different from me. I don't need a whole ten Jennifers.”

Ultimately, she says being the instructional technology director and media services director, allowing her to merge her passions for reading and technology, has been a dream.

“I can have a lot of jobs but this is my passion–I tell my daughter this is my life's work,” says Williams. “I love going to work every day. There's not a morning that I don’t wake up and am like, ‘Oh boy, it's Monday! It’s another day that we're going to be able to do something great for a kid!’ I couldn’t ask for anything more."

Tools They Use

• Canvas
• Nearpod
• Book Creator
• Sora (the literacy app)
• ClassLink
• Microsoft
• Google Education

Last fall, Hollie Sisk, Assistant Coordinator of Instructional Technology at Effingham County School District, attended the Chicago Google Leadership Summit with education heads from all over the U.S. While she found it enlightening to learn where other districts were in their AI journey and how they were using Google tools, one piece of the experience struck her as something to bring back to her own Southeast Georgia district of 14,500 students.

“They took us into a room of three or four stations, with Chromebooks ready to go,” says Sisk. “We rotated through, learning the basics. I just sat there and thought our teachers really need this. ‘How can we implement this in our district?’ I marinated on that and when I came back, I pitched it to our tech director. From there, it blossomed into the ECSD Gemini School.”

In ECSD’s Gemini School, attendees rotate across four sessions through focused 20-minute labs on Gemini, NotebookLM, Gems, and Gemini in the Classroom, allowing them to quickly experience real classroom value without overload.

“It's not just a traditional ‘sit and get,’” says Sisk. “It’s more about creating an environment where it clicks for every educator because they have just enough exposure to spark their curiosity, but not overwhelm them with a lengthy PD session.”

Sisk tries to keep the PD engaging and moving. Instead of having the presenters going from room to room, attendees have to boogie to each round of learning, literally.

“We play disco music in between transitions. It helps them reset and refocus,” says Sisk. “They are going from absorbing a lot of information in 20 minutes from Notebook LM to custom Gems. They really need to turn their brain off and then get it ready for the next session.”

The impact has been immediate and measurable. Forty-five participant comments included consistent themes such as, “I didn’t want to go to another PLC, but this was amazing!” and “This is the first time AI makes sense to me.”

Most notably, a 31-year veteran teacher — who self-identifies as not tech-savvy — was so energized by the experience that she recorded a ten-minute video expressing gratitude and shared that it was the most excited she had felt about teaching in years. This kind of shift doesn’t come from tools, it comes from intentional, learner-centered leadership.

“I knew these tools could help them, but I didn’t want to pull them into a drawn out traditional PD to learn how,” says Sisk, who was recently recognized for this and other efforts with an Innovative Leader Award. “We really wanted to make it an immersive experience — a hands-on experience like I took away from the Chicago summit. Ultimately, my impact when building this was to give teachers back the gift of time.”

3 Tips for Creating An AI Gemini School in Your District

Sisk offers advice for others who are interested in creating such a PD program in their district:

• Create a relationship with the curriculum to ensure buy-in from the top down. “I needed our curriculum department's trust that we could make this work,” Sisk says. “Don't just try to push it out, really build those relationships and get them on board to support you.”
• Be consistent in the marketing. “I'm partial to branding–I try to focus on that not only for our social media account, but anything we're pushing out,” she says. “I stay very consistent which helps with recognition and so teachers feel they are part of something special.”
• Make PD fun and engaging. Training doesn't have to be a traditional “sit and get,” says Sisk. “You can have movement. You can have 25-minute round table discussions and then get up and move to a different table and a different topic.”

Fuel FOMO With a Marketing Moment

“I knew if we did a really good job marketing this, we'd have bought their trust,” says Sisk. “The next time we roll out a program, they will say, ‘Hey, the last thing they did was really fun. I want to come.”

Sisk embraces that marketing mindset for instructional technology—one that reframes tech not as “another initiative,” but as a value-adding experience educators want to engage with.

“My mindset wasn’t, ‘Let's promote another professional development,’ it was more like a product launch,” she says. “One special ed teacher shared how much time she saved writing IEPs as well as writing success criteria and learning targets. Excited teachers are calling a few days later, ‘Look at this song we created with the students after the session!’ Even our athletic coaches loved the training, which speaks volumes because they often hate having to come to PD.”

