Mind the Gap - Tech Learning

Mind the Gap

The debate about technology and computer use by students continues. The decision not to fund Title IID, which was the main source for many states to enhance their technology instructional plans, has become an issue for debate in itself with funding being totally eliminated in the 2006 federal budget. Some warn that
Publish date:

The debate about technology and computer use by students continues.

The decision not to fund Title IID, which was the main source for many states to enhance their technology instructional plans, has become an issue for debate in itself with funding being totally eliminated in the 2006 federal budget. Some warn that computers are the next evolutionary step from television and comprise “the electronic culture” which will eclipse the culture of books and printed medium (Birkerts, 1999.) Clifford Stoll argues that schools that get swept up in the current craze to use computers and multimedia in the classroom are destined to give us a “nation of dolts” with short attention spans and inflexible problem solving skills. Others herald computers as the tool that will finally cause the revolution of the individual over the system (Collins) and the death of didactic education. Khan and Friedman (1998) argue that computers and computing technology, used wisely, will allow schools and students to break free from Skinnerian approaches to education and that it inherently supports constructivists approaches to teaching and learning.

There is an agreement that children, our students, are growing up in a vastly different world. Information technology and multimedia are changing our culture at such an exponential rate that our ability to grasp the scope of these changes and respond to our students needs is failing. Some may try to protect themselves from the uncertainty and stress by attempting to ignore how drastic these changes are.

But just as teachers need to become more familiar with students’ worlds and cultural differences that make each child unique and special, they must also become familiar with their students’ digital literacy. There is a new world full of multimedia and electronic technologies that are completely natural and commonplace for these students. This gives rise to the idea that adults over a certain age or generation type are “digital immigrants” who must learn skills at which our students (“digital natives”) are proficient by the age of ten. Teachers as a group need to learn what seems to come naturally for our students.

Sven Birkets sums it up “pros and cons” in an exceptionally powerful way:

“We can think of the matter in terms of gains and losses. The gains of electronic post-modernity could be said to include, for individuals, a) an increased awareness of interrelations; b) an expanded neural capacity, an ability to accommodate a broad range of stimuli simultaneously; c) a relativistic comprehension of situations that promote the erosion of old biases and often expresses itself as tolerance; and d) a matter-of-fact and unencumbered sort of readiness, a willingness to try new situations and arrangements.

In the loss column, meanwhile, are a) a fragmented sense of time and a loss of the so-called duration experience, that depth phenomenon we associate with reverie; b) a reduced attention span and a generous impatience for sustained inquiry; c) a shattered faith in institutions and in the explanatory narratives that formerly gave shape to subjective experience; d) a divorce from the past, from a vital sense of history as a cumulative or organic process; e) an estrangement from geographic place and community; and f) an absence of any strong vision of personal or collective future.”

If we accept all or even part of what Birkerts has summarized about our students then we are in deep trouble. Given that the majority of teachers are not experienced with computers or information technology (Branigan, 2002) how can we even begin to understand where our children are coming from, much less make some kind of coherent decisions about how to reach them? Using computers in schools or in the classroom – regardless of the pedagogical style we choose – is futile at best and damaging at worst if we do not begin to examine our assumptions about students and their worlds. We must accept that our students change, so must our fluency with their “language,” learning styles and behaviors (Seely Brown, 2002). We must refocus our efforts to address the new sets of skills and deficiencies that children of the information age are bringing into our schools. Whether or not we use computers to do this is irrelevant. We must be conversant with the language of the information age – not to magically improve our lesson plans or to keep students on task – but to keep ourselves current with what is going on inside their heads, which, Birkerts stresses, is changing both developmentally and emotionally. As educators, we are responsible for addressing the new digital divide – the growing rift between students and teachers.

Jeffrey Piontek



Forklifts for Your Mind

“Software,” shares one author, “is the forklift of the mind.” This quote, appearing in Daniel H. Pink's, A Whole New Mind, illustrates the power that technology can play in the hands of people like you and me, as well as our students. At a recent conference, I was made painfully aware of

Filling the Gap in Emergency Response

 When disasters occur, from tornado warnings to domestic or international terrorism, PDAs, cell phones and email are of little help to those without them or those ignoring them. To protect school campuses and the wider community,  wireless PA systems compatible with existing two-way radio systems are filling the emergency response gap at some of the nation's school campuses and municipalities.

Schools bridge language gap

 According to a survey released this week, communicating with limited-English speaking students, parents and communities amidst shrinking budgets is a major concern for school districts for the 2010-2011 school year.

Bridging the Technology Proficiency Gap Through Peer Mentoring

To bridge the gap between the most proficient and the least proficient technology-integrating teachers, one school district in southern New Jersey undertook a ten-month research project. This project was a formal peer mentoring relationship strictly for the acquisition of curricular-driven technology integration

The MySpace Gap

While researching "Technology Literacy and the MySpace Generation", it was difficult not to begin thinking in terms of metaphors. The fact that MySpace has come to embody all that is fearful and frightening to many adults about the freedoms of the participatory Web has much to do with that. It is interesting to

Meeting Of The Minds

At the recent Tech Forum in Chicago, seven area superintendents* gathered for an invitation-only luncheon to share their struggles and rewards in the pursuit of implementing tech at their schools.

A Change of Mind

There was never a doubt that I would become a teacher some day. When I was in second grade our school switched textbook publishers and the teachers began to give away the old textbooks they no longer needed. I was always first in line to take home these readers and math workbooks so that I could “teach” my

Inside the Mind of a Grant Reader

We've all done it. We've labored for days over a grant proposal, treating it tenderly like a child, and with hope in our hearts, sent it off to fame and fortune. Then comes that gray day when the rejection letter arrives. They called our "baby" ugly! When it comes to grant writing one thing is certain: once you send

Bridging the Gap and Connecting Classrooms promo image

Bridging the Gap and Connecting Classrooms

Dorsey is more than 800 miles away from his high school students at South River High School in Maryland’s Anne Arundel County school district. But, since his students use conferencing software to connect to their calculus class, today is just like any other school day.