Put the Laptops Away - Tech Learning

Put the Laptops Away

Clay Shirky talks about something fairly radical for a person who is generally seen as an advocate for social media and technology.
Author:
Publish date:

Part of what makes me pay attention to an article like this is that it’s written by someone whom I respect. Clay Shirky talks about something fairly radical for a person who is generally seen as an advocate for social media and technology. He admits a complete change in mindset on the use of laptops of his class.

I have been teaching classes about the internet since 1998, and I’ve generally had a laissez-faire attitude towards technology use in the classroom. This was partly because the subject of my classes made technology use feel organic, and when device use went well, it was great. Then there was the competitive aspect — it’s my job to be more interesting than the possible distractions, so a ban felt like cheating. And finally, there’s not wanting to infantilize my students, who are adults, even if young ones — time management is their job, not mine.

I’ve been guilty of using the same arguments to challenge those who didn’t want to use devices in class. I would still use the same argument for many people but this thoughtful realization speaks to doing what’s best for students as opposed to what’s easiest for teachers.

But it’s also important not to be thinking about a carte blanche ban but rather consider the class, the task and the student.

I have known, for years, that the basic research on multi-tasking was adding up, and that for anyone trying to do hard thinking (our spécialité de la maison, here at college), device use in class tends to be a net negative.

Image placeholder title

The notion “hard thinking” suggests the importance of a more focused environment. Not all learning is of this nature or intensity. Indeed, if you’re needing to seek out ideas from strangers or are in the midst of creation, having access to the plethora of people and resources online may be necessary. But more and more schools need to recognize the unique resources they have in their building — each other. This may mean making efforts to take full advantage of this by implementing a ban as Shirky suggests. In the same way a basketball coach wouldn’t want his players on their phones during a practice, we may not want our students on them during an class discussion. A math class might require the use of computing to effectively understand and appreciate many concepts. This is about recognizing what types of learning you are doing in class and when technology makes it richer and when it dilutes. Having spent some time last week with Clay Burell, a wonderful Chinese History teacher working in Singapore, he would have a similar response to Shirky. While Clay has always advocated for the use of technology, he sees his class time as precious and sacred in that it’s the only time they get to spend together. You walk into his room, have a cup of tea and engage in that “hard thinking”. Laptops, would seem slightly out of place. Paying attention to one another is the best use of time. The laptops then provide a wonderful supplement for alone time and thinking. The course needs the technology to do a great deal of the work and sharing but the time in class is better without it.

While teachers remain largely in control of their own space, this shift or model works best when we see this as a joint, community effort to honor each other.

This is, for me, the biggest change — not a switch in rules, but a switch in how I see my role. Professors are at least as bad at estimating how interesting we are as the students are at estimating their ability to focus. Against oppositional models of teaching and learning, both negative—Concentrate, or lose out!—and positive—Let me attract your attention!—I’m coming to see student focus as a collaborative process. It’s me and them working to create a classroom where the students who want to focus have the best shot at it, in a world increasingly hostile to that goal.

Schools no longer have information and knowledge as their greatest asset but rather community and relationships. This should shift how we use technology in our classrooms.

creative commons licensed ( BY-NC-SA )flickr photo shared by Boyan Yurukov

cross-posted at http://ideasandthoughts.org/

Dean Shareski is a Digital Learning Consultant with the Prairie South School Division in Moose Jaw, SK, Canada, specializing in the use of technology in the classroom. He lectures for the University of Regina and is the Community Manager of the Canadian DEN or Discovery Educators Network. Read more at http://ideasandthoughts.org.

Featured

Related

Image placeholder title

What Silly Will Get You

I recently watched Clay Shirky's newest TED talk based on his book, Cognitive Surplus. The concept of cognitive surplus simply means that in the last century the amount of free we've had has increased and that in the last decade, we've been able

Image placeholder title

Trade Offs

I began to think about all the trade offs we make with technology. I’m not the first to have these thoughts but wanted to explore this from my own perspectives. I also don’t want to use the typical negative slant that this type of discussion can evoke. People often think nostalgically about trade offs and long for the good old days. That’s a bit too simple for me and is often bias towards personal experience as opposed to a more global perspective.

Mobile Phones, They Just Won't Go Away

 For the last few days, I have been party to three separate conversations about mobile phones and schools, and in the conversations, the only common denominators have been the shoulder shrugs that each conversation has ended in.The use, or in

clehmann

Tech Forum Take Aways

 Cross posted at ThumannResources.com "Technology needs to be like oxygen. Ubiquitous, necessary and invisible." Chris Lehmann, Principal, Science Leadership Academy, Philadelphia. Chris was the Keynote Speaker at Tech Forum yesterday in Palisades, NY and set the tone for a fantastic