Sisk consistently highlights instructional technology successes through social media, reinforcing a culture that celebrates innovation and progress.

“One of the most powerful pieces of this is learning from other teachers,” she says. “It's not technology or curriculum presenting the material, it's teachers and media specialists. April Platt, Crystal Mealor, Jack Sinopoli, and Nick Exely are a few of our rockstar presenters.To me, face-to-face instruction is always more effective.”

One of the goals was to elevate the position of her media specialists and the value they bring to schools. Sisk asked each to earn their Google Gemini-certified educator designation to become the on-site expert at their school post-Gemini School.

Her leadership is shifting perception across ECSD. Instructional technology is no longer seen as optional or burdensome, but as practical, exciting, and directly connected to improved teaching and learning results for their students.

“One of the biggest rewards this year was the blossoming of that relationship between curriculum and tech departments, because they helped us reach out to leadership,” Sisk says. “They allowed us to interrupt their principal's PLC meeting and do a version of Gemini School just for principals. That sparked buy-in. Principals saw the value in their world as a principal and wanted their teachers to have that same experience.”

This PD experience has earned a 4.72 rating out of 5, based strictly on teacher feedback. The demand generated by Gemini School has exploded, prompting plans for expansion—clear evidence that Sisk’s work is not only effective but scalable.

“We are presenting at our board retreat in a few weeks because our board members are asking, ‘What is this Gemini School and why do we have it?’” Sisk says. “Everyone wants a little piece of it. That's exactly what we wanted to create.”

Tools They Use

• Gemini
• Creating custom Gems
• NotebookLM
• Gemini in Google Classroom

Watch above or listen/download below.

There are few things more chaotic in the life of a school administrator than tracking who paid for the field trip. Cash in envelopes, multiple payment portals, different logins for every system — and somewhere in the middle of it all, a kid who shouldn't be left behind because her family doesn't have a bank account.

ClassDojo is betting it can fix all of that. ClassDojo Payments is promising to enable schools to collect field trip fees, manage fundraisers, process technology fees, and accept payments from every family, all on the platform that tens of millions of school leaders, teachers, and parents already use already. Powered by Pay Theory’s payment facilitation infrastructure, the technology aims to eliminate the friction of offline payment collections and disconnected third-party portals while ensuring every family can participate—including through cash-to-digital acceptance at thousands of retail locations nationwide.

It’s a big leap, but Chad Stevens, Head of Growth & Partnerships at ClassDojo for Districts, sounds confident. I had the pleasure of chatting with him about their progress.

The vision, according to Chad, is simple: a teacher sends a field trip message through ClassDojo, there's a payment button right in the post, a parent taps it, uses Apple Pay or face ID, and it's done. No envelope, no separate portal, no morning scramble to figure out who still owes money.

But the feature Chad is most excited about is less flashy and arguably more important. An estimated one in six U.S. households are unbanked — families that operate entirely in cash and can't use digital payment systems. Through the PayTheory partnership, ClassDojo plans to let those families pay for school activities by scanning a barcode at CVS, Walgreens, 7-Eleven, or Family Dollar, with the payment routing digitally back to the school district.

"Just because a kid doesn't have a bank doesn't mean they struggle to get to go on a field trip," Chad says. "To me as a former teacher, that was just one of the really exciting things about what we plan to build."

A full launch is targeted for late 2026, with the company signaling it wants to get the back-end accounting and compliance architecture right before flipping the switch.

One Teacher’s Story

A social studies teacher friend of mine told me recently that AI has changed her work in ways she did not expect. She was an early adopter, using AI to strengthen feedback and make grading more efficient. At first, it worked, allowing her to generate feedback that was more specific, individualized, and actionable than a rubric or checklist alone typically allowed in the past. But as that became easier to produce, expectations shifted. Detailed feedback was no longer optional. It had quietly become the norm, less because of administrators and more because AI made it possible, and therefore expected by students and parents.

But easier did not mean lighter. She still had to review, vet, and revise everything. She was still accountable for every word.

“It’s better for kids,” she said. “But I’m more exhausted than before.”

That may be the irony of AI in schools. The very tool promoted as a way to save time can end up expanding the work.

