PxPixel
No Free Pass - Tech Learning

No Free Pass

from Technology & Learning When faced with funding decreases, every budget item must go under the microscope. Stymied by how to manage anticipated funding decreases and spiraling costs? Bleak funding projections can result in significant reductions or elimination of programs, regardless of their impact on student
Author:
Publish date:

from Technology & Learning

When faced with funding decreases, every budget item must go under the microscope.

Stymied by how to manage anticipated funding decreases and spiraling costs? Bleak funding projections can result in significant reductions or elimination of programs, regardless of their impact on student achievement. Why? One culprit is the tendency to use past practices to define future spending.

Because educators often use previous years' budgets as a starting point, many budget items become entrenched with limited discussion about whether or not these are funds well spent. This approach is particularly detrimental for innovations that are initially supported through special funding sources. Unless successful new initiatives are institutionalized through reallocation of more secure funds to sustain these new programs, they often fall by the wayside when the special funds dry up. For example, instructional technology programs across the country face the chopping block every time Title II, Part D funds are threatened.

In recognition of this problem, some districts are taking another look at modified zero-based budgeting. The underlying philosophy of zero-based budgeting is that no item can be included in a new budget unless the expenditure has been reviewed and justified; there are no automatic rollovers from previous budgets. Public schools and districts cannot build pure zero-based budgets because they must comply with ongoing mandates that have associated costs, such as providing special education services or meeting annual requirements for instructional days. However, districts do have some latitude in how these mandates are met. In addition, expenditures not related to mandated costs can (and should) be regularly reviewed and justified. This is where modified zero-based budgeting comes into play.

This process takes time to fully implement and must have full support from school leaders if meaningful decisions are going to be made. In addition to increased time requirements, it's a labor-intensive approach to budget planning and development. Experts recommend reviewing programs and services in phases to avoid becoming overwhelmed. All budget items should be directly aligned with site and district goals, not included just to maintain the status quo. To ensure this is the case, staff needs to iden-tify performance measures to use during the review and justification process.

Susan Brooks-Young is an educational consultant and writer.

Featured

Related

Tips from the Bottom Line(2)

from Technology & Learning A T&L columnist shares dollarwise highlights from the past year. Revisit Past Funding Practices Stymied by how to manage anticipated funding decreases and spiraling costs? Bleak funding projections can result in significant reductions or elimination of programs, regardless of their

Tips from the Bottom Line

A T&L columnist shares ROI highlights from the past year. Funding Technical Support Ongoing technical support is often under-funded in district budgets. Most fall far short of the Consortium for School Networking's (CoSN) recommended ratio of one technician for every 50 to 70 computers, or one technician for every

No Code? No Problem!

A typical school Web site not only introduces the school and its mission, it delivers diverse information, from weekly menu offerings to samples of student work and news about performance on standardized tests. Many schools that accept E-rate funds must also use their Web space to post electronic copies of local

Tech Support

Even in tight financial times, initial costs for new technologies are impossible to ignore. However, ongoing technical support is often under-funded in district budgets. Although the dot-com bust has made it a little easier for districts to hang on to qualified personnel, most districts still fall far short of the

Count Your Pennies

There's no room for guesswork in grant writing. Less experienced grant writers often use the "by guess or by golly" approach to developing the budget for a proposal, allocating the total amount of money available across spending categories using best guesses. The thinking behind this strategy is that the grant

Staff Development on a Shoestring

Make professional development work for you. Leadership consultant Price Pritchett says, "The biggest challenge today isn't getting an education, it's keeping one." Meaningful and practical staff development is a must for every school employee, but budget and time constraints can make it extremely hard to fit

Get It Done Online

Web 2.0 collaboration tools can help smooth out funding efforts. Your district needs to write or update a plan for categorical funding. The guidelines mandate evidence of collaborative writing. A committee is formed, but scheduling multiple face-to-face meetings to accomplish this task is proving difficult. How can

Maine School Administrative District No. 52

Maine School Administrative District No. 52's recently renovated site (www.msad52.org) is concise and informative, and interactivity is key. Comments about the new site may be posted to the Technology Blog. The School Board Policies area provides a searchable database of all policies. Recommended Web resources are