What the Research Is Starting to Show

What this teacher described is not an isolated experience. A recent article in Harvard Business Review argues that AI does not reduce work, but intensifies it. Workers complete tasks more quickly, but instead of reclaiming time, they take on more. The result is greater cognitive load, longer work hours, and expanded responsibilities.

AI increases speed, but it does not necessarily make work feel lighter because expectations rise alongside efficiency. Schools are not outside this pattern. If anything, they amplify it.

When Efficiency Expands the Work

The introduction of AI into school environments often leads to a rapid shift in baseline expectations. As efficiency increases, so does the scope of work; lesson plans require deeper differentiation, communication remains constant, and data analysis becomes both more frequent and granular. This evolution redefines the standard for quality, where previously comprehensive work is now viewed as merely basic.

While higher standards can benefit students, a problem emerges when these increased demands are viewed as resource-neutral. Educators are often forced to manage expanded workloads without additional time or guidance. Rather than simply saving time, efficiency recalibrates what is expected of staff, effectively filling any newly created capacity.

This expansion of workload is evident across several key areas:

• Instructional Planning and Grading: The ease of AI generation leads to greater demands for personalized feedback and highly customized lesson materials.
• Stakeholder Communication: As parents utilize AI to craft increasingly formal and legalistic messages, educators face a growing burden of processing and interpreting these communications. Even with AI assistance in drafting replies, the cognitive effort required to process the original messages remains high.
• Administrative Documentation: The time saved through automation is frequently redirected toward increased documentation and administrative requirements.

The Loss of Natural Limits

Teaching has never been a light profession. Even before AI, educators managed heavy workloads that required constant planning, decision-making, and responsiveness. What existed, however, were natural limits within the work–time between classes, the pace of planning, and the effort required to produce materials created built-in boundaries. Those pauses did not reduce the workload, but helped contain it.

As the same teacher explained, she used to have small pauses between classes. Now AI makes it easier to fill those moments. She might answer an email between periods, draft something during lunch, or use a few free minutes to produce one more item before the next part of the day begins.

What has changed is not the behavior, but the unspoken expectation. Because AI makes more possible in less time, those pauses no longer feel like pauses, but become opportunities to produce more.

This is where the shift becomes most visible. Work moves faster and becomes more dense, with fewer natural stopping points, squeezing out recovery time and reflective space. Cognitive load increases and decision fatigue builds, making burnout more likely.

We often focus on what AI makes possible, but spend less time examining what it requires from the people using it. This is not just a question of adoption, but one of sustainability.

What Leaders Must Do

If AI is going to remain part of school systems, then leadership has to define and shape how it is used. It is not enough to benefit from faster work.

1. Clarify when AI should be used. Not every task should be automated. Leaders must distinguish between efficiency and professional judgment.
2. Set limits on what speed should trigger. Faster output should not automatically lead to more output or higher expectations.
3. Protect time for thinking. Schools need space for reflection and decision-making, not just continuous production.
4. Match rising expectations with real support. Training, time, clarity, and resources must align with what is being asked of staff.
5. Eliminate or streamline existing requirements. If AI enables more detailed feedback or expanded expectations, something else has to give. Leaders should identify tasks that can be reduced or removed, such as redundant documentation, excessive grading requirements, or rethinking how rubrics and checklists are used. Without subtraction, every gain becomes an addition.
6. Keep the human at the center. AI can support practice, but educators remain responsible for accuracy, judgment, and care.

Leaders cannot raise the bar and then leave people to clear it alone.

Closing Thought

AI does not remove work, it removes friction, and with it, some of the limits that once kept work contained, which can lead to better outcomes. Without thoughtful leadership, it can also lead to faster burnout.

NCCE is the Pacific Northwest’s largest edtech event, now in its 34th year. Even if NCCE hasn’t been on your radar, it should be: the opening session inspires, the exhibition hall buzzes with innovation, and attendees are set for an ed-tech adventure from the start.

The vendor hall featured 80 vendors, including partners from the Pacific Northwest such as Recycle Boise, the Computer Science Teachers Association, and a K-12 school. It was an opportunity for attendees to meet vendors face-to-face and see what was new and exciting. The conference provided dedicated time during an “Exhibitor Blitz,” ensuring attendees did not miss any sessions.

Having attended many conferences, I noticed some special things in the vendor hall. Here are my top 10 vendor Hall finds:

NCCE slideshow below

1. Ozobots are educational robots designed to teach basic coding through color coding, cards, and markers. This year, they have introduced new features to enhance their instructional capabilities. Ozobot Robotics’ latest product, Ari, now includes a touchscreen interface that allows students to input and execute their own code, in addition to reading color codes, offering a meaningful upgrade from previous Ozobot models.

2. The Epilog Laser. Laser engravers have been on the market for some time, and many schools have adopted these into their maker spaces and fabrication labs. I saw something a little more special at the Epilog Laser booth. The Epilog Laser engraver was flat-out cool. It can engrave, cut, and mark at micro sizes I have never seen before, and it made me think about replacing all my laser engravers immediately. One can’t go wrong with their CO2 laser or fiber laser. Better yet, why not select their dual all-in-1 machine? I must try.

3. EduProtocols paired with Learning Genie is a solution for building instructional units. Together, these tools help teachers design detailed lesson plans that align with standards, high-quality instructional materials, and specific locations, with AI elements supporting the process.

4. MagicSchool.AI is an AI-driven educational platform widely used in classrooms for its versatile tools and award-winning performance. At NCCE, the team showcased the platform’s adaptability through demonstrations and user stories. They also highlighted its Pioneer program at NCCE, where users shared ways they customized MagicSchool's tools to fit their classroom needs, demonstrating how the community helps maximize the platform’s effectiveness.

5. LightSpeed Technologies, which is a leader in educational audio enhancement, was at NCCE in a big way. They are sponsors at many conferences to assist in audio enhancements during presentations. What got them placed on my list was their Topcat Cascadia. It is an audio system that mounts the speaker in the ceiling and has a wearable microphone for the teacher. This microphone can connect to devices for classroom use, such as interactive displays and assistive listening devices, as well as emergency communication devices for active alerting, priority paging, and even two-way calling with location alert. This tool not only enhances audio but also provides some safety.

6. iPevo is a provider of classroom technology products, well-known for its document cameras. Over time, they have diversified their offerings to include additional educational tools. What I was most intrigued by at iPevo at NCCE was access to the audio tools. Their Vurbo.ai family had a little bit of everything. From AI-powered software that comes with each kit to a shared new personal mic for Vlogging. They have moved rapidly in this place to provide solutions for one-to-one audio recordings, to enhancements for virtual meetings.

7. Sphero devices. Sphero bots first came on the scene with their codable, waterproof balls. Sphero bots have helped students learn more about STEM and coding principles in classrooms across the country. Sphero introduced other items, such as their Indi for early learning, a car-shaped, screenless robot that moves based on the color tile used. At NCCE, Sphero launched its Blueprint engineering kits. These kits, incorporating components from the acquired LittleBits, are designed to support engineering and maker education, expanding their range for classrooms and makerspaces.

8. SchoolAI. Not to be outdone by competitors, SchoolAI had a booth featuring “Edu Stars” and held a session featuring “several nationally recognized experts and regional leaders who are shaping the future of AI.” As for the booth information, I was pleased and surprised by their browser extension. It allows for tasks such as chatting with pages, giving personalized writing feedback, and viewing a revision history. What I believe makes this tool powerful is the ability to create student spaces with SchoolAI. These spaces are teacher-monitored personalized AI environments that help engage, tutor, or reinforce the given lesson.

9. IBM. A long-standing technology leader, IBM has demonstrated its continued contributions to education by referencing its historic AI achievement with Watson and highlighting new advances. The show featured IBM SkillsBuild, a free educational platform for developing skills through project-based training and awarding credentials recognized by the industry. These skills include AI literacy and the ability to integrate AI into one's learning ecosystem and classroom. It is a must for those motivated learners of all ages.

10. Micro K12. Micro K12 is a reseller that has been helping schools and districts with their devices for years. Not only do they offer a white-glove service for device deployment post-purchase, but they also have so much more. From network security to esports solutions, Micro K12 has you covered. One of Micro K12’s edtech conferences is notable in the industry, which bring together vendors and resellers and include presentations for IT directors and teachers, as well as E-Rate support and device repair services.